Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney Comes Out in Support of Homosexual Boy Scout Leaders, Members
Christian News ^ | August 6, 2012 | Heather Clark

Posted on 08/07/2012 6:36:10 AM PDT by xzins

A spokesperson for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has advised that the former Massachusetts governor disagrees with the Boy Scout’s current policy prohibiting open homosexuals from serving as members and leaders.

According to The Associated Press, Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul told the news outlet in an email that Romney still stands by his beliefs that homosexual men should be able to serve in the organization. She specifically noted that Romney had outlined his views in 1994 during a political debate, and that his stance has not changed.

“I support the right of the Boy Scouts of America to decide what it wants to do on that issue,” Romney stated during the debate. “I feel that all people should be able to participate in the Boy Scouts regardless of their sexual orientation.”

As previously reported, last month, the Boy Scouts of America issued a statement reaffirming its policy prohibiting open homosexuals from joining the organization.

“The committee’s work and conclusion is that this policy reflects the beliefs and perspectives of the BSA’s members, thereby allowing Scouting to remain focused on its mission and the work it is doing to serve more youth,” the statement said. “The review included forthright and candid conversation and extensive research and evaluations — both from within Scouting and from outside of the organization.”

The decision to reiterate and reaffirm the Scout’s current policy followed two years of deliberations from an eleven-member committee comprised of Boy Scout executives and other volunteers who represented “a diversity of perspectives and opinions.”

When all was said and done, the committee concluded that the restriction served as “the best policy” for the Boy Scouts.

The current policy reads, “While the BSA does not proactively inquire about the sexual orientation of employees, volunteers, or members, we do not grant membership to individuals who are open or avowed homosexuals or who engage in behavior that would become a distraction to the mission of the BSA.”

Mitt Romney also recently reiterated his support for homosexual adoption. This past May, in an interview with Neil Cavuto of Fox News, he explained that while he is against the concept of homosexual “marriage,” he does believe that homosexual couples should be able to adopt children.

“[I]f two people of the same gender want to live together, want to have a loving relationship, or even to adopt a child, in my state, individuals of the same sex were able to adopt children. In my view, that’s something that people have a right to do,” Romney outlined. “But, to call that ‘marriage’ is something that in my view is a departure from the real meaning of that word.”

He had first outlined his position on the matter in 1996 while talking to CNN’s Wolf Blitzer.

“Well, they are able to adopt children,” he said. “I’m not going to change that.”

Prior to Saul serving as Romney’s press secretary, Richard Grenell, an open homosexual, filled the position.

Related Stories:


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boyscouts; bsa; circularfiringsquad; elections; flipflopper; goode; homosexualagenda; moron; pedophiles; politicalsuicide; rinoromney; romney; romneyagenda; romneyhasnoshame; romneymarriage; romneytruthfile; scouts; suicide
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 401-428 next last
To: babble-on
Good for Mitt, I agree with him.

With which waffle of Mitt's do you agree.

101 posted on 08/07/2012 7:44:03 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Dead wrong.

A significant percentage go after any kid they can get ahold of, regardless of the sex. There are women who abuse both little girls and little boys, as well as men who do the same.

Some perverts are fixated on control, or despoiling purity, or orgasms rather than the bodies of their victims.

What is true, however, is that an adult who is not sexually attracted to any but the opposite sex are generally safer around kids of their own gender.

102 posted on 08/07/2012 7:44:39 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Romney is not the only choice that conservatives have.

I guess we will all just have to vote for Virgil to teach those nasty wepublicans a lesson.

Your crap is getting tiresome. Give it a rest.

103 posted on 08/07/2012 7:45:40 AM PDT by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg

Very good points: he covers both bases, like the moderate
he is. It is important at this point NOT to let issues like
this become top-heavy and get demagogued into allowing Team
Obama to gain the upper hand in the “Social Issues” realm.
You’ve got to pick your battles. I have no doubt Romney really believes what he is quoted as believing, and he’s managed to cover both bases “without even trying”.


104 posted on 08/07/2012 7:47:01 AM PDT by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
Because he's not Obama; just a carbon copy.

That's about the ONLY reason I have any more to vote for him. He's NOT Obama. I just would like to believe his words about wanting to make America successful, etc... so hard...but right... we don't want Obama tearing down America in another four years.
105 posted on 08/07/2012 7:47:19 AM PDT by Thorliveshere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: xzins
It’s about his beliefs, Steamburg.

He believes in the rule of law and in letting the voters decide.

Romney: "One-hundred-and-seventy-thousand citizens followed our Constitution's process to petition government. They followed the prescribed process to place an item of importance before the voters. They asked for democracy.

"But today, by effectively avoiding the constitutionally required vote on same-sex marriage, 109 legislators disgraced their oath of office. Each of them swore to follow the Constitution. The Constitution plainly states that when a qualified petition is placed before them, they 'shall' vote. By not voting, we have witnessed the triumph of arrogance over democracy. Whether or not you favor same-sex marriage, you should be very concerned that the rule of law and the sovereignty of the people have been trampled."

Editorial: Marriage fiat in Massachusetts The Washington Times Published November 11, 2006

http://www.voteonmarriage.org/editorials.shtml#hc060107

If I were able to pick an ideal candidate, neither of the two on offer would make my list.

However, out of the two VIABLE candidates, Obama, with his unabashed contempt for the rule of law, is clearly the greater threat to our nation. Romney believes in following the law; Obama rules by his own personal fiat tool - the executive order.

106 posted on 08/07/2012 7:48:24 AM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
Dead wrong? I think you didn't read what I posted. 100% of male pedophiles who prey on boys are HOMOSEXUAL.

It is an incontrovertible statement. A female pedophile is not, after all, a male. A male who has sex with a male IS a homosexual ~ the condition is defined by the act.

107 posted on 08/07/2012 7:48:41 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Romney is not the only choice that conservatives have.
Really? I would very much welcome another choice besides Obozo.... Do you have someone in mind who will be nominated as the Republican candidate for POTUS? Thanks, Moleman
108 posted on 08/07/2012 7:49:25 AM PDT by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: redtetrahedron

But, they are your only choice if you don’t want to support someone who stands up for things you abhor, that are against nature itself, that are against Nature’s God.


109 posted on 08/07/2012 7:50:06 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Thanks for the ping!


110 posted on 08/07/2012 7:52:00 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Mitt's numerous stories have been quite consistent over the years.

He will tell you anything he thinks you will believe that he said ~ and walk away and do what he said he was going to do anyway.

The man is a pathological liar, and probably bi-sexual, based on what he has said and has said recently, and will probably be saying somewhere today.

111 posted on 08/07/2012 7:52:18 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SMM48
Your crap is getting tiresome. Give it a rest.

Mitt Romney did not ask my permission to come out in support of homosexual boy scout leaders and members. He did that all on his own.

Nor did he ask my permission to say of the 1st amendment speech and religious freedom, Chick-fil-A case, that it was not part of his campaign.

I don't have to make this stuff up, smm, Mitt's the source of it all.

Why blame me? All I did was post it.

112 posted on 08/07/2012 7:55:00 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: John W

The Republican candidate is still anywhere from 2 million to 6 million voters short.


113 posted on 08/07/2012 7:55:36 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: xzins

He raised taxes on the blind. Somebody called it a “fee” and he jumped on doing that like a bedbug on your leg.


114 posted on 08/07/2012 7:56:53 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: greyfox
What a bizarre belief. Both pedophilia and homosexuality are defined by the acts. A homosexual who targets young boys is still a homosexual and he is a pedophile.

What Romney said is he doesn't care of pedophiles serve as Boy Scout leaders.

115 posted on 08/07/2012 7:59:27 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

According to who or what?


116 posted on 08/07/2012 8:00:01 AM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

But I wouldn’t want him on the Troop Board ~ nor would I trust this dude on camping trips. He’d be the kind of parent we’d want to stay home and away from our Boy Scout troop.


117 posted on 08/07/2012 8:00:57 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: greyfox
“(Mitt and Obama: They’re the same poison, just a different potency.)”

I'll type it again.

Heart attack(D)

Cancer(R)

FMCDH(BITS)

118 posted on 08/07/2012 8:01:40 AM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: xzins

“I feel that all people should be able to participate in the Boy Scouts regardless of their sexual orientation.”

So...Romney thinks it’s OK for my Grandmother to join the BSA?


119 posted on 08/07/2012 8:02:24 AM PDT by moovova (Chic-fil-A is good...and right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moleman

The republicans will not displace Mitt. In fact, they must WANT to rebrand their party as a liberal-moderate party, home of the gay agenda, endless spending, and big government. They must WANT to get rid of those pesky conservatives.

Or they want to lose.

Nonetheless, there will be conservatives on the ballot in Michigan. You will have a choice.


120 posted on 08/07/2012 8:02:51 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper
This guy is not different than Obama.

Except for being an American?

121 posted on 08/07/2012 8:04:16 AM PDT by Max in Utah (A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Thanks to all who voted for Romney in the primaries. I’ll vote for him in November but I have never not wanted to vote for anyone so much in my life that I am going to vote for.


122 posted on 08/07/2012 8:05:12 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

Some are working to establish a viable conservative party.

Everything starts someplace, and why not when 2 radical liberals are the only choice?


123 posted on 08/07/2012 8:06:27 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
No, this is not the anti-Romney crowd. This is the pro heteroxexual crowd, and and the one that demands we protect children from sexual predators.

Romney is simply on the wrong side with his expressed personal beliefs.

He can't be trusted.

Now, do Mormons have some positions on whether or not children should be protected from sexual predators? Are they in favor of heterosexuality?

Maybe we should all turn against Romney for being, as it were, a sort of one-man Jack Mormon who twists and perverts traditional beliefs to suit his political agenda (rather than being against him for seeking his religious agenda by perverting political positions).

Or, maybe he's just an ol'perv into who knows what.

124 posted on 08/07/2012 8:07:16 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

You don’t have to vote for Romney.


125 posted on 08/07/2012 8:08:03 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: dinodino

Interesting comment ~ probably just the way Romney likes it too.


126 posted on 08/07/2012 8:10:41 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: delcopatriot

I have cast my ballot for despicable Rino’s before...

And as a "thank you", the GOP(e) sends you another despicable RINO for your vote four years later. Imagine that. The viscous cycle ends when we end it; they are quite happy to allow it to perpetuate. I won't be voting for either of the liberal POTUS candidates on the ballot this year. Romney is going to have to buy a LOT of "moderate" liberals to make up for the conservative base he is spitting on. I wonder if that will drive him further left?


127 posted on 08/07/2012 8:11:22 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Most New England politicians, both democrats and Republicans; support the sodomite agenda and abortion. Here in Red Hampshire; you have Republican Charles Bass opposed by Anne McLane Kuster, daughter of Satan. BOTH support abortion. What do you do?


128 posted on 08/07/2012 8:12:23 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I hate being forced to vote for a freaking RINO.

Texas was sued by the DOJ for our new voting district map, then over voter ID.

These efforts threw Texas's primary out late. The nominee was all but decided by the time we were able to vote.

Now....we gotta deal with yet another freaking RINO.

129 posted on 08/07/2012 8:12:43 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

He’s a religious man? How so?


130 posted on 08/07/2012 8:13:32 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solson
This is yet another hit job.

And with Obummer and the 'Rats openly supporting gay marriage, they desperately need one.

131 posted on 08/07/2012 8:14:13 AM PDT by jimt (Fear is the darkroom where negatives are developed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: xzins
He's got probably a dozen too many former staff aides from his Massachusetts campaigns wandering about trying to make it look like he's soft on gays.

That stuff is coming across to people who don't live in Massachusetts as if he IS gay.

The only solution is a quick visit to ol'doc Bachmann and a whole new staff, none of whom are from Massachuetts!

Oh, and he has a bunch of gays around him as well. Guess he thinks they are a significant part of the population ~ or maybe they're just there to be handy~!

132 posted on 08/07/2012 8:14:35 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

You support the idea of a 3rd conservative party.

It really is the only option, wkwe.

There is no turning the republican party to the right. The GOP-E owns it lock, stock, and barrel. They’ve written the rules so that it will never be taken out of their hands.

Reagan tried, but the rules people simply waited for his time to pass. This is no longer Ronald Reagan’s republican party. This is Joe Liebermann’s republican party.


133 posted on 08/07/2012 8:17:22 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: A. Patriot

Check your state's ballot. See if Virgil Goode (click) will be on it. There's no one who is remotely willing to support Romney that should not be absolutely giddy about supporting Goode. If we spread the word and all support Goode ... he wins. If he loses but acquires 30+% of the vote, it's 1856 all over again and the current Republican Party goes the way of the Whigs and a new republican party is born.


134 posted on 08/07/2012 8:18:43 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Solson; Gator113
an article with two quotes, one from 1994, the other from 1996, both in support of homosexuals, yet this is now news because the author of the article decided so?? This is yet another hit job. Want to know what Romney thinks NOW rather than 15-20 years ago? Ask him and then quote EXACTLY what he says.

Thanks. The damned leftwing lying press got me that time.

135 posted on 08/07/2012 8:23:07 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I love the Universe, and it loves me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper; xzins

If he (Romney) were making the rules, he’d let homosexuals participate.

Agreed ... and that's the problem right there. FRiend, he's running for POTUS. He's going to be a big part of making *a lot* of rules. That's why we conservatives are so disappointed and bitter about having this liberal goober forced upon us in a "leadership" position. His rules are not our rules; he does not represent us; he is not one of us; he has no business being on our ticket.


136 posted on 08/07/2012 8:23:08 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: John W
You can do your own analysis. Take 2008 or 2004 as a baseline. See what it takes for one candidate to overcome another candidate's parties lasst or best effort.

Romney is still short, and with more discussion of his torrid love affair with the concept of homosexuality over the years, he could really, really, really be short.

I suspect he thinks 10 to 20% of the population are active, practicing homosexuals.

137 posted on 08/07/2012 8:24:00 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: greyfox

And just HOW do you propose the BSA be able to tell the difference between the “gay and pedophile” and then allow one over the other to participate in the BSA? Do we take their word for it? “Yes sir Mr. Scoutmaster, I’m a raging queen, but trust me, I’m not into boys.”

But I guess in your world, it would be acceptable if the Scoutmasters have to watch their own asses because the queers might target them instead?


138 posted on 08/07/2012 8:25:21 AM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political party's in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?
You pray for a stray ICBM or something perhaps ~ after you move.

Too many Satanists around spoils the broth fur shur.

139 posted on 08/07/2012 8:27:39 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: xzins

More proof here of ROmney's idiocies.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2914357/posts?page=21#21

140 posted on 08/07/2012 8:30:43 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Just like McLame pimped for Obama in ‘08, Mitt is doing the same for him this time as well. The GOP is worse than the RATS. At least with the RATS we knew game plan but the GOP is keeps stabbing us in the back and we keep taking it.


141 posted on 08/07/2012 8:31:01 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Some are working to establish a viable conservative party. Everything starts someplace, and why not when 2 radical liberals are the only choice?

Reclaiming the Republican party is the more practical and direct route to conservative power. A conservative third party only advances the leftist agenda, numerically speaking (e.g. Ross Perot).

Meanwhile, our God-given freedoms are tottering on a dangerous precipice. Political differences become irrelevant when a corrupt leader such as Obama holds the Constitution and the Rule of Law in absolute contempt, and ignores or circumvents both at every opportunity.

142 posted on 08/07/2012 8:31:38 AM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
The entire statement is a bit more revealing and not quite so damning:
I concur with your observation. Unfortunately, your opinion is not going to sway anyone today.

However, knowing what he believes does not bode well for us when it comes time to appoint judges that will make that decision.

We are headed towards Sodom, and sadly it was just a matter of time.

Whats next demanding the Angels be released so the men can defile them in the streets? I can see Romney's take on it now,
I agree with the angels right to decline the abuse, but I personally think it is OK if they want to abuse them.

143 posted on 08/07/2012 8:33:33 AM PDT by OneVike (I'm just a Christian waiting to go home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: xzins
The two major candidates seem to be pretty much the same on social issues (though Romney claims to have changed his mind on abortion), but Obama wants nothing less than the DEATH of the Republic. If he wins in November, there won't be any more elections to 'fix' it. So all other things being equal, it would be acceptable in my view to vote for Romney.
That said, my state (AL) will go for Romney with or without my vote, so I could vote third party, but conservatives in other swing states wouldn't have that luxury.
144 posted on 08/07/2012 8:34:02 AM PDT by redtetrahedron ("Before I formed thee in the bowels of thy mother, I knew thee" - Jer 1:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: xzins
The avowed Conservative voters inside the Republican umbrella are at a minimum 40% of total party actual, on the ground voting strength.

African Americans have a similar impact inside the Democrat coalition in the 25 some states where they are mostly located (and where they run some cities, which always gives a voting bloc a bit more clout).

The Democrats cannot afford to have a black walkout. The Republicans cannot afford to have a Conservative walkout.

All same thing in both cases ~ total party meltdown.

On the other hand, the 60% of the part that is not strictly Conservative is broken up into several different groups. There is the 15% GOP-e crowd ~ they are a full 25% of the remaining 60% which gives them a bit more recognition among regular Republicans than they deserve. They also control the rump Republican parties in the states like Massachuetts and New York without significant Republican control, and certainly without Conservative control.

But, they're still only 15% of the total on the ground Republican base voting strength and can be, if an attempt is made, KICKED TO THE CURB like an old paper cup from 7/11.

The Conservatives still outvote all the other blocs.

Maybe the way to start this is to deny the GOP-e a Convention Quorum. I don't know what the quorum rules are, but if the delegates don't go the convention doesn't happen. There are ways to make this an objective.

145 posted on 08/07/2012 8:36:01 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Mitt Romney never met a homosexual that he didn’t like.

And while of that subject he said that he was reminded of that old 1950-60 era TV game show titled "I've Got A Secret".

146 posted on 08/07/2012 8:38:25 AM PDT by Ron H. (Ahh, how's that multi-culturism thing working out for you these days?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I heard Romneys handler was out of touch..this proves it. No indoctrination into Gay life style for boy scouts should be his position.


147 posted on 08/07/2012 8:41:00 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

The whole point of this post is to bring down romney and support Obama - an obama troll?

Sure. Or maybe it is to expose Romney for the wolf in sheep's clothing that he is, and get that word out to all conservatives, before we end up handing him the keys to the hen house. We will never advance a conservative agenda by putting a liberal in charge of implementing one. It'll never happen. We either vote for a conservative or at least prepare ourselves for buyer's remorse.


148 posted on 08/07/2012 8:42:07 AM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

So, what is your goal here? I am assuming it isn’t to make sure he is short enough that Obama is re-elected.


149 posted on 08/07/2012 8:42:46 AM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Yes, Respect his opinion. You are entitled to disagree with him all you like, but it’s important to note that Romney didn’t propose legislation to make it illegal for you to oppose him. I may not agree with him on lots of things, but he has never done anything to justify the personal attacks I have seen on this forum.

This is neither the first or last time I will wonder how many hard line liberals are trying to hide under the label of “Christian”. It’s almost like how many can get in the same closet.


150 posted on 08/07/2012 8:43:23 AM PDT by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 401-428 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson