Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After 30 years, the Marines are returning to the Colt .45 pistol
Stars and Stripes ^ | August 18, 2012 | By MATTHEW STURDEVANT

Posted on 08/18/2012 2:50:53 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-196 next last
To: gundog

LOL, yeah, great reasoning there.


101 posted on 08/18/2012 5:03:54 PM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP goes for it's "conservative" Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade
Hardly any sights and atrocious trigger. Still best.

The 1911 is not a finesse weapon, it is a both eyes open, lead down range quickly type combat weapon. It needs to be man handled to be effective. Don't treat it timidly.

You 1911 without sights is still a damned good weapon.

102 posted on 08/18/2012 5:04:19 PM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Always A Marine

it was the Spanish-American War, not the “Philippine-American War.” .......................................... Uh? Then why didn’t they call it the model 98’ colt automatic?

Love it, we are going to use the same weapon that great,great, great, grampa used against Poncho Villa. Hey if it works, don’t try and fix it. Just rig it for an extended magazine.


103 posted on 08/18/2012 5:04:52 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (Who you chose as President isn't as important as his choice of political appointees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mylife

“If they were going to replace the 1911 with a Beretta they should have gone with the 40 call Beretta 96F.”

The 40 didn’t exist when they made the switch.


104 posted on 08/18/2012 5:07:31 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

No, but then again my manufacturer doesn’t see the need as so important that they’re fitting decockers to the new ones.


105 posted on 08/18/2012 5:11:36 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
Forgive my ignorance, but what about a ‘hang fire?” I do not want my thumb behind a semi-auto slide when a cartridge hangs fire. I reckon that it's much more common with rimfire rather than primered centerfire ammo. But if a round fails to ignite instantaneously on a 1911A1, I would rather keep my eyes on the target, wait one moment, and clear the round by moving the slide with my left hand (touching off the second shot immediately) than put my right thumb in harm's way.
106 posted on 08/18/2012 5:14:56 PM PDT by Unknowing (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: katana
the standard pistol then in use by US marines did not have enough stopping power to take down drugged up Moro fighters. They eventually switched to John Browning’s new .45 ACP pistol and ... problem more or less solved.

"The Browning pistol design was formally adopted by the US Army on March 29, 1911, and thus became known officially as the Model 1911. The US Navy and US Marine Corps adopted the Browning-designed pistol in 1913."

"The pistol was designed to comply with the requirements of the U.S. Army, which, during its campaign against the Moros in Philippines, had seen its trusty .38 revolver to be incapable of stopping attackers. An Ordnance Board headed by Col. John T. Thompson (inventor of the Thompson sub-machine-gun) and Col. Louis A. La Garde, had reached the conclusion that the army needed a .45" caliber cartridge, to provide adequate stopping power. In the mean time, J. Browning who was working for Colt, had already designed an autoloader pistol, around a cartridge similar to contemporary .38 Super (dimension-wise). When the Army announced its interest in a new handgun, Browning re-engineered this handgun to accommodate a .45" diameter cartridge of his own design (with a 230 gr. FMJ bullet), and submitted the pistol to the Army for evaluation."

107 posted on 08/18/2012 5:18:24 PM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP goes for it's "conservative" Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

I still have my Dad’s Government Model .45 automatic that he carried in WWII (it was a civilian model presented to him by the family before he headed off to D-Day).

Don’t know who thinks the M1911 is a cannon. Doesn’t recoil that much and the noise is mild compared to some magnums. An all-steel chunk of gun. Undeniable knockdown power and that’s a fact.

IIRC, lots of Army Rangers & airborne/airmobile folks carry M1911s. Can’t argue with success.


108 posted on 08/18/2012 5:18:34 PM PDT by elcid1970 (Nuke Mecca now. Death to Islam means freedom for all mankind. Deus vult!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; trisham

While I am not much of a fan of the the 1911, I think it is a great thing for the USMC to replace the 9mm Beretta with the much harder hitting 1911. Just like in the racing world there is no replacement for displacement and the 45acp displaces a lot more “stuff” than a 9mm.

Note to trisham: George Patton was usually photographed wearing a pair of revolvers. A nickle plated Colt.45 SAA and Smith & Wesson .357 mag. also nickle plated. Both with ivory grips. Patton was asked about his “pearl” handled pistols once and promptly answered that they were ivory handles. Pearl handles were for pimps and fagots.


109 posted on 08/18/2012 5:21:01 PM PDT by Tupelo (Sara Palin.............my write in vote for 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
"No, but then again my manufacturer doesn’t see the need as so important that they’re fitting decockers to the new ones."

It's a matter of user preference, not safety. CZ still makes the 75B (no decocker) and the 75BD (decocker). You can buy a brand new one (75B) just off the factory floor without a decocker. Certainly, if they were such a critical safety feature, CZ-USA's lawyers would have shut down production years ago.

110 posted on 08/18/2012 5:22:20 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: MikeSteelBe

The Army did not know that, and 15 years fighting the Moro only confused them more.

“At the time US troops were armed with either .30 caliber Krag or Springfield bolt-action rifles and .38 caliber double-action revolvers. While the .30 caliber rifles proved effective in stopping the attackers, the US troop’s handguns demonstrated an unnerving lack of stopping power, resulting in numerous reports of Moro warriors absorbing multiple pistol bullets while they continued to hack away at the Americans. Obviously the US troops’ morale suffered badly in this situation.

The combat pistol situation became so acute that old stocks of Model 1873 Colt revolvers in 45 caliber, many of which dated back to the Plains Indian Wars were returned to active service, where they quickly demonstrated a much better track record of stopping an attacker with one well-placed shot.

The battlefield experience against the Moros resulted in the famous Thompson-LeGarde tests by the US Military in 1904. In these tests a variety of military cartridges of the day were tested for their penetration, ‘stopping ability’ and energy transfer, using both live and dead cattle at the target medium. While somewhat subjective by modern standards, the tests resulted in an official recommendation “…that a bullet, which will have the shock effect and stopping effect at short ranges necessary for a military pistol or revolver, should have a caliber not less than .45.”


111 posted on 08/18/2012 5:23:32 PM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP goes for it's "conservative" Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

I really, really, really want one!

Or a Kimber.


112 posted on 08/18/2012 5:34:10 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (EAT MOR CHIKIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Bought my first .45 Colt for $45 USD in Viet Nam on the black market. Was on Swift Boats and they did not issue side arms except for a .38 revolver the boat officer carried.

I was on the boarding team and had to jump from our boat to some rickety, slimy, filthy wooden boat often in heavy seas. Finally got tired of trying to do this with an AR15 so bought my own .45. Shot the heck out of it and sold it to another Swifty when I left...for $45 bucks.


113 posted on 08/18/2012 5:39:48 PM PDT by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

How about one of these?

http://www.bushmaster.com/catalog_carbon15_AZ-C15P21S.asp


114 posted on 08/18/2012 5:41:19 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (Harry Reid [PERVERT-NV] has Vickie-the-goat in lingerie & stiletto heels, tied-up in his office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: central_va
It needs to be man handled to be effective. Don't treat it timidly.

What the hell does that mean? Any weapon that requires more weight of effort to fire than the weight of the actual weapon *requires* a certain finesse.

115 posted on 08/18/2012 5:42:09 PM PDT by papertyger ("And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if..."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: MikeSteelBe
.40 S&W (.40 Short & Weak).

Nobody sober has called it Short & Weak in ten years.

116 posted on 08/18/2012 5:44:55 PM PDT by Eaker (Stripping Americans of their freedom and dignity and rubbing their noses in it is a very bad idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I love my 1911.


117 posted on 08/18/2012 5:49:17 PM PDT by Tolkien (Grace is the Essence of the Gospel; Gratitude is the Essence of Ethics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

I’d like to get one of these new Colts, too, to add to my 2 Kimbers: a Custom TLE II and a Eclipse Target II.

The Colt sounds like it’ll take some serious punishment, too.


118 posted on 08/18/2012 5:52:15 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (Harry Reid [PERVERT-NV] has Vickie-the-goat in lingerie & stiletto heels, tied-up in his office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill
Funny you'd ask that. I'm seriously looking at the FNH Five-seveN to go with my SCAR. It shoots a 5.7x28 bottleneck round and feels like a .22mag. Ammo is bloody expensive and it's bloody expensive but I think I may pull the trigger next month.
119 posted on 08/18/2012 5:53:53 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (EAT MOR CHIKIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

I think you are right. John Browning’s birthday should be a national holiday. I am serious about that.

During WWI, Browning charged the government exactly $1 for a machine gun which was worth many millions just in royalties.

Browning mentioned that his son was over there fighting (incidentally trying out the BAR) and many other people’s sons were doing the same.

He was a real patriot.


120 posted on 08/18/2012 5:54:04 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson