Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

ALL lab results that verify a crime should be confirmed by A SEPARATE LAB. Additionally, no samples should contain a name or details of the alleged crime.

IF both tests are positive with no chance for impropriety or prejudicial outcomes, then justice should be swift and severe.


3 posted on 10/08/2012 1:26:41 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: clee1
ALL lab results that verify a crime should be confirmed by A SEPARATE LAB.

Chemical analysis usually involves destroying part of the sample, and forensic sample sizes are often small to begin with. There is also the matter of doubling the cost.

7 posted on 10/08/2012 1:47:36 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: clee1

Another way to prevent this is just to randomly send the lab control samples of substances where you already know the composition, and see what results the lab sends back. When they tell you that the control sample of powdered sugar you sent is cocaine, then you know you have a problem on your hands.


13 posted on 10/08/2012 2:43:49 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson