Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vote for Romney is a vote for Communism and baby-killing

Posted on 07/16/2012 12:57:11 PM PDT by JimWayne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-284 next last
To: BatGuano

Too late. Jim Wayne was a lead paint baby.


51 posted on 07/16/2012 1:32:08 PM PDT by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
President Barack Hussein Obama is certainly a President of firsts. Here's a fairly comprehensive list: (Read them and weep for our nation)

Yep...this is the list of "1st"s this President, Barack Hussein Obama, has accomplished in his first four years.

AMERICA CANNOT AFFORD ANOTHER FOUR YEARS OF "FIRSTS" BY THIS PRESIDENT.

52 posted on 07/16/2012 1:35:27 PM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

53 posted on 07/16/2012 1:36:50 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

That is my point in asking the question! How could any override of Zero’s executive orders by the House actually come through into reality before the elections? They can’t. It is much quicker to just cut off the snake’s head by getting Zero out of office.

Anyone here that thinks voting third party (voting for Zero) or just staying home to prove some zealous point of ideology is missing the point of the election. We have a communist dictator who is completely aided by the media and a judicial system that is stacked with liberals - we are the nation’s last line of defense.

Vote this communist out of the White House.


54 posted on 07/16/2012 1:37:16 PM PDT by datura (Democrat = Socialist, Progressive Democrat = Communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

If Obama wins, kiss that GOP House goodbye.


55 posted on 07/16/2012 1:39:21 PM PDT by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nerdgirl
We still don't know what's going to happen with...

1) Obama hauling the State of Arizona to the United Nations Human Rights Council where he made a complaint against one of our own states.

2) UN arms treaty could against U.S. gun owners

56 posted on 07/16/2012 1:41:07 PM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 'smith
Okay. I'm gonna get your money for ya. But if you don't get the President of the United States on that phone, you know what's gonna happen to you? You're gonna have to answer to the Coca-Cola company.
57 posted on 07/16/2012 1:41:51 PM PDT by tumblindice (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

“Not just trolls. There are Obama/Soros campaign employees on FR.”

Some of the radical Paulistineans still think there is some magical way that Paul defeats Romney at the Convention.


58 posted on 07/16/2012 1:42:20 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BubbaJunebug

“I think the TROLLS of the Chicago political machine have taken over this site. I’ve never seen such stupid bullshit posted anywhere other than DU or Daily KOS”

100% right. Not sure why the moderators refuse to take action on any of the trolls here.


59 posted on 07/16/2012 1:42:47 PM PDT by crusader71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: datura

They can vote to refuse funding for starters. Executive Orders can be overturned..To date, U.S. courts have overturned only two executive orders: the aforementioned Truman order, and a 1995 order issued by President Clinton that attempted to prevent the federal government from contracting with organizations that had strike-breakers on the payroll.[8] Congress was able to overturn an executive order by passing legislation in conflict with it during the period of 1939 to 1983 until the Supreme Court ruled in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha that the “legislative veto” represented “the exercise of legislative power” without “bicameral passage followed by presentment to the President.”[9] The loss of the legislative veto has caused Congress to look for alternative measures to override executive orders such as refusing to approve funding necessary to carry out certain policy measures contained with the order or to legitimize policy mechanisms. In the former, the president retains the power to veto such a decision; however, the Congress may override a veto with a two-thirds majority to end an executive order


60 posted on 07/16/2012 1:43:25 PM PDT by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

I think the survival rate of nascent life, and the survival rate of Capitalism has a better chance with 3 Houses which includes Romney than 2 Houses with Obama again in the White House. I’m in no way enamored with Romney, just being pragmatic.

The passive voters argue it’s better to diminish plurality by voting for neither Obama nor Romney. An interesting theory that expects and depends on a just rebound in 2016 with possible midterm gains in 2014.

The risk is ubiquitous. I assure you, however, no one is intentionally promoting abortion and Communism.

Maybe it’s better we focus on both Houses of Congress. There’s a lot of work to be done there which we can all agree on.


61 posted on 07/16/2012 1:44:14 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
If Obama wins, kiss that GOP House goodbye.

In more than one way! Some say the House is already gone. I mean, what good is it if the President can by-pass it? Might as well bring our congressmen back home to become civilians and be forced to live in the country they helped create. Save some tax dollars for Obama's Amnesty program.

As far as the electoral goes, if Romney loses it is because not enough from our side went to vote. That means our side will sacrifice wins in Congress.

It sounds easy to say "Oh I will go and just vote for my congressman but that rarely happens. They stay home.

62 posted on 07/16/2012 1:46:33 PM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: datura

I was commenting to Jim about why the statement that we can blunt what Obama does without the Presidency does not make sense. And, I illustrated it to him. Having the House did not make a dent in what he did to us. You are exactly right, having the House has meant little to the conservative cause. Of course, they could have restricted the purse strings, but they did not.


63 posted on 07/16/2012 1:46:38 PM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: brivette

the problem is that under Obama, the military casualties and deaths have about tripled in less time also. I will vote for Mitt at least for their sakes as Romney has more fire for the fight we are in. This is downright criminal, all of the reg’s the troops are under that is actually killing them!


64 posted on 07/16/2012 1:47:48 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo with laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

I’m glad you didn’t overstate things.


65 posted on 07/16/2012 1:47:48 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne
Sorry, but I'm going to vote in the only way that can end the scourge of the black Bolshevik.

In this case the two evils we must choose from are akin to a jaywalker and Satan—take your pick cuz there ain't no third inside the real world.
If people like you help reelect Obama don't expect those of us who really voted against the mulatto Marxist to share our concentration camp gruel with you.

66 posted on 07/16/2012 1:48:05 PM PDT by Happy Rain ("Obamacare like all Marxist fails, outlaws redress before increasing it's demand.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: datura

I guess we should ignore them. If no one commented maybe they would get bored and quit. Thankfully they are just a kookie minority.


67 posted on 07/16/2012 1:48:11 PM PDT by csmusaret (I will give Obama credit for one thing- he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat
You are exactly right, having the House has meant little to the conservative cause.

OTOH not having the House for the first two years did the most damage of all.

68 posted on 07/16/2012 1:48:46 PM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

>> If Obama wins, kiss that GOP House goodbye.

This is my concern. Obama and the Media will continue the campaign into 2014 disparaging the GOP controlled Houses as being obstructive and counter-productive. We’ve heard it before — we know how this template gets played out.

With an Obama reelection, it is indeed a possibility the 2nd half of his 2nd term will have full Democrat control once again.


69 posted on 07/16/2012 1:51:28 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Because of the bat s#!) crazy ideas like this on this web site, my contribution dollars have already gone to Romney.


70 posted on 07/16/2012 1:53:34 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nobamanomore

You lost everybit of credibility in your responce decades ago when video cameras came into use.

Romney is every bit the communist, and his record on video shows it.

So the major difference would be which party the communist at the helm represented. Period. Hoj lost this one, and you lost it before you began.


71 posted on 07/16/2012 1:54:17 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: datura; JimWayne
....."we are the nation’s last line of defense. "....

Exactly, datura.

JimWayne, unless the guy running against obama happens to be Satan, I'm voting for him. Our country is on the brink.
72 posted on 07/16/2012 1:56:12 PM PDT by Girlene (Chief AHat Roberts - should resign in disgrace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
You have to choose the lesser of two evils, Romney.

Mitt Romney is so bad that even his own supporters automatically stipulate to the fact that he is evil.

This is absolutely unprecedented. It's astounding.

73 posted on 07/16/2012 1:59:00 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (If you've surrendered your principles out of fear of Obama, you've already lost. - TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: datura
...staying home to prove some zealous point of ideology...
WOW! Who knew that standing upon one's principles not to choose one evil (GOPe RINO) over another evil (any Dem) would garner such castigation.

Your mind game doesn't work with me.
You go ahead and abandon your principles and vote for evil, even if it is the lesser evil, and I'll keep my principles, thank you very much.

Note that any attempt to label me as a specific supporter of anyone will be countered vociferously. I have no dog in this chase. And don't tell me that my not voting is a vote for Zero as such will also be soundly attacked for the lie it is.

We have a communist dictator who is completely aided by the media and a judicial system that is stacked with liberals...
No, we have a political ideologue who is aided by an ideological media of the same vein. The Courts fluctuate between 5/4 and 4/5 so they're not really "stacked" to one side or the other right now. 7/2 would be stacked and America isn't there yet.

...we are the nation’s last line of defense.
Who do you mean by "we"? The GOPe? Surely you don't mean "conservatives", do you? The GOPe has in a most effective manner said that they don't support conservatives so I doubt you mean that group.

Aside - can you show me even one instance where Mittens even recognizes our form of government? You know...a Constitutional Republic.
Or does he always say "Democracy"?

74 posted on 07/16/2012 2:00:21 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: bkepley
As a conservative I'm less than impressed with the conservative in 2010 victory in the House. Obama has done more in the last two years to push his own agenda with the conservatives that Sarah Palin is responsable for putting in power than he did with Pelosi in control.

I think we conservatives need to hold those accountable who are already elected and doing nothing before we are expected to be taken seriously about other candidates and looked upon as having any credibility as to whether the new candidates are good or not.

Look at John Boehner! Can you really tell me that you're satisfied with the conservative gains in 2010?

With all due respect Sarah Palin (A REAL conservative) worked hard and succeeded in helping the conservative movement in 2010. Without Sarah Palin I doubt we would control the House today.

You cannot be a real Sarah Palin supporter if you are okay with this House spitting in the face of Sarah and quite frankly in our faces. We need to hold those who betrayed us accountable. It's not only unfair to Sarah Palin (who has worked hard and has taken many hits from the left and the RINOs) but also unfair to the conservative voters.

It's time to hold those accountable who are already elected who ran as conservatives for out vote. Romney is NOT a conservative. Our side did not win. Perhaps the performance coming out of the republican controlled House has something to do with our side losing in the primary.

We need to clean Congress out of RINOs. Obama's done more damage to America in the last 1.5 years than he did in the first two. That's telling!

75 posted on 07/16/2012 2:03:32 PM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: crusader71; JimWayne
Not sure why the moderators refuse to take action on any of the trolls here.You haven't been paying attention. The mods believe Jim Wayne.
76 posted on 07/16/2012 2:05:57 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan
Look at John Boehner!
I'd rather not. I might start crying!
77 posted on 07/16/2012 2:07:07 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: crusader71

Maybe they agree.


78 posted on 07/16/2012 2:08:04 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan
Obama has done more in the last two years to push his own agenda ...

He has been signing Executive Orders to gut previous legislation. i.e. Welfare Reform, etc.

79 posted on 07/16/2012 2:11:14 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
You have to choose the lesser of two evils, Romney.


80 posted on 07/16/2012 2:13:17 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne
There is only one political party in America and it has two wings - Democrat and Republican. Many laughably misnamed "conservatives" on FR cannot bring themselves to see the truth because it challenges their simplistic view of the political fairytale that they are told every day of their lives.

"If the American people knew tonight, exactly how the monetary and banking system worked, there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." - Abraham Lincoln

The same could be said about the political system. The power behind the throne isn't capitalist or socialist, conservative or progressive. It is motivated by an insatiable lust for power regardless of how that power is achieved. The political hurly-burly that fills the 24 news cycle is mostly theater doing what theater does - manipulating our emotions.

There was a time when FR was peopled with real conservatives, not sellouts. Nowadays, FR posters have been so manipulated by Rush, Fox, etc. to support a Leftist that they grumble meekly about not having a real conservative in the presidential election, but become fiery and passionate about voting for Romney in order to defeat Obama regardless of Romney's blatant Leftism.

So, FReepers have been skillfully herded into a pen where they can moo discontentedly, but still trudge off in resignation to the slaughterhouse.

81 posted on 07/16/2012 2:16:14 PM PDT by Dr. Thorne (Don't vote for anyone who worked for Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

I am an independent. I left the Republican party due to the fact that it has been taken over by moderates. That said, I wish the Republicans had a good conservative candidate nominee, but they don’t.

All that said, Calling Romney a communist is laughable.


82 posted on 07/16/2012 2:18:07 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (....The days are long, but the years are short.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

Exactly none of the EO have been challenged by our Congressmen. They’ve been challenged by Newt Gingrich who says it’s illegal to sign EO to change a law which passed through Congress with bi-partisan support. Sarah Palin questions Obama’s move but like Gingrich she is not an elected official. She can only help us put in Conservatives. It’s up to us to make sure they stay Conservative.


83 posted on 07/16/2012 2:18:54 PM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: datura

“Executive orders are just that - Executive Branch. Please tell me how the House can unilaterally override them, as I must have missed some part of how our government is supposed to function.”


Boy you missed the mark on this! EOs are supposed to relate to operations of the Executive branch not an end run around congress and if there were a single set of stones in congress, every EO not directly related to the operation of the Executive branch should be rescinded REGARDLESS of the president who issued them.

Even my favorite president RR exceeded Executive authority in some of the few EOs he issued.

This is not a left/right liberal/conservative issue.

If we are to believe the president can circumvent congress in this manner then there is no need for congress and they should all be fired immediately and we can just revert to the dictatorship that this half breed’s relatives are all so use to.


84 posted on 07/16/2012 2:19:33 PM PDT by Wurlitzer (Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

oh, please....


85 posted on 07/16/2012 2:20:05 PM PDT by terycarl (lurking, but well informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Mitt Romney is so bad that even his own supporters automatically stipulate to the fact that he is evil.

Occasionally, even the most slavishly servile sister-wife will get her HQ-generated "bullet points" mixed up. ;)

86 posted on 07/16/2012 2:21:48 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
As bad as Obama will be for america, a Romney Presidency kills the Tea Party.

If so, then the Tea Party doesn't amount to very much, does it?

87 posted on 07/16/2012 2:23:35 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg
There’s no way in hell I’m voting for Mutt Romney, but even I don’t think he’s a communist.

THANKS!!!!...I'll mark you down in my column...s/ Barack

88 posted on 07/16/2012 2:23:43 PM PDT by terycarl (lurking, but well informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food
Reject Obama. Reject Romney. Reject all evil. Trust God.

Jesus is running for president???????Wow

89 posted on 07/16/2012 2:26:51 PM PDT by terycarl (lurking, but well informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Occasionally, even the most slavishly servile sister-wife will get her HQ-generated "bullet points" mixed up. ;)

Alternatively, they have come to a conclusion via observation, and your conclusion is searching for the fact.

90 posted on 07/16/2012 2:30:59 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Alternatively, they have come to a conclusion via observation, and your conclusion is searching for the fact.

Bald assertion, unsupported by the evidence at hand. Next.

91 posted on 07/16/2012 2:32:43 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne

Good post, Jim. Don’t worry about the Romneybots. All it will take is five to seven percent of the conservative vote refusing to vote for Romney to sink him and the SS RINO.


92 posted on 07/16/2012 2:35:54 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
LOL--there is nothing wrong with observing that there are degrees of evil. Absurdity is an ad hominem attack generated by that part of your imagination that suggests otherwise.
93 posted on 07/16/2012 2:36:18 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; EternalVigilance
there are degrees of evil.

Precisely the point made by EV, above ("Romney's own supporters openly admit that he is evil"), and against which you are tiresomely (and ineffectually) huffing and spluttering.

Must be your night tonight... eh, "sis?"

94 posted on 07/16/2012 2:41:58 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

Well, Barack, you’re wrong. I’m going to vote for a conservative.

Meanwhile, you might wanna tell terycarl that enabling statism is enabling statism whether it wears red or blue.


95 posted on 07/16/2012 2:42:35 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Conservatism is not a matter of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne
Four more years of Obama cannot be worse than four years of Mittens and with good candidates in the House and Senate, Obama's agenda can be blunted

It does not get much more absurd than this. Right - if we have the House and Senate and they vote to repeal Obamacare, President Obama is more likely to sign that repeal into law than a President Romney would when the bill reached the President's desk. Sure...no difference in what would happen there.

The next president will determine control of the Supreme Court...I'm not entirely optimistic on the judges that would be appointed by Romney but there is a 0% chance the appointments by Obama would be anything other than a radical leftist. I suspect the ones appointed by Romney would likely be in the Sandra Day O'Connor / Anthony Kennedy mold...which is still far better than Kagan types.

The GOP-e did not pick Mitt Romney. Our own voters did - not in every primary by large margins, but on the whole they did...including by tea party voters and in primaries where they simultaneously tossed out long entrenched GOP incumbents or other candidates that were heavily backed by the establishment by overwhelming numbers. Who knows why...but they did...and there was much more influence of alternate media this go round.

We play with the hand we are dealt...not the one we wish we were dealt. If Obama has another 4 years, your nonsensical comments about a "strengthened tea party" will be irrelevant - the transformation will be complete.

What are you doing constructive in this election other than sitting around engaging in rants on an internet forum? Have you done anything to help Richard Mourdock? Deb Fisher? Etc.? Or just whining about another race where our preferred candidate(s) did not prevail?

96 posted on 07/16/2012 2:42:59 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Which part of mass murdering innocent babies is less evil?


97 posted on 07/16/2012 2:43:34 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: terycarl
Well, maybe that was a little over the top. I call Obama and Romney evil as sort of a shorthand so I don't have to elaborate. Neither of them are probably all evil.

But, they're both rotten enough to warrant my vote against them.

98 posted on 07/16/2012 2:45:09 PM PDT by Tau Food (Tom Hoefling for President - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: All

To everyone frothing at your mouths reading this post: how come you don’t get rattled when it happens the other way and the RINO establishment sinks the chances of Tea Party candidates? Remember NY-23? Remember when the head of NV GOP and a Romneybot endorsed Harry Reid? Remember AK where the Romneybots refused to accept the results of the primary? So why do you think we should now support the traitors?


99 posted on 07/16/2012 2:45:28 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
Calling Romney a communist is laughable.

Agreed.

I won't classify Romney as a Communist who hates the country clearly as Obama does.

However, Romney is indeed on the Socialist scale and if he is elected, it will be the end of any shred of Conservatism in the GOP. That's fact.

And with the indoctrination that any 3rd party is doomed to fail - the hope of a Conservative Party itself is not even a plausibility anymore.

It makes no difference who casts a vote this November anyway. Cook County has gone national and Romney is just a chosen stooge to perpetrate an illusion to placate the people a while longer.

100 posted on 07/16/2012 2:46:03 PM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-284 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson