Skip to comments.
Candy Crowley Not in ‘Cahoots’ With Obama; He and Axelrod Used Her
NewsBusters.org ^
| October 20, 2012
| Brent Baker
Posted on 10/20/2012 1:07:11 PM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
1
posted on
10/20/2012 1:07:16 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Not in cahoots? So why did she cut off the Fast and Furious discussion right on queue?
2
posted on
10/20/2012 1:10:12 PM PDT
by
The Sons of Liberty
("Get that evil, foreign, muslim, usurping, gay commie bastard out of MY White House!" FUBO!)
To: Kaslin
Oh, I see!
And that must have caused her to interrupt Mitt every time he tried to make a statement.
There are some people in this world who simply have no shame..........and a lot of them seem to be in the media.
3
posted on
10/20/2012 1:10:20 PM PDT
by
basil
(Second Amendment Sisters.org)
To: Kaslin
So how is this not "in cahoots" with Obama?
4
posted on
10/20/2012 1:10:52 PM PDT
by
x
To: basil
5
posted on
10/20/2012 1:11:51 PM PDT
by
Catsrus
(Ma)
To: Kaslin
I wonder if Candy Crowley and John Candy were related.
6
posted on
10/20/2012 1:12:38 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(This is America! Being dead is no excuse not to vote!!!)
To: Kaslin
Candy Crowley Not in ‘Cahoots’ With Obama; He and Axelrod Used Her If she's too stupid to realize she's being a puppet, why does anyone think she's smart enough to report the 'news'.
7
posted on
10/20/2012 1:13:26 PM PDT
by
MamaTexan
(I am a Person as Created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
To: Kaslin
Right I believe that. I always carry papers given to me weeks before with me at all times...like her’s from 9/30 . She had the transcript right at hand. Good thing she keeps it with her.
8
posted on
10/20/2012 1:14:03 PM PDT
by
nclaurel
To: Kaslin
9
posted on
10/20/2012 1:16:32 PM PDT
by
rawcatslyentist
("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
To: Kaslin
Candy just WANTS to be used. It’s a dirty business, I’m sure she feels the same.
10
posted on
10/20/2012 1:16:50 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Kaslin
Thanks for posting.
This account is an outrageous rewrite of what really happened!
If any reasonable, logical person views the 5+-minute video of the President's Rose Garden statement, listens to the inflections, and uses ordinary common sense, he/she will come away with the conclusion that he was not calling the Benghazi attack a "act of terror."
Crowley either did not do that, or she was complicit in promoting a lie.
Remember when the President once claimed that "words matter"? Crowley asserted on The View that it was "a semantic thing." No, Crowley, it was not a "semantic thing." It was a "truth thing."
To: FlingWingFlyer
I wonder if Candy Crowley and John Candy were related.She ate him.
12
posted on
10/20/2012 1:17:35 PM PDT
by
Tex-Con-Man
(Muppet season now open - no bag limit)
To: Kaslin
The alternative explanation offered is not better....
Candy Crowley was STILL a plant.
In several different senses of the word.
13
posted on
10/20/2012 1:17:35 PM PDT
by
alloysteel
("If you are going to follow the road less traveled, at least consult your GPS first.".)
To: Kaslin
As long as no one has a video clip of Candy Crowley saying, “Hi everyone! It’s great to be here! I’m thrilled to be in Cahoots, Iowa with the president on this momentous day!” So long as there is no such explicit statement from Candy, I guess no one can says she is in Cahoots.
14
posted on
10/20/2012 1:18:06 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Global Warming is a religion, and I don't want to be taxed to pay for a faith that is not mine.)
To: Kaslin
She may not have been buying what Axelrod was selling, but she was more than accommodating when Obama yelled ‘get the transcript.’
She became part of the debate, rather than being an impartial moderator.
15
posted on
10/20/2012 1:19:20 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
(Dukakis is to tank as Obama is to binder & Big Bird)
To: Kaslin
OK, I get it. She's subconsciously in cahoots with 0bama.
All better now.
16
posted on
10/20/2012 1:21:30 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
To: Kaslin
They just can’t admit they used a fat chick.
17
posted on
10/20/2012 1:21:39 PM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Corollary - Electing the same person over and over and expecting a different outcome is insanity)
To: bmwcyle
I can see 0bama riding a Moped.
18
posted on
10/20/2012 1:22:32 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
To: Kaslin
Not in cahoots? When have any of the MSM not been 100% in the tank for Dear Leader? They've been worshiping at the shrine of Obamination since he was a candidate for POTUS. Nothing has changed; they are all in for hum. Bammy is their creation and their idol.
To: Kaslin
She should sing a song from the fifties.
Will you still love me tomorrow?
Her having a copy of the transcript shows it was a set-up.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
