Skip to comments.Affordable Care Act SCOTUS Decision--Live Thread
Posted on 06/28/2012 4:56:21 AM PDT by John W
Today is the day. SCOTUSblog live at 8:45 AM.
(Excerpt) Read more at scotusblog.wpengine.com ...
Oh well, back to my Pakman game!
Are you really such a Gloomer that you now are quoting someone who most people had never heard until this month?
I'm with you Rush ... Let's Roll!
Goldberg made me laugh with that.
I also like Casapulla's reply: "Nah, he's punching meat in a freezer to sweet 80s tunes"
and that everyone knows is a lefty blog (Scotusblog)?
That the Obamacare obamanation even became law demonstrates what a freakshow all branches of government have become. And a guy named Carney is the chief carnival barker... how do you spoof the absurd?
Noble institutions are reserved for peoples who are able to discern between the holy and the profane.
——This law of nature, being co-eval with mankind and dictated by God himself,...-—
My BIL was the dean of a Catholic law school. He told me that law students aren’t taught Natural Law theory explicitly. He seemed ambivalent about it.
I wanted to puke. If the law doesn’t rest on eternal moral principles, then it rests on nothing at all.
Odumbo’s too ignorant and arrogant to realize that option 2 can bite the hand that feeds it.
To play it safe, SCOTUS will lecture
every litigant how they overstepped.
Yep...right up there with all the crazy socialist BS, we got and are still dealing with, from FDR.
That was not a dream. It was a Nightmare!
End it, don’t mend it.
Please break out your pocket constitution....
Go to article 1, section 8..
Back when the framers were still alive, it was ruled that naturalization and immigration are linked, and therefore one and the same..
the states cannot set their own immigration policies
this power is specifically granted to the federal government
any power not granted to the federal government is reserved by the states and the people, respectively
the fed cannot interfere with local law enforcement
This was upheld
To put it bluntly, what would california do with an ability to set it’s own immigration policy?
answer, it would open the floodgates
not a “popular” or “trendy” ruling, but a constitutionally correct one
You’re killing me...........
Thanks for the thread... I have been trying to sleep, and just can’t. I hope after it’s announced I can actually get some sleep, but I doubt it. Waiting for the Holder vote as well, today. Too many “Big Doings” that really will have a HUGE impact on our country.
You’re welcome. I started it because I was getting the heebie jeebies sitting here worrying about it without a specific thread on FR on it.
I thinking the ruling goes against ObamaCare, we see the beginning of the phase out of Dear Leader by the Dims as damage control.
No matter how carefully crafted the “three” supposed speeches are-—THIS was his LEGACY and his narcisstic personality (with him, this is personal) will start to unhinge. And quickly.
The “I” word has even been mentioned (and not just on the web). The stress will just “get to him” and he will step aside—my gut feeling.
Any streaming video links?
Live blogging at SCOTUSblog.com starts at O845, and the justices take the bench at 1000 EST. With other cases to be announced, expect the Obamacare decision around 1030 and for Roberts to write the decision; assuming it goes down.