Skip to comments.The Idea That Barack Obama Was Stoned Is Not Outlandish.
Posted on 10/04/2012 7:56:08 PM PDT by nathanbedford
The Idea That Barack Obama Was Stoned Is Not Outlandish.
The man has lost a lot of weight. He has a history of drug abuse. By his own admission he has been unable to focus on one of the most important events of his life, scheduled to occur in front of 70 million people. His published schedule reveals a pattern of empty hours. His image has deteriorated markedly with dark shadows under his eyes, sagging cheeks, and generally a hangdog look which is commonly associated with drug abusers. He was listless in the debate. He could not maintain eye contact, a signal of drug abuse. He had trouble formulating his words. He was slumped in his posture. His eyes appeared dilated.
If Obama is in fact addicted to some mind altering substance one would expect his physical condition to deteriorate as it apparently has and one would expect his mental and emotional faculties to deteriorate as well. Obama is well known as a procrastinator, witness his dithering over the surge in Afghanistan and his inability to give a go-ahead order when pressed more than once to take out Osama bin Laden. Procrastination and inability to make decisions, of course, are tipoff symptoms of drug abuse. Liberals complain that Obama failed to bring up Romney's alleged "gaffe" about "the 47%" and that omission, which liberals regard to be utterly inexplicable, becomes completely inexplicable if it is considered to be the product of a drug abused mind. This failure which is so important in liberal eyes is merely one failing in a 90 minute epic failure all of which can be perfectly explained as the product of a drug distracted mind.
Obama himself admits to a history of drug abuse. Most observers have simply discounted the possibility that the abuse continues probably because Obama, superficially at least, presents himself as a model family man. But what if his marriage is a sham, a contrivance of Reverend Wright and his "down low" program of finding women who were willing to marry homosexual men and thus provide a cover for the men to remain in the closet? Has Obama been leading a double life as a homosexual? If so, is there anything in that existence which would preclude drug abuse? Would one not be at all surprised if these characteristics ran parallel? If someone is living a lie on one level would not he be expected to live a lie on another level?
What is there in Obama's situation that precludes the diagnosis of drug abuse?
To believe that Obama's drug abuse ceased because he is a family man is to rely on an unreliable determiner. Nor is the abuse of drugs by a president unprecedented, John F. Kennedy abused drugs and it was covered up. In fact, John F. Kennedy was widely regarded to be a model family man and he was a secret drug abuser who was President of the United States. We know from John F. Kennedy's history that merely occupying the White House does not preclude drug abuse. If we consider how few real press conference's Obama's handlers have exposed him to, if one considers his utter dependency upon teleprompters, if one considers the very careful stage management of Obama's public appearances, if one considers the severe limitations on Obama's schedule, one can understand that these rather unusual behaviors are completely consistent with drug abuse and absolutely necessary to conceal drug abuse.
Obama might have been incapable of prepping for this debate because of his inability to concentrate and remain focused. He has canceled his security briefings but not his nocturnal excursions to rub shoulders with celebrities or to raise money from celebrities, the rich, and other "sophisticates." If we consider the people he prefers to associate with, celebrities, entertainers, sports figures, "sophisticates," one sees the upscale drug culture. He has every evening open for these people but no time at night for Netanyahu in no time during the day for Congress. Did he absent himself at dinnertime from Netanyahu to take dinner with his family, on its face a preposterous notion, or was he driven by withdrawal symptoms to re-medicate? The glitterati are the people Obama apparently prefers to play with, but whom is he dependent upon? We all know that he has handlers at the public level who promote and protect his public image. We know that he had a very strong Chief of Staff in Rahm Emanuel and we know further that Obama is notoriously distracted from the day-to-day workings of the government. It is the fact that "Obama care" should properly be called "Pelosi care" because Obama abdicated the particulars to her. Personal control over Obama himself apparently seems to be centered and two women, his wife, who might well be a wife in an arranged marriage for the very purpose of committing a public fraud, and Valerie Jarrett who has been described as Obama's "Rasputin." This syndrome is certainly congruent with a drug dependent personality reliant upon his enablers and controllers.
All of this is speculation, but it does provide a coherent explanation for Obama's conduct in office and for his public near breakdown at the podium.
Well, instead of buckling down and really getting ready for the debate, he went to a posh Moroccan-style resort in Henderson, Nevada where he seemed to have plenty of time for golf and a side trip to see the Hoover Dam. I guess he figured Romney would be a pushover.
Al Gore sure has grown into a huge blimp filled with gas.
At an early point in the debate, zero’s face was twitching badly. I could see this plainly as I have an HD projector and large screen.
Did anyone else see this?
Nice read and all possibly (probably, if you ask me) true. If you haven’t already, go over to Hillbuzz. Kevin DuJuan confirms a lot of those very same suspicions. Well done piece, nathanbedford.
Or my hypothesis, that Al Gore is a bigger idiot on matters of environment that we give him “credit” for.
That would be the aLgOrE that achieved “D”s in Natural Sciences and Environmental related courses.
I recall thinking Clinton and Gore were stoned a few times.
Both the Bushes also, however I believe that may have been to alcohol.
This came in 2008 but got very little press (well Duh!). A woman who was a fellow law student of Zero at Harvard and served with him on the Law Review staff said he hardly ever showed up for work.
Look at his endless rounds of gold, his constant vacations!
Work to Zero is truly a four letter word!
I go with just plain lazy as my first explanation for his performance fits the known data and requires the fewest assumptions. (Occam’s Razor!)
Yes, but in the last 4 years, he has probably had free access to whatever he wants in whatever amount he wants without worrying about the cost, logistics of finding it, etc. I would guess one of those around him keeps him “fixed” so that he stays on a fairly even keel. (It just didn’t work Wed. night.) He has just floated through these past 4 years drunk, stoned, or hung over. It’s no wonder he can’t remember anything about what’s gone on during this time. 4 years of one continuous party will do a lot of damage.
I wonder if he was ever arrested for drug usage or dealing? If so, this would be part of those sealed records that he has paid millions to conceal, and would certainly explain why he did it. People have speculated about his birth certificate and college records, but an arrest for drug dealing would make those issues pale in comparison.
or perhaps it's just an elevated HIV level.
Ofcourse, I could be completely crazy but it's a gut feeling.
Whatever happened to your friend?
You know, I have no idea. He had been in rehab four times by the time I left NY for good and never looked back. He was never coming back, that much was certain. Last I had heard he had found out he had contracted Hepatitis C (probably from his time in California) and his liver was crapping out. At 28, the doctor had told him he had the liver of a 50 year old man.
Whoa...not good! There comes a point where you have to do exactly that - leave and never look back. Otherwise, you get sucked into the vortex yourself. been there, done that.
I didn’t say “I am wondering if he really wants to be re-elected. Lots of pain coming I fear.” I posted a pic of obama stoned in the hallway of an apartment building. Did you mean to reply to someone else?
Thanks garjog for the link and nathanbedford for the topic.
The main theme was though, drugs or no drugs, Obama was simply outclassed intellectually in the debate.
As for JFK, his drug abuse has to be viewed in a somewhat different light than Obama's, especially considering the relative lack of knowledge at the time about the addictive potential of prescription pain killing drugs. Kennedy's problem was the result of chronic back pain caused by previous tuberculosis, back pain serious enough to compromise his ability to function in routine daily activities. The urgency of his getting pain relief lured his doctors into what we now know were reckless prescribing practices, although less appreciated as such back then. On the other hand, it is believed that the origins of Obama's drug abuse were strictly recreational.