Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vote for Romney is a vote for Communism and baby-killing

Posted on 07/16/2012 12:57:11 PM PDT by JimWayne

No matter who wins the election in November, a Communist will occupy the White House. However, a Romney win has an added disadvantage. It will strengthen the Communist grip over the GOP.

Right now, there is a struggle between the Tea Party and the Trotskyite neocons for the control of the GOP. If Romney is defeated, it will give a boost to the Tea Party. If he wins, it could be over for the Tea Party.

The RINO GOP establishment has opposed every Tea Party candidate and has ganged up with the Democrats whenever it seemed like a Tea Party candidate would win. It started with NY-23 and then they opposed the TP candidates in other states. In AK, when the establishment candidate lost the primaries, they ran her as an independent, but they now expect us to unite and support a Comiecare pioneer.

It is time for payback and at least save the GOP and vote against every RINO. Four more years of Obama cannot be worse than four years of Mittens, and with good candidates in the House and Senate, Obama's agenda can be blunted, but Mittens winning and strengthening the RINO grip on GOP will put America in an extremely dangerous situation.

A request to Mitt Romney supporters. Stop posting your propaganda here. Don't you get it? Mitt Romney is unwanted here.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: communism; hogwash; laughablethread; romney; vanity; whenmittbotsattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-284 last
To: Randy Larsen; Jim Robinson
Not one post that I’ve ever read has tried to change your mind about Romney! On the other hand, you have tried to use your influence to force others to change theirs under threat of and including banishment from the one forum we thought we all could trust!

Actually, that's not the case. There are hundreds of Romney supporters posting all the time all over Free Republic.

I'm not a Romney supporter, and when I post anything negative toward Romney I'm answered almost immediately by those telling me that I'm some kind of Obama supporter because I don't support Romney.

These people do not get banned. They don't even get confronted. The only time there is a confrontation is when they get belligerant. That's as it always has been here on FR.

Here's what I think, Randy, and you can take it or leave it. I think the Romney supporters want FR to be unified behind Romney rather than split. I think it totally bothers them that others have not gotten on board with him. As they debate their points, I think they have trouble dealing with someone who simply refuses to see it their way.

You check out FR on Tuesday. Watch the number of pro-Romney threads that are posted unmolested, totally free.

There is a truce. JR isn't punishing those who go about their business as usual. Those who get smacked are those who attack this site or fellow freepers in clearly demeaning ways.

But, the truth is, that's as it always has been.

I won't support Romney. It's that simple. Don't worry about it. Live and let live. Feel free to disagree with me, but I'm voting for Goode, Constitution Party, who is the only conservative in the race.

As JR has pointed out, we all win if we vote conservative up and down the ticket. No one should stay home come election day.

251 posted on 07/17/2012 12:35:28 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Finny

Wow .. so you read a book and now you want to lecture people here . You think the Republic will be restored just like that when it took over a century to get here ? Do as you please while I vote for Romney .
When was the last time you voted in a Federal election for someone ? How about just staying home this time around with your statist posture chest thumping my way or the highway . That works .
Demonizing you speak of ? Been here to long for you to mention that sort of thing . You and your type love to try slapping people around here so spare me .


252 posted on 07/17/2012 1:07:12 AM PDT by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Finny
There's only one way to vote for Obama, and that's to mark his name on the ballot.

The truth always bears repeating.

253 posted on 07/17/2012 1:10:04 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Yes it does need repeating . Pick your 1% er , dont vote , vote for the Marxist or Socialist lite . Maybe stay home ? Do as you please . I’ll be voting for Romney .


254 posted on 07/17/2012 1:24:46 AM PDT by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Ben Bolt
I’ll be voting for Romney .

Unlike the angry, self-righteous scolds of Mittens' online Sister-Wife Squadron, I don't consider it my business who you do (or do not) vote for, come November.

The ultimate dispensation of my own vote, however, has demonstrably lead to my currently living, rent free, inside of their heads.

One might wish for marginally less cramped quarters, certainly; and in an appreciably better neighborhood. ;)

255 posted on 07/17/2012 1:48:35 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Yeah .. it’s alway’s good to achieve an upgrade . Just consider your neighbors .


256 posted on 07/17/2012 3:02:27 AM PDT by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: INVAR
And what if the GOP-e and the weak “opponent” were actually on the same side in all of this?

It's a compelling argument but one that has gaps.

I see Obama being driven to socialism by belief in such. I see the GOP-E driven to such by fear of standing up to the populace and possibly losing their own perks and power because of such.

However, they also have different governing principles - the GOP-E will not actively seek to sandbag the economy the way Obama and the Dems do. And I think that is the difference those willing to vote for Romney see - that Obama is killing the economy and Romney would give it a respite. But would that respite come at the cost of entrenching the GOP-E to the point where much more serious and needed reforms in government would become much more difficult if not impossible?

That is the economic impass here. It doesn't even begin to touch on the social impact that having a choice between these two cretins represents.

257 posted on 07/17/2012 3:03:32 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Ben Bolt
Just consider your neighbors .

Willing supporters of a pro-abortion, pro-amnesty, anti-gun Massachusetts liberal? Pffftt. Let them look after themselves.

258 posted on 07/17/2012 3:06:39 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

I’ll say it loud and I’ll say it proud: ABO!!!


259 posted on 07/17/2012 3:29:48 AM PDT by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Finny
You'll explain to your children why you voted for the Repubican president who enacted, with the support of Democrats, laws to force adoption agencies to cooperate with homosexual couples "who love each other" and want to adopt "children of their own," and who ensured that when your kids join the military, they will be forced to accommodate (in fact, punished if they express any dislike for) open homosexuality in their living spaces and chain of command.

You'll explain to your children why you voted for the Republican president who brought on nationalized health care that even "against his own wishes" (ha ha) included tax-payer funded on-demand abortion for anyone 18 or older.

You'll explain to your children why you voted for the Republican who expanded global warming regulations so extensively that America surrendered its sovereignty with regard to energy and food production and consumption to the UN because, as Romney said in his CPAC speech of '08, "Any carbon plan has to be world-wide in scope -- let's have a world-wide solution, not an American one."

You won't have to explain to your children that you helped Obama destroy their country -- you'll have to explain that you lacked the courage to stand and fight government tyranny because Obama scared you too much, so you helped Romney destroy their country instead.

I'll be voting to deny a mandate to either Romney or Obama; I'll be voting to help conservatives fight either one that wins. YOU will be voting for government tyranny and in so doing, risk a landslide victory "popular mandate" for a guy you despise, a guy who would hinder all those conservatives you'll presumably be voting for down-ticket, and a guy who would enslave your children to government tyranny advanced by the Republican party.

Well said!

260 posted on 07/17/2012 5:31:09 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2898271/posts?page=119#119)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

Every one ought to read “The Road to Serfdom” by Friedrich A. Hayck.....very eye opening. And the Federalist Papers.

Even those with out a HS education can understand what is written in both.


261 posted on 07/17/2012 5:41:29 AM PDT by GailA (IF U donI 't/won't keep your promises to the Military, U won't keep them to the public)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: xzins

“As JR has pointed out, we all win if we vote conservative up and down the ticket.”

It’s a good bet that all those “conservatives up and down the ticket” are now supporting Romney. To follow your line of thinking, that would make them unprincipled, perhaps even RINOS. Would not you and the other ABR folks here who vote for these people make you all unprincipled too? If you folks want to remain true to yourselves, you can only vote for candidates who denounce Romney. Please tell me where I’m wrong.


262 posted on 07/17/2012 6:51:39 AM PDT by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

I do . I came here alone and I’ll leave as such . No big deal to me . Another time then .


263 posted on 07/17/2012 7:28:45 AM PDT by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus

I haven’t rejected you. I just think you are wrong.

I am a committed, dedicated social conservative, RM. There’s no way I could vote for a guy who just a FEW WEEKS AGO came out in favor of gay couples. And then he added to it that gay couples should be allowed to adopt children.

I’m not talking ancient history here. It was just recently. I could look it up for you if you missed it.

I would be violating my religious faith to support that.


264 posted on 07/17/2012 7:29:26 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus
If you folks want to remain true to yourselves, you can only vote for candidates who denounce Romney. Please tell me where I’m wrong.

Irony of irony. Voting for that which is hated, by proxy. LOL

265 posted on 07/17/2012 7:31:52 AM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Finny

And you want to live under Obama for another 4 years?

You people can’t see the forest for the trees.


266 posted on 07/17/2012 7:40:49 AM PDT by nerdgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Sorry, I think you’ve dialed a wrong number.


267 posted on 07/17/2012 8:04:17 AM PDT by EggsAckley ( There's an Ethiopian in the fuel supply ! ! ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nerdgirl; Finny

Nope .. cant do it . They have a greater moral depth than the rest us socialist lovers . It’s that walk on water thing like the Republic got here where we are now overnight .
No doubt he will have some superior principled comment so I’ll be back .


268 posted on 07/17/2012 8:55:10 AM PDT by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Ben Bolt
Your post is angry gibberish. Such is the consequent emoting of folks who have convinced themselves to vote for a statist against their better judgment.
269 posted on 07/17/2012 10:37:03 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

OUST THE OBAMANATION


270 posted on 07/17/2012 10:39:23 AM PDT by MEG33 (O Lord, Guide Our Nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Ronald_Magnus
xz points out: There’s no way I could vote for a guy who just a FEW WEEKS AGO came out in favor of gay couples. And then he added to it that gay couples should be allowed to adopt children.

Ronald Magnus, Romney's saying that gay couples "who love each other" should be able to adopt children, is a euphemism for "the government should be allowed to punish adoption agencies that refuse to cooperate with gay couples who want to adopt children." THAT is what Romney really means, and that is what you would really be sanctioning at the top of the Republican party, whether you intended to or not.

I'm with xzins: voting FOR a guy like that is asking -- it is begging -- for massive and permanent buyer's remorse.

Voting for Romney is as nuts as voting for Obama, and in fact all those Republicans/conservatives we'll be voting for downticket would be HINDERED by Romney if he was in the White House, so I doubt they're "all voting for Romney," as you assure us upthread.

They may not say as much because the kneejerk blowback from panicked and angry Republicans would be so hysterical, but I'll bet thare are at least a few who know how Romney would treat conservative Republicans once he was in office -- like "fringe kooks," as one of Romney's supporters-though-he-claims-he's-not considers folks like me, xzins, Jim Robinson, and more than 250 other FReepers who understand that Romney is a BIG mistake.

The ONLY way conservatives can vote at the top of the ticket to try to give an advantage to the conservatives we'll be voting for downticket, is to vote so that whichever statist gets in office lacks a popular mandate. Conservatives in Congress will have more pull and more juice if they're able to deal with the statist pro-homosexual "gays should be able to force adoption agencies to accommodate them and should be able to force every accommodation in the U.S. military" president, whichever guy it happens to be, who was opposed by the majority of Americans in the popular vote.

The last time a president was elected on a thin plurality, a "revolution" of the opposing party happened in Congress two years later, in 1994. :^)

Pray for a plurality, vote for a plurality. I'm voting third party to do my part in helping give conservatives a leg-up on statist president they are guaranteed to have to fight.

271 posted on 07/17/2012 11:03:06 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
However, they also have different governing principles - the GOP-E will not actively seek to sandbag the economy the way Obama and the Dems do. And I think that is the difference those willing to vote for Romney see - that Obama is killing the economy and Romney would give it a respite. But would that respite come at the cost of entrenching the GOP-E to the point where much more serious and needed reforms in government would become much more difficult if not impossible?

The Democrats and MarxoFascists have played the GOP well. The GOP-e knows where the power is going to lie and they will do anything to share in it.

We are beyond saving ourselves and this nation via the ballot box.

And everyone's going to slowly wake up to that reality soon.

We're under enemy occupation, and we're comfortable with it.

Sometime soon, we will even be willing to abide it for the empty promise of bread.

272 posted on 07/17/2012 11:09:13 AM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: nerdgirl
And you want to live under Obama for another 4 years?

No, actually, I've always wanted a pony, and I'd prefer living "under" Palin or Ronald Reagan.

If wishes were fishes we'd have some fried.

You people can’t see the forest for the trees.

Perhaps not, but we DO see that Romney is:
-- virtually guaranteed to advance cap-and-trade global warming regulation with an eye to surrendering US sovereignty in the name of "a worldwide solution"
-- extremely likely to advance nationalized health care with on-demand abortion (even though he claims conversion on that point -- ha ha)
-- virtually guaranteed to use the power of law to force the acceptance and accomodation of the homosexual agenda in every corner of American life, from adoption of children to service in the military
-- and extremely likely to appoint liberal judges.

See, some of us who "can't see the forest for the trees," can at least see Romney's record.

And true, we may not see the forest for the trees, but at least we see that progressive Romney, joined by Republicans seeking to cooperate with the defacto head of their party, moderate Republicans, and Democrats, would OUTNUMBER and OUTVOTE conservative Republicans in congress, who are the SOLE source of opposition in Congress to the liberal agenda that Romney, like Obama, would try to foist on America.

I kinda think you're not seeing the trees for the forest, dear.

273 posted on 07/17/2012 11:19:30 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Randy Larsen
That’s not loyalty to FRiends Jim!, just because of Romney?

You know it profits a man nothing to gain the whole world, Rich, but Wales?
-Thomas Moore, A Man For All Seasons, paraphrasing the scripture in mark.

One of my favorite quotes, especially now.

It profits us nothing to gain the whole world if we lose our principles, but for Romney?

274 posted on 07/17/2012 11:24:05 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Randy Larsen
That’s not loyalty to FRiends Jim!, just because of Romney?

You know it profits a man nothing to gain the whole world, Rich, but Wales?
-Thomas Moore, A Man For All Seasons, paraphrasing the scripture in mark.

One of my favorite quotes, especially now.

It profits us nothing to gain the whole world if we lose our principles, but for Romney?

275 posted on 07/17/2012 11:24:05 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: xzins

These people do not get banned. They don’t even get confronted. The only time there is a confrontation is when they get belligerant.
***The belligerent ABOs aren’t even confronted as far as I can see.


276 posted on 07/17/2012 11:57:45 AM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It's A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

More often than not. You are right Kevmo.


277 posted on 07/17/2012 12:05:07 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

What is TBL? Is it a pro-Obama site?


278 posted on 07/17/2012 12:06:08 PM PDT by miserare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

Bookmarking this to add to all my other anti-Obama talking points.

It’s so hard to convince the younger people I argue with—they are just interested in the “free stuff” they think they are getting from Obama. Wait until they see the bill!


279 posted on 07/17/2012 12:23:56 PM PDT by miserare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: All

Meanwhile...

Another first for Obama:

Canadians Richer Than Americans For First Time In History

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2907384/posts


280 posted on 07/17/2012 12:51:59 PM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne
Romneys a commie,huh?

After his work at Bain?

Then you would have to label Obama a True Blue Libertarian Capitalist after his "If you've got a business - you didn't build it" comment.

Since we know Obama is no capitalist, your whole premise re:Romney is total nonsense as is your post.

Just admit you came over from D.U./KOS.

281 posted on 07/17/2012 1:56:44 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

Your angst is clearly against people like me opposing Romneycare because you know that opposition logically extends to Obamacare. Sorry, Commiecare is Commiecare and I refuse to support it.


282 posted on 07/17/2012 2:09:55 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Finny

angry ? where do you get that from ? You 1 of those hyper sensitive types there finny ? you have super natural powers to go with your superior principles too ? My goodness ... What you read is conviction . Deal with it or walk off . I could care less .


283 posted on 07/17/2012 7:41:15 PM PDT by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne
I don't care much for Romney, but I detest 0bama. I look forward to voting out the jug-eared, Marxist beanpole.
284 posted on 07/17/2012 8:08:00 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-284 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson