Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Department warns Texas AG not to arrest UN-affiliated election observers (list of locations)
Michelle Malkin ^ | 10/27/12 | Doug Powers

Posted on 10/27/2012 5:32:58 AM PDT by markomalley

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott has warned a group of UN-affiliated “international election observers” that they could be subject to criminal prosecution if they breach state laws by being within 100 feet of polling place entrances.

The US State Department issued a warning as well. No, not to the election observers — to Texas:

International election observers planning to visit Texas polling places have “full immunity” from being arrested in the United States, the State Department said when discussing a letter from the Texas Attorney General.

“I’m not going to get into any kind of hypothetical situations or predict where this is going to go other than to say we have every expectation that this will be worked out and to state the fact, which is that under U.S. law they are eligible for immunities,” said State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland. Reporters tried to get her to state explicitly that Texas could not arrest election observers from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), but Nuland would only reiterate that OSCE observers have full immunity.

Hey, it’s not like the State Department has anything else to worry about.

The “observers” will in part be looking for voter fraud and suppression activities by conservative groups. They’re only monitoring conservatives because nobody on the other side of the political spectrum has been busted in a voter fraud scam since, oh… Wednesday.

A list of where the observers will be stationed is here. Because this group is affiliated with the UN, the comptrollers of those listed cities would be wise to prepare to have to unpaid parking tickets on the ledger until the end of time.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: dontmesswithtexas; gregabbott; osce; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-66 last
To: Charles Martel
Check out her qualifications to be an international elections monitor: Media Consultant, and ...

Long Term Observer
OSCE
Nonprofit; 1001-5000 employees; International Affairs industry
May 2011 – June 2011 (2 months) FYROM

Who even knew there was an industry call International Affairs?

Sounds like a booty call for the leftards and a free trip to the US!

51 posted on 10/27/2012 7:38:36 AM PDT by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
State Department warns Texas AG not to arrest UN-affiliated election observers

..it would be a big mistake to try to stop Texas--from doing anything...

52 posted on 10/27/2012 7:49:21 AM PDT by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

These elections are state elections, not federal. So the Feds have no jurisdiction to order immunity.


53 posted on 10/27/2012 8:13:46 AM PDT by Wordkraft (Remember who the Collaborators are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I see that South Carolina is on the list. While not in Columbia, I will be a Poll Manager on election Day.
And I promise, I’ll go to jail before a UN SOB enters MY Station !!!!


54 posted on 10/27/2012 8:14:10 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
“I’m not going to get into any kind of hypothetical situations or predict where this is going to go other than to say we have every expectation that this will be worked out and to state the fact, which is that under U.S. law they are eligible for immunities,” said State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland. Reporters tried to get her to state explicitly that Texas could not arrest election observers from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), but Nuland would only reiterate that OSCE observers have full immunity.

You know, I have heard that name recently. Let me see...

Yep! Here it is.

It was prior to the 9-11 attack on the Benghazi Consult, in June I believe. She was making a statement on the trial balloons being floated regarding releasing Sheikh Omar abdel Rahman — aka the blind sheik, who is serving a life sentence for the first World Trade Center bombing.

He is the leader of Gamaa Islamiyya, a well known terrorist group. In June, the State Department actually issued a visa to a member of that very same Gamaa Islamiyya — again, this is a designated terrorist organization — and met with him in Washington, as part of a delegation of Egyptian leaders. He is told by State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland, in reference to Sheikh Omar abdel Rahman, “We neither had then, nor do we have now, any reason to believe that this particular individual — who at the time of his application was a member of parliament — would pose a threat to the United States”

No threat? Odd, he is doing a life sentence in the federal slammer for leading the first World Trade Center bombing.

But Victoria is very clear here. He is "not a threat."

Yeah, THAT Victoria Nuland.

Now she is covering for for OSCE??

The Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE/ODIHR)

Basically they appear to be the biggest busybody, stick-their-nose-in-your-business org on the planet.

http://www.osce.org/what

But “full immunity” from being arrested in the United States?

Laughable.

Reporters tried to get her to state explicitly that Texas could not arrest election observers from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), but Nuland would only reiterate that OSCE observers have full immunity

Umm, don't think so Mizz Nuland.



Let's look at "Diplomatic Immunity" as it is practiced here in the u.S.

Diplomatic immunity is a form of legal immunity and a policy held between governments that ensures that diplomats are given safe passage and are considered not susceptible to lawsuit or prosecution under the host country's laws, although they can still be expelled. It was agreed as international law in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961),

In reality, most diplomats are representatives of nations with a tradition of professional civil service, and are expected to obey regulations governing their behavior and they suffer strict internal consequences (disciplinary action) if they flout local laws. In many nations a professional diplomat's career may be compromised if they (or even members of their family) disobey the local authorities or cause serious embarrassment, and such cases are, at any rate, a violation of the spirit of the Vienna Conventions.

The Vienna Convention is explicit that "without prejudice to their privileges and immunities, it is the duty of all persons enjoying such privileges and immunities to respect the laws and regulations of the receiving State." Nevertheless, on some occasions, diplomatic immunity leads to some unfortunate results; protected diplomats have violated laws (including those that would be violations at home as well) of the host country and that country has been essentially limited to informing the diplomat's nation that the diplomat is no longer welcome (persona non grata). Diplomatic agents are not, however, exempt from the jurisdiction of their home state, and hence prosecution may be undertaken by the sending state; for minor violations of the law, the sending state may impose administrative procedures specific to the foreign service or diplomatic mission.

The Convention does not cover the personnel of international organizations, whose privileges are decided upon on a case-by-case basis, usually in the treaties founding such organizations.

Yes, the u.S. is an active member of OSCE.

NO, there is no treaty. OSCE is a NGO, not a nation. Continuing...

Other categories of government officials (not international organizations) that may travel frequently to other countries may not have diplomatic passports or diplomatic immunity, such as members of the military, high-ranking government officials, ministers, and others.

There are some limited immunities for staff of international organizations. The following demonstrates the basic difference.

International organization category

Diplomatic-level staff of missions to international organizations

May be arrested or detained? No

Residence may be entered subject to ordinary procedures? No

International Organization Staff

May be arrested or detained? Yes

Residence may be entered subject to ordinary procedures? Yes

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diplomatic_immunity

So, Mizz Nuland, about that OSCE observers have "full immunity."

It is you that appears to be full... of "it."

55 posted on 10/27/2012 8:27:52 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Importantly, the The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) are joining “an additional 80 to 90 members of parliaments from nearly 30 countries.”

I suspect that this is a non-story, for several reasons.

First and foremost, American polling is very orderly, by about any standards. It is also “observer friendly”, because partisan poll watchers are fairly common.

Second, the internationals can “look but not touch”, but that is pretty well expected. They are also not supposed to make any comments on sight, just note if they see anything unusual.

And third, the internationals have already written two reports, one for if Obama wins, showing the election was totally fair and square; and a different one for if Romney wins, which may or may not claim extensive voter fraud.


56 posted on 10/27/2012 8:34:20 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (DIY Bumper Sticker: "THREE TIMES,/ DEMOCRATS/ REJECTED GOD")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Looks like it is time for some patriotic Texans to get in the face of these international observers. Just stand in front of them and talk. Don’t slug them, just...obstruct.


57 posted on 10/27/2012 8:39:05 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
My achin' ass they do! Besides, they may have "immunity" from the police and authorities, but that won't save them from We the People. And I'd hate to face an angry Texas mob ...

Enough of the BS. Two lone women don't have anything to fear from a Texas mob. This isn't Egypt.

58 posted on 10/27/2012 8:44:55 AM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: pepperdog
...they are just here to help y'all and they're such nice people.

"We are here to serve man".

FMCDH(BITS)

59 posted on 10/27/2012 9:23:20 AM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

It would appear that Kirsten Mogensen, who will be the UN monitor, along with Andrew Mc Entee in Columbus, Ohio has penned academic papers criticizing American journalists for getting emotional over 9/11, (the original attack, not Obama’s new one).

It would be nice if we could get some recent pictures of these interlopers:

http://www.academia.edu/674001/How_American_9_11_Journalists_Talk_about_Objectivity_in_Crisis_Coverage


60 posted on 10/27/2012 9:35:55 AM PDT by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; All

I hope Texas and its officials ignore the State Dept.....but this was the same state whose GOP politicians (Gov Rick Perry especially) backed down on the Texas Anti-TSA law when the Obama Admin made threats

This would be a good time for Texas to man up and stick some of the UNPunished Nazis in jail.

Also, for Diplomatic Immunity, you need to prove that you have it....you just cannot merely say “I have diplomatic immunity” Yes, Texas can stick a UN “observer” in jail until it is proven that the person actually has “immunity”


61 posted on 10/27/2012 10:29:32 AM PDT by SeminoleCounty (Political maturity is realizing that the "R" next to someone's name does not mean "conservative")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melas
Enough of the BS.

Talk to the UN. They're the authors of the BS.

Two lone women don't have anything to fear from a Texas mob.

Two lone women who happen to be meddlers interfering in the election of a foreign country had BETTER have something to fear ... and if it isn't going to be the authorities, it should be the People.

This isn't Egypt.

That's true. Egypt is a free country.

62 posted on 10/27/2012 12:27:45 PM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Biff55
Ooooooh, Austin. The hotbed of political conservatism in Texas.

Correction. Austin is indeed just another failed San Fransisco with all its twisted sick-minded Liberals. It just so happens there a few worthwhile Conservatives doing business there.

63 posted on 10/27/2012 1:11:26 PM PDT by Ron H. (America is drawing on its last breaths. Look to the heavens for He is nigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wesagain
You are so right!
64 posted on 10/27/2012 1:12:38 PM PDT by Ron H. (America is drawing on its last breaths. Look to the heavens for He is nigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I’m sure the US State Dept would feel the exact same way if the KKK announced that they would do the very same thing in heavily Dimocrat neighborhoods.


65 posted on 10/27/2012 1:15:55 PM PDT by Ron H. (America is drawing on its last breaths. Look to the heavens for He is nigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bshaw

wow good find!! Send to Drudge!!


66 posted on 10/27/2012 1:22:14 PM PDT by pollywog ("O Thou who changest not, abide with me.".......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson