Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GilGil

Think about this for a minute: the Princeton Election Consortium - which aggregates all polling - has accurately called the last three electrons – and this time around, the predictions were dead accurate.

The polling showed how people *said* they would vote, and the actual returns show how they *actually voted*.

If there had been vote fraud on a scale sufficient to swing the election, the stolen votes would *have* to be evident as a difference between the intended and actual vote.

There is no such difference. (This is not to say there was “no fraud”, but rather that “fraud was not sufficient to change the outcome).

Now, there is no harm in ignoring this evidence, if it makes someone feel better.

But there is a lot of harm done if the belief causes someone to believe that they will get a different result by doing the same thing next time, if only they can eliminate “voter fraud”.


26 posted on 11/12/2012 6:00:22 AM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (million)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: M. Dodge Thomas

At least in Allen West’s case it lookd like ffffrrrraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaauuuuud!


30 posted on 11/12/2012 6:25:20 AM PST by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson