Sales of ammo just went up.
Democrats never let a tragedy go to waste if they think they can walk on some dead bodies to further their agenda.
Sen. Frank Lautenberg (N.J.) and Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (N.Y.)- two jerks with their usual knee jerk reaction to events. The side show bob shooter didn’t get many rounds off as his big magazine jammed, the shotgun held the usual 3 or 4 shells and the handguns magazines were not all used up. He may have had a lot of rounds in his apartment, but killed with far fewer. Limit rounds and the bad guys will use something else, like a big glass jug of gasoline - will that require a limit on gas sales?
>> “The shooter who killed 12 and injured 58 in an Aurora, Colorado movie theater this month had purchased over 6,000 rounds of ammunition anonymously on the Internet shortly before going on his killing spree, according to law enforcement officials” <<
.
Bullshit!
You can’t purchase a stick of chewing gum on line anonymously. Paypal and credit cards are far from anonymous.
McVey killed a lot more with fertilizer. Should we ban that too?
I wonder if there is any way for the author to find out for sure and then get back with us.
Were the Founding Fathers Sportsmen? Were the members of the Continental Army Sportsmen? Does the word Sportsmen appear in the text of the Second Amendment?
Maybe it was listed right after the word “hunters”, another word I must of missed.
Who cares of he had 600,000 rounds?
Was he carrying it around in his pocket?
Criminals will have NO PROBLEM getting ammo - because organized crime will provide it - - giving organized crime one more income stream.
Which makes criminals and crime families more powerful...
If you don’t hate liberals, you’re not paying attention.
These idiots think nothing of 25 ga of gasoline, but bullets scare them.
The amount of ammo this guy actually used could have been bought at any Walmart any day of the week.
“make it harder for criminals to anonymously stockpile ammunition through the Internet.” “
What’s anonymous about it? It has to be paid for by someone, and delivered to someone. That’s hardly anonymous.
Of course this bill will fail, the only question is the political one.
Should Boehner put it up for a vote or not- get the Congress on the record?
Would putting it to a vote just give Democrats in the House a chance to get some 2nd Amendment bonafides by castinga “nay” vote and thus help them in the upcoming election?
The fact this gets reported is BS. These people don’t have the authority to even discuss this.
they never miss an opportunity to ratchet up regulations tighter and tighter like a noose around our necks
We will see what Mitt says.
Stick a rider on it ending taxpayer paid security for government officials.
You know, I hear tell that on the world market, AKs can be had for $10 each. Is this true?
So the next nut case will have bought all the ammo locally. How many lives would that have saved?