Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Girl of 10 can choose to convert from Judaism to Christianity
Telegraph (UK) ^ | 10:00PM BST 02 Aug 2012 | By Martin Beckford, Home Affairs Editor

Posted on 08/02/2012 3:28:17 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin

A 10-year-old Jewish girl may become a Christian after a judge rejected claims by her mother that she had been “brainwashed” and was too young to change faith.

Judge John Platt said: “My job is to decide simply what is best for you and I have decided that the best thing for you is that you are allowed to start your baptism classes as soon as they can be arranged and that you are baptised as a Christian as soon as your minister feels you are ready.” But the judge stressed that it did not mean the girl would lose her Jewish heritage.

The girl was born in 2001 to Jewish parents. Her mother and father divorced in 2010 and she, and her younger brother, live for a week at a time with each.

Her father converted to Christianity after the breakdown of his marriage.

In November the girl’s mother, without telling anyone, sought a court order forbidding the father from baptising or confirming her into the Christian faith.

The father said his daughter told him after an evangelical Christian festival that she had “experienced an encounter with God”. He was initially sceptical and thought she was just “on a high”. The father also said he was “unhappy” when the girl went behind his back to talk to a Sunday school teacher about being baptised.

The girl’s grandparents accused her father of forcing her to give up her Jewish heritage, while a rabbi told the court it would be “unnatural to their soul” to make a child change religion. The judge was scathing about these claims, saying that neither the mother nor the grandparents had made “any real effort” to consider what was best for the girl while the rabbi’s letter was made in “inflammatory terms without any supporting evidence”.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: freedomofreligion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 08/02/2012 3:28:23 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

What? Before her Bat Mitzvah?


2 posted on 08/02/2012 3:30:12 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1290 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
“My job is to decide simply what is best for you and I have decided that the best thing for you is...

The horrying attitude of most judges and politicians.

Time to make a clean sweep.

3 posted on 08/02/2012 3:31:20 PM PDT by Drill Thrawl (I can haz CW 2 now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
Why shouldn't she be able to? Brainwashed? How silly.And yes,the opposite conversion (Christian to Jewish) should have been allowed too.
4 posted on 08/02/2012 3:34:21 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Poor Barack.If He's Reelected,Think Of The Mess He'll Inherit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drill Thrawl

“The horrying attitude of most judges and politicians.”

Naa. They’re just clearing the decks to allow mass conversion to Islam - as the Brits will find out when Muslims hit the 30% mark, with 55% of the younger adults being Muslim, and the non-Muslims being too few and too old to fight.

It’s over.


5 posted on 08/02/2012 3:35:19 PM PDT by BobL (Cruz'd to Victory - July 31, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

What’s the big deal? Those monotheists are all alike anyway.


6 posted on 08/02/2012 3:39:26 PM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

If she tried that from Islam she would be killed.


7 posted on 08/02/2012 3:46:35 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

let’s see here...give up Judaism and convert to an erroneous version of Christianity....how good is that? I guess, because she will be baptized, she will at least be absolved of original sin. Christ, however, laid out a plan for salvation and the protestant church wasn’t mentioned anywhere....in fact it didn’t exist for 1,600 years after He laid out the plan.


8 posted on 08/02/2012 3:47:23 PM PDT by terycarl (lurking, but well informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drill Thrawl

>>The horrying attitude of most judges and politicians.<<

Before we knee-jerk, reread the article. It appears Dad is an evangelical Christian and Mom is Jewish.

This is REALLY Mom v. Dad - the judge is using the kid’s wishes as a tie-breaker IMHO.


9 posted on 08/02/2012 3:51:10 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (obozo could bring back literal slavery with chains and still he will get 85+% of the black vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: terycarl
>> convert to an erroneous version of Christianity....how good is that? I guess, because she will be baptized, she will at least be absolved of original sin. Christ, however, laid out a plan for salvation and the protestant church wasn’t mentioned anywhere....in fact it didn’t exist for 1,600 years after He laid out the plan. <<

I didn't see anywhere in the article mentioning she wants to convert to a protestant denomination. In fact, the article talks about the dad who converted before her and mentions "The judge said it was “wholly wrong” for the mother to go to court without discussing it with the father or his priest." If the father's pastor is a priest, then he's probably Catholic, or possibly (though unlikely) Orthodox.

10 posted on 08/02/2012 3:52:33 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: terycarl
give up Judaism and convert to an erroneous version of Christianity

Which version would that be?

11 posted on 08/02/2012 3:52:57 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (obozo could bring back literal slavery with chains and still he will get 85+% of the black vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

“If the father’s pastor is a priest, then he’s probably Catholic, or possibly (though unlikely) Orthodox. ‘
________

Or Episcopalean (sp?).


12 posted on 08/02/2012 3:55:09 PM PDT by rem_mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

She can believe in her heart whatever she wants. As for outward signs of a religion (church attendance, baptism, or in other cases wearing a hajib, mosque attendance, or in other cases circumcision, wearing a special hat, attending temple) are up to her parents until she is independent.

In this case, dad’s ok with it, mom’s not, I say let the child split the difference and so as she wills.

That’s the way I see it.


13 posted on 08/02/2012 3:56:34 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

“. Christ, however, laid out a plan for salvation and the protestant church wasn’t mentioned anywhere”

Terycarl, he didn’t mention Roman Catholics, either. He just mentions the church, which RC’s think means them, and Protestants thinks means them.

FYI Bible believing Protestants believe they are the true church, maintained since apostolic times, just like the RC’s do. Where RCs say Protestants left to go with bad doctrine, Protestants say RCs left to go with bad doctrine.


14 posted on 08/02/2012 3:59:26 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

I thought the judge handled it pretty well. He didn’t ask for the case, the parents brought it to him.

He ruled that the girl could continue to study the religion that drew her, that she would still have her jewish roots, and that her parents would continue to love her whatever happened.

I thought he handled it correctly and sensitively. A judge should not be deciding what your religion should be and he didn’t try to. He just refused to deny the girl her right to believe what she already believed which was her father’s religion. Had she been from a Christian mother attracted to her father’s jewish faith the correct answer would still be the same.


15 posted on 08/02/2012 4:00:26 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero
"FYI Bible believing Protestants believe they are the true church, maintained since apostolic times, just like the RC’s do. Where RCs say Protestants left to go with bad doctrine, Protestants say RCs left to go with bad doctrine."

Except one of those holds that the Scriptures are the authority for believers, the other clings to a single guy in a bathrobe, with a pointy hat.

16 posted on 08/02/2012 4:08:38 PM PDT by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: terycarl
I guess, because she will be baptized, she will at least be absolved of original sin. Christ, however, laid out a plan for salvation and the protestant church wasn’t mentioned anywhere....in fact it didn’t exist for 1,600 years after He laid out the plan.

Hm there are several incorrect things in your statement, but let's start with the idea that Jesus laid out a plan for salvation. Jesus said "When you have lifted up the Son of Man, then you will know that I am [the one I claim to be] and that I do nothing on my own but speak just what the Father has taught me." therefore, if we are honest it is not Jesus's plan of salvation, but the Father's. {Jesus is merely the executor of it. (If "merely" can be applied to Jesus, that is.)}

Secondly, where can you find the doctrine that baptism washes away sin, original or otherwise? 1 John 1:7 states clearly that it is Jesus's own blood that washes away all sin. {Then there's Paul and James to consider.}

17 posted on 08/02/2012 4:22:06 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Before we knee-jerk, reread the article. It appears Dad is an evangelical Christian and Mom is Jewish.

This is REALLY Mom v. Dad - the judge is using the kid’s wishes as a tie-breaker IMHO.

EXACTLY.

I must admit I get tired of FReepers who immediately blame "big government" without knowing the facts.

Courts have had to, for hundreds of years, parse between religious convictions of divorced couples' kids. Nothing new, nor "big government"-like about this case. Just rather sad.

Similarly, libertarian-minded folks think if only government "got out of the marriage business," the homosexual-marriage debate would go away.

Such individuals know nothing about the complexities of English law involving marriage--complexities going back hundreds of years.

18 posted on 08/02/2012 4:27:07 PM PDT by AnalogReigns (reality is analog, not digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Baptismal regeneration isn’t as easy to dismiss as many want to assume:
“Corresponding to that, baptism now saves you— not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a good conscience—through the resurrection of Jesus Christ...” (1 Peter 3:21, in the New American Standard Bible (widely considered the most literal of English translations))


19 posted on 08/02/2012 4:31:51 PM PDT by AnalogReigns (reality is analog, not digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark; freedumb2003

Whoops, I meant to send the below to OneWingedShark, not freedumb2003.

Baptismal regeneration isn’t as easy to dismiss as many want to assume:
“Corresponding to that, baptism now saves you— not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a good conscience—through the resurrection of Jesus Christ...” (1 Peter 3:21, in the New American Standard Bible (widely considered the most literal of English translations))

I’m not really here to argue about baptism though... My main point is like freedumb2003—this is a parental custody issue, NOT a Judge-determining-religion/big government issue.


20 posted on 08/02/2012 4:38:32 PM PDT by AnalogReigns (reality is analog, not digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson