Skip to comments.Homeland Security-Funded Study Lists People ‘Reverent of Individual Liberty’ as Terrorists
Posted on 07/04/2012 12:25:22 AM PDT by Errant
Are you reverent of individual liberty? Are you suspicious of centralized federal authority? Do you think there is a grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty?
Well, then you fall into the category of extreme right-wing terrorist, according to a new study out of the University of Maryland, which was funded in part by the Department of Homeland Security.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
“Words fail me.”
As a white guy my government made it clear years ago that I had no place in the future as they envisioned it. Now that they are assigning specific categories to the same notion, why is this any different?
THE NEW TERRORIST LIST IS HERE!
THE NRW YERROTIST LIST IS HERE!
I”M SOMEBODY NOW!
They would have thrown the Founding Fathers into prison.
Specking of his excellency, exactly where is he?
FEMA thinks the Founding Fathers were terrorists.
More than likely en-route on AF 1 to meet up with his motorcoach convoy. They will have to organize the emergency equipment, the fore and aft egress routes, the black hole umbrella shutting down all air traffic from RC hobbyist planes to hot air balloons.
Its actually very easy to mark his progress across America, look for the moving dead zone.
These people work for the government. They had their memories erased during the induction rites.
Oh, what a storm is coming.
If this definition describes me, then I wear it as a badge of honor.
Yeah dissent will become patriotic again, the moment a Republican is elected.
Then it will be patriotic again.
For the years the republican is in office. Then, back the the current situation. If that happens.
Especially when NAXIS were actually borderline Marxists.
Speaking of the Senate, what happened to the “almost guaranteed Republican Senate of 2012”? Several months ago it was noted that in the Senate the Repubs had to defend 10 seats while the Dems had to defend 28 seats and thus a Repub Senate was likely. Now, we hear that the Repubs will be “lucky to gain 4 seats” while Romney will not make ObamaCare a campaign issue. Can anyone explain this drastic change in forecasting?
I downloaded it.
Pages 9 and 10 have the definitions of left-, right-, ideological-, religious-, and single motive- terrorists.
Page 25 synopsizes the areas where an attack is most likely to occur.
Note that it is NOT in the countryside and small-town regions; it is in the high density cities with HIGHER percentages of FOREIGN-born individuals.
I would be worried if I lived in a big city.
I list democrats as robbers and plunderers of America.
In my list ‘religious’ should be ‘separatist’.
“Picture is worth 1000 words”
The map showing which areas had the most attacks is on page 17.
Trying again..... list is: right, left, separatist, religious, single- issue.
Note also that the highest incidences of attacks occurred in the 1970s, while the attacks with the most fatalities were later (probably skewed by 9/11).
Come and get me Copper!!! LOL!
“...Right-wing means Nazi - how could someone who cherishes individual rights be a Right-wing?...”
Nazism wasn’t and isn’t a “right-wing” ideology. That may be what the popular establishment (read that Liberal) wants you to believe.
Nazism - or National Socialist German Worker’s Party - is a left-wing Socialist ideology. Always has been, from it’s inception.
Libs have successfully clouded that for years. They’re lying, as they’ve always done.
Turds go with the flow.