Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen Daily Tracking Poll: R: 49% O: 47%: Obama -13%
Rasmussen Reports ^ | 10/07/2012 | Rasmussen Reports

Posted on 10/07/2012 6:56:17 AM PDT by SoftwareEngineer

Sunday, October 07, 2012

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows Mitt Romney attracting support from 49% of voters nationwide, while President Obama earns the vote from 47%. Two percent (2%) prefer some other candidate, and two percent (2%) are undecided.

These results are based upon nightly interviews and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. As a result, today’s update is the first based entirely upon interviews conducted after the first presidential debate last Wednesday night.

The numbers reflect a modest debate bounce for Romney. See daily tracking history. As with all bounces, it remains to be seen whether it is a temporary blip or signals a lasting change in the race.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; barackrupt; cokehead4prez; election; gomittgo; obama; rasmussen; romney; tacky0bama; tackytacky0bama; taqiyya0bama; taqiyyataqiyya0bama; taquiyya; taquiyyataquiyya; vacationvacation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: flaglady47
Ya but does the cell have a flat screen constantly looping the Acceptance Speech on 11/6... LOL!!!! :-)...

It will be like the inspector in the Pink Panther, screaming Clouseau, except it will be Mitt ! Mitt ! LOL !!!!

21 posted on 10/07/2012 9:17:53 AM PDT by taildragger (( Fubarward Obama 2012, think about it :-) ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer

Rasmussen is apparently using D+3. Based on his monthly numbers, the electorate is at R+4. I expect somewhere between R+0 and R+3 for the election. That would put Romney up by 5 to 8 percent. The latest Rasmussen independent count was Romney +16.


22 posted on 10/07/2012 9:19:13 AM PDT by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer
Is the Rasmussen poll skewed?

Even Rasmussen is skewed toward the Democrats
23 posted on 10/07/2012 9:28:57 AM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer

You are right. I bet Romney is at least up another point or two since this is a weekend poll.


24 posted on 10/07/2012 9:56:59 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer

Modest bounce? From -3 to +2? With so few undecideds, that’s a huge bounce.


25 posted on 10/07/2012 10:07:36 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (Our economy won't heal until one particular black man is unemployed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolutionary

I dont know. Usually in presidential years, democraps have a slight advantage. I think a D+2 is probably more realistic.


26 posted on 10/07/2012 10:09:24 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer
However, it is also, ALL weekend (normally not good for Republicans)

Then Romney should lead by at least 5 by Wednesday.

27 posted on 10/07/2012 11:13:05 AM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
As background?
true... you can drive the office liberal crazy, too. :-D

28 posted on 10/07/2012 11:23:41 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (WA DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...Brazilian saying: "$@me Old $hit; w/ different flie$" :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MrChips

“Note too that Rasmussen gives Romney a 16 point advantage among independents.”

Do you have a link to internals? I thought Ras had indies split at 47-47. If this is true then it would be practically impossible for Mitt to lose, especially if Ras uses the current GOP party ID advantage of 2.6 pts.


29 posted on 10/07/2012 6:30:50 PM PDT by princeofdarkness ( Nobama. No more. No way. November 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer

I find it distressing that conservatives are set to vote for a liberal just because he carries an “R” after his name


30 posted on 10/07/2012 6:31:00 PM PDT by LMAO ("Begging hands and Bleeding hearts will only cry out for more"...Anthem from Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LMAO

Vote for 0bama then LMAO. Problem solved.


31 posted on 10/07/2012 6:39:40 PM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LMAO
I find it distressing that conservatives are set to vote for a liberal just because he carries an “R” after his name

You would prefer that we vote for the radical with a "D" after his name?

Is that what you want?

32 posted on 10/07/2012 6:42:53 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MrChips

Sorry, didn’t read further down. Still, I don’t see the 16-pt advantage. It is interesting to see AA Romney support at 12% yet only 2% disapprove of BO’s performance. What gives?


33 posted on 10/07/2012 6:52:48 PM PDT by princeofdarkness ( Nobama. No more. No way. November 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: okie01

No.

But it’s more and more evidence to me that too many conservatives are reflexively voting for Republicans without question.

Just what we need. Another big government Republican


34 posted on 10/07/2012 6:56:09 PM PDT by LMAO ("Begging hands and Bleeding hearts will only cry out for more"...Anthem from Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative

I love the reflexive, non thinking answer because I won’t vote for a liberal Republican that must mean I’m voting for BHO.

LOL!!! Nothing like letting the fingers type before the mind engages


35 posted on 10/07/2012 7:01:23 PM PDT by LMAO ("Begging hands and Bleeding hearts will only cry out for more"...Anthem from Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LMAO
But it’s more and more evidence to me that too many conservatives are reflexively voting for Republicans without question.

If I might ask...

Who the hell do you think they should be voting for?

36 posted on 10/07/2012 7:01:55 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: okie01

You said...
“Who the hell do you think they should be voting for?”

It’s none of my business who people should vote for. I’m just pointing out that Mitt is a liberal that too many conservatives are voting for simply because he’s a Republican.

There is no way conservatives would vote for him except for the party label with his record and past positions


37 posted on 10/07/2012 7:07:51 PM PDT by LMAO ("Begging hands and Bleeding hearts will only cry out for more"...Anthem from Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: LMAO

Yeah, LMAO, I hear you. I wish Romney was more conservative, too. (I wanted Newt, with all my heart). But it just didn’t happen.

But I do believe Romney is a highly intelligent, good and decent man who does not hate America as Obama very obviously does. Romney is not going to “spread the wealth” or promote socialism openly. He’s for a strong military. I believe he’ll do the best job he can — I think he’s really eager to get to work to solve at least SOME of this country’s problems — and I don’t think we’re going to see him out golfing or playing basketball, wasting taxpayer dollars on trips to Spain and generally acting like a freaking CLASSLESS PUNK.

In the end, Americans need to solve these problems themselves, also. They need to get off their fat butts. They need to vote in conservative representatives, and then we can hold Rom’s feet to the fire.


38 posted on 10/07/2012 7:10:20 PM PDT by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LMAO
There is no way conservatives would vote for [Romney] except for the party label with his record and past positions

May I ask again...?

Have you considered the alternative?

39 posted on 10/07/2012 7:13:55 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Well, since we won't change each other’s minds on Romney we'll agree to disagree.

My surprise, and disappointment, is after the rise of the TEA Party we ended up with a nominee like Romney

40 posted on 10/07/2012 7:21:36 PM PDT by LMAO ("Begging hands and Bleeding hearts will only cry out for more"...Anthem from Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson