Skip to comments.Was the attack on Benghazi an "October Surprise" gone bad?
Posted on 10/19/2012 8:09:15 AM PDT by Jeff Head
click here to read article
FYI...as horrible as it may seam, this is something to think about.
This is quite possible. I first heard this theory a week ago.
Once again the Obama administration giving the American people the not so subtle, good ole one finger salute.
I pray so Jeff. This is a National disgrace !!
I agree. And don’t forget the pre-planned video to blame.
And don’t forget the unexpected presence of two SEALS that fought back. They weren’t supposed to be there. They “messed up” a likely pre-planned hostage situation that 0dumbo would solve.
If so none of the attackers, if identified, will be taken alive. Some know too much.
Or maybe the SEALS killed those who were supposed to get the Ambassador alive.
Do not forget, Fast and Furious was an attempt at gun control likely by executive order, and it went horribly wrong.
The October Surprise angle is very plausible with these manipulators controlling our government, complete with their lap-dog media.
Most of those were probably the producers updating and editing and fixing it as best they could...and then their family and friends.
With the Chicago Mob, anything is possible.
I think that is why NBC and MSNBC ran the story about the terrorist responsible for the attack on the Embassy thumbing his nose at America. I think he is being set up (willingly) to replace the Embassador in the trade for the Blind Sheik.
Now whether this story is truthful is another issue. I for one want to hear from the security guys who State says were there. Without starting a witchunt I think Issa should subpoena them and the vids and radio comms. My own feeling is that if five guys are tasked with protecting Stevens and Stevens winds up dead then some or all of those five should be lying beside him, like Randy Shuggart and Gary Gordon
Yes. The hidden story is that of this abomination of a regime arming al Quaeda. Fast and Furious, Middle Eastern edition.
That is beyond treasonous.
What you suggest is certainly possible, especially considering the chicago thugs with which Obama surrounds himself.
However, IMHO “never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity”.
Obama and his choom gang were (and are) single-mindedly focused on Obama’ re-election. Their entire world view and all of their behavior in the run-up to this tragedy were informed by that single, simple goal.
Embassy security was neglected out of pure sloppy management and focus on other things (the convention, the campaign).
Other than the fact that the islamofascists are ALWAYS predisposed to killing us, if there was anything that “set them off”, it wasn’t that retarded movie — it was parading bin Laden’s head on a pike around the ‘rat convention. But again, Obama and his genius advisors were focused on the election. The possibility of fallout from their spiking the bin Laden ball enver came up in their planning sessions.
Once the tragedy occurred, an explanation HAD to be found that let Obama and his administration off the hook. That’s really all that’s necessary to completely explain the ham-fisted coverup.
IMHO, those things, and not an October surprise conspiracy, are the “occam’s razor” explanation for what has occurred.
Just my 2c, and FRegards
The first comments out of Steven’s Libyan friends was ‘he was killed by his own puppets’.
The facts on the table are so bad for Obama you really don’t need to stretch the narrative.
Exaclty. The MSM is following the lead of the Administration and would be wholly unaware of the depths that this thing goes, if such a scenario were true. But they would cover for (as they have obviously been doing) Obama to the hilt because of their unbelievable bias.