Skip to comments.PACK IT UP.. ROMNEY/RYAN, 4 and out.. It's OVER!
Posted on 10/17/2012 9:44:54 AM PDT by carlo3b
PACK IT UP.. ROMNEY/RYAN, 4 and out.. It's OVER!
Without the need for a third Presidential debate, Candy Crowley's unabashed bias, made the next debate totally meaningless.. The fact that she, and the shameless display with her girlfriend last week, have stripped the veil of impartiality of the process, making Governor Mitt Romney appear to be a victim, something we never could have hoped for..
Now no one will need, or find it necessary, to watch the next debate, unless to scrutinize the antics of the moderator.. WOW, who'd a thunk??
The Economy, Benghazi, Jobs, Benghazi, Jobs, the Economy, OH, and the integrity, or the lack thereof, of the moderator!..
These are the only topics that are dominating the post debate discussion on every outlet on TV, radio, and the web.. Nice try Candy, you misfired and it has made you, and Obama, the laughing stock, unless you count the utter failure of your cause..
You made too easy, now everyone knows.. Thanks, really..
Yes, but I can NOT understand why the Republican planners put up with this.
How about holding a debate held at Ave Maria University or Brigham Young? How about a debate moderated by someone besides the news-show hacks from the MSM?
Without the magic of curlers and makeup, this is one butt ugly woman...I’m tellin’ ya.
The Fat Lady is singing...
Nice take, and accurate.
This stunt doesn’t do much but to make the left chuckle, the right get pissed off, and the indies to see that Obama is playing with words. Seriously, everyone clearly remembers the news story, and that the administrations blame on all this, was some stupid video that nobody had seen.
The play on words is such Clintonism...
I only hope that Romney’s campaign makes a video about Libya, and run some video tv commercials on that. Make it simple, and pound the message home.
I;m sorry, but I thought that was a transvestite when he/she first came out...
Poor Handy Candy! Softball questions, biased moderating, more time to obama and what was left of your tattered reputation.
You gave all for your messiah to no avail it would appear.
Obama had very little hesitation when asked a question. It seemed to me that he knew what was coming at him before the question was asked. ???????????
However, Romney won the debate based in his command of the economic issues. I also noticed multiple glaring examples of Crowley interrupting Romney as he started to make a crucial point. Obama threw out numbers and statistics on oil production and leases that were simply a damn lie. Crowley let these lies go with no interruptions
OK. I agree, Romney has so many low hanging fruits out there to pick he can’t get them all in one debate.
I’m more impressed with Romney each time I see him, Carlo3b. The GOP has certainly presented us with much worse, some of them people got all excited about. It’s time we got excited and try to get the man elected. I thought Obama was a stuttering, stammering little thug with nothing but complaints and lies. Romney has held his own, been eloquent in these debates. Not bad traits for a leader.
>> “ Not bad traits for a leader.” <<
You’re right AuntB.
These anti-Romney sleeper-trolls are disgusting.
We’ve had far more reason to be against Dole, and W than Mitt.
Nobody knows exactly what to expect from Mitt, but he is more open than W was, and I am becoming more hopeful about his candidacy every day.
>> “ michelle was in the audience proudly applauding their efforts!” <<
Yes, how dignified.
Yes. I'm up a notch on my cautiously optimistic meter.
It’s really bad when the press screws up, it’s always to the Democraps advantage. Her siding with Obama on Libya and admitting after the debate she was wrong ranks up there with the Stephanopolus call getting thru to Larry King show when he was interviewing George Bush (the elder) and taking questions from the viewers. Turns out Stephy was called by a producer of the show, and patch thru to Larry King.
Contact CNN and tell them how you feel about their moderator...
Perhaps Barry’s reported late-afternoon downtime with a couple of friends at his hotel was really a sneak-peek coaching of the selected questions.
Do you really think they care what anyone thinks about Candy Crowley? Her presence and mission was to derail Romney and could care less about opinions, she as well as the MSM feel they have a much higher purpose than to protect their professional reputation. If I was a known right or left leaning journalist as a moderator and their was talk about my potential bias in a presidential debate, I would go out of my way to be fair, bipartisan and ethical. That didn’t happen.
Thanks for your advice and link.. Here is my email;
Candy’s intentional defiance regarding the rules of engagement in the debate, was clearly a precursor of her intentions to disrupt the flow of this important event.. Someone should have taken action before it was allowed to happen..
The unabashed bias that she displayed in her actions during the most important interactions of this Presidential campaign was clearly intentional, and inexcusable..
This incident clearly casts doubt on your leaderships in matter, and your network in particular, and it’s ongoing credibility..
I still hold out some hope that your subsequent actions regarding her tenure at your network can redeem, and hopefully reestablish your noted impartiality in being trusted to report the unvarnished news.. I guess we will see how long it will take for leadership to do what is necessary!
Romney doing “I know you are but what am I”.. with Obama was lame..
Must’ve been getting debate coaching from Pee Wee Herman..
Never once did Romney mention the word lie..
And literally everything Obama said was a lie..
And Candy Crowley swallowed..
Ugh.. LOL, hoseman.. you are soooooo naughty.. :)