Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Social Security Number challenged
WND ^ | July 5, 2012 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 07/05/2012 9:53:40 AM PDT by Smokeyblue

If Barack Obama has an immediate eligibility problem, it is more likely to derive from the Social Security Number he has been using for the last 25 years than from his birth certificate.

Ohio private investigator Susan Daniels has seen to that. On Monday, July 2, she filed suit in Geauga County (Ohio) Common Pleas Court demanding that Jon Husted, Ohio secretary of state, remove Obama’s name from the ballot until Obama can prove the validity of his Social Security Number.

Daniels, who has vetted thousands of Social Security Numbers for numerous other clients, has done her homework. In her filing, she thoroughly documents her contention “that Barack Obama has repeatedly, consistently, and with intent misrepresented himself by using a fraudulently obtained Social Security Number.”

To acquire appropriate standing in court, Daniels has gone to the trouble of establishing herself as a valid write-in candidate for president. Before she is through, this 70-something mother of seven, who has been a licensed Ohio PI since 1995, may cause Obama more trouble than the Romney campaign.

Daniels started her investigation in August 2009. Given her profession, she has been able to access a variety of proprietary databases. What she learned without much trouble is that Obama has been using a Social Security Number with the prefix “042″ since 1986.

As she discovered, the “042″ number is reserved for the exclusive use of individuals who register in Connecticut. When she ran 10 sequential numbers before and after Obama’s, all returned with the documentation “issued 1977-1979 in CT.”

When Daniels ran the numbers immediately flanking Obama’s, she came to the firm conviction that Obama’s number was issued in March 1977 in Connecticut.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ayers; birthcertificate; certifigate; crime; dnc; fraud; jackcashill; liar; naturalborncitizen; obama; socialsecurity; ssn; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-229 next last
To: Sherman Logan

You put in bold the very reason the given state does NOT have to follow that clause if it chooses not to. The state governor issues an executive order declaring a certain individual invalid and ineligible.

Done. Stroke of the pen, law of the land- kinda cool, huh?

101 posted on 07/05/2012 12:54:17 PM PDT by atc23 (The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation
Obama has also used other SS numbers as in this Michigan state SSN:

Obama Num 364

102 posted on 07/05/2012 12:59:08 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

Thanks for the post about Jean Paul Ludwig.... I had seen this before in 2009.... then it disappeared fro the net.

Great article about Susan Daniels & Obama’s fraudulent use of a CT SS number.

“We The People” are thankful that this has come to the forefront “again”..... This information form 2009 has been tried to be swept under the rug.

Obama Administration put in a change to the way SS numbers are now distributed..... They will be “randomly” administered....

“NOT” by State & County as they had been for 40 + years.......Why?? This is another cover-up!!

Number Has Three Parts

The nine-digit SSN is composed of three parts:

The first set of three digits is called the Area Number
The second set of two digits is called the Group Number
The final set of four digits is the Serial Number

Attention All Users

This will be the FINAL publication of the High Group List.

The implementation of SSN Randomization on June 25, 2011 eliminates the significance of the High Group List, making it ineffective for validating SSNs issued through the new random assignment method. Please visit SSN Randomization for more information regarding this change and other effects on the SSN resulting from Randomization.

103 posted on 07/05/2012 1:05:00 PM PDT by ebysan (ebysan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kabar


I am angered by the fact that this whole administration and everyone throughout this country is protecting or ignoring all these facts that point to fraud!

If a normal person attempted what this man has gotten away with, we’d be in jail faster than you could throw a ball.

104 posted on 07/05/2012 1:06:40 PM PDT by jcsjcm (This country was built on exceptionalism and individualism. In God we Trust - Laus Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...

In 1977, Barack Hussein Obama II was a Permanent Resident Alien (Green card holder) living in Hawaii with his grandmother, Madelyn Dunham. Madelyn Dunham had been appointed Obama’s guardian (foster mother) while he was in the legal custody of Catholic Social Services of Connecticut.

A children’s services case manager working for Catholic Social Services of Connecticut filed on behalf Obama for his SSN in 1977. The number is valid because Permanent Resident Aliens can and do obtain valid SSNs to function and live in America.

Obama’s vulnerability is not whether or not the SSN is valid. Obama’s vulnerability is enumerated in his NUMIDENT file with SSA. The NUMIDENT file is a alpha- numeric sequence identifying the applicant. Specifically, Obama’s PRA Field (Permanent Resident Alien) has a “y” in it to indicate he was a Permanent Resident Alien in 1977.

In 1983, Obama naturalized as an American citizen.

105 posted on 07/05/2012 1:09:48 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee
I'm not against impeachment. I'm against attempts to use the court system to decide who is and is not eligible to be on the ballot, particularly if the challenge to eligibility is based on criminal allegations. And most especially to claims that the Constitution requires this, thereby vastly expanding the power of an already vastly over-powerful judicial branch.

BTW, I think the Clinton case shows that the people will not support impeachment based on what they view as nit-picking. I disagreed with them, but their position, as usual, carried the day.

106 posted on 07/05/2012 1:16:54 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Major Matt Mason

“Look up “Harrison J. Bounell”, an alias of Obama (how many presidents have had an alias, or several in the case of Obama?). The only reason people use phony/stolen SSN#’s is for nefarious purposes.”

Harrison j Bournell has the same SS# as Obama & he also has the same address as Obama ....5046 S GREENWOOD

“Obama House - Tony Rezko

Everyone better download it fast, because they seem to keep disappearing.

Lisa Myers - NBC

Good link !!

Obama Could “Not” afford to buy his Mansion..... He turned to “Corrupt” Rezko

Rezko’s Lawyer Owns Obama’s House
By DemocracyRules

This is another scandal that just keeps growing. When it first became known that Rezko helped Obama buy his house, Obama himself called the deal “boneheaded”.

Now things look much worse, because Rezko ‘s lawyer owns the house. His name is William Miceli, and Obama formerly worked for him.

Assessment Record For COOK County
Owner Information
Standardized Name: MICELI, WILLIAM
Original Address: 14 W ERIE ST
CHICAGO, IL 60610-5397
Standardized Address: 14 W ERIE ST
CHICAGO, IL 60654-5397
Property Information
Original Property Address: 5046 S GREENWOOD
Standardized Property Address: 5046 S GREENWOOD AVE
CHICAGO, IL 60615-2806
Legal Information
Assessor’s Parcel Number: 20-11-115-034
Recording Date: 06/21/2005
SEC 11 TWN 38N RNG 14E; MAP 20-11-NW (C&D)
Sale Information
Recording Date: 06/21/2005
Sale Price: $1,650,000 - FULL AMOUNT
Document Number: 517233010
Assessment Information
Assessment Year: 2006
Assessed Land Value: $14,700
Assessed Improvement Value: $139,681
Total Assessed Value: $154,381
Tax Information
Tax Rate Code: 70001
Tax Amount: $22,162.47
Tax Year: 2006
Property Characteristics
Baths: 6
Partial Baths: 1
Fireplace: 3
Garage Type: DETACHED
Garage Size: 4 Car(s)
Building Area: 6,199 T TOTAL
Air Conditioning: CENTRAL
Construction: MASONRY

Why would Rezko’s lawyer own Obama’s house?

There are several explanations, and none look good. Obama tried to buy the house because Michelle wanted it. “According to My DD: Direct Democracy, in 2004, Barack’s wife, Michelle, was on the board of the Commission of Chicago Landmarks and in this capacity, learned of a designated historical home in Kenwood that was for sale — the home and the adjacent land at 5046 South Greenwood.”

But the sellers were asking more than the market value. They also insisted on selling the adjacent empty lot at the same time. The house and the two lots together made an attractive package, because it became a corner property with a big yard.

The price was too high for Obama, so he went to Rezko for help. Rezko’s plan was to buy the adjacent property on the same day Obama bought the house. Obama would still have to overpay, even for just the house. But once the whole deal was finished, the package would become a reasonably good deal.

Obama (or William Miceli) bought the house, and Rezko’s wife bought the adjoining lot. Then Obama got a strip of the lot from Rezko’s wife for about $100,000. This did two things. It expanded the house lot, which increased the house value. The picture shows a new fence that Obama had built along the new property line. It also made the adjacent lot so narrow, it’s unlikely anyone who bought it could make money building something on it. They might not even be able to get a building permit. So essentially the deal gave Obama a house and the use of two lots.

Michelle had the house she wanted, and the Obama’s had a house that looked “Senatorial”.

But the deal was unethical because Rezko had conferred a benefit by helping Obama obtain something he couldn’t otherwise afford.

And since Rezko’s lawyer actually owns the property, a benefit is still being conferred to Obama all the time he lives there.


(Note below Obama’s Mortgage was “ $903,000 over “ FM/FM Legal Limits)


But wait, there’s more! The mortgaged amount is very high.Obama Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Chicago Home Mortgage $903,000 over Legal Limit It’s so high it violates the ordinary lending rules for Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac, which carries the mortgage. This is probably legal, because the owners set up a complicated land trust arrangement to bypass those rules. But why? And who pays this mortgage? Why would Obama pay a mortgage on a house he doesn’t own? Does he just pay rent, while Rezko’s lawyer pays the mortgage?

But wait, there’s even more! It’s now clear the adjacent lot was overvalued by Rezko’s bank. At the time, an appraiser said it was worth $500,000. But Rezko’s bank unilaterally upped the value to about $650,000. This enabled Rezko’s wife to get a bigger mortgage on the lot.

Bank employee Kenneth J. Conner found out, and complained this was mortgage fraud. Overvaluing a property to get a bigger mortgage is against the law. Conner blew the whistle, but “he was fired”. Now he’s suing the bank.

Conner filed a civil complaint in October with the Illinois Circuit Court in Cook County alleging he was fired by Mutual Bank of Harvey, Ill., because he objected to land appraisals submitted on behalf of the Rezkos and the Obamas, with the complicity of the bank.

After he was fired, Conner told World Net Daily that the bank and the Rezkos were engaged in “fraud, bribes or kickbacks, use whatever term you want,” to benefit the Obamas.

But wait there’s even more! Rezko borrowed money for the deal from his friend and backer “Nadhmi Auchi”, a British billionaire from Iraq who was mixed up in the oil-for food scandal. Auchi has a very complicated past, and he’s very litigous about any mention of his name.

Does Nadhmi Auchi effectively own or control the house Obama lives in?

107 posted on 07/05/2012 1:19:34 PM PDT by ebysan (ebysan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer
Catholic Social Services of Connecticut filed on behalf Obama for his SSN in 1977.

This theory, passed off as fact, comes up here at FR whenever the subject of Obummers eligibility comes up in respect to his fraudulent SS#. Nothing ever is provided to substantiate this theory ... it simply is stated as fact. Where's the proof?

108 posted on 07/05/2012 1:20:56 PM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

In 1983, Obama naturalized as an American citizen.

A red herring...the SSN Obama is currently using was originally issued to a person who was born in 1890. SSN’s cannot be re-issued.

109 posted on 07/05/2012 1:22:30 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

I’ve finally learned (from this thread no less!) that there is no mention of Social Security Numbers in the U.S. Constitution. Thank you too much!

110 posted on 07/05/2012 1:24:10 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
Read the Constitution.

Article. II. Section. 4.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

111 posted on 07/05/2012 1:24:21 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: kabar

“Snopes has pretty much demolished the Ludwig story”

The CA Couple who started Snopes is supported by George Soros

They are in the Tank for Obama.... Don’t Believe them !!

112 posted on 07/05/2012 1:24:47 PM PDT by ebysan (ebysan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ebysan

Check out the SS website link and check for yourself.

113 posted on 07/05/2012 1:34:26 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: ebysan

Nice read. Thanks! I can’t wait for the definitive book to hit the shelves - sometime in about one year from now.

114 posted on 07/05/2012 1:38:16 PM PDT by atc23 (The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue


The Ludwig story may or may not be correct but Snopes consists of two people (a married couple) sitting in an apartment somewhere giving out their personal opinions as fact.

That you quote them as some objective-reliable source just tells me you are a moron.”

Good comment!!

George Soros Supports Snopes & they are in the tank for Obama... I don’t use them at all anymore!!

I too posted same article last night.

Skip to comments.

World Net Daily ^ | 7/4/2012 | Jack Cashill
Posted on July 4, 2012 7:51:52 PM PDT by ebysan

click here to read article

92 comments;page=1

115 posted on 07/05/2012 1:55:10 PM PDT by ebysan (ebysan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
I'm 100% sure that was not the intend of the founding fathers.

Really? I don't believe that any of them were still living when Congress, who they gave the power to in our U.S. Constitution, passed the Social Security Act.
116 posted on 07/05/2012 1:59:19 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: dps.inspect

The Republicans (if they have an brains, principles or spine) need to go Krav Maga.

117 posted on 07/05/2012 1:59:54 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
BTW, I think the Clinton case shows that the people will not support impeachment based on what they view as nit-picking. I disagreed with them, but their position, as usual, carried the day.

I that even the sheep will recognize the difference between lying about an affair (albeit to federal officials) and living a lie based on ID theft that anybody else in the world would go to jail for.

He's lying about a federal crime, not lying about an affair that led him to an impeachable coverup. It really is different.

118 posted on 07/05/2012 2:01:43 PM PDT by Sirius Lee (Goode over evil. Voting for mitt or obie is like throwing your country away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan; ClearCase_guy

Federal employees can’t be hired if they have bogus SS numbers.

Geeze louise, get a grip.

119 posted on 07/05/2012 2:01:54 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan; LyinLibs

We’ve had four years now, and AFAIK not one of the 50 states has made proof of eligibility a prerequisite for being on its presidential ballot. All we needed was one state, and we couldn’t come up with that.

Not sure who you mean by “we”. Many excellent legal arguments were made, but the judges were all idiots/traitors/cowards.

Please note my point above about fed employees being unhire-able with a bogus SS number. Simple. He’s a fed employee, has boguss SS number, he should be fired.

120 posted on 07/05/2012 2:05:48 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-229 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson