Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Posting the address of TruBlueRinos.com for those FReepers who can no longer stomach FR

Posted on 07/10/2012 2:39:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

Received yet another FReepmail message regarding the underground campaign to get disgruntled freepers to move on over to the latest anti-freeper site.

I'll save them the trouble of having their moles to do their underhanded dirty work underground.

If you're totally fed up with me and my absolute refusal to support the GOP-e's outright plunge into supporting the progressive/statist agenda and no longer wish to resist tyranny, please by all means go join the RINO squishes over on TrueBlueRINOS.com ( actual address: http://www.trueblueliberty.com ).

But when you join them, please do us all favor and don't come back. It'll save us all a bunch of grief.

Thanks for the memories. It was fun working with you when we all agreed on our pro-God, pro-Life, pro-family, pro-small government, pro-liberty causes.

By the way, those caught continuing their underground campaigns against FR will be zot on sight.

Like this guy:

-------------------------------------------------------

From Pasadena2k | 07/10/2012 1:22:46 PM PDT new

try a site at which it’s OK to discuss alternatives to Obama at least for a short period during this presidential elction season.

Many of us ( over 550 in the last two months ) spend some of our time at trueblueliberty.com

-------------------------------------------------------

Goodbye, Pasadena, we hardly knew ye.

No one appreciates moles. Filthy animals.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Free Republic; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antifreepers; backstabbers; bluebloodrepublicans; establishment; filthyanimals; freespeech; gope; ib4tz; moles; poachers; rinosrus; trolls; truebluerinos; zot; zots4romneybots; zzot; zzzot; zzzzot; zzzzzot; zzzzzzot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 801-844 next last
To: onyx

New tag line bump


51 posted on 07/10/2012 3:14:14 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (I ate at The Olive Garden last night. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Well said Sir .


52 posted on 07/10/2012 3:14:49 PM PDT by Nebr FAL owner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers; Patriots; Jim Robinson; BuckeyeTexan; RedMDer; trisham; TheOldLady; STARWISE; Lady Jag; ..

WE ARE FREE REPUBLIC!

We're God and Country first!

WE VOTE TEA PARTY CONSERVATIVE!!


We are legion, and we are in your face!!

WE ARE HERE TO STAY!



The Place for Conservatives
PLEASE DONATE, & DONATE MONTHLY, IF YOU POSSIBLY CAN!


53 posted on 07/10/2012 3:15:19 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY- IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Thanks Jim. As long as the lights stay on and the door isn’t padlocked, I’m staying right here.


54 posted on 07/10/2012 3:17:07 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Woo hoo!! Great post!!


55 posted on 07/10/2012 3:17:46 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
LOLOLOLOL


56 posted on 07/10/2012 3:18:48 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY- IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
LOLOLOLOL


57 posted on 07/10/2012 3:18:48 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY- IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
AMERICA NEEDS A CONSERVATIVE LEADER.

TODAY, ANY SPECIES WILL DO.


58 posted on 07/10/2012 3:19:06 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Let the puritans eat cake.

Photobucket
59 posted on 07/10/2012 3:20:24 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

I have the same view as I did for the 2008 election; I don’t want to vote for Romney but I will anyway because I need a job, and they’re extremely hard to come by with Obama in office. The sooner Obama is out, the better off we’ll all be. Should he succeed in being reelected, who’s to say we’re going to have any more elections in this country?


60 posted on 07/10/2012 3:20:43 PM PDT by wastedyears ("God? I didn't know he was signed onto the system.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
It's not me, either.

Heck, I almost used "r0nin" when I first decided to sign up... only to find out someone (you) already had the name "Ronin" and I figured mine would be too close to yours (and "disrespectful" from a new poster). I'd used that handle for years on BBSs.

I've considered changing my handle several times... but there's something about a 1998 sign-on date that is just too compelling to throw away... I'm not sure there are many other things that have stayed in my life for 14 years...

61 posted on 07/10/2012 3:21:33 PM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwaet! Lar bith maest hord, sothlice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

If I ever choose to leave FR, it’s pretty much certainly not going to be to go over to any of the anti-Freeper sites. Because f I ever decide FR has exceeded my limits for bats**t crazy, I’m not going to trade one form of bats**t crazy for another.

:-D )))


62 posted on 07/10/2012 3:22:11 PM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Look at it this way, if Obama loses, we’ll get at least to enjoy seeing the liberals cry tears of unfathomable sadness, so at least it’s worth it, if for nothing else.


63 posted on 07/10/2012 3:22:16 PM PDT by dfwgator (FUJR (not you, Jim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SayNoToDems

64 posted on 07/10/2012 3:22:56 PM PDT by tumblindice (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I’ve discussed Romney, but never bashed a freeper to do it.

You really do have a nice site.

You seem relatively patient.

It’s the best place to come to see conservative news items aggregated and the community is incredibly well-informed about things. I often enjoy simply reading the comment threads to get fellow posters’ take on things I’m not as well-informed about.

I’ve had some heated discussions here, but some people just get their noses out of joint and seek drama, I guess.

It’s not worth trying drag everyone into it.


65 posted on 07/10/2012 3:23:54 PM PDT by Winstons Julia (Hello OWS? We don't need a revolution like China's; China needs a revolution like OURS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

Well at least so far they haven’t gone LGF Bats—t crazy. I mean they went over to the dark side via the express lane.


66 posted on 07/10/2012 3:24:12 PM PDT by dfwgator (FUJR (not you, Jim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior

I agree w/ your post 100%!


67 posted on 07/10/2012 3:25:19 PM PDT by leaning conservative (snow coming, school cancelled, yayyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: BuckeyeTexan

LOLOLOL!


69 posted on 07/10/2012 3:25:31 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93destr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Speaking about those memorable moments, here Mitt paints a picture of perfect happy Michigan trees.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
70 posted on 07/10/2012 3:25:31 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Well Jim Thompson, there you go again!


71 posted on 07/10/2012 3:25:42 PM PDT by jaz.357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; FReepers

Your words make it easy-peasy. My love, prayers and gratitude always.

God bless you and our wonderful, fabulous, awesome patriot FReepers and everyone’s precious families.

May God keep us all and help us save our Republic. I have faith He will.

Please everybody, keep praying for a miracle in Tampa!


72 posted on 07/10/2012 3:26:08 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY- IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I really don’t get why you are talking about that other site so much these days.

Yes, it sounds like some folks over there have it in for you, but so what?

Free Republic has accomplished what it has by being recognized by its users as a good place to read and post.

So long as that continues to be true, then whatever is said on some other site really doesn’t matter.


73 posted on 07/10/2012 3:26:41 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I wrote this elsewhere. You might as well see it: "My take on Jim's Romney view for example: If EVERY person rolls over on UberRINO Romney, then the GOP-e has no motivation to change the presentation of increasingly leftwing Republicans. So, yes, Romney will run, and probably defeat Obama, but it is comforting to see ONE tea-party-type not cave. It won't matter if Robinson does or does not endorse Romney -- he's not that powerful -- but isn't it refreshing to se ONE person not cave to the GOP-e?"

It's how I feel. It won't matter who who do or don't endorse. You just aren't that powerful; neither am I. However, I admire your stick-to-it-ivness.

Look, some people who won't like Romney will still vote for him. I get that. I get that he's the lessor of two evils, and by a longshot. However, all indications of his former governing indicate it's not a choice for good, just one of the lessor-of-two-evils. Still, I don't begrudge a man or woman for making that choice.

I've often said that, to all appearances, a vote for Romney is a vote for pancreatic cancer, and a vote for Obama is a vote for a bullet to the temple for America. Some people, given that choice, choose to vote for the cancer, because then they can at least get their affairs in order, and tell the people they love that they do.

I am lucky, I don't have that Hobson's Choice. I live in a state that will go Romney no matter what I vote. Ok, so I get to vote my conscious.

But that is a luxury. Others are not so lucky. They will likely have to vote for pancreatic cancer. I don't fault them for that.

Still, it is refreshing that at least ONE MAN is sticking to his conservative guns. I cannot fault you for that, just as I cannot fault those who vote Romney. In fact, I think I admire you for that.

No bulls**t there. It's how I feel.

74 posted on 07/10/2012 3:26:50 PM PDT by Lazamataz (I'm watching 'The Walking Dead' and rootin' for the zombies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin; Jim Robinson

I’m not going to bother going to that site, but if anybody on there is posting as ‘wastedyears’, or saying it’s me under a different name, like another Iron Maiden song, it is most certainly not me. I’ve put years and over 25,000 posts into Free Republic, and the only time I’m going to stop is when either the internet shuts down, or I die.

FReeper to the end of time.


75 posted on 07/10/2012 3:27:29 PM PDT by wastedyears ("God? I didn't know he was signed onto the system.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thanks for posting this, Jim.

To this day, I can't understand why some who post here refuse to understand your clear and unambiguous mission statement, and insist upon trying to turn FR into an 'open minded' place where views that conflict with your plainly stated aims, are tolerated.

76 posted on 07/10/2012 3:27:34 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Interestingly TBL are constantly saying how courteous and sane they are, while trashing FR and naming names of people here.
They have said that you JR have trumped Limbaugh and Palin as being pro-homosexual and abortion - huh?
They are comparing Christianity to that storm place.
They are saying JR that you and the rest of us are democrat operatives and trying to bring down the US.
Then they add how conservative and polite they are.
Keep up the good work Jim.
Next month I may just increase my monthlies.


77 posted on 07/10/2012 3:28:14 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; onyx; TheOldLady; DJ MacWoW; trisham; musicman; The Cajun; JoeProBono; Lady Jag; ...
Click!

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_090711/content/01125111.guest.html
With Freedom Under Assault, We're Told We Must Moderate?
Moderation is not a substantive belief. This is my problem with moderates. There isn't a core there! Moderation is a tactic. It's not a set of principles. It is a tactic that says, "Regardless of the situation, regardless of events, my first impulse is to find a different way around." I know moderation, per se, is illogical because there are clearly times when it is self-destructive or counterproductive. For instance, moderation after we were attacked at Pearl Harbor would have been irrational. Moderation against slavery would have been immoral. How do you debate the issue of moderation if it has no core? You wind up debating tactics, but tactics without principle are pointless -- and this has always been my problem with moderates. ...

Particularly in the face of the most radical and destructive administration in modern American history, where the president has said he wants to fundamentally transform the nation, what does moderation look like? Where am I supposed to moderate? What am I supposed to moderate? Are all these Republican candidates tonight at the debate be asking themselves, "Who's willing to go further in compromising with the Democrats?" To show what? To accomplish what? Isn't the purpose of this debate tonight for one of these people to stand head and shoulders above everybody else in demonstrating he or she is the one who can beat Obama?
Republican moderates are guaranteed losers in eight out of ten elections you're gonna have. Now, I think that people who write pieces about "moderation" need to do a little bit more than just sit back and be critical. We need to know what it is these moderates think is worth fighting for. Is it just winning elections with whoever can win so that the result may not even be productive? These moderates need to tell us what are the principles that they believe that an individual or a nation should stand firm on, because, so far, moderates don't do that. That's why they are moderates! They don't want to be tied down. They want to be able to preach moderation because it gets them praise.

78 posted on 07/10/2012 3:28:35 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93destr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Squantos; Southack

Please see my above. I think you won’t disagree.


79 posted on 07/10/2012 3:28:56 PM PDT by Lazamataz (I'm watching 'The Walking Dead' and rootin' for the zombies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I have reluctantly decided to vote for Romney, but I won’t begrudge anyone who decides to vote their conscience....I wanted to, but I just cannot do it, Obama sickens me too much.

Get Obama out, then we’ll cross that bridge and deal with Romney. At least it gives us a sliver of hope.


80 posted on 07/10/2012 3:30:06 PM PDT by dfwgator (FUJR (not you, Jim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

My family were Puritans and they did like cake.


81 posted on 07/10/2012 3:31:54 PM PDT by Little Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
From Pasadena2k | 07/10/2012 1:22:46 PM PDT new

try a site at which it’s OK to discuss alternatives to Obama at least for a short period during this presidential elction season.

Many of us ( over 550 in the last two months ) spend some of our time at trueblueliberty.com

---------------------------------------------------

The site has threads as far back as Sept 2011.... I have a feeling his numbers may be off.

82 posted on 07/10/2012 3:32:20 PM PDT by icwhatudo (This is not a choice between Romney&Reagan-Its between Romney & most radical leftist Pres in history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
have reluctantly decided to vote for Romney, but I won’t begrudge anyone who decides to vote their conscience....

There ya go. That's the sort of give and take FR can do, on the individual level.

I'm lucky I don't need to make that choice. I understand if you need to make yours....

83 posted on 07/10/2012 3:33:44 PM PDT by Lazamataz (I'm watching 'The Walking Dead' and rootin' for the zombies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer
B T T T ! ! ! ©

84 posted on 07/10/2012 3:36:20 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY- IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

ROTFL!!! OMG! Bwahahaha!


85 posted on 07/10/2012 3:37:39 PM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer
Rush Goes On the Record with Fox News Channel's Greta Van Susteren

VAN SUSTEREN: Why has Governor Mitt Romney not had a so-called "surge"? We hear "surge" used with basically every Republican nominee, but you don't see that "surge" with Governor Romney.

RUSH: Well, every poll I've seen of Republican primary voters, he can't crack 30 percent. It has been curious. And you look at it from the reverse, 70 percent of Republican voters want somebody else. This is why we have the phenomenon of the "Not-Romney." Bachmann was the "Not-Romney" for a while. Herman Cain was the "Not-Romney." Now Newt is the "Not-Romney." I think it boils down to something that's not complicated at all. Republican primary voters are conservative. They don't believe that Romney is. They believe that he will stick a finger in the air and moisten it and see which way the winds are blowing and try to get in that direction. They remember that Romney said he believes in global warming and he believes that man is causing it. Well, conservatives don't believe that. They believe it's a hoax. Conservatives know that the whole story of man-made global warming is a hoax. And they're not going to get excited by a candidate who is trying to gain favor with non-Republican primary voters by articulating that stuff.

Here's the big problem, Greta, for the Republicans. And I am a lone wolf on this. The rule of thumb in elections, both parties, 40 percent are going to vote Democrat automatically, whatever you do, 40 percent are going to vote Republican, automatic, no matter what you do. And in the middle, who do we have? The precious, God love them, independents and the moderates. And they are the targets. They are the focus of every election. And our brilliant campaign consultants tell our candidates they are the ones that know how to go get a majority of those independents. And we have, as Republicans, put ourselves in prison to this whole silly notion that you only win elections by moving to the center and getting great independents. Fine and dandy, but if you squander your base in the process, you haven't a prayer.

The Republican Party is trying to do something in this primary that is unprecedented. They're trying to split the conservative vote and win the primary with a moderate, with Romney. It's the other way around. You consolidate your base and then you move to the center in the general. The Republican establishment has decided they don't want any part of conservatism. And this is really not new. People are surprised to hear this, but the Republican Party formative event with conservatism is Goldwater's landslide defeat. That's what they think of when they think conservative. They don't think Reagan. They think Goldwater.

They believe what the inside-the-Beltway philosophy is about conservatives. They're racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe, Southern hayseed hicks. They're pro-lifers. They're embarrassing to have to go to the convention with them. And they're just embarrassed to have those kind of people in the party. They're dumb. They're not erudite. They're not educated in Ivy League schools. We'll take their votes on election day, but we really don't want to hang around with them. We don't want anybody in Washington thinking that we're really that close to them and aligned with them. So in the process -- you know, it's a very sophisticated electorate. The Republican primary voter can sense that the Republican Party really doesn't like them, really doesn't want them, thinks that they are the route to defeat. That's the problem in a nutshell. The Republican establishment thinks that a conservative nominee is the route to defeat because they think Goldwater landslides are going to happen because they believe what the popular misconception the left has created of conservatives.

86 posted on 07/10/2012 3:37:54 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Thank you, Sir.

IMHO, it’s time to call off the truce with the Romneybots, too. They’re willing to vote for a gun-grabbing, homo-marriage backer who created a socialist health-care system and made abortion available for fifty bucks.

They can all KMA.


87 posted on 07/10/2012 3:39:33 PM PDT by APatientMan (Pick a side)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Just cut out the leftover Clown Possee stuff and you’ll be OK.


88 posted on 07/10/2012 3:40:00 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
Look, the antifreepers have an underground mole campaign going on. Might as well shine the light of day on it. Moles are filthy, nasty, destructive pests and need to be exterminated before they destroy your property (or liberty). Don't look now, yam, but your front teeth are growing.

Moles/trolls are zot on sight.

Your current efforts are much better suited elsewhere.

89 posted on 07/10/2012 3:40:43 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; JesusBmyGod; buffyt; rom; persistence48; Hanna548; DvdMom; leftyontheright; ...

There is but one place on the WWW that conservatives can know is and always will be conservative. That would be FR.

I could not imagine, a world where I did not come to FR at least once a day to see what is going on in the world.

When that day comes for me, it will be because I am no longer a member of the human race.

I will instead have finally gone home to my Lord to take up residence in the home Christ has prepared ahead of time for me.


90 posted on 07/10/2012 3:44:11 PM PDT by OneVike (I'm just a Christian waiting to go home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; onyx
Freepers on this site have educated me beyond belief and helped me through my sons' deployments.

The thought of going to some amature, cry-baby site sickens me.

I never stab my FRiends in the back!

I'm stayin' right here!

91 posted on 07/10/2012 3:45:42 PM PDT by MountainDad (Support your local Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
WOO-HOO!
BTTT!

92 posted on 07/10/2012 3:46:41 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93destr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer
"Republican moderates are guaranteed losers in eight out of ten elections you're gonna have."
~ Rush Limbaugh

So why did Rush expend so much CO² pimping the Romney vote today?

93 posted on 07/10/2012 3:46:54 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I looked at it recently (you had a Quix thread going), when "Cyber Liberty" gave me google hits there. Funny, I can't view the pages popped up by Google...I don't have access. Well, I don't think I'll be going through whatever it takes to get access..LOL!
94 posted on 07/10/2012 3:47:44 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“People are surprised to hear this, but the Republican Party formative event with conservatism is Goldwater’s landslide defeat. That’s what they think of when they think conservative. They don’t think Reagan. They think Goldwater.”

The Republican Party’s landslide defeat with Rino-ism came in 1948...Dewey was that candidate. Truman would have been beatable with a good, conservative Republican candidate who knew how to campaign effectively, and not just sit back and believe the pollsters who were telling Dewey he had it in the bag. Even Dewey could have won if he had been a good campaigner.

Let’s not let 2012 be a repeat of 1948! The stakes are much higher today...and btw, by today’s standards, Truman would not be a bad candidate for the Republicans now...or maybe JFK...likely somewhat less to the left than is Romney.


95 posted on 07/10/2012 3:48:19 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

I’m voting for Romeny because of Obamacare...that I believe will be the death of me someday. Don’t see what choice we have if we want to get rid of the monster.

Yeah, he isn’t perfect and I’d do anything to vote for Sarah...but that isn’t reality - at least for now.


96 posted on 07/10/2012 3:50:32 PM PDT by Aria ( 2008 wasn't an election - it was a coup d'etat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea
“People are surprised to hear this, but the Republican Party formative event with conservatism is Goldwater’s landslide defeat

I wonder if not for JFK's assassination how that election would have gone....at the time of his death, JFK wasn't exactly lighting up the polls.

97 posted on 07/10/2012 3:50:54 PM PDT by dfwgator (FUJR (not you, Jim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

I’m not voting for Romney.

Period.


98 posted on 07/10/2012 3:52:00 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

It shows how childish or attention seeking some people are when they complain about a site and yet can’t just leave unless they make a statement.

Keep up the good work Jim and thanks for providing a place for us conservatives to come to.


99 posted on 07/10/2012 3:52:21 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

LOL!


100 posted on 07/10/2012 3:52:38 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 801-844 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson