Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem lawmakers to announce bill limiting online ammo sales
The Hill ^ | July 29, 2012 | Meghashyam Mali

Posted on 07/29/2012 3:38:40 PM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-143 next last
To: jazusamo

Criminals will have NO PROBLEM getting ammo - because organized crime will provide it - - giving organized crime one more income stream.

Which makes criminals and crime families more powerful...

If you don’t hate liberals, you’re not paying attention.


51 posted on 07/29/2012 4:40:39 PM PDT by GOPJ (Political correctness is simply George Orwell's Newspeak by a non-threatening name. FR- Bernard Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

These idiots think nothing of 25 ga of gasoline, but bullets scare them.


52 posted on 07/29/2012 4:40:57 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The amount of ammo this guy actually used could have been bought at any Walmart any day of the week.


53 posted on 07/29/2012 4:45:50 PM PDT by Malone LaVeigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“make it harder for criminals to anonymously stockpile ammunition through the Internet.” “
What’s anonymous about it? It has to be paid for by someone, and delivered to someone. That’s hardly anonymous.


54 posted on 07/29/2012 4:46:15 PM PDT by Fireone (Traitors must be purged from Washington D.C.- Impeach, convict, and sentence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Of course this bill will fail, the only question is the political one.

Should Boehner put it up for a vote or not- get the Congress on the record?

Would putting it to a vote just give Democrats in the House a chance to get some 2nd Amendment bonafides by castinga “nay” vote and thus help them in the upcoming election?


55 posted on 07/29/2012 4:49:04 PM PDT by I_Like_Spam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The fact this gets reported is BS. These people don’t have the authority to even discuss this.


56 posted on 07/29/2012 4:49:34 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

they never miss an opportunity to ratchet up regulations tighter and tighter like a noose around our necks


57 posted on 07/29/2012 4:51:39 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Scalia said that gun control is possible.

We will see what Mitt says.

58 posted on 07/29/2012 4:53:03 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1malumprohibitum

Facts? Don’t confuse the lib-dem idiots with facts. Facts are stubborn things.


59 posted on 07/29/2012 5:04:41 PM PDT by carriage_hill (All libs and most dems think that life is just a sponge bath, with a happy ending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Stick a rider on it ending taxpayer paid security for government officials.


60 posted on 07/29/2012 5:05:39 PM PDT by Iron Munro ("Jiggle the Handle for Barry!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Absolutely. A Wolf walked into a room from of Sheep, just like the Nazis walked into the Jewish Ghetto. Extreme statement, I think not. I was just talking to my Brother who lives in Colorado. He carries a .45 in his waistband holster and a 9MM in his ankle holster. Living in CA, I envy the Constitution he gets to live by.

He isn't into “Gun Free Zones”, if you know what I mean. He follows the philosophy that “I would rather be judged by twelve than carried by six”.

How amazing it is that people so easily surrender their personal safety and God Given Constitutional Rights to appease the Useful Idiot Citizenry who support Liberal Politicians and their agenda. Only Fairies and Unicorns exist in a Criminal free Utopia.

We were discussing the “ballistic” clothing the Perp was wearing. I think the Rats are trying to outlaw that too.
Even if a round would not penetrate the clothing, that skinny little Perp would have been knocked off his feet while peeing his pants had anyone even winged him.

Just ranting. I hate Democrat, Liberals and everything they stand for. I'll blame my Brother for getting me all fired up. LOL

61 posted on 07/29/2012 5:05:39 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (The only good Commie is an Impeached Commie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

You know, I hear tell that on the world market, AKs can be had for $10 each. Is this true?


62 posted on 07/29/2012 5:09:49 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
Indeed. In fact, in case of such there would very likely be Unintended Consequences . . .
63 posted on 07/29/2012 5:11:44 PM PDT by Salgak (Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border. I **DARE** you to cross it. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Victor
Jeez....right about now I wish I owned an online ammo site like Cheaper than Dirt. I'd make a fortune!!!

I went to the gun show today, here in Miami. HUGE show and packed tighter than any I've seen in recent memory. Sales looked brisk. Ammo was a decent price too. Especially the 45 and 9mm that I saw. I wasn't in the market for that having made a bulk buy of shooting ammo a few weeks ago. But I did pick up some 45 Colt, 454 Casull and 460 magnum for my XVR 460. Those prices were excellent. Even better than online and I didn't need to pay shipping or wait for delivery. It's nice to have a heavy caliber revolver that fires three distinctly different calibers. That's what I call DIVERSITY!

