Skip to comments.Sheriff Joe set to release more Obama 'shockers'; TODAY Live Thread
Posted on 07/17/2012 9:08:06 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhostEdited on 07/17/2012 9:17:36 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
click here to read article
I can't find where she explains this. Is there a recording?
I saw the video, but a real question has come up if they had the 1961 codes or later codes..it makes a big difference. there is more that needs to be investigated to resolve this issue alone. I am doubtful she would remember the difference between 1961 and 1968 codes...unless Hawaii had their own codes and why was obies cert coded anyway what is the answer to that?
I hope you appreciate my being soooo helpful, you KNOW that if there was a recording, it wasn't played on the video. What a transparent jerk you are.
She did not explain what the numbers mean...she explained, instead that the numbers “meant” something. The Posse then dug up the number code in a stack of documents and were able to tell that, for instance, the number 9 meant the information was unknown at the time of filing.
But we knew that requirements to get a HI birth certificate were unbelievably liberal well before the Arpaio investigation. So that part of the press conference shouldn't have shocked anyone who had been following the Obama BC issue diligently beforehand.
You don't think that maybe their motivation was to get that information out to a wider audience, and not just preach to the choir here on FR?
hi fred -see my post 821
So he’s come over here from the Dr Conspiracy site quoting a graphic that’s totally unconnected to the matter of the RACE OF PARENT.
Doesn’t surprise me.
But you fell for it?
Try this site:
I would agree with you on that - the wider the audience the better, generally speaking. I did acknowledge in my earlier post here (#142) that the Arpaio investigation, although not coming up with much astonishing when viewed in the light of previous investigations, gives findings the official imprimatur of a law enforcement agency, which is likely to influence some people who previously were unsure about the birth certificate issue.
Have you noticed the various comments that appear from time to time on FR about the public, when asked, do not recognize the names Frank Marshall Davis or Jerermiah Wright, for example? The public knows NOTHING. And that’s the way the perps NEED it to be.
Any little light shining on what’s going on has to be appreciated methinks.
(As long as the light-bearers remain hale, hearty and healthy...)
We live in interesting times.
Yes, you are right. I did forget about him. He is a sort of weak target on my radar, but now that you have mentioned him he is indeed a possibility. One of the benefits that might have been available for her in going to Chicago is a more easily obtained abortion. She probably could get one in Seattle or Vancouver, but in Chicago it would be a virtual certainty, especially given the connections Frank Davis would have had.
Much of these people's lives do seem to orbit Chicago, one way or the other.
Major problem; theres no physical evidence of SAD either pregnant, or with the kenyan or in Hawaii before we see images of her with a two or three year-old.
Chasing where SAD may have given birth is a dead end if she was the nanny and not the mother.
Not so much a problem for me. My mother has no evidence that she was pregnant with any of us, other than birth certificates. Neither does any of my three sisters, nor for that matter does my wife. Apparently my family never thought it worthwhile to take photographs of any pregnant family members. As a result, I regard it as unremarkable that there are no pictures of Stanley Ann pregnant. Now we do have BIRTH pictures. (Pictures of us taken shortly after birth.) But we have no pregnancy pictures at all.
The notion that Barack is anyone's child but Stanley Ann's would have to have a great deal of supporting evidence in order for me to take a serious look at it. A lack of pregnancy or infant pictures is not sufficient to generate any suspicion on my part.
I want to understand the details in the stig CNN case. Are they on your or another site or threAd?
Couple that with typical white granny being in the bank. However, it's odd that after all these years, they failed to dot all the i's and cross all the t's. That's what I can't get, is if they had the right people in the right places then why wave around silly photoshop documents that a 12 year old could do a better job on. Also, if they were grooming one then there's a high likelihood that something could go wrong such as an accidental death or serious injury, the kid turns out to be a total bozo (uh, yeah, I know), he doesn't want to play the game, he has no charisma, etc. That means, if they were smarter than said 12 year old, then they would have groomed others. So, who are the others and where are they?
Except there shouldn't be a binding. The very old books came pre-bound but we're talking way before the usurper's time. The problem with pre-bound books is that you can't end the book at the end of the year so they had to come up with a more workable book. The books were changed to be like loose leaf notebooks. The pages have holes in them so you can slip them into the book as more records come in. When a record is needing to be xeroxed, the clerk opens the metal prongs or posts, takes out the page, copies it flat, and then returns it to the book. Besides, these books are too big, clumbsy and heavy to be flopped upside down and xeroxed and the clerk would risk tearing pages. Also, it would never be a legal document if the curve readability was messed up. I know this because I used to be such a clerk though not in HI but that's how every one of these books I've ever seen in other states is. So, of course, if someone wanted to switch pages, it'd be simple as pie.
One of the Austin, TX tv stations was supposed to have aired it but guess who just happened to be landing in Austin at the exact same time? Yet another in a very long, long string of coinky dinks.
Can you identify that individual by name?
Your mention of Austin TV stations brings to mind that none other than Lady Bird Johnson owned one of them at a time when there were very few to be had. Wonder how she managed that? Yet another case of crony capitalism!
I agree that there shouldn’t be a binding, but the image they put out makes it look as if there is one. We’ve seen that curved edge on some other long-form images. It may be from the curvature of the microfilm.
My point is that there are codes over on the left side, too. There were two pages to the records. One was for that personal, medical-type information and the other was for the data that went on certified copies handed to the parents, for example. The codes I’m talking about are codes for information on the regular, certified part of the document. The part given out when they made certified copies. Those codes also belong to the record supposedly belonging to Obama. Read the Daily Pen article to see what he reports.