Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehring

I see no value in voting for someone who has less than a snowball’s chance.


5 posted on 07/25/2012 6:36:14 PM PDT by SandyInSeattle (Running in circles and screaming is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SandyInSeattle

The same no value in voting (R) on the top line in New York State.


14 posted on 07/25/2012 6:50:35 PM PDT by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SandyInSeattle

Hey he got 14,000 signatures, Boy they do have a low hurdle to get on the ballot there. Newt and Rick didn’t make it!


21 posted on 07/25/2012 7:00:18 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SandyInSeattle; mnehring; P-Marlowe; cripplecreek; greyfoxx39; kabar; mkjessup; SoConPubbie; ...
To: I see no value in voting for someone who has less than a snowball’s chance.

I see that you are from the state of Washington. Rasmussen has your state listed as solid blue, safe for OBAMA!

That means that Romney doesn't have a snowball's chance in your state. (You know it and we know it.)

What we're saying is basically what you just said. Since there's no chance at all that Romney will win in Washington State, any logic about anyone but Romney doesn't compute.

Therefore, you don't have to hold your nose and vote for liberal Romney. It isn't going to help.

You can vote your conservative principles instead...Vote for a true pro-life, pro-gun, pro-God, pro-small government conservative...vote for Virgil Goode.

23 posted on 07/25/2012 7:03:02 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SandyInSeattle
I see no value in voting for someone who has less than a snowball’s chance.

Good, then I'll vote for Goode because Romney doesn't have a snowball's chance in California.

74 posted on 07/25/2012 7:47:15 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SandyInSeattle; All

The value is Ralph Nader. We need more independent parties. Are there any Tea Party candidates, and what about Libertarians.


140 posted on 07/25/2012 10:46:12 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SandyInSeattle; All

The value is Ralph Nader. We need more independent parties. Are there any Tea Party candidates, and what about Libertarians.


141 posted on 07/25/2012 10:46:27 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SandyInSeattle
I see no value in voting for someone who has less than a snowball’s chance.

Well, (R) voters in Washington, Oregon, CA, Illinois, Rhode Island, Delaware, Maine, Vermont, NY, NJ, Hawaii, CT, Maryland, Massachusetts, & DC also have less than a snowball's chance of giving Romney those states' electoral votes...are you going to tell all (R) voters in those states not to vote for Romney 'cause he likewise has less than a snowball's chance??? Where's your consistency there?

144 posted on 07/25/2012 10:52:08 PM PDT by Colofornian (Saying Mitt would keep past political promises is like prophesying that Gumby won't bend anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson