Skip to comments.News Flash: Debate Was Beneath Obama
Posted on 10/08/2012 7:33:55 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam
From the New York Times:
Mr. Obama does not like debates to begin with, aides have long said, viewing them as media-driven gamesmanship. He did not do all that well in 2008 but benefited from Senator John McCains grumpy performances. Mr. Obama made clear to advisers that he was not happy about debating Mr. Romney, whom he views with disdain. It was something to endure, rather than an opportunity, aides said.
This is stating the obvious.
Given theat the Obamadorn/felon/cretin is the baseline below which intelligence cannot be measured, just what exactly is below him?
He doesn’t like questions from the press either. Oprah, the View seem to be the exception.
Without a teleprompter with Jarett telling him what to say he’s totally lost.................
I’d love to see a real warrior like Allen West debate Obama.
I’m sure obama has the same disdain for Romney he has for most American citizens,it may even be stronger than my disdain for him, he appears to be driven by hate.
Atilla the Hun
Ho Chi Ming
Is this excuse number 100 or only number 99.
All that I read there simply stated that Hussein views with disdain those people who demonstrate that they are light years smarter than he.
The debate is ‘W O R K’ and “O” doesn’t like that.
Elsewhere, he apologized to his Hollywood friends that he can’t ‘perform’ well consisgently.
“O” thinks being President of the United States of America is a ‘performance’? What...? Really?? Like an actor performs?
“O” has NO CLUE what being President is.
Does this look "grumpy"?
.....when you have to hand over the club (obama's record) that's going to knock you into another dimension, it's understandable, but deserving
I never bought the excuse that he was “distracted”. What I saw was contempt; he resented being there. And yes, he considers Romney to be “beneath” him. This tin pot thought he was a “god” (note the little “g”)with his Greek columns and adoring crowds. His keepers are only stating the obvious.
Well, he will learn just how many of us “little people” have an even greater contempt for HIM in November.
Like any other tin pot dictator, Skippy wants to approach the podium, blather on and on until he’s done, then retire to the applause of his sycophants.
Any sort of push back not allowed.
Is THIS what the founders had in mind?
why do these men have to smile and act like they like each other?
I wish Romney would really let him have it,
I cannot think of a person on this earth for whom I have less regard than this fake, cheating, never has worked a day in his life, idiot.
He is slime.
He is smegma.
He is stupid.
There is not a single profitable job that he could hold.
He is nothing.
He is the only place in the multiverse that is so diverse of energy that even quantum particles refuse to appear.
There is nothing there.
He is a perfect vacuum.
And - -
“What I saw was contempt; he resented being there.”
Exactly, but he is so devious he has everyone believing he is a NICE guy.
Whatever, I never thought he was a nice guy.
There, fixed it.
The entire NY Times article gives me great hope for all the debates to go Mitt’s way. Obama is clueless.
Well if Bam will just show up and “endure” two more times he won’t have to worry about it anymore. He will be retired.
This reminds me of the dumbasses I knew in college who would always explain their failing grades as some disabilty that made them unable to “take tests”
I had one professor who would tear anyone apart who said that to him- He would ask them a question fromt he test and verbally tear them a new one when they could not answer - and said the reason they “can’t take tests” appears to be because they DONT KNOW ANYTHING
The O had to descend from his White Tower and mix with a mere mortal.
Ironically, The O has about as much substance as those styrofoam Greek Columns he used in 2008.
“Mr. Romney, whom he views with disdain”
He knows that Romney is the man that Obama will never be.
That's an irreparable problem.
Well, I can think of a few ...
In the future, we could see an end to debates. When you have a front-runner who is not good at debating, or is, as Obama, an affirmative action president; there really is no reason to engage in debates. I guess we're fortunate that Obama deigned to do any debates at all.
That would be one for the ages, love to see it. In fact, I’d love to see West debate some of our beloved RINO’s and show them for what they are.
That's ok, cuz I hate the commie pussy even more in return.
He learned that pose from Il Duce.
“Mr. Obama made clear to advisers that he was not happy about debating Mr. Romney, whom he views with disdain.”
I mean, I don’t care much for his flip-flopping, change his mind with the wind politics, but disdain for the man?
I’m showing your post to my husband. He’ll love it!
The Mao loving commie is back! Wait a minute, was she ever actually gone?
All his life Obama has had everything handed to him..college, law school, law review, a teaching job, a state senate seat, the US senate, and the WEH ( by the MSM)..the ONE time he faced a tough opponent..when he challenged sitting congressman Bobby Rush for his House seat, he got clobbered 2:1..He’s never had to work or fight hard for something...and he can’t believe that he’s losing..
Millions think Obummer’s presidency is “something to endure,” and we are praying fervently for deliverance.
It amuses me, in a way, how ozero tries to make the last physical contact to patronize whomever he is with shaking hands. It’s dominance thing he attempts every time, with every handshake and introduction, which reveals what an insecure man he really is.
As someone said recently, Romney could hold a CEO position with almost any corporation out there; Obama isn’t qualified to clean the toilets of those same corporations.
Obama does not like debates to begin with, aides have long said, viewing them as media-driven gamesmanship
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
I ‘kind of’ agree with this statement.
That said, you would think that once a narcissist/bully would agree to participate he would do EVERYTHING in his power to destroy his opponent - that is his ‘personality’ - then again if he is nothing but a faux pResident, he is not capable of ‘destroying’ an opponent, at least not on his own.
Of course, I also think that if I am way ahead etc, it doesn’t behoove me to give you an opportunity to ‘catch up’.
When G Allen ran against J Webb in VA, all he had to do for the victory was kiss babies and raise money.
He (’they’) decided to put Webb in the same category as J Kerry and then there was that ‘makaka’ thing. So we end up with a “D” Senator - who although he says he agrees with US, also took the straight party line when it really counted.
My grandsons were supposed to face off for the first time (3 yr age difference) in baseball but, for some reason one didn’t get to pitch against the other.
The younger one had absolutely NOTHING to lose, if he didn’t get a hit, who expected more? And if he did get a hit, he would never let the older one ‘live it down’. Reverse situation with younger one pitching and you have the same result.
“It was something to endure, rather than an opportunity, aides said.
I feel the same way about Hussein, I endure him.
Typing too fast here. It’s A dominance thing.
Someone in my sewing group asked me if I “hate” Obama. I told her, “No. I’d have to like him a whole lot more to bring it up to the level of ‘hate’.” I told her that no word exists in the English language to describe how I feel about him.
not so with a narcissist....they come to the situation already thinking they are superior....my dad has NPD...comes at every situation thinking he is completely right....every single time......couple that with someone that thinks they know everything and you have a taste of what these soul-less folks are wrestling
he told me recently "Ive never made a mistake"....I quickly pointed out that in saying such a thing, he had, and congratulated him for being Christs brother.....