64 posted on 07/29/2012 5:15:05 PM PDT by ExSoldier (Stand up and be counted... OR LINE UP AND BE NUMBERED...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

So the next nut case will have bought all the ammo locally. How many lives would that have saved?


65 posted on 07/29/2012 5:19:44 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The hype about him buying 6000 rounds is just that, hype, plus it was legal and those rounds could have been bought at a retail outlet or at a gun show.

Duh, that's why we need to limit sales of ammo *everywhere* (step 2 of the game plan)

66 posted on 07/29/2012 5:21:09 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: funfan

First off, these assholes never give up. Lautenberg, surprised that walking mummy is still walking. MCCarthy, another joke.

I guess I see now why the NRA supported Reid in the election.


67 posted on 07/29/2012 5:30:27 PM PDT by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT

Pump shotguns like the 870 he used generally take at least 5 shells in the magazine. Many take 8.


68 posted on 07/29/2012 5:37:46 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 1malumprohibitum
F ing a$$hats. Yes he bought 6 k rounds, but was he carrying 6 k rounds? Did he shoot 6k rounds?

Don't try to use logic. They are Democrats, the antithesis of anything logical.

69 posted on 07/29/2012 5:48:11 PM PDT by OldMissileer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All


70 posted on 07/29/2012 5:52:48 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It’s best to pay cash anyways.


71 posted on 07/29/2012 5:53:28 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

Yep, or make it illegal to fly planes into buildings.
Or, how about make it illegal to use box cutters as weapons?


72 posted on 07/29/2012 5:55:48 PM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the Statist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Why do the Dems not want Americans with guns?????? New World Order!!!!!They want to control all the people..... SCREW EM!!!!


73 posted on 07/29/2012 5:58:53 PM PDT by angelcindy ("If you follow the crowd ,you get no further than the crowd!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The corollary to my tag line, of course, is you can’t have too much ammunition.


74 posted on 07/29/2012 5:59:31 PM PDT by gunsmithkat (There is no such thing as Too Many Guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
“We need to start today on efforts to prevent the next attack,” he said in a statement. “We should begin by passing my legislation to ban the sale of high-capacity gun magazines. No sportsman needs 100 rounds to shoot a duck, but allowing high-capacity magazines in the hands of killers like James Holmes and Jared Loughner puts law enforcement at a disadvantage and innocent lives at risk.”

Come on, now. Do you even use a rifle to shoot ducks? Most of the duck hunters I know use shotguns.

I suppose there might be somebody out there bagging waterfowl with a rifle, but I honestly think they'd be an exception, not the rule.
75 posted on 07/29/2012 6:15:48 PM PDT by Milton Miteybad (I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Thank you. I have been saying this for many years now. The North Hollywood shootout involved drum magazines as well - cheap, unreliable magazines that are prone to jam. If this shooter had been using standard 30 round magazines, the damage would’ve been much worse. 100 round magazines (and even 50 round magazines) are novelty items and nothing more. The military doesn’t use them because they are garbage.

In this case, high-capacity magazines saved lives.


76 posted on 07/29/2012 6:32:42 PM PDT by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Victor

A bit hard to fathom that folks don’t already have thousands in each caliber they need, and a few thousand in other calibers for barter.


77 posted on 07/29/2012 6:37:51 PM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Actually, just boxcutters.


78 posted on 07/29/2012 6:53:26 PM PDT by jimjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Typical “don't let a (manufactured) crises go to waste” legislation. Why target a small group of criminals when an entire nation can have it's natural right to self-defense against tyrants infringed.
79 posted on 07/29/2012 7:15:34 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah, so shall it be again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

I bet they both used the Interstate Highway System in some way connected with their crimes, too! And the Internet!

Idiots like these Congresscritters and this reporter need to buy a clue.


80 posted on 07/29/2012 7:43:15 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

the libs just don’t get it....pathetic!


81 posted on 07/29/2012 7:43:47 PM PDT by terycarl (lurking, but well informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
the ease with which criminals can now anonymously stockpile

So they can't just go to store and pay cash? I can get a lot more ammo than Holmes did without raising any red flags, while purchasing everything local.

Yet another anti-gun bill that does nothing except punish the law-abiding.

82 posted on 07/29/2012 7:44:44 PM PDT by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said last week that he does not intend to bring gun control legislation to the floor.....

Funny that this reporter only mentions Dingy Harry and the Senate prospects for passage of these gun/ammo grabbing bills, but doesn't mention the prospects for passage in the GOP controlled House!!!

Maybe the reporter forgot to mention that the House must also approve these bills for them to become law. Or more likely, didn't want to ruin this puff piece article for gun grabbers by pointing out that these bills are DOA in the GOP controlled House.

I would be suprised if Mccarthy's ammo-banning bill even makes it to a House committee hearing before this Congress ends it's term in January, 2013 or if Boehner just tables the bill himself using his authority as Speaker to do this and no action is taken on it at all. Either way, this bill is DOA in the House - the House GOP leadership is not so stupid as to allow this bill to see the light of day, in my opinion.

83 posted on 07/29/2012 7:46:16 PM PDT by dsm69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsm69
...the House GOP leadership is not so stupid as to allow this bill to see the light of day, in my opinion.

One would like to think so.

But one wonders if one can ever be completely certain of the intelligence of the GOP leadership.

Next thing you know, they might be funding the HHS regulation requiring all insurance plans to pay for contraception, abortifacients and abortions...

84 posted on 07/29/2012 7:52:01 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
limiting online ammo sales

And how is this to stop - or slow - massive ammo purchases in Cabelas and Sportsmen Warehouse? All of this is just political theater - in the feeble libtard gun-hater brain the solution to all the world's problems is more government and more laws.
85 posted on 07/29/2012 8:07:34 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Whew! Good thing he only had 6,000. Just think how much trouble he could have caused if he had 6,000,000!

/s


86 posted on 07/29/2012 8:12:39 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
geez... when will these lunatics get it?

first off, 6,000 rounds of .223 weighs in at just shy of 200 pounds (give or take). No one can carry that sort of load if they are on a mission of any sort. I'm interested in hearing how banning bulk sales would have somehow prevented this (CO) incident or even diminished it in some way.

Secondly, I think it's worth pointing out that 100 round drum magazines in the hands of thugs or nuts is an advantage for the LEO. Finding one that functions properly (as shown in the CO case) is next to impossible.

87 posted on 07/29/2012 8:14:51 PM PDT by FunkyZero (... I've got a Grand Piano to prop up my mortal remains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
One would like to think so.....But one wonders if one can ever be completely certain of the intelligence of the GOP leadership.

I understand, but feel that even Boehner and Cantor do not want to become enemies of the NRA, Gun Owners of America and other Gun Owners/2nd Amendment supporters, especially this close to an election or even after the election.

Boehner, Cantor and the rest of the House GOP leadership know that allowing Gun Control laws to pass out of the GOP controlled House, especially when there is no national popular call/consensus for gun control legislation to be enacted will mean no more GOP control of the House next year or by the next election after that if they try to pass a lame duck bill. If they lose the solid support of Gun owners, then they know they are thru.

Next thing you know, they might be funding the HHS regulation requiring all insurance plans to pay for contraception, abortifacients and abortions...

I hear you on this and don't understand why Boehner just doesn't allow Obamacare to be funded in next years budget, along with the DOJ/ATF, Homeland Insecurity, the EPA and some other renegade cabinet departments of zero's - it ticks me off as well. But I believe that the House GOP leadership fears backlash from Gun Owners/2nd Amendments supporters more than any other of their core constituencies as this time.

88 posted on 07/29/2012 8:19:19 PM PDT by dsm69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
“make it harder for criminals to anonymously stockpile ammunition through the Internet.”

Yeah, every ammo-selling website has that special shopping section for "anonymous criminals wishing to stockpile ammunition."

Customers with valid credit cards and shipping addresses not welcome...

FAIL

89 posted on 07/29/2012 8:29:44 PM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsm69
But I believe that the House GOP leadership fears backlash from Gun Owners/2nd Amendments supporters more than any other of their core constituencies as this time.

If they don't fear a backlash from 1st Amendment religious liberty supporters, we damn well should make them fear it.

90 posted on 07/29/2012 10:15:01 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: okie01
If they don't fear a backlash from 1st Amendment religious liberty supporters, we damn well should make them fear it.

Amen!!! Like I posted earlier, I don't understand why Boehner would not want to defund Obamascare - he has absolutely nothing to lose politically by doing this (other than being disinvited from a few Potomac cocktail parties) and can only gain by doing this. Like you said, maybe the House GOP leadership needs to fear the backlash from their supporters who support 1st Amendment Religious Liberties as much as they do Gun Owners/2nd Amendment Supporters!!!

91 posted on 07/29/2012 10:42:40 PM PDT by dsm69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Lautenberg is an old, braindead liberal who should have retired when he still had a functioning brain cell.

Maloney, whose husband was killed by a black racist, is an anti-gun fanatic who has lost most touch with reality.

They should be ignored. Not worth the trouble to deal with.


92 posted on 07/29/2012 10:54:34 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Any minute now, they will notice that anyone can purchase reloading equipment, lead, copper plate, priming caps and gunpowder, and produce ammunition anonymously and easily. Next they will want to “regulate” reloading equipment, lead, copper plate, priming caps and gunpowder. Then they will notice that anyone with a few household items can make their own gunpowder and mercury fulminate, that there are reloading presses and dyes all over the place, that it’s possible to manufacture more at home, etc. Always, the magic formula for stopping rampaging shooters is one more law away.


93 posted on 07/29/2012 11:48:33 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

He had to use 6,000 rounds and that’s all he hit in a crowded theater? What a helaciously bad shot.


94 posted on 07/29/2012 11:55:11 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Victor

Exactly

I haven’t bought ammo in years, but now am going to get busy stocking up with lots of 7.62 to fill all of the high capacity magazines I bought in the early 90’s when the domestic commies last tried this crap.

I imagine the corrosive Czech stuff in the spam cans is all gone, right?


95 posted on 07/29/2012 11:55:53 PM PDT by Rome2000 (WILLARD ROMNEY -- MORMON MELCHIDEZEK BISHOP -HIS FAMILY HAS AVOIDED MILITARY SERVICE FOR GENERATIONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

what next ATF going to be selling guns and ammo in the US at a high profit?


96 posted on 07/30/2012 12:12:49 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: funfan

funfan~ “ Well if Harry is against it I guess it will go nowhere.”

It will go nowhere in an election year ,... but hold onto your socks if the POTUS gets re-elcted. BOHICA


97 posted on 07/30/2012 12:15:39 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It will fail....


98 posted on 07/30/2012 1:25:24 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
This is what I call "donut" legislation. It intentionally focuses on sensationalized (and often inaccurate) issues that can garner support through deception, intentionally leaving a gap that can later be plugged with further legislation.

Ordering ammunition online is exponentially less anonymous than walking into a store and purchasing it. If I go into WalMart and purchase several hundred rounds of ammo with cash, you might have a grainy surveillance video of me if you somehow were led to the idea I had purchased ammo at WalMart in the first place. This type of purchase would be anonymous.

When I purchase ammunition online, however, I use a credit card and input a shipping address, all information that can already be followed up on by investigators without any additional legislation. Indeed, reports of the Colorado shooter indicate investigators used just such information to determine how much ammo Holmes purchased, and from where. It was the very type of internet purchase they are trying to stifle that allowed investigators to quickly determine the origin of Holmes' ammunition.

Why the legislation, then? Because once they've passed a law that deals with sensationalism ("anonymous" stockpiling of internet purchased ammunition), the donut is in place. The lawmakers then point to the hole left by the donut law - "oh no, now people are gong into local stores and buying ammunition anonymously!" - and they then attempt to close it by further legislating local ammunition purchases, i.e. copying one's driver license for ammo purchases at Wal Mart. They realize that they must move in these tiny steps to deceive the public.

These guys aren't stupid, and they know damned well that regulating internet purchases of ammunition is pointless in itself. It is the leftover hole that they are aiming for, the ability to come back later, once the wedge legislation is in place, to implement further regulation.

99 posted on 07/30/2012 1:35:17 AM PDT by 101stAirborneVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The sad thing here is that no one on our side is ever ready to propose legislation to move the ball forward when one of these tragedies occurs. It’s always a defensive posture.

Try this instead: because the Aurora shooting, more people need to carry. Thus, we’re proposing legislation to institute a $100 tax credit for pistol purchases. Or for CHP issuance.


100 posted on 07/30/2012 3:34:05 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Vote for willard. Because "our" pro-abort, anti-gun socialist is SO much better than theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson