Skip to comments.Was the attack on Benghazi an "October Surprise" gone bad?
Posted on 10/19/2012 8:09:15 AM PDT by Jeff Head
click here to read article
And by the way... I’m groovin’ on the fact whether I’m right and the root cause is sheer stupidity... or YOU’RE right and it’s something sinister... either way this situation is a BIG lose-lose for Obama. At a *very* (shall we say) awkward time in his life. :-)
I’m just sorry that American lives were lost, needlessly. THAT I am NOT groovin’ on.
At first I thought this crazy talk. Now I'm not so sure.
Have you watched the video of the CNN interview with Mohammed Al Zawahiri, the brother of the Zawahiri, who was the Al Qaeda leader? The video did not air in the US, only in Canada. It’s supposed to be a peace proposal, but it is just a series of demands, the same demands that were issued by Osama Bin Laden, prior to the first 9/11 attacks.
My guess is that Obama was going to allow Stephens to be captured and then trade him for All the Islamic prisoners, as in the demands and capitulate to all the other demands, as well. Then Obama was going to claim that he had single handedly brought peace to the Middle East.
Or he has documented the plot and the White House knows if he dies the truth will come out. If so he is untouchable.
Anyone who believed such a plan could be set up and executed without anything “going wrong” had to be insane. Look at who would have to be trusted to do the kidnapping and the later release...what kind of people!
What would stop people like that from keeping the ambassador, not releasing him? Answer, nothing.
OR deliberately killing him AFTER pretending to go along with a kidnapping/release scheme? Answer, nothing.
And who would the person be who was trying to orchestrate all of this for Obama??
Would they have been working personally for Obama’s re-election, under the radar, OR, would they have had an official job with the American gov’t while pursuing this scheme for Obama on the side?
Just some questions that came to me when I tried to “imagine out” the scenario.
But they would have to be INSANE, whoever they were, to believe they could pull off such a plan, that they actually could’ve had control of events, when dealing with the people they would’ve had to deal with, to carry out the kidnapping and release.
The only thing I can think of, aside from that, is if a dummy operation were planned. That is, America, or Obama personally, had people who would pretend to be the kidnappers but could be counted on not to harm Stevens and to release him later.
But the dummy operation - if there was one - had to have ended up being CRASHED by real kidnappers or deliberate killers (depending on your POV).
Very bad neighborhood, eh?
Hannity indicated yesterday that he would be breaking big news about this story tonight on his show. We’ll see. Whatever it is...it is getting darker and worse for the President, as well it should.
Let’s try an experiment. Let’s blow a 40-foot hole in the White House wall and see if these people are stupid enough to ignore it.
Is there a jurisdiction on earth that hasn't had someone confess to a lesser crime that they did commit in order to prevent being charged with a much more severe crime?
Disclaimer: For illustrative purposes only. I am not suggesting anybody actually do this.
The US Consulate is located in the southern part of Benghazi, not far from the ocean. There are numerous routes of egress therefrom. Many options. None were taken. 6 hours is a long time. Fast movers could easily have been scrambled in such time. None were.
When early reports claimed the attackers were employing mortars, I knew then this was not a spontaneous demonstration gone bad. Rather, a planned, coordinated military type attack. Civilians make poor cannon-cockers.
Obi and company clearly dropped the ball on this one. Now doing damage control until post-election. With their ownership of the media, they may succeed...
Benghazi Attack Was Botched Kidnapping To Trade Blind Sheik.
Western Journalism.com ^ | October 17, 2012 | Kris Zane
Purely as an academic thought experiment, of course.
Just explicitly saying it because there might be someone reading who is dead stupid, flat out evil, paid to protect with maximum violence and minimum reason the occupier of the White House against all enemies real or imagined, a DU lurker, member of the MSM, lacks any ability to discern humor or exaggeration or is all of the above...
The first I heard about this possibility came from a thread posted by Kozy:
Two SEALs ruin October Surprise
Author ^ | 10/14/2012 | Kozy
Posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 8:28:48 AM by Kozy
The murder of Ambassador Stevens at Benghazi is Obama’s October surprise gone bad thanks to two former SEALS who were not supposed to be at Benghazi. But then I ran to the end of the story so let’s back fill the datapoints.
First President Morsi first public statement to us was that he wanted the blind iman who first bombed the WTC released. Now Obama forever dedicated to appeasing the muslim world, bowing to them comes natural to him, knew that he had to obey Morsi’s request however he couldn’t release Omar Abdul-Rahman. There had to be a reason powerful enough to warrant his release. What better than to return to the Carter era of American hostages?
Obama sees a way to release the iman and secure his reelection in one act. So the wheels are set in motion. So he needed a cover story. Oh, the You Tube video that no one has seen, released in July. America could be shamed into releasing the iman because someone posted an obscure video and we have to follow Obama’s lead and bow to muslims.
Next weaken the security at Benghazi by removing the security teams and employing Libyan bodyguards for the ambassador. In effect the embassy could not defend itself. The back channel had to be from the WH to the iman’s legal representatives. It was suggested that Obama needed a reason to release the iman that America could agree to. What better than hostages? They were informed that there were no security forces at Benghazi to defend Stevens so over run the embassy and take him hostage. Really easy.
What was not planned for were former SEALS Donerty and Woods. They were not part of Stevens security detail; they happened to be in Benghazi working for the CIA to located missing surface-to-air missiles.
So the terrorists plan the assault on the embassy thinking there would be no resistance. Well two SEALS never back down from defending America and Americans. These two heros gave their lives fighting to protect our embassy and our ambassador. No telling how many peaceful muslim they transported to the after life however the terrorists who thought this was just a walk in the park protect now sought out the Americans to kill them not hold them captive. The over throw went from hostage taking to killing.
Now the WH knew the plan had blown up. There were no hostages only dead Americans. How to cover? Roll out the 14 minute video, no one has seen, as the cause. The WH cover up was in play.
With the killing of Ambassador Stevens, there could be no exchange, no October surprise. Oh what was the October surprise? Well Obama would spend a month negotiating with the terrorists for the release of Ambassador Stevens and finally and after his focused efforts on saving Stevens’ live, Stevens would be released just before the election. Obama would have sucked out all the energy from the campaign as everyone would be watching him, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, negotiate for the release of Stevens. The world would applaud him, the muslim would have their murderous iman back, he would be reelected and the destruction of America who go on.
We can only thank every day these SEALS for defending America with their lives.
A lot of datapoints, Benghazi, President Morsi, SEALS, blind iman, 14 minute You Tube video; withdrawal of security from embassy, October surprise and Obama’s October surprise.
Wonder which story makes more sense? Mine of the one the WH spins every day that keeps changing as the lies are exposed.
If what I've read is correct, then his and their deaths would not bear discussion with a polite woman.
Of course, that's swimming against the stream of "police procedural" material that has flooded television for the last 12 years, that used to be confined, even by yellow-journal editors, to the police blotter and raw detective files.
Concurring bump. Barky owes us a couple of consecutive life sentences in Leavenworth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.