Skip to comments.GOP Insiders More Confident Than Ever of Romney Win
Posted on 11/02/2012 8:18:43 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Republicans have never been more confident that President Obama will lose re-election, according to the latest National Journal Insiders Poll, but Democratic conviction their party's leader will earn a second term still hasn't wavered.
On average, GOP insiders polled by National Journal gave Obama slightly less than even odds he'll occupy the White House another four years. The 4.6 average score - based on a 1 (no chance at re-election) to 10 (virtual certainty) scale -- was a precipitous drop since the last Insiders Poll, a late September survey in which Republicans pegged the score at 5.8. That poll was taken before the first presidential debate in early October, after which Mitt Romney's support surged. In April, Republican Insiders rated Obama at exactly even odds.
Democratic optimism in the last month has also dipped, although the change has been far less significant than the GOP's. They gauged Obama's chances at 7.2, down one-half from last month but still higher than their expectation in April.
A majority of Republicans, 76 percent, say Obama has a moderate chance of re-election (a score between four and six). Seventy-four percent of Democrats say he has a strong chance (a score between seven and 10).
On a scale of zero (no chance) to 10 (virtual certainty), how likely is it that President Obama will win reelection?
|Slight chance (1-3)||1%||17%|
|Moderate chance (4-6)||26%||76%|
|Strong chance (7-10)||74%||6%|
On aggregate, the combined score of Insiders from both parties gives the president slightly less than a 60 percent chance at reaching 270 electoral votes.
A fierce debate over which campaign has momentum, if there's any at all, has consumed the presidential race of late. But many of National Journal's GOP Insiders are convinced the trend favors Romney and will propel him to victory.
"This is the first time that I really feel the momentum swinging to Romney," said one Republican. "It has been a slow progression for the Republican since early September, but it is steady and no matter what Obama throws at him, it doesn't hurt."
Said another Republican, "The trend is definitely in favor of Romney -- with independents leading the way."
Romney has stirred hope among Republicans that he's expanded the number of battlegrounds in which he's competing with the president, placing ad buys in once safely blue states like Minnesota, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Democrats have called the move a bluff -- public polling indicates Obama does carry at least a small lead in each of the trio.
"Obama's held on to his defensive perimeter longer than anyone expected, but he's also left his flanks exposed in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Minnesota," one GOP Insiders said.
National polls depict the race as a dead heat, with many even giving the GOP presidential nominee a slight edge. But battleground-state polling is more favorable for the president.
"Romney has not gained ground in the key battleground states," said a Democratic Insider. "It is hard to see him winning Florida, Virginia, Colorado, and Ohio, and it looks like he needs all of them."
Said another, "I was a 9 before the debates -- Romney has momentum but still has a difficult electoral map."
One more Democrat chimed in: "It's all about the swing states. Every national poll that's reported is increasingly irrelevant as the President leads in Ohio, Wisconsin, and others."
How many insiders of either party would not say they were confident of their guys win this close to election day?
I remember when I was in journalism and sat down for an interview with Newt Gingrich, 3 days before the 2006 midterm and asked for his prediction on congressional races. He told me that the GOP would hold a small majority. At the end of the night it was a rout. Since then I have held skepticism on what party insiders say, but if some insiders on the Dem side are saying Obama is going to lose it looks good.
I distinctly remember some GOP insiders beginning to bash the McCain campaign right around this point of the 2008 race.
There’s no doubt in my mind that Romney’s campaign feels confident of a win, especially in Ohio. If he were losing Ohio and needed to pick up a state, as is the current media meme, he’d be living in Wisconsin and Iowa, both of which are more favorable prospects than Pennsylvania.
I’m trying to remember back in 2008. Even though the polls shifted WAY over toward The One after the financial debacle, I seem to remember McCain’s cronies saying things were looking good near the end. I may be mistaken...
This is an anonymous survey, so it has value. The insiders were all over McCain in 08, with constant leaks to the press. Haven’t heard any of that this year.
“If Romney were losing Ohio and needed to pick up a state, as is the current media meme, hed be living in Wisconsin and Iowa, both of which are more favorable prospects than Pennsylvania.”
Good point. And it’s the kenyan who has been camped out in Iowa since the convention. He must hate being there. LOL.
Republican insiders must be avoiding FR then. One look at the latest posts and that confidence would be gone, gone, gone.
That’s right. Include bashing of McCain and Palin. This time I at least haven’t heard any “insider” bashing of either Romney or Ryan. That to me is a big difference.
The author needs to look up the definition of the word "confident".
That is not a quote from what I said
I remember McCain’s staff beginning to bash Sarah Palin at this point in 2008. There was no surer sign of impending defeat as Nicolle Wallace and the Lex Luther looking guy (can’t recall his name) attempted to save their own careers by blaming Palin.
..it is in the media’s interest to keep everyone’s attention fixed on this as a photo-finish rather than a Secretariat-like runaway—which is what I sense is happening...
It’s from the article.
Um, 2008? Don’t you remember the campaign bashing from almost a week out?
I must have still been in shock from McCain getting the nomination...
Ohio is looking good. NV is looking bad. I was wondering why Romney was paying so much attention to NH, and then figured it out (duh); if Romney wins Ohio, NH puts him over (as does any state), the old 3-2-1 strategy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.