Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RINO Scott Brown criticizes GOP Abortion Stance
http://www.wbur.com ^ | August 22, 2012 | Fred Thys

Posted on 08/22/2012 9:01:08 AM PDT by NKP_Vet

BOSTON — In another step to distance himself from his party, Massachusetts Republican U.S. Sen. Scott Brown is asking GOP leaders to be more inclusive on the issue of abortion.

In a letter released Tuesday, Brown asks Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee, to drop the anti-abortion plank in the party platform.

“If we are to grow and succeed in all parts of this great nation, we must be a ‘big-tent’ party,” Brown wrote. “There are people of goodwill on both sides of the abortion issue, and we need to send a message to voters that there is room in the Republican Party for differing perspectives.”

(Excerpt) Read more at wbur.org ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; brown; debt; marxist; obamaeconomy; proabortion; prolife; romneyryan2012; scottbrown; sourcetitlenoturl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Bitsy

Yes, because having a Republican who will vote to confirm your SC nominees who would happen to be pro-life vs having a Democrat that will support every form of abortion, retroactively if they could get away with it, is so much better.

It’ll be good to feel smug and righteous having about 30 votes in the Senate, completely powerless and unable to stop anything the Democrats do of course, but smug and righteous.

Fact is, Republicans need every senate vote they can get, especially after that debacle in Missouri. Romney may have to replace a couple Supreme Court justices, that’s a hell of a lot harder to do with a Senate controlled by Dingy Harry and that’s really the only chance of abortion ever getting overturned in the first place is through the SC.


41 posted on 08/22/2012 9:45:06 AM PDT by PhxTM06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

42 posted on 08/22/2012 9:45:27 AM PDT by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
Just FYI...regarding the "RINO" label:there's a despicable Marxist organization called "Americans For Democratic Action" ("ADA").Among the things they do is to annually rate each member of Congress on his/her voting record.The ratings are percentages,0 is the lowest,100 is highest.100 means that you're a perfect Marxist,0 means that you're a filthy fascist,racist,homopohobe,etc,etc.

For the year 2010 (the latest report they've done and Brown's first year in the Senate),Mr Bennet of Utah,for example,got 15%...Mr Lahey of Vermont got 100% and Scott Brown got 20%.

As a lifelong resident of Massachusetts I can assure you all that regardless of how imperfect Brown might be he's the ***very best*** that we'll ever get from the state.That's how far this state has fallen into the cesspool.

43 posted on 08/22/2012 9:47:58 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (The Word Is Out,Harry Reid's Into Child Porn.Release All Your Photos,Harry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

TURN THE TABLES on the Pro-Aborts!

The “Rape & Incest exception” argument has been a Fraud and a Red Herring for over 40 years.

DO NOT answer that question!

Instead, say:

“This argument has been a Fraud and a Red Herring for over 40 years!”
“Bring me the legislation containing this exception, and THEN we can begin to talk.”
“NOBODY, has EVER brought forth legislation with this language, yet it is used to beat up Pro-Lifers at every turn!”
“ Would YOU support such restrictions on abortion?”

You can go on to say, you would sign such legislation, because it is a starting point that would save over 1 Million lives a year.


44 posted on 08/22/2012 9:49:37 AM PDT by G Larry (Progressives are Regressive because their objectives devolve to the lowest common denominator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969; cripplecreek
So what's your point? Think Palin is RINO establishment now?

That depends on whether or not she calls for a write-in candidate to run against Scott Brown in Massachusetts.

45 posted on 08/22/2012 9:50:32 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

"Is there room in the tent for me, Scott?"

46 posted on 08/22/2012 9:53:48 AM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

All flags are flying, the accelerator is mashed into the floorboard, and there’s a cliff up ahead.

Seems to me that Ronald Reagan had an appropriate comment for such situations.


47 posted on 08/22/2012 9:53:55 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

If Reince Priebus has any balls, he’d tell Mr Brown to resign the GOP and join the Dems.


48 posted on 08/22/2012 9:57:57 AM PDT by chemicalman (The more support I see,the harder I want to work,and the more determined I am not to let folks down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut; All
He needs to do this for cover. I live in the Boston TV market. They are killing him in Boston over this Akin fiasco. It has been non stop.

Exactly. But that's ok... he'll be attacked for it because Elizabeth Warren is so much better for moving along a conservative agenda. /s

49 posted on 08/22/2012 9:58:02 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Election night is 75 days away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nifster
and realize ‘no exception’ includes the life of the mother is at risk ( think tubal pregnancy). Some folks as soooo singularly devoted to one idea they cannot see clearly.

False. Abortion was legal in all 50 states prior to Roe v. Wade in cases of danger to the life of the woman. Only 2.8% of women have an abortion due to a risk to maternal health. Medically speaking it is not even considered an abortion because the purpose is not to abort the child but rather to save the mother's life. Any possibility of saving the baby would also be employed.

50 posted on 08/22/2012 10:05:57 AM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: DPMD
Almost rather have someone like Warren, who is a blatant democrat than Brown, who is a faux republican waiting at every turn to prove his democrat creds.

Retch..puke...Warren's face is the face of the future of America, unfortunately. When I have to vote for Warren is when I'd stop voting and I'd definitely vote for Brown over that beotch.

51 posted on 08/22/2012 10:17:09 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Great post. Don’t think for a moment these people are conservatives. A couple of weeks ago they were on every thread trying to convince us that Obama and Romney were no different. They’re goal is to maximize the number of democrats in office and don’t ever forget that. There style is to attack from the right and travel in packs and post quickly and often. I thought this place was toast but I watched as this sleeping giant came back and squished them into pulp. The thought of re-electing Obama for another 4 year term was way too much. It has been quite a thing of joy to watch. This lame attempt to win back the “Kennedy seat” for the dems is as pathetic as it is laughable. I have been keeping a list and you should too. Judge Bork will offer up strong prolife SC judges and Brown will vote for every last one of them. When they overturn Roe v Wade I know the Florida legislature will make abortion illegal and Gov. Scott will sign it. Massachusetts never will but Brown doesn’t get a vote on it anyway. No is the time to keep a close watch on your state legislatures, that is where the next civil war will be fought.


52 posted on 08/22/2012 10:18:00 AM PDT by ynotjjr (Romney/Ryan 2012 It's called the Constitution. Learn it, live it, love it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ynotjjr

Nice straw man. I wasn’t on any thread two weeks ago.


53 posted on 08/22/2012 10:24:28 AM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

The tired old claim that “You support Obama/McCaskill/Warren/ etc” is exactly like the race card. Its used by people who have no argument and no courage to admit it.

You can’t find an issue more central to conservatism than abortion and those who find it acceptable should stop lying to themselves and vote democrat. The GOP has been moderated into a coma and the moderates need to moderate the party that actually needs them.


54 posted on 08/22/2012 10:31:20 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

There are a few of use still on FR who know what is is like to live in an occupied state.
This is the first time in my life I’ve lived in a battleground state. Feels much better than MN, CA or OR.


55 posted on 08/22/2012 10:33:44 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Apple Pan Dowdy
Personally, I would rather have God on our side than more (Rino) Republicans, and I don’t see how advocating baby-killing is going to endear us to our heavenly Father
You said a mouthful there!!!
56 posted on 08/22/2012 10:50:55 AM PDT by mlizzy (And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell others not to kill? --MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I agree. Politics is important to me but it isn’t my god. If no one can be found to run for office that doesn’t even have respect for life then I have no respect for them and will give them no support. I will meet the Death Cult on some other battle field.


57 posted on 08/22/2012 10:52:08 AM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I will meet the Death Cult on some other battle field.

The only reason I'll be voting at all is because my congressman is as rock solid conservative as you'll find this side of Heaven. (he was thrown overboard by the NRCC in 08 after criticizing the party and firmly voting against TARP but we sent him back against party wishes in 2010) Pete Hoekstra is also pro life though not as conservative as I would like but he's acceptable against Stabenow.
58 posted on 08/22/2012 11:02:08 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

You have some good candidates and I am glad for that. If it sounded like I was inferring that I would abandon politics entirely that wasn’t my intention. (just to clarify) I will vote for every ticket and issue that doesn’t require me to make a false choice.


59 posted on 08/22/2012 11:08:37 AM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
What an odd sort of irony. None are more innocent than the unborn and none are more vulnerable and at our mercy, especially today. Who can these innocent beings trust?

Not the reasonable person of good will, Scott Brown, and the big tent, reasonable people of good will he represents and speaks for.

In this improbably match, we have on side the unborn, the now reviled and openly hated, generally reliable supporter of life, Akin, now nominated by his remarks to be the pro-life face of the GOP.

Interesting how the board gets set sometimes.

We seem to be at a rare time, a passing of the old guard, now diseased and failing with the mark of the progressive beast.

60 posted on 08/22/2012 11:27:51 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson