Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Let's see what Gallup's tracking poll is showing. It's September 10, and so far Gallup is showing a small lead for Obama, ranging from 7 points (49% to 42%) on one day, stretching to 10 points (51% to 41%) only days later. Oh, wait! That's the Gore v Bush, not Obama v Romney, contest. Sorry, my mistake. Hmmm, how did Gore ultimately make out back in 2000? I'd have to check and see, given the stunning predictive power of these September polls, dontchaknow.

So what's Gallup showing currently? Obama leading, 49% to 44%, as of Sunday (yesterday). That's after a tsunami of ritual-style adulation and homage in the media over Bill Clinton giving a speech. (Clinton even got bonus points for not raping anyone throughout the convention, especially with Hillary thousands of miles away.)

What Gallup and other pollsters aren't fully factoring in is the dismal Friday jobs report, indicating as many as 368,000 people dropping out of the work force (technically known as 'joining the Democrat Party').

Obama says the reason for the lousy job market is because Bush's still running the economy from Crawford, Texas. As Obama would put it, this jobless recovery is stamped with three proud words, Made in the U.S.A by the Bush Junta.

Don't know about you, but every poll I've seen shows the economy as the numero uno issue on voters' minds. As Joe Biden would say, everything boils down to a 3-letter word, jobs.

And there's nothing indicating the economy will magically be turning around in the next 50 days or so. So, since Obama's post-convention poll boomlet was the result of Clinton's speech, the media are now telling us Clinton's speech was the 2012 campaign's 'inflection point', that the election this November no longer boils down to jobs and the economy but will ultimately come down to Clinton's speech-making skills. Oh really? Ask yourself, what are the odds that on Election Day the economy won't be the top issue on voters' minds, but rather some speech Clinton gave in the summer? I like R/R's chances.

Anyway, that's ...
My Two Cents ...
"JohnHuang2"

1 posted on 09/09/2012 11:56:15 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Forgiven_Sinner; xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ...

Monday-morning mega ping! Have a great day, y’all!


2 posted on 09/09/2012 11:57:44 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

John,

Not one analyst has considered the 2010 results, as far as I have seen.

Please correct me if I am wrong.


4 posted on 09/10/2012 12:01:38 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (The pundits have forgotten the 2010 election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

“”Let’s see what Gallup’s tracking poll is showing. It’s September 10, and so far Gallup is showing a small lead for Obama, ranging from 7 points (49% to 42%) on one day, stretching to 10 points (51% to 41%) only days later. Oh, wait! That’s the Gore v Bush, not Obama v Romney”””

Races with no incumbent have polls that are very unstable. Look at Gallup in 1960,68,88,2000 polls varied almost weekly. In 1968 at one point Nixon was up 15 even with Wallace in the race. He won by less than 1. Races with incumbents are more steady.


5 posted on 09/10/2012 12:24:14 AM PDT by Bobloblaw2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

There are a lot of parallels between Kerry and Romney, but that doesn’t mean Romney has no chance. A Massachusetts liberal who is a governor is slightly better than a Massachusetts liberal who was Senator.


6 posted on 09/10/2012 12:36:54 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Charlie Cook, a highly-respected non-partisan political analyst

Why is Charlie Cook so revered by the press as such a political whiz to be respected? This isn't the first time I have seen him so highly regarded in an article while being so terribly wrong in his "analysis".

10 posted on 09/10/2012 3:15:12 AM PDT by submarinerswife (Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different results~Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Election 2000 and 2004 were way to close for comfort. Both could easily have gone either way. It all came down to one state. If 2012 is the same, we better hope that Colorado goes Red.


11 posted on 09/10/2012 3:46:03 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Paul Ryan/Rick Santorum 2012....That would be the best scenario ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Yep, you are so correct with your 2 cents!


16 posted on 09/10/2012 12:47:58 PM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Oh, Lordy, JH2...why are there so many serious posts in reply to such a wonderful and exquisite $.02 by you?

We need better clientele around here! lol

“Ask yourself, what are the odds that on Election Day the economy won’t be the top issue on voters’ minds, but rather some speech Clinton gave in the summer? I like R/R’s chances.”

You, and me, too, my FRiend.

I hope you are back, and plan to post more during the election. Your posts crack me up! At the same time, there is great truth to them.

From, dc2k...your greatest fan. ;o)


19 posted on 09/12/2012 11:58:15 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (This hobbit is looking for her pitchfork...God help the GOP if I find it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson