Skip to comments.FBI probe of Petraeus triggered by e-mail threats from biographer, officials say
Posted on 11/10/2012 12:19:37 PM PST by RoosterRedux
The collapse of the dazzling career of CIA Director David H. Petraeus was triggered when a woman with whom he was having an affair sent threatening e-mails to another woman close to him, according to three senior law enforcement officials with knowledge of the episode.
The recipient of the e-mails was so frightened that she went to the FBI for protection and help tracking down the sender, according to the officials. The FBI investigation traced the threats to Paula Broadwell, a former military officer and a Petraeus biographer, and uncovered explicit e-mails between Broadwell and Petraeus, the officials said.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
The real story of Ben Gahzi is that the Muslim-in-Chief was using the CIA (or vice versa) to arm al-Qaeda.
That quote says the Justice Dept. notified intelligence on Tuesday. Didn’t say how long Holder sat on the info.
This is at the very least 20 emails a day, 7 days a week. When did this man have time to run the CIA, and could he have had anything else at all on his mind except for this woman if he was behaving this way? I wonder how many people in our government are still doing something like this right now. I think the lowest life forms on earth are the people leading our nation.
It’s all real Spooky stuff.
This will all blow over by 2016 then Petraeus can run for POTUS.
I didn't think much of it at the time, but how convenient would it be for someone like Petraeus to toss that kind of story out there as a way of opening up the possibility that ANY e-mail message he sent could have been sent by someone else?'
"I know that e-mail message with the top-secret information about the security situation at the Benghazi compound was sent from my address to a recipient named firstname.lastname@example.org, but I swear it wasn't me. It must have been someone who hacked into my e-mail account."
I keep telling my son, hot women are dangerous. Find yourself a nice, fluffy chick who’ll happily keep the homefires burning. ;-)
The lower the body fat, the higher the crazy.
,,,, pictuie looks like Hiedi Fleiss .
But it is important that stupid old WaPo is venturing into the fray. If they become part of the mob, they will be dragged along even if they didn't originally plan to participate in this story.
Getting better by the minute?
Have u noticed the story is not about 4 murdered Americans anymore.
And it won’t be. The MSM will cover the sex story, not the lies about
The BroadWell is likely working on the sequel - “Sacked”.
I find it hard to believe that a man of his quality would
send emails and incriminate himself. Maybe he had a lapse
of judgment and had an affair, but I can’t see him leaving
such a trail of evidence.
How to explain the ('rat) WasserWoman then?
, liWhat if Mittens’VP nominee had instead been PETREUS and not Ryan?
Then instead we would have heard of all this in the week BEFORE the election and not after:
I’m sure that as soon as soon as speculation mounted that the choice might end up as Petreus, that very millisecond every info rat and honeypot in Chicago went onto a full war footing.
Given recent political history I find it highly implausible that the original reason why the FBI launched down this sensitive path was because a “jealous and possessive female” tried to scare away a RIVAL.
That notion stinks to high heaven of the ole vaguely Arkanasas, “nuts and sluts” defense.
Even here at FR today people are swallowing that bait hook
How to explain the ('rat) WasserWoman then?
All that mayonnaise on her hair penetrated her skull.
“Though he let the wrong words slip while kissing persuasive lips...”
the related issue of gunnrunning through Libya and assasination of the Ambassadors mission is not even making a paragraph on page twelve
But Benghazi is the backdrop to this entire story. If it weren’t for Benghazi, this story would already be below the fold or back on page 7.
These dumb GOP house members should have put all these hacks under
Oath before the election. I guess they did not want to offend all these moderates and independents before the election.
You know, these moderates and independents that was the key to Romney’s victory. Big mistake by Romney and Bonehead not to call them
All before the election. I’m guessing the GOP will bring it up again right
Before the 2014 elections to use it as a campaign tool. Of course, the GOP
Never make anyone pay, they just like using scandals as campaign tools.
The GOP got hoodwinked again. Bigtime!
She’s hot, but the sex angle is a red-herring:
The real story is Bengazi, MANPADS, and Al Qaeda.
Look Nation of Islam was openly returned for his re-election —that’s two times, now.
We do NOT know what dirt the muzzies have on this gay man, but we do know how much it would benefit them to put a Salafist into the White House —we might have that, now.
I like sex, but THAT IS NOT REALLY THE POINT OF THIS STORY.
How many of these scandals happen daily that we never hear about? This thing could have been contained. The rationale that the White House and DNI might use on the FBI, would be that only minor crimes were committed, that Petraeus was irreplaceable, that the scandal would impact the morale of the CIA, and be an international embarrassment. Obama’s first term has been full of scandals that barely reached the surface because the administration stonewalls and the news media sticks its head in the sand. In the case of Petraeus the DNI told him to resign just before the story was fed to the media.
If you think Christopher Stevens was really a "U.S. ambassador" over there -- in a country that doesn't even have a real functioning government -- then I think you're being naive.
That’s a very good point. Obama evidently believed at one point just before the GOP convention that Romney was going to ask Petraeus to be his VP, so this was probably going to be the classic Obama-style October Surprise (always something sleazy and personal).
However, it was a win-win for Obama, because he probably now feels that this discredits Petraeus and anything he might say about Benghazi. That said, I think people here are seriously overestimating Petraeus. He’s a military man, and thus loyal to whoever is in charge. Right now, that’s Obama.
I don’t think Petraeus’ civilian status as CIA director and now as just plain civilian is going to change his loyalty to Obama.
But it would be nice to be proved wrong.
This is already infinitely bigger than Watergate...and still growing.
Don’t forget hs headline!
Petraeus on Benghazi: It Wasn’t Me
Not defending Patraeus at all, but I about spewed my coffee this morning when I read one article that talked about how terrible it was to have someone as important as the head of the CIA be put into a position in which he could have been blackmailed!
Ding! Ding! Ding! The MSM seemed not to realize this when Mr. BJ Stainman was doing his thing.
It’s almost always about power (or money). She had a beautiful family. Feel sorry for her children.
Dont forget this headline! From Breitbart.com
Petraeus on Benghazi: It Wasnt Me
Central Intelligence Agency director David Petraeus has emphatically denied that he or anyone else at the CIA refused assistance to the former Navy SEALs who requested it three times as terrorists attacked the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on the night of Sep. 11. The Weekly Standard and ABC News report that Petraeus’s denial effectively implicates President Barack Obama, since a refusal to assist “would have been a presidential decision.”
Be careful what you wish for.
That would complete discredit anything DP might have to say IF, he should elect to come forward and tell the TRUTH!
Of course, that may very well be what this is all about anyway.....sigh ;(
I have a feeling that 2013 is not going to be Obama’s favorite year.
From your lips to God’s ears!
If this holds up, Petraeus must have powerful mojo. This reminds me of the crazy astronaut who traveled halfway across the country to stage a kidnap attempt on her romantic rival, also an astronaut.
About time for the old-hag AllRed to show up. (i am female, okay if i mock a female ;))
His very first question is: "The book is called 'All In'. So, the last time I recall a journalist or an author embedded with a person at this level was McChrystal, and it was Rolling Stone. And he got fired. How did they let you-? How did Petraeus allow that? Did he know you were there? Were you, like, hiding? Did he allow this?"
They got their Stimulus through political ads. I don’t watch nor listen to much anymore. It’s almost all reality shows on free, over the air TV.
When your pants are down, you just cant run fast enough to get away from extortion.
Do you mean extortion or extraction?
Is there a problem here? It’s just about sex between consenting adults. Should be a huge plus for Democrats everywhere.
I sure have a hard time knowing whether Democrat sex is good or bad. Is it tied to day of the week? Phase of the moon?
Enlighten me so I won’t be so naive.
Quite telling that little bit of video is. John Stewart said something about either her or her hubby being a “sell-out”? for the book sales (potus question re: the general)
WaPo: “The collapse of the dazzling career of CIA Director David H. Petraeus was triggered when a woman with whom he was having an affair sent threatening e-mails to another woman close to him, according to three senior law enforcement officials with knowledge of the episode.”
ps. Paula’s “All In” co-author, Vernon Loeb, is back at the WaPo, since 01/11.
Vernon Loeb is the Metro Editor at The Washington Post. In 2003, he embedded with the 101st Airborne Division under Petraeuss command.
For that matter, his entire affair and all the “evidence” could be faked by the Obastards. They’ve done it multiple times with birth certificates and draft registration cards.
Holly Petraeus also works in the Obama administration, for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
OBAMA: ROMNEY WANTS VP PETRAEUS
Drudge ^ | 78/7/12 | Drudge
OBAMA: ROMNEY WANTS VP PETRAEUS
Tue Aug 07 2012 12:01:02 ET
President Obama whispered to a top fundraiser this week that he believes GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney wants to name Gen. David Petraeus to the VP slot!
“The president wasn't joking,” the insider explains to the DRUDGE REPORT.
A Petraeus drama has been quietly building behind the scenes.
Romney is believed to have secretly met with the four-star general in New Hampshire.
This would be gross negligence of epic proportions, not only on Petraeus' part, but also by whomever was supposed to vet him for the DCI job. Please let it not be true.
Because Clinton had historical precedent (JFK, LBJ, etc.), and evidently
that trumps the rule of law. Anyone below the rank of CinC never gets away with it. Seems like one of those “ unwritten rules”