Obama, Who's Your Daddy?

Your problem seems to be that you can only focus on one item at a time. First it was the tooth, now it’s the chin. Soon I expect you will be telling me that Frank Marshall Davis photographed both girls on the same day in the same room and they both wore the same necklace and earrings. You really need to get off your high horse and take the time to STUDY the images.

I do not know that they were photographed on the same day. If the theory is to be salvaged at all, it would require the John Ray photographs to have been made in 1960, while the other was made in 1958. (We have LorenC's word that he found one of the Gilbert Photographs in 1958. We do not know for sure that this is true. ) Again, if the theory is to be salvaged, it requires two different women in two different years, but both wearing the same shoes and jewelry. (Yeah, it's a stretch.) The only thing making this remotely plausible is the difference in Chin sizes between the presumed 1958 pictures, and the presumed 1960 pictures.

If Frank Davis was making money doing naked photo shoots I don't see why he would stop doing it from year to year, or stop using the same props. Perhaps he just likes those shoes and jewelry, and perhaps the one girl reminded him of the other.

This is, of course, stretching plausibility, and is very unlikely to be true, but it does seem to me that the chins are different from one girl to the other, and the resemblance is questionable.

When you see a hoof-print, you normally think "Horse." But a hoof-print can also be left by a Zebra. I doubt this is a case of a Zebra, but it doesn't hurt to wonder about it until we know for certain that it is a Horse.

Speaking of Horses, Why the long Face?

I hate to have to sign up for a site just to examine the photographs, but from what I can see of the thumbnails, they do appear to be very similar to the John Ray photos. (I haven't seen these other photos before.)

None of this is establishing that the photos were actually from 1958, but if one of them can be proven to be from 1958, and it can be established that it is indeed the same girl from the John Ray photos, then that pretty much kills it. It would definitely not be Stanley Ann, though the woman has a remarkable resemblance to her.

Give us a hint.Pretty please.
“There is this for all Freepers to consider: Information is coming out of the woodwork about Obama. Bombshell stuff.”

If the theory is to be salvaged at all, it would require the John Ray photographs to have been made in 1960, while the other was made in 1958.

and not likely inside of the home FMD. There are plenty of his children still living. Why not look at some of their family albums? I'm sure that Mark would be willing to share a couple. He seems to be quite open about the subject. There must be plenty of family photographs showing the inside of their home.

Keep in mind, that in 1960, there was a 9 year boy and 4 girls ages, 10, 7, 2 and newborn Jill living in that house. No traces of any children in those photos and Stanley Ann lived with mom and dad.

I doubt if those outfits came from his home either. So how would two different women (that just happened to look similar) just happen to be coming to the same place for a photo shoot wearing the exact same outfits, two years apart?

So much blah blah blah blah and lots of white noise. I have clearly shown you there was only one model and she had a superficial resemblance to Stanley Ann Dunham. Just what Mr Ray might have thought is pretty useless, some anonymous person sent him three images (he says) and told him they just had to be Stanley Ann Dunham because he thought they looked like her. And now you are still, after being shown a dozen times or more there was only ONE woman in dozens of poses, wearing the same earrings, necklace and shoes in many of them, which clearly showed NONE of them were who the anonymous sender thought they were...you still cling to a tooth and a chin and try to persuade us to ignore all else.

I am now almost convinced it was you who was the anonymous sender and what you are doing is defending yourself.

On the other hand, if you and Gilbert are trying to convince people that zero had two US citizen parents by placing a girl in bed with Frank Marshall Davis on the strength of a tooth and a chin, it's not working on me.

Your last line of defence appears to be trying to find a magazine printed prior to 1960 that shows images of the same model. Good luck with that. Should you find what you are looking for, all you will have found is more images of the same woman, and frankly, I've seen more than enough of them.

None of the four images in the above composite are of Stanley Ann Dunham. The four images are all of the same model. The four images are from the Gilbert video in which he identifies the model as Ann Dunham. Who-ever she might be, it's the same woman FOUR TIMES.

Without major facial surgery, Stanley Ann Dunham just doesn't fit into the picture.

Gilbert still needs to answer how he came by the caption to this image which has the Elks Club at the wrong address. He maintained that Frank Marshall Davis lived on a floor of a four story building occupied by the Elks Club. The Elks Club was in Vineyard Street, it was a two story office block, not a private residence. And Frank moved into 2994 Kalihi Street, a single level Tudor style residence in 1957/58 - so he had no connection to the Elks Club whatso-ever, particularly not in 1952 when the above image was supposedly taken.

Described as a 'raid' it quite evidently is no such thing, it's just a group of people walking beneath a sign for the Elks Club, being led by a sailor with a flashlight. Gilbert is either smoking something or he thinks we are all idiots. The caption is false, and I would like to know how it came into his possession. From the FBI details you have previously posted, it's obvious FMD never lived at the Elks Club address on Vineyard Street.

That’s definitely Stanley Ann Dunham......When or who took the picture, I really don’t care.

I’ve been going through some old posts and comments, can’t recall if I ever showed you the origin of the images when they were first identified (wrongly) as being of SAD.

http://dissectleft.blogspot.com.au/search?updated-min=2007-12-31T04:30:00-08:00&updated-max=2008-10-30T00:10:00%2B11:30&max-results=50&start=64&by-date=false

Thursday, October 23, 2008
Naughty Obama Mamma

It’s amazing what there is on the internet. A geneological researcher has emailed me with three pictures of Obama’s mother in the nude. That would be of trivial interest except for the setting in which the picures were taken. They were clearly taken in a sophisticated mid-century apartment and my correspondent suggests that the apartment details could be used to identify the photographer. He feels that the photographer is the Communist “Frank” whom Obama mentions as his mentor. That Frank was so intimate with Obama’s mother would support the contention that Frank was in fact Obama’s father. Various bloggers have pointed out how similar Obama looks to “Frank” and the coverup of Obama’s birth certificate is certainly very suspicious.

I will not post the pictures here as Google would undoubtedly take down this blog as soon as I did. Instead, I have posted the pictures here and here and here.

I give below part of the email from my correspondent:

By pure serendipity I found a photo of what I believe is Stanley Ann Dunham; two more I found through sheer plod. They are taken before Christmas by the decorations and unopened presents. Also a stereo and records that an expert could confirm as jazz records are in view.There is a distinctive grain to the wood floors. I do research including genealogical and had downloaded everything I could find. Not much. So when I saw the picture, I locked on the the ear lobes, chin, eyebrows. It is she. A nude photo,not distasteful, but posed, I believe, by a mature man who knows what he likes, including jazz and now we know young girls. One could ascertain the location of where the photos were taken.

And the shoes..not indigenous to Hawaii,but maybe not unsual for Helen Canfield Chicago socialite and Marshall’s second wife. The photos are important in the sense that they explain the going to Chicago and the immediate acceptance by the hard left, if his father is Frank Marshall Davis, not just his mentor

And here’s a link to a webpage which shows a number of otherwise unpublished images of the same woman, named Marcy Moore. The entire story was a fraud from the beginning.

http://a.gogousenet.com/set/mukogvqptgqBlufpppkiqqnrxDbfkunxxherjbyexuortpjy/page-1-date-50.html