California law barring parents from 'curing' gay children moves through legislature

foxnews.com ^ | 8/18/12 | Jim Crogan

[ColdOne]

A first-of-its-kind state law that would restrict parents from trying to "cure" their minor children's same-sex attractions seems headed to the governor's desk.

[skeeter]

F Sacramento. If my kids were still young enough and I suspected one was gay I'd dare the perverts in government here to try to stop me from doing anything I could to straighten them out.

[montag813]

And so the state invades the doctor-patient relationship, opening up unlimited controls and loss of freedoms. Where on Earth are Conservative groups on this? It is NOT just about homos, it is about Big Brother, period. Where is Alex Jones and the Ron Paul dudes? This is insanity!

[Dilbert San Diego]

Of course, we have to be liberal and celebrate diversity and all that.

I’m sure the homosexual activists will praise this as some sort of ground breaking legislation, so that evil straight parents, the kind who don’t celebrate diversity, would be disappointed that their non-adult children claim to be homosexual.

We have gone far beyond the idea of homosexuals wanting to be left alone, not wanting private activity to be criminal, and all that.

I’m sure that with pressures brought to bear by homosexual activists, that Jerry Brown would be afraid to veto a bill such as this.

[dartuser]

Twenty years from now people will wonder why Sandusky was sent to jail.

[AEMILIUS PAULUS]

This law is designed to create a pool of young faggots that the adult gays can reap at a later time.

[skeeter]

The best thing that could be done to counter this is for a commercial to be aired in spanish on spanish language radio & TV telling those people what their democrat representatives in Sacramento are doing.

I'll bet right now you could not find a single word about this in the spanish language media.

[onedoug]

I’m almost surprised that the state doesn’t just take a child the moment it’s born and send the mother home with,”Be proud of your service to the State. Now go home and cotinue your duties.”

But under obama, it will come.

[LaserJock]

I don’t care what “safeguards” they say are in it - this law is aimed directly at the church.

[Flycatcher]

I don’t care what “safeguards” they say are in it - this law is aimed directly at the church.

Correct.

To the homosexualist radicals, the foremost enemy is the Church.

[Gay State Conservative]

The “big one” can’t come quickly enough for my liking.I’ll pay a little more for my vegetables and I sure as hell don’t go to any movies anyway....

[scottjewell]

NARTH warned of this and knows it has been a long time coming. The APA opened the door to this kind of legislation when they lost their objectivity and scientific stance in the ‘70s and began to embrace all aspects of the liberal agenda. It is their bread and butter— the profession would collapse (as it now stands) if it began to concede to our side.

[UCANSEE2]

This law is designed to create a pool of young faggots that the adult gays can reap at a later time.

Statutory reap will become legal.

[SCalGal]

I'll bet right now you could not find a single word about this in the spanish language media.

I bet you're right.

[wolfman23601]

How is such a law constitutional?

[rockinqsranch]

You, and those that think like you can all go to Hell IMO. There are many of us out here in California doing the best we can to overcome the radical Leftist crap that’s been bestowed upon our Golden State by the immigration of Leftist anus orifices from all over the East Coast of this Nation since WWII. Same has happened to Florida. East Coast liberals, so shove your “big one” where the light don’t shine.

[UCANSEE2]

To the homosexualist radicals, the foremost enemy is the Church.

To the Islamist radicals, the foremost enemy is the Church.

Does anyone see a 'common link' here ?

[Las Vegas Ron]

Recruiter: Now, are either of you homosexuals?
John Winger: (John and Russell look at each other) You mean, like, flaming, or...
Recruiter: Well, it's a standard question we have to ask.
Russell Ziskey: No, we're not homosexual, but we are *willing to learn*.
John Winger: Yeah, would they send us someplace special?
Recruiter: I guess that's “no” on both. Now if you could just give Uncle Sam your autograph...

[Flycatcher]

Indeed.

[SCalGal]

How is such a law constitutional?

It's not. They don't care.

One of the times I was in Sacramento, one of the aides told me "oh, we pass unconstitutional laws all the time". I wish I could remember who's office it was - but we were in so many that day.