Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/03/2012 6:51:09 PM PDT by Justaham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Justaham

All they had to do was find a couple of democrats. Those bastards will say / do anything to further the cause. We’ve seen it many times. Liars and bastards, all of them.


33 posted on 09/03/2012 7:28:07 PM PDT by youngidiot (The name's Bond. James Bond. James Bond Jovi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Justaham

this is why you NEVER hire liberals / progressives

and if ou identify one in your company ... fire them


35 posted on 09/03/2012 7:35:16 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

This will come off as the peevish maneuver it obviously is.


36 posted on 09/03/2012 7:39:08 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Justaham

I’m assuming they are going to extol Obama and his plans to tax the rich.

If these are people who work FOR bain, not companies bain took over, what are they going to say?

All of us at bain are a bunch of capitalist running dogs, we stink?

I don’t think so.

I also rather doubt they are going to personally slam Romney, that would be extremely bad form and I doubt it would be worth it just to help the dis-loyal and term-limited Obama.

So, I’m pretty sure it will be along the lines of Obama is great, tax the rich, even though I’m rich, tax me, tax me tax ME (by which they’ll mean you, of course, but never mind).

I don’t think this is any more exciting than Artur Davis speaking at the R. convention or Charlie Christ speaking in Charlotte.

I suppose I could be wrong. We’ll see.


37 posted on 09/03/2012 7:44:17 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Justaham

Excerpt:
Democrats ignore this inconvenient truth: Bain’s private-equity executives have enriched dozens of organizations and millions of individuals in the Democratic base — including some who scream most loudly for President Obama’s re-election.

Excerpt:
They will accuse Republican nominee Mitt Romney and Bain’s other “greedy” co-founders of stealing their winnings, evading taxes and lighting cigars with $100 bills on their yachts.

But Democrats will ignore this inconvenient truth: Bain’s private-equity executives have enriched dozens of organizations and millions of individuals in the Democratic base — including some who scream most loudly for President Barack Obama’s re-election.

http://www.startribune.com/opinion/commentaries/168045946.html?refer=y

Google Obama and Bain


38 posted on 09/03/2012 7:46:35 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer. FREEDOM OR FREE STUFF- YOU GET ONE CHOICE, CHOOSE WISELY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Justaham

Another chance to get the scoop!

Be the first Freeper to catch the lie and post the evidence!


42 posted on 09/03/2012 7:59:18 PM PDT by airborne (MY HEROES DON'T WEAR CAPES. MY HEROES WEAR DOG TAGS ! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Justaham

They can’t let this stuff go, can they?


43 posted on 09/03/2012 8:06:29 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (This stuff we're going through now, this is nothing compared to the middle ages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Justaham

Just a stupid thought here. It seems to me Romney could put the whole rich man thing to bed if he did something noble and declared he would only take a Dollar a year in salary as President, no benefits and no retirement.

I’m not on the tack of declaring who does and does not need what but if it were me and I were so successful to have the opportunity to take on such a job in public service it would be just that, in public service. Not expecting anything but costs to be covered and that would be enough.


44 posted on 09/03/2012 8:12:34 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Half the people are below average, they voted for oblabla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Justaham
They should interview obamacare recipients.


48 posted on 09/03/2012 9:04:02 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Justaham

These super greedy company officials have figured out that they can sell out themselves for access to taxpayer money and special government waivers and contracts. The dems are cheap dates.


49 posted on 09/03/2012 9:06:13 PM PDT by mom.mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Justaham

This is personal. Romney/Ryan should reciprocate.


50 posted on 09/03/2012 9:18:31 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Justaham

Well, one thing is for sure, Romney’s people will NOT find a disgruntled, former employee from Obama’s past. Guess there are no skeletons in his “never” been a boss or had a real job closet!


53 posted on 09/03/2012 9:29:36 PM PDT by Ms Mable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Justaham

http://bostonfinancialguide.com/wp-content/uploads/stevepagliuca_1.jpg

Pagliuca joined Bain Capital in 1989 from Bain & Company where he focused on the information services and healthcare industries and developed Bain & Company’s turnaround practice.

Pagliuca started his career as a senior accountant and international tax specialist at Peat Marwick Mitchell & Company in the Netherlands (Peat Marwick is today KPMG).

Pagliuca, a Democrat who unsuccessfully ran for Senate in 2010, told CNN: “Mitt Romney left Bain Capital in February 1999 to run the Olympics and has had absolutely no involvement with the management or investment activities of the firm or with any of its portfolio companies since the day of his departure.”

In explaining the SEC documents filed in 2000 and 2001, Pagliuca said, “Due to the sudden nature of Mr. Romney’s departure, he remained the sole stockholder for a time while formal ownership was being documented and transferred to the group of partners who took over management of the firm in 1999. Accordingly, Mr. Romney was reported in various capacities on SEC filings during this period.”


54 posted on 09/03/2012 9:44:26 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Justaham

Steve Pagliuca is rich. Very rich. Two hundred and sixty million dollars to $400 million rich.


56 posted on 09/03/2012 9:50:20 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson