Skip to comments.Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer: My sources tell me Obama was in the room watching Benghazi attack
Posted on 10/27/2012 7:18:05 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer said tonight that his sources tell him that Obama was one of the people in the room watching the Benghazi attack go down and both he and Col. David Hunt agree it would have taken an order by the president to intervene.
Further, Col. Hunt said that we were only 20 min away by jet and a couple of hours away by AC-130 gunships and special forces, and the decision not to intervene had to be political.
(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...
2 Generals and 1 Admiral have been removed ....Mutiny ongoing as we speak? Time will tell and I believe it will tell SHORTLY.
I don’t have the time to read through 251 replies on this thread, but I really wonder if someone hasn’t already, could they please post...
that picture of Zero, before he got elected, photoshopped in Arabian sultan attire, “this is what you’ll be getting the day after he’s inaugurated” picture.
VERY APPROPRIATE TO THIS THREAD.
Unbucking felievable. It's like something out of a movie. It's certainly a Horror.
See Post 33 this thread.
O could more rightly be charged with Maleficence and Dereliction of Duty. Prefer ‘Enemy of the State’ as is more apt.
how do we remove him
from the White House ?>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thats simple, arrest warrants for treason from the Supreme Court and a large possee of US Marshals to serve the warrants, backed up by the US Marines.
“He cant do jack if he loses and the military would take him out of the White House on Jan. 20, 2013, because he is nothing as soon as his successor takes the oath.
“I guess that means he can’t annul the election and declare himself El Presidente for life.”
Easy as pie - with that huge storm bearing down of the East Coast, O has returned to the WH for the duration.
Many are saying that the storm could well impact the election. If so, then it would be easy to declare a ‘postponement’ until things return to ‘normal’.
And then continue in office for as long as the turmoil lasts ...
Wasn’t Ambassador Stevens gay and also from Chicago? What was his relationship with O’Bummer that got him the position?
I still say that pic was photoshopped to show Obozo in it. The light reflections are from the wrong side of his head when compared to anyone else around him...
“He opted out, why?”
Excellent point. Add in, the generals, General Ham specifically, commander of African forces, wanted to go in and got relieved of command. Why? What was so important that the top general didn’t understand?
Kinda looks like me might be crouched down lining up his shot on the golf course.
Ping - let’s get the story out.
What if Ozero is not calling the shots. what if all calls/decisions are mde by Valerie Jarrett,axelrod and moochhell since everything inthei regime is political little else matters. What if zero is just a waling talking teleprompter? What if Jarrett, Axel and Moochhell decided that Stevens was loose cannon.He knew too much about everything and had to go? What then? Does that explain why Panetta was told to stand down? Could be.
He is deliberate, not incompetent. You STILL don't know what he's all about.
I think Zero is a walking, talking strap-on.
Who was on the ground taking pictures of it all that night? There are professional looking photos of the building and a vehicle on fire, etc.
What about the guns Stevens was shipping to jihadis in Syria through Turkey? When are these idiots at Fox sNooze going to get to that?
With Stevens out of the way and Benghazi in turmoil it might be easier for AQ to take control of those weapons and send them through their channels. Perhaps through Egypt?
I know he’s deliberate as you say but, if Obama is given a pass by the voters this means they’ve simply decided he was incompetent. Some folks can live with a ‘bad decsion’. Most folks can not live with an evil decision. We think what he did in regards to Benghazi is evil but, it remains to be seen how the rest of the public views his handiwork. They simply may view it as a ‘bad decision’ and move on to his second term. I know....the thought hurts me too.
As for the attack, with Stevens out of the way and Benghazi in turmoil it might be easier for AQ to take control of those weapons and send them through their channels instead of the CIA's chosen group. Perhaps through Egypt?
As for Zero, I'd bet he's just hell bent on claiming that these are small things in his "big picture" approach to the liberation of the Arab world. Perhaps he thinks that North Africa (supposedly) "at peace" would demonstrate what he remembers so fondly from his Islamic childhood in Indonesia. White European capitalist greed is what causes all the instability in that region you know. ;-)
I don’t know. My guess would be that since it was CNN that found Stevens’ diary, it might have been them. Possibly al jazeera or the news guys from Lebanon who first announced that Stevens had been raped. Could have been Libyan press.
It could have been ansar al shariah itself since they do so love to film themselves in action and upload it straight to youtube.
whole thread ping
I agree about Jennifer also.
Whomever it was, they were on the scene as it was happening. Strange we haven’t heard of any wounded or killed photo journalists.
What did Obama gain from the murder, rape and humiliation of special ops team members at the hands of radical Muslims?
What did radical Muslims learn from the Benghazi experience?
What did American commanders learn from Benghazi?
He wanted the ambassador dead in a protest over a video. The CIAs ex-seals were told to stand down and let em die.......”
Perhaps it would be more correct to say “stand down and let them be taken hostage....so I can, just in time for the election, be a hero when they are rescued by prearrangement with the Muslim Brotherhood”.
Just another theory—who knows the depths of depravity to which the Obamamites will descend. If such a thing was planned it was foiled by several heroic Americans and the incompetence of the Libyan Islamic organization to which was subcontracted the “taking” portion of the operation.
More interested in campaigning...
“Tell me what was so important, so vital that Obama PASSED ON THE GREATEST PRESIDENTIAL POLITICAL OPPORTUNITY EVER to lock up his reelection? Think about it.......he could have had a BinLaden rerun. 130s, Seals, Delta! Massive rescue mission, saving the lives of Americans, We would have been watching footage on every station, 24/7 right up to November 6th. Just one word....GO! He opted out, why?”
Indeed: this is so baffling. It seems necessary that there be some reason that -bama and Jarrett decided that it would be better/easier re-election campaign if Stevens was dead.
What the heck could be better than a real he-man military rescue?
Something HAS to be hidden in this that they worried about more than any concern about some Americans abandoned and left behind to die thousands of miles from home.
Thanks bitt. I had made some remarks around #245 thread range.
GREAT job, dearest Phil!
He was mostly up to speed but he had not heard the detail that was on the John Bachelor thread late last night.
Now I see this thread is still popping.
Got some reading to do to get caught up.
Title is not very descriptive....so easy to miss:
Posted on Sat 27 Oct 2012 14:55:17 PDT by Hojczyk
My fresh information is how to explain the surprising scale of the errors at Benghazi. It is useful to stipulate that the building where Ambassador Stevens was attacked was not a consulate.
It was a State Department residence that was maintained to provide an explanation for the presence of the CIA station that was about a mile distance --
The CIA station "annex" was responsible for recruiting and training Libyan assets in Benghazi, many of whom were directed to the so-called "Libyan Brigade" that is serving in Syria under the supervision of Turkish Military Intelligence. (This is part of the operation aimed at removing the Assad regime and replacing it with Jihadist/Islamists sympathetic and beholden to the Sunni lords at Cairo-Ankara-Riyadh-Doha.)
The attackers were fully informed of these facts, as they are part of the Cyrenaica networks of Jihadists/Islamists that have dominated the province for decades. (The attackers are commanded by the tribes/authorities of the province.) Why was the US dealing with treacherous gunmen?
This is the infamous big picture of Libya and the Obama administration. I am told that, following the fall of Tripoli in the fall of 2011,
Kirsten Powers has also been FURIOUS over this issue. A couple good Dems still left.
I noticed that, Kirsten Powers eyes might have been opened.
So much is dripping out and in many cases coalescing around facts at this point that the alphabets management must be wondering if their nuts to simply give Fox so much material to work with.
Canada Free Press ^ | Saturday, October 27, 2012 | Erik Rush
Posted on Sat 27 Oct 2012 17:04:07 PDT by Snuph
A Mideast Fast and Furious emerging within weeks of the election would be devastating
On October 4 in Canada Free Press, I wrote a column entitled Was Ambassador Stevens Death a Hit?, so suspicious did I find the circumstances surrounding the attack on the US embassy in Benghazi, Libya at that time. On October 25, I followed up with Obamas Feet of Clay, in which I discussed the likelihood that President Barack Obama failed to react to the attack despite real-time knowledge of developments in Benghazi because he wished to obscure or bury evidence of the administrations gun running activities to Libyan and Syrian rebels.
The reason for Obamas desire to do so, in this scenario, would be twofold. One, because weapons were not only being provided to Libyan and Syrian rebels, but were in fact being provided to jihadists across the Middle East with whom Obama sympathizes, but who are enemies of the US. Two, because Ambassador Christopher Stevens himself may have become a liability for reasons still uncertain (although my first column outlines one possibility). The fact that Stevens mission, and that of other US operatives in Libya was a clandestine one has been established; this is certainly a likely reason for Obama to want a lid kept on it. If revealed, obviously this would substantially threaten his re-election chances.
As I indicated early on, not only did I see Obamas pre-September 11 actions as being executed in order to cultivate plausible deniability on his part, but I suspected even then that he might have employed rebels or jihadis to eliminate Stevens. It does bear mentioning that Obamas cavalier dismissal of intelligence briefings leading up to Sept. 11, 2012 was widely reported prior to that date.
The fact that FOX was almost alone in getting info out came up on the round table of the Sunday Morning Show from Brit Hume.
That was my thought, too.
From Alas Babylon!, Todays Transcripts from the Sunday Shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sens. Mark Warner, D-Va.; Mark Udall, D-Colo.; Rob Portman, R-Ohio; and Ron Johnson, R-Wis.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Govs. John Kasich, R-Ohio; John Hickenlooper, D-Colo.; Scott Walker, R-Wis.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel; Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Stephanie Cutter, deputy campaign manager for President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign; former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): David Axelrod, adviser to the Obama campaign; Reince Priebus, Republican National Committee chairman; Gov. Bob McDonnell, R-Va., and former Gov. Ted Strickland, D-Ohio.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.