To: The Ignorant Fisherman
Remember, the GOP and Romney gave NO place to the Evangelical vote at the RNC convention. They outright snubbed us and that act rubbed Evangelicals the wrong way.
Do you really need to be the center of attention in every election cycle? Jews, Catholics, Orthodox can say every so often, our guy's not up there, but the guy who is, speaks for us? Why is that impossible for Evangelicals?
Many Evangelicals who voted for Bush in 2000 and in 2004 felt betrayed by his agreeing with and passing many of the Marxist policies of the progressive Left. To this day it still has left a bad taste in our mouth.
It's not clear who you're talking about here. Bush? Romney? You can disagree with positions that each man took, but nothing Bush did was actually and literally "Marxist." I'd say the same for Romney. Can we just finally recognize that not everything one disagrees with is Marxist? Isn't it time to drop that kind of loser talk?
411 posted on
11/07/2012 3:36:59 PM PST by
x
To: x; The Ignorant Fisherman
Do you really need to be the center of attention in every election cycle? Jews, Catholics, Orthodox can say every so often, our guy's not up there, but the guy who is, speaks for us? Why is that impossible for Evangelicals?
That's just the point, with his support of Abortion and the Gay Agenda he didn't, so many of couldn't say he spoke for us.
472 posted on
11/07/2012 8:49:49 PM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
To: x
Jews, Catholics, Orthodox can say every so often, our guy's not up there, but the guy who is, speaks for us? Why is that impossible for Evangelicals?HMMmm... good point!
Why CAN't our dismayed FREEPERS say the same about Obama?
534 posted on
11/08/2012 4:12:20 AM PST by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson