Skip to comments.E.J. Dionne: Justice Scalia must resign
Posted on 06/27/2012 11:48:03 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
EJ Dionne needs to resign.
E.J. Dionne, a man on a mission to prove that brainwaves are not necessary to write for the WaPo.
Insert Italian Hand Gesture here.
The SCOTUS should have Secret Service protection.
Just one more reason why the ComPost is going down the crapper.
Send E.J. back to Canada where he can be among his own kind.
What a left wing nit-wit. I don’t know who’s worse....Dionne or his twin brother Paul Krugman.
All of them except Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy vote according to party lines. Clarence Thomas is principled. Anthony Kennedy is unpredictable and seems confused at time. All the others are crooks who vote according to party lines and go by whatever is in vogue in their party.
It is so much fun watching the Left begin their mental breakdown. Soon, E.J. will be curled up in a corner sucking his thumb and wimpering, “George Bush did it”.
What has Scalia done that every liberal justice since Thurgood Marshall hasn’t? They never seem to mind discussing their political philosophies (except during confirmation hearings, of course).
I guess he finds the “wise latina” more to his liking since she’s unbiased and apolitical./s
Too bad for you he’s in a lifetime berth, huh? Hahahahaha!
Scalia is partial towards the Constitution and liberty. Shame on him.
Hey, EJ, tell you what, you get enough votes together in congress to impeach the man, and then your opinion on the matter might have some weight.
Where was the outrage when Obama spoke directly down to and dissed the Supreme Court Justices in his State of the Union? Hmmmm? Did you call for Obama to resign?
Just like I thought, none and no.
More selective outrage for political purposes from a so-called “journalist,” which means your article actually does belong in the ComPost pile where it was written.
America at the Crossroads of History
Author is an idiot.
Application of current events to illustrate the problem with a decision is no more biased than using an historic illustration.
An illustration is simply an illustration.
Someone needs to inform this clown that Ruth Bader Ginsberg has done the same thing once (and sometimes twice) a year during her time on the Court.
With any luck she’ll do it again tomorrow after the Obamacare decision and leave E.J. with egg all over his face.
And if the 0bamacare is upheld...
Will we not demand similar things up to and including impeachment of the court?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.