Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Conservative's Despair of a Romney Republican Ticket (Video)
Youtube/ Rush Limbaugh ^ | March 30 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 06/23/2012 7:58:06 PM PDT by Mozilla

From March when Rush read a e-mail from a friend upset at Romney. Best email ever that describes our dilemma.

A Conservative's Despair of a Romney Republican Ticket

Another related clip from last October.

Rush Limbaugh: We are Letting The Media And RINOS Pick Our Candidates

And Finally:

Rush Limbaugh: Romney Is NO Conservative

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: carter4romney; clinton4romney; dnc4romney; goode2012; hyperrinoromney; kerry4romney; libs4romney; lies; loserromney; msm4romney; obama4romney; rinos; romney; sharia4romney; soros4romney; tarp4romney; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-163 next last
To: MindBender26

I will no longer bother to read their crap.

ABO!


141 posted on 06/25/2012 2:00:33 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Oh no!!!! The Mexicans are coming! The Mexicans are coming!!! How will we save Muffie's trust fund????? I think SCOTUS ruled today that it is NOT Arizona's job to deport Mexicans and that the federales have the specific discretion to decide whether to do so. Is there a different SCOTUS in your quisling universe??? How many moons in your sky and what color is your sky?

Other than "Sid Mellman," your list consists of Republicans who have recently run for POTUS or VPOTUS and who are subject to an incredible level of party pressure to support quisling Romney as GOP nominee. The claim as to Palin comes from a prehistoric remark before the primaries that any GOP candidate was better than Obozo. I don't remember a specific endorsement of Myth Romney after his utterly dishonest and despicable primary campaign of lies, slanders and libels funded by the usual gang of polo players, Junior Leaguers and apparently an even more sinister group of megabucks slingers buying the nomination for Myth so that he can come through for them on promises to harm our nation and our people in Lucifer only knows which specific ways.

IF Sarah Palin actually endorsed or endorses the Massachusetts pseudo-GOP Antichrist, I would forgive her. Likewise Cain, Santorum, Newt, Bachmann and Perry IF he abandons Dewhurst. IF the Massachusetts trashbag is elected, it really won't matter whether you or his other pom pom girls abandon him upon his first or any other atrocity, I doubt any of you will EVER be forgiven. You have not been subject to the fallen candidates excuse. You actually wanted this reincarnation of Wendell Willke to be elected.

Who the hell is Sid Mellman??? Did you mean lavender queen former RNC Chairthing Ken Mehlman???

I fool no one and I don't intend to fool anyone. I say what I mean and mean what I say. What you see is what you get. I don't have to hide behind a screen of lies and distortions like the Romney pom pom girls.

When the BS is yours (as it is) you have to stop it.

142 posted on 06/25/2012 2:00:35 PM PDT by BlackElk (Viva Cristo Rey! Tom Hoefling for POTUS! Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Romney's *far* from perfect but he's still light years better than Osama Obama.

Fallacy of the year.

143 posted on 06/25/2012 2:09:08 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
Either you are a strong Obama troll trying to fool everyone.... or you're trying to fool yourself.

You don't know Sid? You probably don't know what he and Marty Cavendish did in 62-64 to help start the modern Conservative movement either. What an amateur!

144 posted on 06/25/2012 2:14:14 PM PDT by MindBender26 (America can survive 4 years of Romney. She cannot survive another 4 years of an unfettered Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: unkus
It’s like trying to reason with a liberal.

I see that's your false mantra, and an ironic one since ABOers are the ones who do such ludicrous things as yelp that those of us who refuse to vote for either Romney or Obama are "Obama supporters," while if we observe that they are Romney supporters because they are here a) saying they'll vote for him and b) urging us to vote for him, those same people scream bloody murder at being called exactly what they are: Romney supporters.

That behavior looks a lot like Romney's record: pure liberal.

145 posted on 06/25/2012 2:16:54 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Finny
Fallacy of the year.


146 posted on 06/25/2012 2:18:15 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Bill Ayers Was *Not* "Just Some Guy In The Neighborhood")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Innovative; Jim Robinson

So ... you’re saying that Jim Robinson is a secret lib trying to re-elect Obama? You’re certainly saying that I am, and you are dead wrong. You may not know it, but I do.


147 posted on 06/25/2012 2:21:12 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: unkus; Windflier
unkus, I notice that you don't actually extend any arguments to support your statement that equating Romney with Obama is totally unreasonable.

You just whine that "it's like arguing with a liberal," which is so ironic that it would be funny if it wasn't so damned sad.

148 posted on 06/25/2012 2:27:57 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RginTN; Innovative; unkus
Its your opinion that critizing Romney helps Obama.
So what that it’s now Romney or Obama. That doesn’t mean one should shut up and only look at Obama.
Besides this is a Conservative site not a groupthink Republican site.
If Romney becomes president are Conservatives supposed to continue to shut up?

Your last question is exactly the point that these terrified ABO tunnel-vision folks refuse to ponder.

Many ABOers loathe Romney truly. One of them, unkus, seems certainly to despise Romney but his fear of Obama is overpowering his common sense, and he has posted frequently to folks like me (see my tagline) that we'll go "nuts" if Romney wins.

I can only shake my head sadly: if Romney wins on a landslide and Innovative, unkus, and all the other ABOers ignoring their common sense and better judgment out of fear, anger, and desire for vengeance against Obama, see their anti-Obama referendum suddenly being taken up as a pro-Romney mandate, they are the ones who would go nuts. And only the most naive pollyanna doesn't get that if Romney wins on a landslide, that is EXACTLY what he would do.

And they, like conservatives in Congress, would be impotent and outnumbered by a president, moderate Republicans, GOP Establishment, Democrats, and liberal press who would point to Romney's landslide as a clear indicator that the majority of Americans wanted his "progressive style of governing." Obama would be long forgotten and irrelevant.

That is when we would be seeing ABOers going nuts, because they voted FOR it.

We had all better pray for a plurality regardless of who wins. A plurality is what is what I will be voting for, by casting my vote third party, because there is n such thing as voting "against" -- it is materially impossible; a vote can only ever be for something, even if it's for the rejection of a ballot proposition, and we don't have that thumbs-up-or-down option with individual candidates.

If two of every three voters says "to hell with both of them" and votes third party, there is an excellent chance, considering Obama's low poll numbers, that the winner, whichever one it is, enters office on such an embarassing plurality that nearly two in three votes were cast against him. It would make a downright mockery of Obama, if he was the one to win.

149 posted on 06/25/2012 3:03:58 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg; Innovative
Inno: Which part of “your ONLY choice is Obama or Romney” are you having trouble comprehending?

Col. Flagg: The part where that's true. Because it's not.

Colonel, Innovative is confusing choices with outcomes. The only outcome (unless we have a miracle) is Obama or Romney. As for ballot choices, we have many. If enough of us choose other than Obama or Romney, whichever plick wins will be a joke opposed nearly two to one, weak, vulnerable, and embattled, while conservatives in Congress will have the upper hand in battling him. Because the ONLY outcome (unless we have a miracle) will be an anti-conservative authoritarian statist president.

150 posted on 06/25/2012 3:15:10 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: unkus; BlackElk
You will go crazy when Romney wins. LOL

And you will go crazy when Romney takes your anti-Obama referendum and perverts it into a pro-Romney mandate.

But I won't LOL.

151 posted on 06/25/2012 3:21:15 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Finny; unkus
unkus, I notice that you don't actually extend any arguments to support your statement that equating Romney with Obama is totally unreasonable.

Yeah, that is a bit of a glaring omission, isn't it?

152 posted on 06/25/2012 3:21:55 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26; Jim Robinson
Relax, they’re all a bunch of Obama trolls who are afraid to admit it.

Really? What about the founder of this site, who is as opposed to Romney as I am? Is he a troll, too? Are the 130 (at least) FReepers who reject Romney all trolls?

And my third party vote will be entirely neutral as to whether Obama or Romney wins -- I am willing to leave it to chance, to other folks, to select the winner, and it will be close because Obama has become despised by many who voted for him last time. Are you so cowed and whipped that you think Romney would lose without me?

You need to admit that you are for moving the Republican party hard left out of your fear of Obama, that you have lost the courage to stand and fight liberalism, that you plan to vote like a coward and call people like me "trolls" in the bargain.

Or are you afraid to admit it?

153 posted on 06/25/2012 3:33:52 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26; Jim Robinson
They want to help Obama, period.

Even Jim Robinson?

154 posted on 06/25/2012 3:35:05 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Wizdum

Your fear of Obama borders on hysteria.


155 posted on 06/25/2012 3:38:09 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: unkus
I didn’t even bother reading this.

Of course you didn't -- intellectually, you can't afford to.

156 posted on 06/25/2012 3:41:32 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Have you given any thought at all to the risks of a Romney landslide?
157 posted on 06/25/2012 3:44:22 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: RginTN; Innovative; unkus

Correction: If ONE in three voters says to hell with both of them ...


158 posted on 06/25/2012 3:48:14 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
Replace Boehner, or nothing good will ever happen.

Sorry to report it, but Romney Republicans have a whole new crop of Boehners in the hopper.

159 posted on 06/25/2012 4:21:17 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Finny

I’m not afraid of Oblunder, I’m afraid of what America will look like when he is finished destroying it. If that doesn’t bother you, you really need to get your head out of the sand and think what your kids and grandkids will have to deal with for their lives.


160 posted on 06/25/2012 5:07:53 PM PDT by Wizdum (My job is to get you to shoot soda out your nose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson