Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are We Being Too Hard On John Roberts?
CE.com ^ | July 5th, 2012 | Ken Connor

Posted on 07/05/2012 7:14:59 PM PDT by Salvation

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-176 next last
To: Salvation
This guy is full of horse manure. Roberts sided WITH the socialists who have absolutely no use for the Constitution, and AGAINST Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Kennedy. All the creative spin in the world can't redeem what that traitorous coward Roberts did. Roberts, and this author Connor, can KMA.


61 posted on 07/05/2012 7:46:47 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

If I had my way I would drag him out of there kicking and screaming and would make it so if he came within a mile of a courthouse he would be arrested.

This clown has no idea WTF he is doing.

He has no idea what his job is.

His job is not to redefine what the Democrats did, but to determine if it was Constitutioonal the way it was written.
Obviously it is not or he would not have had to redefine it.


62 posted on 07/05/2012 7:46:57 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Roberts has been compromised badly in my opinion and will be laudhed at for 200 years. He is now and will be a total joke.


63 posted on 07/05/2012 7:47:06 PM PDT by marygonzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Its quite simple; the same majority that will repeal ObamaCare in January 2013 will vote to impeach John Roberts in February 2013.

the last and only Justice to have been impeached appears to have been in 1805..

Samuel Chase (April 17, 1741 – June 19, 1811) was an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court and earlier was a signatory to the United States Declaration of Independence as a representative of Maryland. Early in life, Chase was a “firebrand” states-righter and revolutionary.[2] His political views changed over his lifetime and in the last decades of his career he became well known as a staunch Federalist, and was impeached for allegedly letting his partisan leanings affect his court decisions. Chase was acquitted by the Senate.

All of this is an attempt by those “invested” in his “leadership” to avoid having their investment flushed.

Perhaps an American can be found to fill his seat.


64 posted on 07/05/2012 7:47:21 PM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Nothing to see here, people. Move along...


65 posted on 07/05/2012 7:47:21 PM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Sounds like he has been reading some of the posts on FR.
Sounds like he's seeing the lack of thoughtful analysis on FR.
66 posted on 07/05/2012 7:47:52 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

” - - - the prerogative to make policy judgments.”

Traitor John changed his mind after ONLY two public tongue-lashings from Dictator “You Lie” Obama. Traitor John is a true Profile in Cowardice.


67 posted on 07/05/2012 7:49:06 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Are We Being Too Hard On John Roberts?

Nope.

Next stupid question?

68 posted on 07/05/2012 7:50:27 PM PDT by Washi (Surviving the Zombie Apocalypse, one head-shot at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marygonzo
He is now and will be a total joke.

As is the globalist treasonous twit who appointed him.

69 posted on 07/05/2012 7:51:26 PM PDT by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
It doesn't take much thinking to realize that Roberts was looking to his inner wannabe John Marshall and tried to slice the baby into a number of pieces.

Truly a Solomoronic ruling as the legislation under consideration had no severability provision, on purpose (it was in there before it wasn't).

70 posted on 07/05/2012 7:52:45 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I didn’t read the article, but was wondering what the heck does a ‘center for a just society’ mean and what does it do.

Mega suspicion rises every time I hear some one calling for ‘a just society’.


71 posted on 07/05/2012 7:53:34 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Who cares about the constitution, I am now liked by liberals and it is soooooooo goooooooooood.


72 posted on 07/05/2012 7:54:47 PM PDT by HerrBlucher ("The cross opens its arms to the four winds; it is a signpost for free travelers." GK Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Not al all, Ken. Roberts was stupid.

The intent of the law was for it to not be a tax. That was argued in the House, in the Senate, and by the President.

The word ‘Tax” is not used in the law.

Roberts re-wrote the law. And opened a GIGANTIC pandora’s box of taxing possibilities.

Stupidest decision since Roe v Wade.


73 posted on 07/05/2012 7:55:26 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; All

“And before we go further, let’s make one thing clear. In ascending to the Supreme Court, John Roberts did not take an oath to advance the cause of conservatism or the agenda of the Republican Party. He did not agree to become a judicial activist for the Right. He took an oath to uphold the Constitution. The role of the Court is to interpret the Constitution, and in the Obamacare decision, he has made a good faith, well-reasoned, carefully considered attempt to do just that.”

This is utter stupidity. There is no such thing judicial activism on the Right. Last time I checked, it’s us on the Right who demand that the Constitution be upheld. That’s not activism, that’s what Supreme Court Justices swear an oath to do. Not a difficult concept, to say the least.

And another thing, since when is rewriting a bill so the square peg fits in the round hole making a decision that’s “well-reasoned” and in “good faith” ?


74 posted on 07/05/2012 7:56:35 PM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (The Doomsday Clock is at 11:59:00......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Roberts is a RINO, a Republican liberal. As such, he has no reason to feel any shame and none of us has any reason to feel any shock or surprise.

If you read his most important opinions, the opinions people think are “conservative” are simply opinions he thought at the time would help the Republican Party (e.g., Citizens United).

Roberts is a Republican. He is also a liberal. He is a RINO. He is not a conservative. If anyone thought he was a conservative, the veil has now been lifted.


75 posted on 07/05/2012 7:58:03 PM PDT by Tau Food (Tom Hoefling for President - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

The founding principle of this nation is the “right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”. Roberts has just subjected that right to taxation: you exist, so pay up several thousand dollars annually (with limited exemptions at the whim of Congress) or forfeit that right.

About on par with Germany’s “Enabling Acts of 1933”. That’s...about as bad as it gets.


76 posted on 07/05/2012 7:58:22 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Bookmarked for later reading.

Thanks!


77 posted on 07/05/2012 7:58:40 PM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (The Doomsday Clock is at 11:59:00......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands

Moon Pie Face must equal Twisted Logic and Obvious Dain Bramage.


78 posted on 07/05/2012 7:58:40 PM PDT by ponygirl (Be Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher
Impeach Roberts


79 posted on 07/05/2012 8:00:34 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ponygirl; DainBramage

Ping


80 posted on 07/05/2012 8:01:49 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson