Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BobbyJindal.com Server Change Stirs New VP Speculation
Talk Radio News Service ^ | 8/9/2012 | Luke Vargas

Posted on 08/10/2012 7:42:45 AM PDT by MountainLoop

Reporters have been scrambling to track Wikipedia article edits and other “behind the scenes” clues for any possible advanced word about Mitt Romney’s upcoming vice presidential selection for weeks, and a website registration change Thursday built on that trend, steering attention to Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal’s prospects for the job. Publicly available information for BobbyJindal.com showed a change in the site’s registration information occurring today, prompting speculation that communications teams affiliated with Romney’s campaign or the Governor himself could be in the preliminary stages of unveiling a new web presence for the Governor should he be chosen as the Republican candidate’s running mate. In the hours after Jindal’s servers changed, an unused website for Tim Pawlenty, Paul Ryan’s Congressional campaign page, Marco Rubio’s official Senate website, and Rob Portman’s Senate campaign site have undergone updates to their administrative contact information. In 2008, then-Senator Joe Biden’s website was changed on the day of his selection as vice president to reflect a new design in line with the visual theme of Barack Obama’s campaign , even though news of his announcement began to leak out the previous day when Secret Service personnel were spotted outside of his Delaware residence.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bobbyjindal; election2012; romney2012; vp
I thought this was interesting!
1 posted on 08/10/2012 7:42:54 AM PDT by MountainLoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MountainLoop

Golly-gee.....but I thought I’d read somewhere that he was..... not eligible...er sumpthin’ ...???/!!!!!

Semper Wondering!!!!!
*****


2 posted on 08/10/2012 7:47:26 AM PDT by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MountainLoop
This would completely neutralize all talk that Ubama is ineligible.

That must be the plan.

3 posted on 08/10/2012 7:52:31 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MountainLoop

Or they were just updating the server. That does happen.

I have a feeling it will be someone that few are speculating on.


4 posted on 08/10/2012 7:52:53 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunnyg

Jindal is not eligible to be VPOTUS. Stooping to Ibama’s level and dumping our principals for politics is not virtuous.


5 posted on 08/10/2012 7:53:01 AM PDT by frogjerk (OBAMA NOV 2012 = HORSEMEAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

” the plan. “
****

plan?

puppets never think of the plan....they are perfectly content just being.....jerked around...

;)

Semper WTF
*****


6 posted on 08/10/2012 7:57:19 AM PDT by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
Jindal is not eligible to be VPOTUS. Stooping to Ibama’s level and dumping our principals for politics is not virtuous.

I completely agree, and this needs to be drilled into the skulls of our politicians! We don't accept the Marxist faggot, Obama, as eligible, and we also won't accept Jindal or Rubio as VP since they're both ineligible by jus sanguinis.

7 posted on 08/10/2012 7:58:40 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gunnyg

Reporters will grasp at anything for a scoop and bragging rights. It reminds me of throwing peanuts to the monkeys at the zoo.............


8 posted on 08/10/2012 8:02:42 AM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MountainLoop

In the past Willard has mocked the birthers and told us to leave Obama alone, that he was born in Hawaii and is eligible..

part odf the reason for Willard’s insistance in ignoring the Constituation is his only problem with a father born outside the US, in Mexico...

(George Romney had his own problems with eligibility when he ran for POTUS)

If Willard picks Governor Jindal he will be thumbing his snotty nose at the birthers as well as neutralizing any argument that Obama is ineligible...

Hardly a Constitutionally nor American thing to do...

But then when has something “trivial” ever stopped the entitled Willard...


9 posted on 08/10/2012 8:05:47 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MountainLoop

Bobby Jindal would bring a lot of conservatives to the polls, just like Sarah Palin did for McCain.


10 posted on 08/10/2012 8:05:51 AM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

I believe Nikki Haley falls into the same category. Stupid pols can’t figure out what natural born citizen means. Would they be so dismissive if a candidate was only 30 instead of 35?


11 posted on 08/10/2012 8:06:48 AM PDT by klb99 (I now understand why the South seceeded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MountainLoop

Others are reporting that Droopy Pawlenty’s website is down and being scrubbed for the same reason. Lots of speculation.

To make the libtards go nuts, Palin should temporarily pull down her site with some vague reason that makes them think Mitt has picked her as his Veep.


12 posted on 08/10/2012 8:08:34 AM PDT by peyton randolph (Mitt has more views on an issue than he has pairs of magic underpants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
Jindal is not eligible to be VPOTUS

Why not? He was born in the US. I know his parents weren't, though. Not flaming...just seriously asking.

13 posted on 08/10/2012 8:09:36 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
"I have a feeling it will be someone that few are speculating on. "

I agree. I recently came to the conclusion that the choice might be a woman, but I'm not aware of any being considered except Condi, and I don't believe that she will be the choice.

14 posted on 08/10/2012 8:13:45 AM PDT by matthew fuller (They'll have to pry my gun, my bible, and my chikin from my cold dead fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MountainLoop

new wiki entry!!!!....I, robert jindal, do saul leminy swear that I is not natural born citizen of united states. sorry for da delay.


15 posted on 08/10/2012 8:34:13 AM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: klb99
The word "constitution" means more than just the old "living document" residing in DC

constitution
con·sti·tu·tion
noun
1.the way in which a thing is composed or made up; makeup; composition
2.the physical character of the body as to strength, health, etc.
3.Medicine/Medical, Psychology . the aggregate of a person's physical and psychological characteristics.
4.the act or process of constituting; establishment.
5.the state of being constituted; formation.

So aside from being the establishing document for our Republic, it also, I believe, is a representation of the health of our nation. Its very name represents the heartiness of our country and the soul of it.

I believe the further we stray from the Constitution of the United States, the further we stray from our own health. The Founders had an idea and knew what they wanted when it came to leadership in this nature. With such bastardizations of liberty as the 17th Amendment, allowing popular elections of Senators, and the arbitrary freezing of Representatives at 435, we've destroyed threads in the very fabric of our nation's health.

By allowing any man or woman who is not born of parents who are solely loyal to our great nation, we are allowing any man or woman born with fealty to a potential enemy to lead our nation into that enemy's hands.

Regardless of where or when Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama was born and/or raised, his father was known to be loyal to the British by his citizenship alone. This very fact should've disqualified Obama from leading this nation, but it did not.

To allow another man or woman to take the office of President or even Vice President under these pretenses, and regardless of political motives, is to continue to allow the undermining of our nations very fabric of existence.

16 posted on 08/10/2012 8:36:55 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

do you actually think that every dirtbag born in the US is eligible to be president, or that there might be further qualifications?????


17 posted on 08/10/2012 8:38:07 AM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’ve been saying for 4 years that that’s the plan. With Jindal as VP, that will put a stop to any GOP questions on eligibility.


18 posted on 08/10/2012 8:45:43 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: biggredd1
do you actually think that every dirtbag born in the US is eligible to be president, or that there might be further qualifications?????

That's why I asked a simple question. Rather than being a snide doosh, perhaps you would be kind enough to actually list a few of those further qualifications hmmm?

19 posted on 08/10/2012 8:47:43 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: biggredd1
do you actually think that every dirtbag born in the US is eligible to be president, or that there might be further qualifications?????

Not everyone. Only those 35 or older. Jindal is eligible.

20 posted on 08/10/2012 8:48:33 AM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
perhaps you would be kind enough to actually list a few of those further qualifications hmmm?

Birthers believe that being born in the U.S. is not enough, that one's parents must have also been U.S. citizens at the time of birth. It was a definition they created to be a standard of eligibility that Obama could not possibly meet. So far, nobody outside of the birther short bus is buying this definition. Yet they'll scream from the rooftops that they're right and everyone else is wrong despite a mountain of failed lawsuits that say otherwise.

However, to be consistently wrong, birthers are now forced to argue that stalwart conservatives such as Bobby Jindal and Marco Rubio are equally inelgible. Fortunately for these two individuals, nobody is buying the nonsense birthers are selling.

21 posted on 08/10/2012 8:56:30 AM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

If Jindal is not eligible, Obama folks may step into trap if they call out Mitt and Jindal.

“Obama, lets see your eligibility records since you want to see Jindal’s”.

Really put the force on Obama before saying Jindal was not the choice, just a rumor; our real choice, from the beginning, is _________________.

Force Obama into a corner he can’t get out of without showing his eligibility.

If he cannot provide eligibility during a vetting process, then he can’t run for president.

Hey, Obama, background checks go both ways and it is the burden for the candidates to prove who they are.

The importance and appearance make it imperative for Obama to disclose.


22 posted on 08/10/2012 9:01:35 AM PDT by hummingbird (Breitbart and Spartacus: here, there, everywhere. Join them. Join us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
"To make the libtards go nuts, Palin should temporarily pull down her site with some vague reason that makes them think Mitt has picked her as his Veep."

That would be s-w-e-e-t!

Keep dems running around in circles.

En garde. The game is afoot!

23 posted on 08/10/2012 9:08:21 AM PDT by hummingbird (Breitbart and Spartacus: here, there, everywhere. Join them. Join us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MountainLoop

With the Romney pick for VP Possibly being a non natural born citizen, how does one go about filing suit to try and stop the state ballot from including that pick? Would circuit or county court work instead of going to a state court?
In the federal system there is a procedure where someone can file with out putting up money. Indigent status. Some states may have this also.
September one and 10,000 cases are filed nation wide just might give some of the elite pause.


24 posted on 08/10/2012 9:32:04 AM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Maybe the horse (RNC) will learn to sing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

And that statement makes you complicit in the fraud.
The Supreme court case Minor vs Happersett makes clear and establishes precedent that a natural born citizen must be born on this nations soil and have both parents as US citizens at the time of birth. This case is cited numerous times as the legal definition for “natural born citizen”. On-line sources can not be relied on for accuracy as they have been abridged to hide Obama’s fraud.


25 posted on 08/10/2012 9:48:09 AM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Maybe the horse (RNC) will learn to sing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Read ‘em an weep, Mr. Know-It-All:

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/minorvhapp.html


26 posted on 08/10/2012 10:22:23 AM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (Tosca, mi fai dimenticare Iddio!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Thank you, that’s very helpful. I didn’t think they were ineligible.


27 posted on 08/10/2012 10:22:49 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
A portion of the the nutty birthers believe a "natural born citizen" must have been born in the US and had two citizen parents at the time of birth.

There was once a standard for citizenship that children of two citizen parents were citizens regardless of where they were born. In fact, the very first Congress and President Washington passed this into law in the Naturalization Act of 1790.

Now the birthers will ignore that the Naturalization Act of 1790 used the term "natural born citizen" to removed a requirement to be born in the US meaning most importantly the "natural born citizen" term, that is native born citizens, are whatever Congress says and this was so even in the start of the nation in the minds of those involved in the founding.

It's an inconvenient truth for the birthers who themselves can't settled on a single definition.

Jindal, Rubio and others are native born American citizens under US law and thus qualify under the "natural born citizen" requirement.

Rubio shouldn't be chosen because he's too new on the scene and we know how that works out... look at Obama. Neither man is Abe Lincoln.

While considered an outstanding manager, Jindal is not a pretty face and, as I recall from a State of the Union response, not much of a speaker. I don't see how he'd help win an election that is largely a popularity contest. Of course I'm in a bitterly cynical mood, of the opinion no one could stop Obama in part because too many conservatives don't want him stopped as well as the "historical nature" of his presidency.

28 posted on 08/10/2012 11:53:18 AM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine

Your excerpt covered only the voting portion of the case.


29 posted on 08/10/2012 1:16:24 PM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Maybe the horse (RNC) will learn to sing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson