Skip to comments.OBAMA DOCTRINE: FT. HOOD WAS NOT TERRORISM, WOUNDED SOLDIERS GET NO BENEFITS
Posted on 10/21/2012 12:05:35 PM PDT by Snuph
Victims of the Nov. 2009 Ft. Hood shooting are being denied benefits commensurate with combat injuries because the Obama administration refuses to label the attack an act of terrorism. Instead, the shooting Maj. Nidal Hasan carried out after screaming "Allahu Akbar" it is still being labeled "workplace violence." The difference between labeling the incident "workplace violence" and "terrorism" is not only the rightful recognition 13 of our troops deserve for being killed in service to their country on Nov. 5, 2009, but also ongoing benefits that would help survivors pay for the physical therapy, and other medical and psychological treatments that might be necessary to a full recovery. Texas Gov. Rick Perry has openly stated that the shooting, which took place in his state, was an act of terrorism and that the president such recognize it as such. He said, "President Obama's refusal to call it an act of terror is a shining example of this administration's devotion to political correctness over the defense of our men and women in uniform."
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
It would be considered ‘terrorism’ if you were against the policies of the Obama Administration.
Like obama says, in this economy we all have to sacrifice. Soldiers first, apparently. First kill ‘em, then starve their families.
Romney should definitely try to work this into the upcoming debate.
“Mr. President, your administration’s attitude toward Islamic terrorism has been deplorable. Aside from the ‘not optimal’ response to the murder of four Americans at the consulate in Benghazi, numerous reports state that the Fort Hood shooter shouted ‘allahu akbar’ as he was murdering people. Yet your administration has specifically claimed that this was NOT an act of Islamic terrorism and, in doing so, you have denied the victims the benefits to which they’d otherwise be entitled. Is this part of your game plan for the next four years? To continue to ignore obvious cases of Islamic terrorism to avoid having to face the reality of the situation? Should we refer to you as the Ostrich President until you leave office in January?”
It is just AMAZING that BHussseinO’s pro-terrorista pro-Caliphate pro-MuslimBros ideology is allowed to hold up the legal benefits for American victims of his terrorist friends, especially when they were attacked right here in the USA.
We need a new ... American ... President!
This is especially galling to me as one of those killed was Mike Cahill who I worked with in the Montana Army National Guard at Ft. Harrison, Mt. Mike died a hero as he fought back at hasson with a chair. He undoubtedly saved lives. To call this a work place shooting event is an incredible insult to those who were killed or injured. OIF vet.
It most certainly DOES define zero's foreign policy.
If I use the phrase n lover ... I'll be banned and chastised for being insensative and racist.
But when the n is every BIT a muzzie lover, it is allowed and spun to be a good thing.
If I remember correctly, every nation at war with Germany in WW2 had serious penalties for even talking about Germany/Hitler in a friendly or compassionate way.
zero DID say we would fundamentally change Washington .... no one believed us when we tried to warn that the Washington he referred to was a dead general and President.
The victims of the Ft. Hood terrorist will have to wait for Romney before getting justice.
We can pray that he does.
Thank you everyone for the great comments
First thing after taking office, he changed the ROE to give the advantage to the Taliban - which resulted, in that first year - 2009 - our KIA's DOUBLING from any other year of the wasr! And TRIPLING in 2010 and almost 4x's in 2011 - and it continues in 2012.
The media, sho used to run a daily count with photos during the Bush years, is SILENT. The American people are too busy watching "Idol" etc to do due-dilienge.
I could link to horror stories that have resulted in 'bozo's coddling of the Tallies that had DRIECTLY killed our troops = but I wouldn't want to over tax your attention or take up 5 whole minutes of your precious time...so I'll just post this chart - next post - and let you read between the lines.
Just make-up new words, Ron. We can add '-spittle' and '-sucker' to many other words, and they don't even have to make sense!
We can even write in invisible ink!corksucker!................................................. FRegards
chart per my post above
Sbuph - my POSTS 31 and 33 were ot directyed at YOU - but I forgot to include the “all’ in the address line -
chart per my post above
I’d also like SOMEONE to mention how many of out soldiers ‘bozo has iklled wince he changed the ROE (Rules of Engagement) for our troop.
First thing after taking office, he changed the ROE to give the advantage to the Taliban - which resulted, in that first year - 2009 - our KIA’s DOUBLING from any other year of the wasr! And TRIPLING in 2010 and almost 4x’s in 2011 - and it continues in 2012.
The media, sho used to run a daily count with photos during the Bush years, is SILENT. The American people are too busy watching “Idol” etc to do due-dilienge.
I could link to horror stories that have resulted in ‘bozo’s coddling of the Tallies that had DRIECTLY killed our troops = but I wouldn’t want to over tax your attention or take up 5 whole minutes of your precious time...so I’ll just post this chart - next post - and let you read between the lines.
If Ft.Hood wasn’t an act of terrorism,
Benghazi was an example of work place violence.
Fuck you Barack Obama, you Islamic bastard!
Ah, I feel much better.