Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

19,605 to zero is statistical proof of outright vote fraud in 2012 presidential election
Natural ^ | November 14, 2012 | J. D. Heyes

Posted on 11/15/2012 9:22:24 AM PST by Little Ray

(NaturalNews) In the weeks leading up to the Nov. 6 election, there were scattered concerns from across the political spectrum that vote fraud could occur in some sections of the country. While many of those fears did not come to fruition, based on final vote tallies in some polling districts, it's hard to fathom that some form of fraud did not occur.

Take Philadelphia, for instance - the "city of Brotherly Love" - where, once again, New Black Panther Party members were seen at some of the same polling places they were at in 2008, when charges of voter intimidation were leveled against them. In 59 districts around the city, GOP presidential challenger Mitt Romney got zero votes.

Zip. Nada. None.

Granted, in heavily Democratic urban districts in the city, it's not unusual for that party's candidate - in this case, President Obama - to win a heavy proportion of the vote. But all of them?

Sure, say analysts. It's not unusual at all. Nothing to see here.

Saddam Hussein always got nearly 100 percent of the vote too

"We have always had these dense urban corridors that are extremely Democratic," Jonathan Rodden, a political science professor at Stanford University, told, a joint website of the Philadelphia Inquirer and Philadelphia Daily News newspapers.

"It's kind of an urban fact, and you are looking at the extreme end of it in Philadelphia," he said.

That's because most large cities are 75-80 percent Democrats, making them practically politically homogenous and much easier to organize than, say, rural areas where folks live far apart, said Sasha Issenberg, author of The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns.

"One reason Democrats can maximize votes in Philadelphia is that it's very easy to knock on every door," she said.

But isn't it just as easy to knock on doors in Republican strongholds, even if they are farther apart? And that's another issue - if we are to believe there are Democratic "corridors," doesn't it follow that there are Republican "corridors" as well?

Some GOP officials are asking these very same questions, especially after learning that, in 59 Philadelphia voting districts Obama out-polled Romney by a stunning 19,605 to zero. Even in heavily Democratic Philly, are we to believe that in nearly 60 polling districts there is not a single dissenting voter? The last political candidate in recent member to poll that overwhelmingly was Iraq's Saddam Hussein.

Those districts were concentrated in overwhelmingly black sectors of the city. But again - not a single Romney supporter? Not even one?

That's a huge stretch, to say the least, says Steve Miskin, a spokesman for Republicans in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives.

"We believe we need to continue ensuring the integrity of the ballot," he said, referencing his party's voter ID initiative that, perhaps not surprisingly, was held off the state ballot for this election.

No such thing as a 100 percent Republican voting precinct

University of Virginia political scientist Dr. Larry Sabato, who has studied voting in African American-dominated precincts, told he had occasionally seen instances where 100 percent of the vote went to the Democratic candidate, citing precincts in Chicago and Atlanta which recorded no votes for the GOP's candidate, Sen. John McCain, in 2008.

"I'd be surprised if there weren't a handful of precincts that didn't cast a vote for Romney," he said.

Still, the high number of zero precincts in Philadelphia deserves examination, he added.

"Not a single vote for Romney or even an error? That's worth looking into," he said.

In a city with 1,687 of the ward subsets known as divisions, each with hundreds of voters, 59 is about 3.5 percent of the total, reported.

Not much has been made about this voting phenomenon by the mainstream media, but we suspect the outrage and uproar would have been loud and boisterous, to say the least, if there were wide swaths of voting districts where not a single Democratic vote was cast.


Learn more:

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election; electionfraud; fraud; votefraud; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: nomobs
When congress changed the way we elect senators, our country was forever doomed to be corrupted by the election process.

Yep. The 17th Amendment was snake oil sold under the banner of empowerment when all it really did was strip the states of power and gave the idiots a popular vote for senators. Care to guess where Levin and Stabenow win?

21 posted on 11/15/2012 10:18:58 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

So what, who’s going to anything about it?

Soap box - Ha, who listens?
Ballot box - Who needs it, Fraud.
Jury box - See John Roberts
Cartridge box - after that, dictatorship.

22 posted on 11/15/2012 10:23:38 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

While I agree that the election overall was won through fraud, I don’t find it odd that a neighborhood that is 100% black underclass voted 100% for Zero. I have lived in Harlem - which is Paris compared to a bad Philadelphia neighborhood and I know these people. They probably didn’t know who Romney was, and wouldn’t have recognized a photo of him.

23 posted on 11/15/2012 10:25:10 AM PST by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Any questions why the democrats don’t want photo ID?.

24 posted on 11/15/2012 10:27:17 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

I don’t understand this argument. Have you ever been to Cleveland or Philly? I am not at all surprised that Romney received no votes in large parts of both cities. This is about voter choices, not statistics. There are areas of both cities where a few republican voters live (parts of South Philly for instance are still somewhat GOP friendly). But huge swaths have no republicans at all - zip, zilch, nada.

25 posted on 11/15/2012 10:28:28 AM PST by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Be prepared to hear all about lots of “voters staying home” its..”they came and voted but the touch screen vote didn’t register”..”there’s no Republicans in that part of town anywhere”...NONSENSE!!!!....the Bipartisan Oligarchy would rather we all stew in that mess..than having us all bothered, and deciding to investigate, about all the voters voting who never voted...

Listening to descriptions of how “Democrats got out their ground game” with “superior ability to bring those to the polls who normally would never go” by the commentators on Fox election night..made me realize..what they actually have done is track names that HAVE NOT VOTED IN MANY, MANY elections cycles....and vote them.

A well-funded project, examine the names signed in at at the polls..and going out to find those’ll find they were never physically at he polls..or they themselves never filled out the absentee ballot....or their names in the death registers.

The very LAST thing the Bipartisan Oligarchy want or need is any semblance of Constitutional Federal Gov’mt or a clean vote.

Both those are up to We the People to cram it down their throats so hard in DC they will, someday, never do otherwise.

Absent a clean vote.....We the People are being taxed without representation..Ask George III how well that worked out!

26 posted on 11/15/2012 10:33:56 AM PST by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
These are the welfare, food stamp, handout precincts. Still, not ONE holdout or mis-vote? Fishy.

I just checked the Cleveland numbers. In each precinct, even where Mitt got zero, there were several over votes* and or a vote for Gary Johnson.

My guess is the over vote was the person too dumb to vote just once for president. May have written in and filled in the oval.

Also, the precincts neighboring these also had Romney votes of around 2 to 10 votes a precinct.

Also turnout in these was not especially high.

There's less here than meets the eye.

27 posted on 11/15/2012 10:36:27 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Tagline X. Waiting to be given a new tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

These people are also largely idiots. Not even one mistake?

And they managed to get 90%+ turnout?

And this just happens to be in precincts where they expelled the Republican poll watchers?

Smells bad to me.

28 posted on 11/15/2012 10:36:59 AM PST by Little Ray (I have VOTED AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet

“Romney ran a “Johnny One Note Campaign”. Used a poison dart blow gun when he should have used a cannon loaded with grape shot because he had pleanty of stuff he could fill that cannon barrel with...”

Ya see...the problem here is that you, as do some of the the other Freepers her, and most of the general public, believe we still had an election. What we had was a stage “election”

This “election” worked out great for,DC...the Inside the Beltway crowd, while preoccupied with voter disenfranchisement in the 60’s ...could no longer care about the peons and peasants in Flyover Country.

“Direct” disenfranchisement refers to actions that explicitly prevent people from voting or having their votes counted, as opposed to “indirect” techniques, which attempt to prevent people’s votes from having an impact on political outcomes (e.g., gerrymandering, ballot box stuffing, stripping elected officials of their powers).

In fact the DC crowd made sure we all knew about this just prior to the election...

Which was basically their “ watcha gonna do about it “. Threat.....

Romney himself may/may not realize yet he just ran in an “election”...though if he didn’t before Nov 6th, he’s beginning to realize it now.

29 posted on 11/15/2012 10:38:19 AM PST by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The 17th Amendment should have been written, so that, whatever was the previous Election Method A, *that* would be followed by *the other Election Method B,* resulting in Election Method A (VOTE BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE) alternating with Election Method B (VOTE BY PROVEN U.S. CITIZENS WHO ARE ALSO PROVEN RESIDENTS OF THE STATE); hence, A then B then A then B and so on.

30 posted on 11/15/2012 10:50:45 AM PST by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
These people are also largely idiots. Not even one mistake?

If the whole reason you show up to go vote is to vote for Obama I'm not sure how you'd screw that up. And folks who are illiterate can receive assistance. I've not heard the "no poll observer" argument but if Romney didn't have any, he was an idiot - that said I'm not sure why these results are strange. Lilly white John Kerry got 88% of the black vote nationally in 2004 - and since that's an average that suggests that in a lot of areas he got well over 90% and possibly 100% of the black vote. Obama is obviously more popular among blacks than Kerry was. So not only does this not seem strange to me, but it seems kind of obvious.

31 posted on 11/15/2012 10:52:10 AM PST by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

What most refuse to acknowledge is that it was unlikely that ANYBODY could have beaten the voter fraud planned and perpetrated by the Obama machine. They seem to prefer pointing fingers, blaming Romney and blathering on about Patraeus' sex life.

Col Allen West; "I don't want to see America become like Zimbabwe where people don’t trust their electoral process. If we cannot trust the integrity of the voting system then we are no longer a free republic".

Col West has opened the door.

We must fight election fraud.

It falls on ‘We the People’.

Silence is consent

There’s overwhelming evidence of fraud.- Here



>MITT ROMNEY in 2012! ‏@PlanetRomney #tcot The Competent Conservative: Elections Have Not Yet Been Certified, Here’s What You Can Do:


Excerpt from Mitt Romney's reference:

These elections are NOT certified yet. The only way to get this investigated, much less recounted or overturned, is through the Secretary of State of each of the five key states: Florida, Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. EVEN IF YOU ARE IN ANOTHER STATE you can help. But it won’t do any good to dilute our effort to challenge California or Michigan or other states. Until a major group gets involved to do more, here is the plan: Contact the Secretary of State of the state in question. See contact information below...

Read the rest- Here

SARAH PALIN speaks out on Twitter about massive Obama machine voter fraud:

>Sarah Palin @SarahPalinUSA Between suppression of the military vote and voter fraud, Obama stole another election. …DEMAND A RECOUNT! #VoterFraud

>Sarah Palin News @SarahPalinUSA People need to stop pointing fingers within the GOP and investigate the Dems' massive voter fraud and suppression of the military vote.


The website,'Barack Obama Vote Fraud 2012' is keeping a running account of cases of voter fraud and what to do about it:

(Astonishing!) > Visit the site- Here
Sign this petition- Here

Another website:

Is There Enough Evidence of Voter Fraud To Merit a Recount? If you wish to add your voice, click here and sign the petition for a recount Here-

< Hannity and Col Allan West slam voter fraud Nov 12- Here

Photo of SOMALIANS brought to Ohio voting stations by the busload, 95% of whom did not speak English, and told to vote for Obama, straight Dem ticket- Here

Must watch videos!

VIDEO-- Programmer Testifies About Rigging Elections With Vote Counting- Here

VIDEO- Illegal Aliens Caught Voting and Stealing Elections In Florida In Vast Numbers- Here

VIDEO- MICHAEL SAVAGE: How Obama fixed the 2012 election- Here

VIDEO- Massive voter fraud discovered in April- Here

VIDEO- Whistle blower speaks out about voter fraud- Here


We can not wait for 2014 and 2016 to regroup and figure out new strategies. By then it will be too late. The Marxist/Muslim usurper will have completed his planned distruction of America. That's what people fail to understand.

We must act NOW.

Start with the election. If we let the Rats get away with this massive voter fraud, we're no better than a bananna republic.

We must keep digging and pounding him every day, in every way we can- phony birth certificate, Benghazi, Fast and Furious, his hidden life, records....

We are FReepers. We must fight!

Those who shrug and accept this atrocity without a fight are not worthy to be called Freepers!

Join us!! See thread, 'BARACK OBAMA FRAUD 2012- (MUST READ- MUST GO VIRAL!)' thread- Here

32 posted on 11/15/2012 10:54:10 AM PST by patriot08 (Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen; garyb; MrChips; Mr. K; Thorliveshere; copaliscrossing; plain talk; M Kehoe; TigerClaws; ..


33 posted on 11/15/2012 10:55:21 AM PST by patriot08 (Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

There is no question that the founders KNEW that the popular vote in the senate would give us the Harry Reids, Mich McConnels, and Graham/McCain twins. They wanted statesmen, not snake oils salesmen as the body that would not have any problem doing the right thing - like actually find a president guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors and remove him from office.

Now - they are playing politics with the survival of the nation, without regard to what their state wants or is doing. No state representation in DC anymore. It is no wonder you have so many petitions for succession right now.

With the severe damage being done to the 10th amendment, this goes hand in hand with how a nation dies.

34 posted on 11/15/2012 10:56:51 AM PST by nomobs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
And they managed to get 90%+ turnout?

If true, that is suspicious.

I heard all kinds of crazy allegations about Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, I went to the Board of Elections website and found almost all of the crazy stuff to be false.

Now I am not defending Philly. I just wonder if anyone has looked.

35 posted on 11/15/2012 10:59:28 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Tagline X. Waiting to be given a new tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

The ‘Pubbie poll watchers DID show up. They were kicked out.

I still think it is suspicious.

36 posted on 11/15/2012 11:07:46 AM PST by Little Ray (I have VOTED AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
>>>”Not a single vote for Romney or even an error? That's worth looking into,” he said.<<<

What I said day after the election.

There are several areas that normally cause variation to every process besides simply the Person that should that have resulted in some measure of error...Machine, Method, Measurement, Materials, Mother Nature (aka Environment).

In Quality - this is referred to as the 5M’s and a P (or 6M’s) and are considered the 6 Major Factors that relate the causation of errors in a process. These types of errors are considered normal or common cause to the variation.

This election yielded orders of magnitude more of Zero vote results for Romney and that's exceptional to Sabato and others.

With that, here is the statistical data artifact - when there is a complete ZERO of errors (shown as 100% Obama) at this extreme level then statistically that demonstrates that there is a Special Cause that is providing those results.

So to sum up, they most likely cheated to an extreme and in doing so have left data that demonstrates this because there are no traces of the normal amount of usual errors that a process exhibits.

I can't prove they cheated with this data, but I can prove that this data should be DEEPLY and THOROUGHLY INVESTIGATED to define what that Special Cause was!!!

This is how Companies use statistics to tell them there is a business problem for them to dig into and resolve.

Its what WE the PEOPLE should be screaming to our Political Leaders today.

37 posted on 11/15/2012 11:10:00 AM PST by R0CK3T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger

We should place an ad in those districts asking for somebody to come out. It would give standing to challenge the results.

38 posted on 11/15/2012 11:11:24 AM PST by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nomobs

If you had to live there, would you announce to the world that you voted for Romney?

39 posted on 11/15/2012 11:23:21 AM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

If I was not willing to own it, I do not deserve the right to vote. Period

40 posted on 11/15/2012 12:15:08 PM PST by nomobs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson