Daily Presidential Tracking Poll O48/R46 (O49/R47 w/Leaners)

Rasmussen Reports ^ | 9/29/2012 | Rasmussen

[tatown]

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows President Obama attracting support from 48% of voters nationwide, while Mitt Romney earns the vote from 46%. Three percent (3%) prefer some other candidate, and four percent (4%) are undecided. See daily tracking history.

[thingumbob]

Not saying its a lost cause at all......(maybe it's the other two....not watching their posts) and don't know how I got put into that catagory?...

Just saying the Rasmussen poll adds up to 101%

Read post #10 if you don't believe me....

[MrDem]

To be fair, other than not being Obama, what has Romney done to energize us?

Good God! Your country is teetering at the brink of being destroyed and you need Romney to be your mommy and coax/energize you to do something about it? "Come on Billy, Get out of bed and go to school?" If you are not hyper energized, you clearly don't understand the magnitude of the threat.

[Rocko]

Correct. Before we break out the nooses, perhaps some of us should read this.

[Lacey2]

What would you do differently where you in charge of Romney’s campaign?

If he is giving speeches and they are being attended by huge crowds, how would you FORCE the media to cover them and air it on the nightly news?

[wiggen]

Hard to believe Obama lost so little from 08. Astounding really.

[LibLieSlayer]

I specifically mentioned national cable channels like Discovery and History and obama ads have me muting all of the time and romney ads are far and few between. Save your bullshit for the enemy.

LLS

[Perdogg]

You can buy local ads on national cable channels.

[tatown]

There is NOBODY more energized than me. For the 49% that is currently supporting Obama, however, Romney simply not being Obama is obviously not enough.

[ncalburt]

Good catch

[Hawthorn]

>> When are we going to stop using “red” for GOP and “blue” for DemCommies. Commies are “RED” <<

I’ve been saying the same thing for several years now. But obviously nobody pays any attention to me!

Anyway, the dominant media — esp. USA Today — pulled off a major psyops coup back in 2004 (I think that was the year) when all of a sudden, they reversed the traditional colors on their electoral maps.

Therefore, it seems now that our youngsters are being shielded from the the truth, i.e., that most Dhimmis are old-fashionned “ideological Reds” — with the remainder being what we used to call “Pinkos.”

[thingumbob]

I know there is..... not agreeing with any polls being accurate right now especially in Ohio since I used to live there.....

Just saying

this Poll adds up to 101%

see post # 10.....

BTW there's more than just hocus pocus in them I was thinking a lot of this

is included too....

[p. henry]

Response rates to pollsters are at all time lows: around 9%. I question whether ANY pollsters, even Rasmussen, are getting an accurate picture with that low a response rate of what the electorate that shows up at the polls this year is actually going to do. It will be very interesting.

In that regard, I believe (actually hope) that Obama's support is a mile wide and an inch deep and based largely on the negative image of Romney that Obama and the media have created. If that is true, Romney still has time, especially in the debates, to reverse that image. Also, if your primary motivation for voting is a sense of disquiet or distrust regarding Romney are you as likely to vote as the millions of folks who desparately fear another four years of Obama?

I am actually more concerned about the Senate. If we lose Maine and hold Nevada and Massachusetts, we need four for a tie and five for a majority. Where will those seats come from? In order of probable liklihood: Nebraska, Montana, North Dakota, Virginia, Wisconsin, Missouri, Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania. Can it be done? Certainly. Might I humbly suggest that Ryan spend some time campaigning with the Republican Senate candidates in Virginia, Wisconsin, Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania?

[thingumbob]

THANK YOU!!!!!

You'd think someone else would have noticed....sheeezz.....

and this one's for you

[ncalburt]

Your catch does not interest the “ it’s Over “ crowd that has fallen for psych ops shelling going on non stop for weeks .

[buckalfa]

"Hard to believe Obama lost so little from 08. Astounding really."

Four years of media propaganda trumpeting "why put the people who got us in the mess we are in back in office" is allowing Obama and the rats to frame the debate and put Romney on the defensive from the start. It is really not astounding given that Romney does not seem to have the stomach to go on attack.

As the march to inevitability continues, the question will become can the GOP minimize losses in the Senate and hold on to control of the House.

[exist]

Where the heck is all his $$$$ going!

Unfortunately, it's going to overly micro-targeted campaign mailers like THIS.

[Hawthorn]

>> If we lose Maine and hold Nevada and Massachusetts, we need four for a tie and five for a majority. Where will those seats come from? <<

My take:

NE — ‘Pub win

MT — ditto

ND — ditto

VA — too close to call

WI — ditto

MO — Dhimmi win

OH — ditto

FL — ditto

PA — ditto

Conclusion: 50% chance for a tie, with only a 25% chance for a GOP takeover. So if Romney loses, then Biden probably casts the deciding vote in the Senate, meaning that if Scalia or Kennedy dies or retires before the 2016 election, bye-bye 2nd Amendment.

[ncalburt]

The news media is on ‘black out “ status for Ryan.
The media is run by Axelrod now.
It’s obvious the news media has intentionally
Stop covering the crowds and any excitement linked to the GOP period .

It’ conflicts with the Axelrod orders which is peddle the
Race is over .
Read the posts here , the posters have fallen for the psych ops .
A news black out except for negative news has posters panicked here.

[Alberta's Child]

You may believe that sincerely, but you have absolutely no evidence to support that statement. I'm not even a Mitt Romney fan, but it was obvious to me that Newt Gingrich is nothing more than an inside-the-Beltway @sshole who has absolutely no credentials, executive experience or any other attributes that would indicate any competency in the White House.

The guy couldn't even see his roles in his two biggest Federal positions to completion -- having stepped down as House Speaker in 1998 before resigning from his House seat in 1999. For this guy to crawl out from the swamp of Washington D.C. 13 years later and present himself as a credible presidential candidate was a complete joke.

I hate to be the one to break this to you, but a lot of these people (I'll even include Rick Santorum in the mix) see the Federal government as an enormous industry, and they make careers out of lobbying Congress and occasionally launching a pointless "political campaign" for the sole purpose of promoting themselves and living at the expense of campaign donors for months at a time.

Say what you want about Romney, but you'd have a hard time including him in that group of hacks.

[Forty-Niner]

“Buck up boyos!!!”

Cheer up me ladds,
Let your hearts never fail,
When the mighty Ship of Diamond,
Goes a-fishing for the whale!