Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

I agree. Real internal polls are almost never leaked for any reason.


66 posted on 11/05/2012 1:49:58 PM PST by LongWayHome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: LongWayHome

It’s psyops, plain and simple, and the fact that the author is a Romney “insider” makes me even more sure that the real number is somewhere north of this. They’ve decided on a number that 1) is credible 2) is on the positive side, and 3) will maximize turnout by energizing committed voters to show up. In OH, that number is +1. In PA and WI, they probably don’t actually know which way it will go because the recent past history is so different between 2008 and 2010, so they’re questioning their own models — which might look quite good. But in states with some volatility between 2008 and 2010 Party self-ID is going to be a huge variable — and may even be changing as we type...


74 posted on 11/05/2012 1:55:12 PM PST by FredZarguna ("Post Hoc, ergo propter hoc," is no way to reason through life, son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: LongWayHome

Um, Rove leaked internals in 2004. Story about it out today.


92 posted on 11/05/2012 2:10:46 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: LongWayHome

I believe this. Romney has been asking for EVERY VOTE at his stump speeches today. He knows he needs big turnout. I just think he’ll get it.


120 posted on 11/05/2012 3:50:05 PM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson