Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'If four Americans get killed, it's not OPTIMAL': Obama's extraordinary response to Benghazi
Daily Mail ^ | 10/18/12 | Toby Harnden

Posted on 10/18/2012 4:56:38 PM PDT by MissesBush

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: MissesBush
HOW MANY DEAD AMERICANS WOULD YOU CONSIDER TO BE OPTIMAL, MR. OBAMA?

HOW MANY MORE NEED TO DIE BEFORE YOU ARE SATISFIED WITH THE RESULT?

41 posted on 10/18/2012 6:24:26 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush
THIS MAN IS RUNNING YOUR COUNTRY

Have a nice day. :)
42 posted on 10/18/2012 6:24:33 PM PDT by Tzimisce (THIS SUCKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush
but ignore this really boorish and insensitive comment to the murder of our people in Libya.

It was a very heartless, but it was also an odd choice of a word.

Optimal is an adjective. I don't Native English speakers typically put adjectives at the end of sentences. (okay, its been just a few years :-) since high school English, but I'm sure I'll be corrected shortly if I'm wrong)

The word itself means 'most favorable or desirable'. The more common use is the form optimum.

So does that mean he thinks it was not desirable, or not satisfactory....as in not sufficient.

Argh! I HATE how he talks out of both sides of his mouth.

43 posted on 10/18/2012 6:25:19 PM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as Created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Question that has to be asked is who actually talks like this. Stewart uses the word appropriately for the question he asked and Uhbamuh once again decides he needs to sound like smartest guy in room and screws it up.

He might have said, “Well, it didn’t go quite as well as we hoped”.


44 posted on 10/18/2012 6:33:52 PM PDT by WillVoteForFood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

Obama had hoped for so much more...


45 posted on 10/18/2012 8:44:34 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (I will fear no muslim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
But would it be optimal if only 3 were killed?

Sounds to me as if he means that 4 weren't enough to worry about, maybe a couple hundred, but not just 4. What a jerk!

46 posted on 10/18/2012 9:02:08 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

I wonder how many Americans have to die before obama thinks it is optimal.


47 posted on 10/18/2012 10:07:51 PM PDT by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

Bump


48 posted on 10/18/2012 10:28:32 PM PDT by MissesBush (The Fourth Estate has Become a Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson