Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Harvard essay, young Michelle Obama argued for race-based faculty hiring
Daily Caller ^ | August 15, 2012 | Charles Johnson

Posted on 08/15/2012 12:31:05 PM PDT by grundle

During her third and final year at Harvard Law School, first lady Michelle Obama — then named Michelle Robinson — penned an article for the newsletter of Harvard’s Black Law Students Association (BLSA), arguing that Harvard and its students were perpetuating “racist and sexist stereotypes” by not intentionally hiring minority and female law professors on the basis of their sex or skin color.

The 1988 essay, titled “Minority and Women Law Professors: A Comparison of Teaching Styles,” ran in a special edition of the BLSA Memo. The future first lady justified her demands for more black and female law school faculty by attacking the “traditional model,” in which law students were educated through the Socratic method.

She also opposed the traditional meritocratic hiring principle, where professors with better legal pedigrees were more often hired, arguing that it limited the success of women and blacks.

“The faculty’s decision to distrust and ignore non-traditional qualities in choosing and tenuring law professors merely reinforces racist and sexist stereotypes,” Mrs. Obama wrote, ”which, in turn, serve to legitimize students’ tendencies to distrust certain types of teaching that do not resemble the traditional images.”

In particular, she condemned the Harvard law professor ideal made famous in John Osborn’s 1970 book “The Paper Chase” and Scott Turow’s 1977 autobiographical novel “One-L,” for promoting the view that law school faculty should be “cold, callous, domineering, old, white men who took pleasure in engaging their students in humiliating and often brutal discourse.” She faulted her fellow students for being “racist” and “sexist” and buying into that particular “image” of a proper law school education.

Instead, she praised the teaching of several professors who didn’t use the Socratic method, including the far-left academics Martha Minow and Charles Ogletree. Minow’s father, Newton Minow, later recruited Michelle and Barack Obama to Sidley Austin, the Chicago law firm where the two met. Ogletree, who mentored both Michelle and Barack at Harvard, admitted during the 2008 election that he had concealed a videotape of Obama praising “critical race theory” architect Derrick Bell.

Michelle also gushed praise for critical race theory itself — the view that law is an instrument of the powerful against the powerless, rather than an effort to seek justice.

“Now, unlike before, students are being made to see how issues of class, race, and sex are relevant to questions of law,” she wrote. These issues, she said, were “being presented by people who possess the enthusiasm, sensitivity, and ingenuity necessary to bring excitement back into the classroom.”

Her choice of language bore clear similarities to the “empathy” test Barack Obama promised to use when deciding on nominees for the judiciary. If the advances of the critical race movement were stymied, Michelle worried, this “new breed of law professors will be systematically excluded” from Harvard.

During the final weeks before she received her Harvard law degree, Mrs. Obama participated in a sit-in protest along with about 50 other BLSA members. In what The New York Times called an “occupation,” the future lawyers stormed the office of Dean James Vorenberg on May 10, 1988 with a list of 12 demands.

Carrying signs demanding an “end to racism,” they occupied the dean’s office for 24 hours and demanded that Harvard Law School hire 20 female or minority professors in the next four years as tenured, or tenure-track, professors. Seven of those professors, they insisted, must be black — and four of those seven female.

They also demanded tenure for Ogletree and a deanship for Bell, and dictated a new plan for curriculum diversity that would include a required course on racial issues.

During the Obama presidency, the same Mrs. Obama has reportedly helped the president pick appointees to the federal courts. Along with Cassandra Butts — a former White House deputy counsel and another Derrick Bell disciple — the first lady reportedly helped Obama decide on the “wise Latina” Sonia Sotomayor as a Supreme Court nominee.

President Obama also named Robert Wilkins, the president of the Harvard BLSA in 1988 and organizer of the occupation of the dean’s office, to a federal circuit judgeship in the District of Columbia.

“Diversity in this country is a good thing,” Mrs. Obama told MSNBC when asked about Sotomayor, “whether it’s gender or race or socio-economic background or religion. You know, that’s the world I come from.”


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Her article can be read here - you need to have Javascript turned on.
1 posted on 08/15/2012 12:31:10 PM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

“...Harvard and its students were perpetuating “racist and sexist stereotypes” by not intentionally hiring minority and female law professors on the basis of their sex or skin color.”

And she and her vapid hubby - through their indescribably awful performance as Cretin-in-Chief and wife thing, have done a superb job of continuing that perpetuation.

When I want intellectual input from African Americans, I turn to Walter Williams, Thomas Sowell, Allen West, and many others. They are intelligent and talented. She and he are not.


2 posted on 08/15/2012 12:35:46 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
Bank on it... MO has been p#%$ed off at the world for a long time!

It's funny too because, by her own admission, she has received assistance and special consideration in order to overcome her early disadvantages in life. Now she has more than most minority women and ought to be grateful for the assistance she got and she should be helping others out of their alienation and hostility....so they can ACHIEVE too

3 posted on 08/15/2012 12:42:37 PM PDT by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

Janna Ryan is an attorney. I guarantee that she didn’t write anything so full of malarky.


4 posted on 08/15/2012 12:57:40 PM PDT by Kanzan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Well at least Moochelle’s college writings and grades are accessible.
5 posted on 08/15/2012 12:58:15 PM PDT by dblshot (Insanity: electing the same people over and over and expecting different results.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
The left’s philosophy in a nutshell:

“I deserve more because I'm a victim. That makes me better and more deserving than you.”

“You're a victimizer and a racist. You deserve less and the government should take it from you and give it to me because I'm more worthy.”

6 posted on 08/15/2012 1:02:36 PM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Carrying signs demanding an “end to racism,” they occupied the dean’s office for 24 hours and demanded that Harvard Law School hire 20 female or minority professors in the next four years as tenured, or tenure-track, professors. Seven of those professors, they insisted, must be black — and four of those seven female.

Harvard listened... and hired Elizabeth Warren. "Minority" and female, 2 out of 3, not bad.

Do I need the "/S" here?

7 posted on 08/15/2012 1:05:23 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
She heap big minority - first ‘woman of color’ at Hahvahd law - color be white - me um call that a twofer for Fauxahontis.
8 posted on 08/15/2012 1:10:25 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grundle

We need race based hiring.

Let us start with the NBA. No more than 12% can be black in accordance their percentage of the population.


9 posted on 08/15/2012 1:12:45 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

So lets guess who was really responsible for the two new chick picks on the supreme court.


10 posted on 08/15/2012 1:15:49 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
That was what the "strike for diversity" was all about ...

... okay, it was all about having a day off and partying, but that's what it was allegedly supposed to be about ...

(The strike was during Barack's days at the school, but the theories and tendencies were already in circulation before that.)

11 posted on 08/15/2012 1:22:22 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I see Elizabeth Warren did just that


12 posted on 08/15/2012 1:22:44 PM PDT by scooby321 (AMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

The two biggest Affirmative Action parasites are never going to be satisfied, but the millions they’ll have to live large after their luck runs out in D. C ought to buy them dozens of fellow leeches, who will find it profitable to hang with such disreputable characters.


13 posted on 08/15/2012 1:25:43 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Racist, arrogant, and communist. This harpy makes Hillary look friendly.


14 posted on 08/15/2012 1:26:45 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kanzan

Where does Janna Ryan come in here?


15 posted on 08/15/2012 2:01:36 PM PDT by kenavi (Obama doesn't hate private equity. He wants to be it with our money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grundle

““Diversity in this country is a good thing,” Mrs. Obama told MSNBC when asked about Sotomayor”

Absolutely. But what you pursue is racism and sexism to benefit your desires.

And, that’s not diversity.


16 posted on 08/15/2012 2:08:04 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (OWS = The Great American Snivel War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

What would happen if Harvard had a WHITE law students assn? Oh never mind, that would be racist.


17 posted on 08/15/2012 2:26:49 PM PDT by taillightchaser (When a dimorat says"The American people" the next words will be a lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
No surprise here. I would love to get a gander at some of Obama's college papers. He would probably come across as something along the lines of this:
obama_radical
18 posted on 08/15/2012 2:32:05 PM PDT by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Surprised that she hasn’t claimed that jurors and judges are racist because they do not give black lawyers and defendants courtroom victories in order to guarantee equality of outcome.


19 posted on 08/15/2012 4:08:44 PM PDT by Iron Munro ("Jiggle the Handle for Barry!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
“Diversity in this country is a good thing,”

Absolutely.

Respectfully, I say absolutely not.

The notion that diversity itself as a goal is politically correct balderdash.

What makes the modern approach to diversity in America "a good thing" in and of itself?

What meaningful "good things" has diversity brought to improve our quality of life beyond what we would otherwise experience?

What advantages and benefits does a modern diverse population bring to a neighborhood, village or town?

What is the basis for thinking that a polyglot population of people who do not hold the same values, think the same way, have the same basic goal and aspirations and pull in the same direction is superior to a more homogeneous population?

The promotion of incompetent, uncaring people may improve diversity but what does it do to improve an organization?

What does the importation of millions of skillless people who cannot support themselves and who end up on welfare and food stamps do to make America a better place?

How does the importation of muslims who despise America and Americans qualify as "a good thing"?

What does the importation of tribal Africans, Haitians, illegal Hispanics do to strengthen America and make it a better place for Americans to live?


20 posted on 08/15/2012 4:33:58 PM PDT by Iron Munro ("Jiggle the Handle for Barry!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
What is the basis for thinking that a polyglot population of people who do not hold the same values, think the same way, have the same basic goal and aspirations and pull in the same direction is superior to a more homogeneous population?

A free country of 300,000,000 people is probably going to have some "diversity" and should.

Whether or not a mix of smaller, more homogenous countries is really better, massive, homogenous countries can get stagnant and uninventive.

They can become too inwardly focused and uncompetitive, too lumbering and unresponsive to changing conditions.

A large country that aspires to lead technologically has to draw talent from a variety of sources.

I don't go in for the whole "diversity" racket, but you might consider that your indictment is exaggerated in some respects.

21 posted on 08/15/2012 4:43:41 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: x
A free country of 300,000,000 people is probably going to have some "diversity" and should.

A large country that aspires to lead technologically has to draw talent from a variety of sources.

My comment was about striving for diversity as an objective, not as a by-product of seeking people with talent, ability, skills, etc.

Diversity as an unintended, unsought characteristic seems normal enough.
But diversity as an end goal is a foolish, meaningless notion.

To make a case for people of different backgrounds being valuable members of a community or organization because their skills or abilities are beneficial to the group, is one thing.

But to make the case that each organization or community should aspire to be diverse, to include people of different backgrounds, culture, skin color, etc, solely so it can attain diversity - well, that is something quite different.

And that is pretty much what we have today.


22 posted on 08/15/2012 7:39:37 PM PDT by Iron Munro ("Jiggle the Handle for Barry!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: grundle

White racists have great reasons why whites should be officially and systematically perferred, too. She’s advocating for preferences for herself and her tribe. She’s a racist.


23 posted on 08/16/2012 11:44:00 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson