Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Conservative's Despair of a Romney Republican Ticket (Video)
Youtube/ Rush Limbaugh ^ | March 30 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 06/23/2012 7:58:06 PM PDT by Mozilla

From March when Rush read a e-mail from a friend upset at Romney. Best email ever that describes our dilemma.

A Conservative's Despair of a Romney Republican Ticket

Another related clip from last October.

Rush Limbaugh: We are Letting The Media And RINOS Pick Our Candidates

And Finally:

Rush Limbaugh: Romney Is NO Conservative

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: carter4romney; clinton4romney; dnc4romney; goode2012; hyperrinoromney; kerry4romney; libs4romney; lies; loserromney; msm4romney; obama4romney; rinos; romney; sharia4romney; soros4romney; tarp4romney; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-163 next last
To: BlackElk

You will go crazy when Romney wins. LOL


101 posted on 06/24/2012 7:30:13 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

Romney has never been outside of his liberal enclave.

This has been his actual first moment, straying out.

Whether he moves out and to the right remains to be seen, but I’m betting he will.

Bigtime.


102 posted on 06/24/2012 7:32:26 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

I don’t believe that Romney wants to be President for the same reason that Reagan did. The difference is ego.


103 posted on 06/24/2012 7:40:17 PM PDT by Mountain Mary (Liberalism is the philosophy of the stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk; All

Great post!


104 posted on 06/24/2012 7:42:46 PM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

Bottom line, you support Obama’s reelection

Why are you afraid to admit it?


105 posted on 06/24/2012 8:28:23 PM PDT by MindBender26 (America can survive 4 years of Romney. She cannot survive another 4 years of an unfettered Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26; BlackElk
Bottom line, you support Obama’s reelection

Refusing to drink cyanide does not equate to support for drinking strychnine.

There's only one group drinking pro-choice democrat socialist kool-aid here, and Black Elk isn't among them.

106 posted on 06/24/2012 9:39:37 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Relax, they’re all a bunch of Obama trolls who are afraid to admit it.

On election day, everyone has a choice; help Obama or help Romney. They deny it, but they know a vote for anyone else but Romney helps Obama. Of course, they know so much more than Newt, Michelle Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Rick Santorum, The Hermanator, etc.

They want to help Obama, period.

Now they will all flame us, but who cares.


107 posted on 06/24/2012 9:42:30 PM PDT by MindBender26 (America can survive 4 years of Romney. She cannot survive another 4 years of an unfettered Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Tell me, are you this Tom guy running for president.... and have you/he ever run for School Board, or anything else, that let’s us know more about you/him rather than some self-serving website?

We see your/his ego very clearly, but what about RESULTS?

PS, if you don’t get elected President, have you thought about running for Pope next time around?


108 posted on 06/24/2012 9:49:56 PM PDT by MindBender26 (America can survive 4 years of Romney. She cannot survive another 4 years of an unfettered Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

As if you had any standards.


109 posted on 06/24/2012 9:57:04 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Now they will all flame us, but who cares.


That’s right.

Let them flame us for opposing an avowed Marxist and enemy of the United States.

And for them to equate Romney with Obama is beyond belief.

They continue to accuse us of being Romney-botts or whatever and still don’t get it that we must do whatever it takes to defeat Obama.

Obama and his minions (Communists) have spent over 70 years getting to where they are now and they won’t give up easily.


110 posted on 06/24/2012 10:07:07 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Oh, they get it.

They just want Obama reelected!

Be well


111 posted on 06/24/2012 10:18:27 PM PDT by MindBender26 (America can survive 4 years of Romney. She cannot survive another 4 years of an unfettered Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Their arguments are lame and getting more desperate. They will get no where.


112 posted on 06/24/2012 10:26:11 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26; Diogenesis; BlackElk
On gay marriage, it was ordered by the Mass courts. Romney spent millions of his own personal money trying to elect enough Rs to pass a constitutional amendment baning it.

Nice talking points from the Romney Camp.

How about we deal with history and the truth instead?!


Joint Letter to Governor Mitt Romney from Pro-Family Leaders
(This letter was hand-delivered to the Governor’s staff on Dec. 20, 2006.)


December 20, 2006

The Honorable W. Mitt Romney Governor, Commonwealth of Massachusetts The State House Boston, MA 02133

Dear Governor Romney:

You have a few weeks left in your term to take action on the issue of marriage. Contrary to opinions offered up by liberal commentators, liberal legal authorities, and perhaps even your own staff, you have the authority as Governor to reverse the damage that has been done to the sacred institution of marriage. The signatories below urge you to declare immediately that homosexual “marriage” licenses issued in violation of the law are illegal and to issue an order to all state and local officials to cease violating the law.

As is increasingly well known, the Massachusetts Constitution denies the Judicial Branch any role in marriage policy:
"All causes of marriage...shall be heard and determined by the governor and council, until the legislature shall, by law, make other provision." (PART THE SECOND, Ch. III, Article V.)
In hearing the Goodridge case and issuing an opinion, four of the seven judges violated the Supreme Law of Massachusetts. Massachusetts courts have admitted, on other occasions, that neither they nor legislators, nor the governor are authorized to violate the Constitution:
g[The words of the Constitution] are mandatory and not simply directory. They are highly important. There must be compliance with them.h (Town of Mount Washington v. Cook 288 Mass. 67)
Nevertheless, after these judges issued an illegal opinion, you told the citizens of Massachusetts and all of America that you had no choice but to "execute the law." Oddly, you were not referring to a law, but to the judgesf opinion.

Your oath to uphold the Constitution requires treating an unconstitutional opinion as void (as President Thomas Jefferson did in Marbury v. Madison). You failed to do this. Nor did you treat it as an illegal ruling that affected only the specific plaintiffs (as Abraham Lincoln did, refusing to accept the Dred Scott ruling as law, pointing out that judges do not make law).

Instead, you asserted that the courtfs opinion was a glaw" and thus binding. Though the Legislature never revoked the actual law, you issued . with no legal authority -- the first ghomosexual marriageh licenses in American history.

The Massachusetts Constitution does not confirm either your statements or your actions:
"[T]he people of this commonwealth are not controllable by any other laws than those to which their constitutional representative body have given their consent." (PART THE FIRST, Article X.)
The Constitution also disproves your assertion to the nation that the marriage statute (M.G.L. Chapter 207) was somehow suspended or nullified by the four judges:
"The power of suspending the laws, or the execution of the laws, ought never to be exercised but by the legislature, or by authority derived from it, to be exercised in such particular cases only as the legislature shall expressly provide for." (PART THE FIRST, Article XX.)
In light of both your actions and your explanations, it comes as a great surprise to many of us to learn that, under the Massachusetts Constitution, judges cannot suspend or alter statutes. This principle is clearly fundamental to Massachusetts' system of government and is restated in multiple ways.
"The judicial shall never exercise the legislative and executive powers, or either of them: to the end it may be a government of laws and not of men." (PART THE FIRST, Article XXX.)
We note that the Massachusetts Constitution so completely protects citizens from the rule of judges that even laws passed in the Colonial period before the Constitution itself was ratified cannot be suspended by judges:
"All the laws which have heretofore been adopted, used and approved c shall still remain and be in full force, until altered or repealed by the legislaturec" (PART THE SECOND, Article VI.)
We note, Governor, that in all of your justifications to the nation, there was no mention of these parts of the Constitution which you swore to defend. Why? Even this same court is forced to admit:
"The Constitution as framed is the only guide. To change its terms is within the power of the people alone." (Opinion of the Justices, 220 Mass. 613, 618)
We note Massachusetts Chief Justice Hutchison's words in 1767: "laws should be established, else Judges and Juries must go according to their Reason, that is, their Will" and "[T]he Judge should never be the Legislator: Because, then the Will of the Judge would be the Law: and this tends to a State of Slavery.' " As Judge Swift put it in 1795, courts "ought never to be allowed to depart from the well known boundaries of express law, into the wide fields of discretion."

As for your claims about the authority of Goodridge and its illegal 180-day instruction to the Legislature, the same court had admitted in 1992 that they cannot issue an order to the legislature or the governor:
"The courts [instructing] when and how to perform...constitutional duties" (mandamus) "is not available against the Legislature [or] against the Governor)."

"The...principles expressed in...the Massachusetts Constitution...call for the judiciary to refrain from intruding into the power and function of another branch of government." (LIMITS v. President of the Senate, 414 Mass. 31, 31 n.3, 35 (1992)
We also note this ruling in 1969: "an unconstitutional overreaching by the judiciary is an act that is gnot only not warranted but, indeed, [is] precluded.h (Commonwealth v. Leis)

We note that even the Goodridge majority said they were not suspending the marriage statute:
gHere, no one argues that striking down the marriage laws is an appropriate form of relief."
In fact, they admitted that under the statute, Chapter 207 of the Massachusetts General Laws, homosexual marriage is illegal: gWe conclude, as did the judge, that M.G.L. c. 207 may not be construed to permit same-sex couples to marry.h

Moreover, we note that nothing in the Goodridge ruling asked or pretended to authorize the governor to violate the statute in the event that the Legislature would not repeal it.

We also note that the statute remains in the Massachusetts General Laws, and has never been stricken, suspended or nullified. The court itself has previously clarified your obligation:
"But the statute, so long as it stands, imposes upon both branches [of the Legislature] uniformity of procedure so far as concerns this particular matter. One branch cannot ignore it without a repeal of the statute. A repeal can be accomplished only by affirmative vote of both branches and approval by the governor." (Dinan v. Swig, 223 Mass. 516, 519 (1916)
Nevertheless, with no legislation authorizing you to do so, you ordered the Department of Public Health to change the words on marriage licenses from "husband" and "wife," to "Partner A" and "Partner B." Stunningly, you later admitted that without enabling legislation you cannot change birth certificates in a similar way.

We note that, despite the court's admission that the statute prohibits ghomosexual marriage,h and the Constitution's statement that only the Legislature can suspend laws, you ordered officials to perform homosexual marriages and thus violate the statute (a crime under c. 207 ˜48), and the oath of office by. Those who refused, you ordered to resign.

This emboldened other local officials, including the mayor of Boston, to boast publicly that they would break the law by "marrying" out-of-state homosexual couples . also a crime under c. 207 ˜48.

In summary, while the four judges asserted that Chapter 207 is unconstitutional, they did not suspend the marriage statute and were powerless to do so. The legislature has not changed or repealed it. Therefore:

1. The marriage statute is still in effect.
2. The statute continues to prohibit same-sex marriages.

We note that you swore no oath to execute court opinions, but rather laws and the Constitution. The same Massachusetts high court itself said in 1986: [The Executive branch] must "be faithful to the words of the statute ... as written, and an event or contingency for which no provision has been made does not justify judicial [or Executive Branch] legislation." (Amherst v. Attorney General, 398 Mass. 793)

You swore an oath to uphold the Constitution against assault from the other two branches. You swore on a Holy Bible, and said, "So help me, God." Your oath itself declares that it is violated on penalty of perjury, a felony.

Like much of America, many of us accepted as sincere your explanations of your role in this social and constitutional crisis that is fundamentally altering the moral fabric of our culture and eroding basic building block of human society. We are now forced to look at your role, as constitutional sentry and a gatekeeper of our form of government, in a different light.

We would be greatly disappointed if your principal contribution to history will be imposing homosexual marriage -- knowingly or unknowingly, willfully or negligently -- in violation of the state Constitution you swore to uphold.

. We urge you in the strongest possible way to fulfill the obligation imposed by the Constitution of Massachusetts upon the "Supreme Executive Magistrate" to uphold Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 207 the marriage statute, by declaring immediately in a formal, written executive order that the Goodridge court cannot overrule the Constitution and that homosexual marriage therefore remains against the law.

. We urge you also to issue immediately a public memorandum from the Office of the Governor declaring members of the Legislature to be engaged in a conspiracy against the Constitution, to which the oath of office attaches the penalties of perjury -- a felony.

. We urge you to immediately notify the legislators who openly conspired against the Constitution in denying the first marriage amendment petition a vote in 2002 that:

. they violated the oath of office, a constitutional felony, and

. as a citizensf constitutional petition, that initiative remains pending until brought to one of the five final actions the Constitution requires and

. therefore their crime against the Constitution is perpetual and without statute of limitations

. unless they vote, you will call them into session on that original marriage petition and

. will order the state police to arrest them and bring them to the chambers to vote (as the Governor of Texas ordered in May 2003 when Texas legislators refused to convene a quorum).


Under conditions of repeated and systematic constitutional abuse, these steps by a governor are the minimum required to defend constitutional democracy and our republican form of government.

Signed,
Paul Weyrich, Free Congress Foundation
*Sandy Rios, Culture Campaign
*Gary Kreep, Esq., president, United States Justice Foundation ++
*Robert Knight, a draftsman of the federal Defense of Marriage Ac
t Linda Harvey, Mission America
Rev. Ted Pike, National Prayer Network
Randy Thomasson, Campaign for Children and Families
Peter LaBarbera, Americans for Truth
Dr. Chuck Baldwin, radio host, columnist
Paul Likoudis, The Wanderer
Rev. Stephen Bennett, Stephen Bennett Ministries
Phil Lawler, Catholic World News
Rev. Scott Lively, Esq., Defend the Family
*Dr. William Greene, RightMarch.com
Michael Heath, Christian Civic League of Maine
David E. Smith, Illinois Family Institute
Gary Glenn, American Family Association of Michigan
Diane Gramley, American Family Association of Pennsylvania
Micah Clark, American Family Association of Indiana
Kevin McCoy, West Virginia Family Foundation
Stephen Cable, Vermont Center for American Cultural Renewal
Joe Glover, Family Policy Network (National)
Terry Moffitt, Family Policy Network of North Carolina
Marnie Deaton, Family Policy Network of Virginia
Danny Eason, Family Policy Network of Texas
Matt Chancey, Family Policy Network of Alabama
Ron Shank, Family Policy Network of Tennessee
*John R. Diggs, Jr., M.D., leading expert on the medical risks of homosexuality
Sonja Dalton, Real Civil Rights Illinois
Allyson Smith, Americans for Truth/California
Brian Camenker, MassResistance
Bunny S. Galladora, Woman's Christian Temperance Union
Dr. Paul Cameron, Family Research Institute
James Hartline, The Hartline Report
Jan Markell, Olive Tree Ministries & Radio
Bill Cotter, Operation Rescue Boston
R. T. Neary, ProLife Massachusetts
Mike O'Neil, CPF/The Fatherhood Coalition, Massachusetts
John F. Russo, Marriage & Family, Massachusetts
*Stacy Harp, Active Christian Media, host, The Right View
Rena Havens, Mothers Against Pedophilia
John Haskins, Parentsf Rights Coalition
Rev. Michael Carl, Constitution Party of Massachusetts
Carl Parnell, author, From Schoolhouse to Courthouse

Affiliations are listed for identification purposes only and do not imply a formal endorsement or commitment by those organizations.

*Signed after December 20, 2006.
++Notes he has not had an opportunity to investigate punishable criminal consequences of violating the Massachusetts oath of office.

Massachusetts in-state contact: John Haskins, 781-890-6001
113 posted on 06/24/2012 10:32:25 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I’m starting to think that many of them would rather see Mr. Obama get another four years and ruin our country than see a RINO in the White House. What were Bush 41, Bush 43, Ford, Ike and Nixon?

Problem is 2DV, is that we aren't dealing with a RINO, but a Progressive Liberal with Mitt Romney.

If this was GWB, Bob Dole, or even GHB, you'd have a point.

Romney's own record proves beyond a shadow of a doubt what I am saying.

All you and other ABOs have to recommend Romney is fear of Obama.

That's not good enough for me, knowing what I know about Romney.

Oh, and BTW, I don't want either to win, and neither do any of the other FReepers who refuse to vote for the lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal Romney.

You're running with the POP (Party over Principle) crowd 2DV, it does not suit you.
114 posted on 06/24/2012 11:23:34 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I’m a life-long Republican (worked on local, Nixon and Ford campaigns before I could even vote) but that’s not what I’m talking about. We have absolutely no control over Mr. Obama and in his second term that’ll be 100X worse. Do you truly want this man setting the tone, controlling the entire military and security apperatus, influencing the economy and ruling with his pen for another 48 months? And what’s to say he’ll leave office or even allow elections next cycle? That’s how they play it where he comes from. Look what he’s already done! TARP, Bailouts, the Porkulus, a homosexual military, amnesty, doubling food stamps, 18% U6 unemployment, etc.


115 posted on 06/24/2012 11:42:28 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (In honor of my late father, GunnerySgt/Commo Chief, USMC 1943-65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: unkus

See below. The rest of the coven is back.


116 posted on 06/25/2012 12:00:03 AM PDT by MindBender26 (America can survive 4 years of Romney. She cannot survive another 4 years of an unfettered Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We have absolutely no control over Mr. Obama and in his second term that’ll be 100X worse. Do you truly want this man setting the tone, controlling the entire military and security apperatus, influencing the economy and ruling with his pen for another 48 months? And what’s to say he’ll leave office or even allow elections next cycle? That’s how they play it where he comes from. Look what he’s already done! TARP, Bailouts, the Porkulus, a homosexual military, amnesty, doubling food stamps, 18% U6 unemployment, etc.


Anyone not terrified of another 0bama tetm is not rational....


117 posted on 06/25/2012 12:25:39 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Get out the silver crosses and wooden stakes.

LOL/s


118 posted on 06/25/2012 12:27:57 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: unkus

“Anyone not terrified of another 0bama term is not rational....”

I also find the Romney hatred mystifying. At this point it is like the leftie Dems voting for Nader, leaving Al Gore out to dry.

Oh well, I hate to see my FRiends behaving irrationally. They say their fire is so hot, but they’re blinded by their zeal and its consequences; Obama.

Not that I think Romney will lose if a few white hot irrational FReepers don’t support him. Things are so bad under O that’s not what’s going to happen.

ABO!!!


119 posted on 06/25/2012 1:16:41 AM PDT by ThirstyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

No truer pic, thanks!!

God will not bless a nation who elects one or the other,
Romney and Obama are pro-abortionists and both profess a belief in the terrible sin of sodomy.


120 posted on 06/25/2012 1:27:26 AM PDT by stpio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ThirstyMan

Very good points.

It’s similar to the thinking of some that if JFK was elected, the Pope would run the country.


121 posted on 06/25/2012 1:48:50 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: unkus

“It’s similar to the thinking of some that if JFK was elected, the Pope would run the country.”

~ ~ ~

I wouldn’t say “similar”, Romney is not Christian, Mormons reject the Holy Trinity and so much else basic to Christian belief. The Church does not recognize Mormon baptism.

The “darkness” of Romney and BHO, no “grace” to see abortion and sodomy are grave mortal sins.


122 posted on 06/25/2012 2:40:47 AM PDT by stpio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: All
With all the bantering going on back and forth between the 'Hate Romney, Inc' crowd and the 'A-B-O' crowd, let me remind ALL of you of one very distinct fact.

The present POTUS and his administration has done anything and everything to circumvent, isolate, and marginalize the laws of the nation and the Constitution.

Oblunder and his minions have been the worst thing to happen to the country, and if you 'Romney Haters, Inc' don't realize a can of peaches in the WH would be better than we have now, you are just helping the Oblunder Gang destroy what is left of America.

You can whine, gnash your teeth, wring your hands, and cry and moan, but the fact is we have a candidate, while not what we'd LIKE to see, is 1000 times better for the nation than what we have now.

I don't like it any more than you do, but there comes a point when you have to man-up and look at what IS happening, and what could happen in a second Oblunder term.

My turning point came when Oblunder implicated himself in F&F with his 'Executive Privilege'.

123 posted on 06/25/2012 2:57:52 AM PDT by Wizdum (My job is to get you to shoot soda out your nose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wizdum

I can’t vote for Obmney. Both candidates have legislated for abortion! A grave mortal sin and becomes a mortal sin for you if you vote for either one.

There is no lessor of two evils this time. If only Romney
could show he has really changed, acted for life. It’s all
talk. The reason...

Where is God’s “grace” to come from if you reject who God is?

A grown man, to be leader of our country saying Christ is
NOT God, 2nd person of the Trinity.


124 posted on 06/25/2012 3:32:25 AM PDT by stpio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary

The “reason why” of Romney vs Reagon, is not the point of what I wrote, that Reagan started early and Romney both made their decisions early and layed the foundations for their campaigns, that went through 1 or more election cycles is my point. We have not seen a conservative candidate since Reagan who has done that.


125 posted on 06/25/2012 5:57:56 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: stpio
Sorry. There are no words to convince you of what will be happening to this country if Oblunder is re-elected. You have to decide for yourself, as I see you have, that you could live with 4 more years of unrestrained, unbridled disregard for the law of the land.

Oblunder has shown a deep contempt for the rule of law and the limitations of his power under the Constitution.

I can only hope that those who can, will vote this scumball out of office. Regardless, a Repub controlled House and Senate will control a Romney. They have shown they cannot control an out of control child such as Oblunder and his minions.

126 posted on 06/25/2012 7:01:40 AM PDT by Wizdum (My job is to get you to shoot soda out your nose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I’m a life-long Republican (worked on local, Nixon and Ford campaigns before I could even vote) but that’s not what I’m talking about. We have absolutely no control over Mr. Obama and in his second term that’ll be 100X worse. Do you truly want this man setting the tone, controlling the entire military and security apperatus, influencing the economy and ruling with his pen for another 48 months? And what’s to say he’ll leave office or even allow elections next cycle? That’s how they play it where he comes from. Look what he’s already done! TARP, Bailouts, the Porkulus, a homosexual military, amnesty, doubling food stamps, 18% U6 unemployment, etc.

Fear of the unknown and improbable fear-based scenarios should never be the reason for making a decision in any situation.
127 posted on 06/25/2012 8:15:33 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; CedarDave; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; ...

” They managed to get their approval rating down to almost 10% AND pretty much pass everything Obama demanded, maybe not everything he wanted. First thing they needed was to replace Boehner. “

Replace Boehner, or nothing good will ever happen.


128 posted on 06/25/2012 9:44:28 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; CedarDave; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; ...

” They managed to get their approval rating down to almost 10% AND pretty much pass everything Obama demanded, maybe not everything he wanted. First thing they needed was to replace Boehner. “

Replace Boehner, or nothing good will ever happen.


129 posted on 06/25/2012 9:44:58 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: stpio

It’s the same.


130 posted on 06/25/2012 10:36:43 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26; rogue yam; Lakeshark; unkus; EternalVigilance; Colonel_Flagg; fieldmarshaldj; ...
Mindbender26:

I fear God but I fear no human being. My boyhood hometown was the New Haven where Yale University maintains a statue of its distinguished alumnus Nathan Hale, a model for today's actual conservatives. We proudly have but one life to give for our country (and far more importantly for our God) like young Nathan, a martyr of the American Revolution. It is the specialty of the Romney harem to "fear" Obozo when Romney is virtually indistinguishable other than on $$$. Cowardice is the benchmark of spineless accommodationist quisling "Republicans" like Myth Romney, a true son of his evil "brainwashed" and GOP-rejected daddy of whom Senator Gene McCarthy said: A light rinse would have sufficed.

When Myth Romney has been destroyed in this "election" or afterwards, he will take his place alongside those "beloved" (among RINOs) quislings like Herbert Hoover, Alf Landon, Wendell Willke, Tom Dewey, Dwight "Modern Republican" Eisenhower (Ike the other golfer), Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Bush the Elder and the globaloney artists, Robert Dole, and John McCain. Veritable giants among men without political spines. And NOW: the worst in show: Myth Romney!

It is the function of conservatives to follow the advice of St. Paul: Be not afraid!

Admit supporting Obozo???? Not bloody likely because it would be a lie. Since you support Myth Romney, it is your job and Myth's and that of Myth's other love slaves to confect and provide the lies on the allegedly "Republican" side of politics in this non-election year (for POTUS anyway) which poses as one. It is Obozo's and Axelrod's and Plouffe's jobs to provide the Demonrat lies.

It is, as always, the job of the actual conservatives to provide the light and truth. That disqualifies you and every other Romney and Obozo pom pom girl from the light casting and truth telling category.

Also, Clint Eastwood, as Dirty Harry Callahan, advised that it is our job to shoot our own dogs when necessity arises. A man (or woman) must assume and discharge his/her own responsibilities. Since Myth Romney just insists on calling himself a "Republican," it will be the job of actual Republicans to drive his sorry unprincipled backside out of public life. We will.

Myth fled the Massachusetts governorship after only one term with a 36% approval rating (that would be a step or two ahead of the guys with the buckets of hot tar, feather supply and stripped log, riding to the sound of the guns). Considering how Myth abused even that awful state, 36% was a miracle. Conservatives will destroy your favorite pet idiot in November, or, as necessary, at leisure thereafter. There is only so much $$$ in the universe and nowhere near enough to maintain an ongoing American majority or a Republican majority for a rank quisling and Trojan Horse like Myth Romney (essentially Gerald Ford II without the stumblebum charm). His supporters are volunteering for inevitable infamy and that is exactly what they will reap.

If I frequented sites that support Obozo, that would be an opportunity to attack Obozo with equal vigor and for precisely the same policy reasons: two Stage IV malignant tumors in one body politic. No one here that I know of is supporting Obozo. As it is, I spend my time, as I have for many years, on Free Republic where the problem lately is limited to a small, bitter cadre of Romney pom pom girls, made up of Myth's paid staffers, AND others who are the gullible, the deluded, the $$$ obsessed, the dishonest, the corrupt and the trust fund babies. I am none of those and therefore oppose BOTH Obozo AND Myth Romney.

I AM a conservative as I have been since 1964 or so when I was still in high school. My parents and other relatives voted and most registered as Democrats of the labor union persuasion. By the time Ronaldus Maximus challenged Romney's spiritual ancestor, Spineless Gerald Ford, most of my relatives, sickened over the seizure of the Demonrat Party by McGovern and other communists and social issue barbarians and thrilled by the rise of Reagan, had become Republicans and NOT to foster persecution of our pro-life Roman Catholic Church (and other pro-life churches) which persecution is a Romney specialty, NOT to take over our medical care system with mandatory funding schemes and calling such "Republican" and Romneycare, NOT to grab guns, NOT to protect Muffy's trust fund and NOT to protect mass baby slaughter courtesy of Herod Blackmun and the Junior League/polo club airhead "Republicans," and NOT to support Bruce roaming Adam's Hershey Highway or similar perversions, and NOT to be brainless myopic isolationists and NOT to lose sleep over worthless, useless irrelevant trivia like the value of Chatsworth Worthington 32nd's stock portfolio BUT to be full-throated patriotic, interventionist, moral, blue-collar job promoting, tax on modest folks-resisting, anti-snobbican, welfare state despising actual conservative Republicans.

I have not sold my soul and I won't. Sorry about you and any other Myth Romney love slave!

I am still waiting to hear why I should be caught dead or alive voting for a baby-killing, marriage destroying, lavender queen encouraging, etc., etc., etc., sorry SOB who persecuted my church and every other pro-life church as the one term governor of Taxachusetts. Crickets!!! Crickets!!! Crickets!!!

See SoCalPubbie's #113 for the definitive answer to Myth's well-rehearsed litany of lies.

131 posted on 06/25/2012 12:51:14 PM PDT by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey! Tom Hoefling for POTUS! Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Than you!

What was that Hamilton quote about it being better to have an enemy in office that we CAN unite to oppose??? Of course, it would be far better to have Tom Hoefling as POTUS.

132 posted on 06/25/2012 1:01:50 PM PDT by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey! Tom Hoefling for POTUS! Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

#132: ThanK you! Proofreading is my friend. God bless.


133 posted on 06/25/2012 1:03:55 PM PDT by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey! Tom Hoefling for POTUS! Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Avoid injury to your finances. Bet no more than a penny that the future direction of leftist Myth being to the right. His entire life, his campaign of relentless lies, and his DNA say otherwise.


134 posted on 06/25/2012 1:07:49 PM PDT by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey! Tom Hoefling for POTUS! Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

Great post. Bears repeating

I fear God but I fear no human being. My boyhood hometown was the New Haven where Yale University maintains a statue of its distinguished alumnus Nathan Hale, a model for today’s actual conservatives. We proudly have but one life to give for our country (and far more importantly for our God) like young Nathan, a martyr of the American Revolution. It is the specialty of the Romney harem to “fear” Obozo when Romney is virtually indistinguishable other than on $$$. Cowardice is the benchmark of spineless accommodationist quisling “Republicans” like Myth Romney, a true son of his evil “brainwashed” and GOP-rejected daddy of whom Senator Gene McCarthy said: A light rinse would have sufficed.

When Myth Romney has been destroyed in this “election” or afterwards, he will take his place alongside those “beloved” (among RINOs) quislings like Herbert Hoover, Alf Landon, Wendell Willke, Tom Dewey, Dwight “Modern Republican” Eisenhower (Ike the other golfer), Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Bush the Elder and the globaloney artists, Robert Dole, and John McCain. Veritable giants among men without political spines. And NOW: the worst in show: Myth Romney!

It is the function of conservatives to follow the advice of St. Paul: Be not afraid!

Admit supporting Obozo???? Not bloody likely because it would be a lie. Since you support Myth Romney, it is your job and Myth’s and that of Myth’s other love slaves to confect and provide the lies on the allegedly “Republican” side of politics in this non-election year (for POTUS anyway) which poses as one. It is Obozo’s and Axelrod’s and Plouffe’s jobs to provide the Demonrat lies.

It is, as always, the job of the actual conservatives to provide the light and truth. That disqualifies you and every other Romney and Obozo pom pom girl from the light casting and truth telling category.

Also, Clint Eastwood, as Dirty Harry Callahan, advised that it is our job to shoot our own dogs when necessity arises. A man (or woman) must assume and discharge his/her own responsibilities. Since Myth Romney just insists on calling himself a “Republican,” it will be the job of actual Republicans to drive his sorry unprincipled backside out of public life. We will.

Myth fled the Massachusetts governorship after only one term with a 36% approval rating (that would be a step or two ahead of the guys with the buckets of hot tar, feather supply and stripped log, riding to the sound of the guns). Considering how Myth abused even that awful state, 36% was a miracle. Conservatives will destroy your favorite pet idiot in November, or, as necessary, at leisure thereafter. There is only so much $$$ in the universe and nowhere near enough to maintain an ongoing American majority or a Republican majority for a rank quisling and Trojan Horse like Myth Romney (essentially Gerald Ford II without the stumblebum charm). His supporters are volunteering for inevitable infamy and that is exactly what they will reap.

If I frequented sites that support Obozo, that would be an opportunity to attack Obozo with equal vigor and for precisely the same policy reasons: two Stage IV malignant tumors in one body politic. No one here that I know of is supporting Obozo. As it is, I spend my time, as I have for many years, on Free Republic where the problem lately is limited to a small, bitter cadre of Romney pom pom girls, made up of Myth’s paid staffers, AND others who are the gullible, the deluded, the $$$ obsessed, the dishonest, the corrupt and the trust fund babies. I am none of those and therefore oppose BOTH Obozo AND Myth Romney.

I AM a conservative as I have been since 1964 or so when I was still in high school. My parents and other relatives voted and most registered as Democrats of the labor union persuasion. By the time Ronaldus Maximus challenged Romney’s spiritual ancestor, Spineless Gerald Ford, most of my relatives, sickened over the seizure of the Demonrat Party by McGovern and other communists and social issue barbarians and thrilled by the rise of Reagan, had become Republicans and NOT to foster persecution of our pro-life Roman Catholic Church (and other pro-life churches) which persecution is a Romney specialty, NOT to take over our medical care system with mandatory funding schemes and calling such “Republican” and Romneycare, NOT to grab guns, NOT to protect Muffy’s trust fund and NOT to protect mass baby slaughter courtesy of Herod Blackmun and the Junior League/polo club airhead “Republicans,” and NOT to support Bruce roaming Adam’s Hershey Highway or similar perversions, and NOT to be brainless myopic isolationists and NOT to lose sleep over worthless, useless irrelevant trivia like the value of Chatsworth Worthington 32nd’s stock portfolio BUT to be full-throated patriotic, interventionist, moral, blue-collar job promoting, tax on modest folks-resisting, anti-snobbican, welfare state despising actual conservative Republicans.

I have not sold my soul and I won’t. Sorry about you and any other Myth Romney love slave!

I am still waiting to hear why I should be caught dead or alive voting for a baby-killing, marriage destroying, lavender queen encouraging, etc., etc., etc., sorry SOB who persecuted my church and every other pro-life church as the one term governor of Taxachusetts. Crickets!!! Crickets!!! Crickets!!!

See SoCalPubbie’s #113 for the definitive answer to Myth’s well-rehearsed litany of lies.


135 posted on 06/25/2012 1:10:56 PM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: unkus
You suppose that Myth will be elected. Arrogance does not become squishball moderates posting on conservative websites.

I already know that if EITHER major party candidate is elected, it will be a genuinely major disaster for this nation and its people.

To review the bidding: Short of a lightning strike of divine intervention, the 2012 "election" between two equivalent enemies of our country and our civilization both lusting to be POTUS from 2013 to 2017 will bring disaster.

The good news is that either Obozo or Romney MUST lose and that will clear away, regardless of result, a major enemy of our way of life.

The bad news is that one of them (it really does not matter which except to gullible folks ignorant of what they are dealing with) is quite likely to "win." Starting on election night, as soon as the result is clear, conservatives will begin the Resistance to the "winner" until the "winner is destroyed.

Conservatives (the actual ones) will know what you and other Romney pom pom girls REALLY are if Romney "wins." For example, if, God forbid, he gets a chance to nominate a new generation of Herod Blackmun, John Paul Stevens or David "Swish" Souter to the SCOTUS, will you get out the old pom poms and hike that miniskirt shaking your body parts to distract the crowd for despicable phony and Obozo in whiteface Myth and his appointee??? Yay, rah, rah: kill them babies! OR "I NEVER imagined he would appoint a POS like that!!!" Just in case you ask, in the absolutely unlikely event that Myth EVER appoints a new Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito or John Roberts, I will support such a SCOTUS nominee, retaining my quite justified distrust of Myth.

I know exactly what I will do whether Obozo OR Myth is elected and it won't be going crazy. I despise Myth and Obozo and all of the universe of their identical agenda items. I won't vote for either. I won't support the "winner" regardless of which major party candidate that may be. I WILL RESIST the major party winner no matter which.

LOL!!! Back atcha now and forever!

136 posted on 06/25/2012 1:29:04 PM PDT by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey! Tom Hoefling for POTUS! Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
Please, stop with the BS.

With Obama telling his agents to not help Arizona deport illegal aliens, there is even more reason to be ABO,

Of course, you and your alter-egos know more than Palin, Cain, Rick Santorum, Newt, Sid Mellman, Michelle Bachmann, Tim Paw, etc.

Do you really think you are fooling anyone?

137 posted on 06/25/2012 1:31:08 PM PDT by MindBender26 (America can survive 4 years of Romney. She cannot survive another 4 years of an unfettered Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances

Thank you, my lady. May God bless you and yours!


138 posted on 06/25/2012 1:32:00 PM PDT by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey! Tom Hoefling for POTUS! Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
The bad news is that one of them (it really does not matter which except to gullible folks ignorant of what they are dealing with)

Romney's a big government hump, but to say that it doesn't matter whether he or the America-hating Marxist wins demonstrates the absolute height of political ignorance.

Astonishing blindness in the face of what's at stake.

139 posted on 06/25/2012 1:33:40 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

You suppose that Myth will be elected. Arrogance does not become squishball moderates posting on conservative websites.
I already know that if EITHER major party candidate is elected, it will be a genuinely major disaster for this nation and its people.

To review the bidding: Short of a lightning strike of divine intervention, the 2012 “election” between two equivalent enemies of our country and our civilization both lusting to be POTUS from 2013 to 2017 will bring disaster.

The good news is that either Obozo or Romney MUST lose and that will clear away, regardless of result, a major enemy of our way of life.

The bad news is that one of them (it really does not matter which except to gullible folks ignorant of what they are dealing with) is quite likely to “win.” Starting on election night, as soon as the result is clear, conservatives will begin the Resistance to the “winner” until the “winner is destroyed.

Conservatives (the actual ones) will know what you and other Romney pom pom girls REALLY are if Romney “wins.” For example, if, God forbid, he gets a chance to nominate a new generation of Herod Blackmun, John Paul Stevens or David “Swish” Souter to the SCOTUS, will you get out the old pom poms and hike that miniskirt shaking your body parts to distract the crowd for despicable phony and Obozo in whiteface Myth and his appointee??? Yay, rah, rah: kill them babies! OR “I NEVER imagined he would appoint a POS like that!!!” Just in case you ask, in the absolutely unlikely event that Myth EVER appoints a new Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito or John Roberts, I will support such a SCOTUS nominee, retaining my quite justified distrust of Myth.

I know exactly what I will do whether Obozo OR Myth is elected and it won’t be going crazy. I despise Myth and Obozo and all of the universe of their identical agenda items. I won’t vote for either. I won’t support the “winner” regardless of which major party candidate that may be. I WILL RESIST the major party winner no matter which.


I didn’t even bother reading this.


140 posted on 06/25/2012 1:56:41 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

I will no longer bother to read their crap.

ABO!


141 posted on 06/25/2012 2:00:33 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Oh no!!!! The Mexicans are coming! The Mexicans are coming!!! How will we save Muffie's trust fund????? I think SCOTUS ruled today that it is NOT Arizona's job to deport Mexicans and that the federales have the specific discretion to decide whether to do so. Is there a different SCOTUS in your quisling universe??? How many moons in your sky and what color is your sky?

Other than "Sid Mellman," your list consists of Republicans who have recently run for POTUS or VPOTUS and who are subject to an incredible level of party pressure to support quisling Romney as GOP nominee. The claim as to Palin comes from a prehistoric remark before the primaries that any GOP candidate was better than Obozo. I don't remember a specific endorsement of Myth Romney after his utterly dishonest and despicable primary campaign of lies, slanders and libels funded by the usual gang of polo players, Junior Leaguers and apparently an even more sinister group of megabucks slingers buying the nomination for Myth so that he can come through for them on promises to harm our nation and our people in Lucifer only knows which specific ways.

IF Sarah Palin actually endorsed or endorses the Massachusetts pseudo-GOP Antichrist, I would forgive her. Likewise Cain, Santorum, Newt, Bachmann and Perry IF he abandons Dewhurst. IF the Massachusetts trashbag is elected, it really won't matter whether you or his other pom pom girls abandon him upon his first or any other atrocity, I doubt any of you will EVER be forgiven. You have not been subject to the fallen candidates excuse. You actually wanted this reincarnation of Wendell Willke to be elected.

Who the hell is Sid Mellman??? Did you mean lavender queen former RNC Chairthing Ken Mehlman???

I fool no one and I don't intend to fool anyone. I say what I mean and mean what I say. What you see is what you get. I don't have to hide behind a screen of lies and distortions like the Romney pom pom girls.

When the BS is yours (as it is) you have to stop it.

142 posted on 06/25/2012 2:00:35 PM PDT by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey! Tom Hoefling for POTUS! Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Romney's *far* from perfect but he's still light years better than Osama Obama.

Fallacy of the year.

143 posted on 06/25/2012 2:09:08 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
Either you are a strong Obama troll trying to fool everyone.... or you're trying to fool yourself.

You don't know Sid? You probably don't know what he and Marty Cavendish did in 62-64 to help start the modern Conservative movement either. What an amateur!

144 posted on 06/25/2012 2:14:14 PM PDT by MindBender26 (America can survive 4 years of Romney. She cannot survive another 4 years of an unfettered Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: unkus
It’s like trying to reason with a liberal.

I see that's your false mantra, and an ironic one since ABOers are the ones who do such ludicrous things as yelp that those of us who refuse to vote for either Romney or Obama are "Obama supporters," while if we observe that they are Romney supporters because they are here a) saying they'll vote for him and b) urging us to vote for him, those same people scream bloody murder at being called exactly what they are: Romney supporters.

That behavior looks a lot like Romney's record: pure liberal.

145 posted on 06/25/2012 2:16:54 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Finny
Fallacy of the year.


146 posted on 06/25/2012 2:18:15 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Bill Ayers Was *Not* "Just Some Guy In The Neighborhood")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Innovative; Jim Robinson

So ... you’re saying that Jim Robinson is a secret lib trying to re-elect Obama? You’re certainly saying that I am, and you are dead wrong. You may not know it, but I do.


147 posted on 06/25/2012 2:21:12 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: unkus; Windflier
unkus, I notice that you don't actually extend any arguments to support your statement that equating Romney with Obama is totally unreasonable.

You just whine that "it's like arguing with a liberal," which is so ironic that it would be funny if it wasn't so damned sad.

148 posted on 06/25/2012 2:27:57 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RginTN; Innovative; unkus
Its your opinion that critizing Romney helps Obama.
So what that it’s now Romney or Obama. That doesn’t mean one should shut up and only look at Obama.
Besides this is a Conservative site not a groupthink Republican site.
If Romney becomes president are Conservatives supposed to continue to shut up?

Your last question is exactly the point that these terrified ABO tunnel-vision folks refuse to ponder.

Many ABOers loathe Romney truly. One of them, unkus, seems certainly to despise Romney but his fear of Obama is overpowering his common sense, and he has posted frequently to folks like me (see my tagline) that we'll go "nuts" if Romney wins.

I can only shake my head sadly: if Romney wins on a landslide and Innovative, unkus, and all the other ABOers ignoring their common sense and better judgment out of fear, anger, and desire for vengeance against Obama, see their anti-Obama referendum suddenly being taken up as a pro-Romney mandate, they are the ones who would go nuts. And only the most naive pollyanna doesn't get that if Romney wins on a landslide, that is EXACTLY what he would do.

And they, like conservatives in Congress, would be impotent and outnumbered by a president, moderate Republicans, GOP Establishment, Democrats, and liberal press who would point to Romney's landslide as a clear indicator that the majority of Americans wanted his "progressive style of governing." Obama would be long forgotten and irrelevant.

That is when we would be seeing ABOers going nuts, because they voted FOR it.

We had all better pray for a plurality regardless of who wins. A plurality is what is what I will be voting for, by casting my vote third party, because there is n such thing as voting "against" -- it is materially impossible; a vote can only ever be for something, even if it's for the rejection of a ballot proposition, and we don't have that thumbs-up-or-down option with individual candidates.

If two of every three voters says "to hell with both of them" and votes third party, there is an excellent chance, considering Obama's low poll numbers, that the winner, whichever one it is, enters office on such an embarassing plurality that nearly two in three votes were cast against him. It would make a downright mockery of Obama, if he was the one to win.

149 posted on 06/25/2012 3:03:58 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg; Innovative
Inno: Which part of “your ONLY choice is Obama or Romney” are you having trouble comprehending?

Col. Flagg: The part where that's true. Because it's not.

Colonel, Innovative is confusing choices with outcomes. The only outcome (unless we have a miracle) is Obama or Romney. As for ballot choices, we have many. If enough of us choose other than Obama or Romney, whichever plick wins will be a joke opposed nearly two to one, weak, vulnerable, and embattled, while conservatives in Congress will have the upper hand in battling him. Because the ONLY outcome (unless we have a miracle) will be an anti-conservative authoritarian statist president.

150 posted on 06/25/2012 3:15:10 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson