Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Phrase That Lost Romney the Election
RCP ^ | 11/23/2012 | Heather Higgins and Alex Cortes

Posted on 11/23/2012 2:11:34 PM PST by SeekAndFind

What if we told you that the election was decided by a phrase?

You might not believe it, but assume we’re right for a minute. What word would you guess decided the election? Hurricane Sandy?

The answer lies in perhaps the single most illustrative exit poll question conducted, where CNN asked “What is the most important candidate quality to your vote?”

The response options were “Strong Leader,” “Shares Your Values,” “Has a Vision for the Future,” and “Cares about People.” Among folks that chose one of the first three responses, Mitt Romney won between 54-61% of their vote. But, among folks who chose “Cares About People,” Romney lost dramatically – 81-18%.

“Cares about you” is the single phrase that lost Romney the election. Those for whom empathy was the most important candidate quality clearly did not get a sense that he cared about people and worse, many eventhought he was antagonistic towards many Americans. Why was this so?

Romney’s business career, which was the central argument for his candidacy in an election dominated by the economy, was turned into a weakness by the left and the Obama campaign early on, with them portraying his experience leading Bain Capital as one of the opposite of care: harm. Laying people off, taking away their pensions, and destroying communities, Mitt Romney allegedly brought all of these across America.

The Bain attacks were less about vilifying Wall Street (though that too) and more about conveying the message “he’s not like us, he doesn’t care about us.”

Many voters bought into this early portrayal of Romney as one who does not care for people. Others, who did not quite buy into it, still held it as a potential lens through which to consider his future actions and statements.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 47percent; care; coldfish; election; empathy; ifeelyourpain; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-168 next last
To: SES1066

Special interests, elites:

http://www.wnd.com/2008/02/56745/

I would take nothing for fact, verify everything, I’m not trusting wnd implicitly. It’s just a highlight overview - but it shows the basic idea.

Big money interests from the political left and money-only camps feed Congress everything it passes.


101 posted on 11/23/2012 5:08:31 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Without doubt, the social security collecting age group, is the most republican voting age group.

While no one can define what the heck Mitt meant with his 47% gaffe, one of the popular definitions, is that it means, those collecting a government check.


102 posted on 11/23/2012 5:09:52 PM PST by ansel12 (The only Senate seat GOP pick up was the Palin endorsed Deb Fischer’s successful run in Nebraska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Ideally, we need every member and regular user to contribute to keep Free Republic up and running strong.

103 posted on 11/23/2012 5:13:47 PM PST by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation; muawiyah
You guys get it...

...absolutely, we need a new tax system, preferably, a NST type of tax...

....but, as long as we are stuck with the progressive income tax that we have, the very least that should be done before someone's vote counts is to show a lifetime of positive tax payments. Just saying that payroll taxes count...absolutely does not count.... since they are supposedly paying for a couple of bankrupt "entitlement" programs.

..I want what Pres Zer0 wants...for everybody to pay his fair share....and that means that everybody must pay something...

104 posted on 11/23/2012 5:19:19 PM PST by B.O. Plenty (Give WAR a chance.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

They are today. Or I mean they have in the past few years. Giving you what you think you want is not always a good idea. Unfortunately, America is getting what it wants now.


105 posted on 11/23/2012 5:44:46 PM PST by taterjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Again, Romney was an obviously bad candidate from the get-go. No intelligent, informed, conservative Republican had any excuse for nominating him.

I contend that no "conservative republican" did nominate him, it was more that we failed to nominate one of our own. We've yet to figure out a way to keep a half dozen fairly conservative candidates from vying for the top spot against one well heeled liberal and make no mistake, Romney was, is and always will be a liberal.

It didn't help that Hannity, Coulter, Rove, et al were pushing liberal Romney from the git go.

Unless the system is changed radically, we'll have a repeat in 2016, it is inevitable.

106 posted on 11/23/2012 6:01:23 PM PST by Graybeard58 (What G.O.P.e. candidate is in store for us in 2016?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: taterjay

My post 72, “”Did teacher give us Romney/Obamacare and take our guns away, and try to give us gay Scout leaders and convince us of the importance of being pro-abortion, and tell us why homosexuals need to share foxholes with us?””

Was a description of Mitt Romney’s politics and positions.


107 posted on 11/23/2012 6:05:14 PM PST by ansel12 (The only Senate seat GOP pick up was the Palin endorsed Deb Fischer’s successful run in Nebraska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation
I hate the MSM too...why don't we just "buy" one of them?

I'm serious....

108 posted on 11/23/2012 6:07:08 PM PST by B.O. Plenty (Give WAR a chance.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Monty22002

“Anyone that believes any government agent or any politician ‘cares about you’ is too stupid to live, much less vote.”

Apparently not dumb enough to parasitically subsist thou.

The left did an Evil thing when they demonized Mitt for bain capital’s activities, even Bill Clinton recognized their propaganda as such. But Obama no more recognizes ethical restraint than he does a private sector job.

To Obama the world revolves around government, that is unbenounced to his victoms force, fire, the gun, and the sword. To drive people into this trap he must demonize freedom itself, convece people to place their trust into him & the politicians that follow him rather than their own individual choices.

This of course is not an argument they can win when framed as such, so they must see to it that it is never framed as such.

We on the other hand should frame it as such by forcing people to think about what Government really is, and what private enterprise really is as an ateritive. To do that we must dispel their complicated private concerns and shine a light upon their individual choices instead.


109 posted on 11/23/2012 6:07:35 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

You are the one who helped elect Obama, not me.


110 posted on 11/23/2012 6:08:50 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: madameguinot

A nice trip down memory lane from 2008 election...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1971234/posts

It’s fascinating looking back, IMHO.


111 posted on 11/23/2012 6:10:02 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Romney is a stiff. Who the hell wants to vote for a stiff.


112 posted on 11/23/2012 6:12:26 PM PST by gotribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

In this conversation, there’s only one of us who supported a liberal, and it’s not me. I don’t support liberals.


113 posted on 11/23/2012 6:15:30 PM PST by EternalVigilance (America's creed: Our rights come from God, not men. Governments exist to secure those rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

That is true. Many of us voted for that too. So, many are participating in giving America what it wants. The question is can this be changed? Probably not, until we say I do not want any more of this. We are pretty weak right now.


114 posted on 11/23/2012 6:16:13 PM PST by taterjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: B.O. Plenty
Social Security is not bankrupt ~ and the US government owes it $6 trillion bucks. Should you want to put an end to it least you could do is refund the money currently in there to the folks who paid it.

I"m sure you could find somebody else to loan you $6 trillion ~ (LMAO)

115 posted on 11/23/2012 6:22:31 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Tom, I know your heart is in the right place but you just got done reelecting the Marxist/Muslim Obama and you're trying to tell me that I am the only one supporting a liberal.

Get a life. You have no conscience--only an ego.

116 posted on 11/23/2012 6:23:26 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Your statement captures the thought I had as to why people would turn to Obama as someone who “cares”. I mean, I know how the sheeple could have been duped by the media's caricature of Romney as “uncaring”, but why would anyone think Obama “cares”? Here is a guy who voted against legislation that would have allowed medical intervention for survivors of the abortionist's knife. How “caring” is that? Obama basically left four of our fellow citizens to be brutally murdered and dragged through the streets of Benghazi and lifted nary a finger to help them. How “caring” is that?
117 posted on 11/23/2012 6:25:48 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
SSI is a government administered pension program. In theory it should not be considered "government assistance" because people pay into it

SSI recipients need never to have worked a day in their lives. You may be confusing it with regular retirement Social Security.

SSDI is Social Security Disability and requires a work history to collect.

118 posted on 11/23/2012 6:29:53 PM PST by Graybeard58 (What G.O.P.e. candidate is in store for us in 2016?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation
federal taxes ~ that means Subtitle A—Income Taxes (§§ 1–1564), Subtitle B—Estate and Gift Taxes (§§ 2001–2801), Subtitle C—Employment Taxes (§§ 3101–3510), Subtitle D—Miscellaneous Excise Taxes (§§ 4001–5000C), Subtitle E—Alcohol, Tobacco, and Certain Other Excise Taxes (§§ 5001–5891)

Each of these categories of federal taxation goes on at the citation to list a myriad of federal taxes that fall within the category selected.

NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE escapes federal taxes in this country!

The original claim was about federal income taxes levied on individuals ~ not just federal taxes in general, or taxes in general ~ least you can do is use the 47% claim as originally meant and not this made up thing that people out there are not paying taxes ~ that's just stupid. This is America, not the Khalihari desert where they run around dressed in penis shields and killing small game with small arrows! Those guys don't pay taxes ~ we pay taxes!

119 posted on 11/23/2012 6:33:48 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It was the root of an unrealized argument about fairness. Unforgettably it was framed as something different

This line out of the article struck me as most enlightening:

“Haidt’s research further elucidates the particular importance of care as a moral foundation. His study of anthropology and evolutionary theory led him to the conclusion that humanity possesses six moral foundations: care, fairness, liberty, authority, sanctity, and loyalty. In over 130,000 individual interviews on how relevant each of these moral foundations are to determining right and wrong, Haidt found that conservatives respond to each of them whereas the center and the left appreciate essentially only two: care and fairness. “

If any civilization only cared about perceptions of “fairness” and preceved concern by political leaders (about them) rather than concepts of liberty, authority, sanctity, and loyalty. Then its only a matter of time & men before such a civilization falls under a despotic tyrant time and time again. (very much like Mexico’s history) It is very easy to for a carasmaic man to convince people he cares about them & their problems while also advocating policy’s under trumped up notions of fairness(you just demonize whatever side you want to take from as having stolen from you, like the Jews or the “rich” or “wallstreat” or “whites”).

What is scary about this is it means when whites do become a minorty(politically) they will not be treated as present minortys but rather scaped gloated by the new majority and persecuted.


120 posted on 11/23/2012 6:36:52 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chimera
Here is a guy who voted against legislation that would have allowed medical intervention for survivors of the abortionist's knife.

For BO's constituency, "caring" means getting rid of the baby.

121 posted on 11/23/2012 6:36:52 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: traditional1
You just fell into the trap of failing to recognize THE PAST TENSE.

This is hereditary with some people, so if that's your problem please accept my apology for brutally ridiculing you, but black people in America used to vote for the Republicans. I believe it was Ann Coulter who worked up the numbers of black Republicans who were murdered in the old post Civil War South ~ something like 30,000 people.

There's a reason they voted Republican when they voted.

You need to buff up on American history.

122 posted on 11/23/2012 6:48:17 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott

Actually its very simple, we simply have to find someone who is very Charismatic(like Obama) and lead him around on a stick(also like Obama).

Unlike Obama we however will have to convene people to be consernd about the fairness of personal property, and caring about those who work hard for what they get.

Still without a population that cares about sanctity, or liberty the future is as bleak for this country as Mexico’s past. Like it or not we can no more expect to win all the battles than the liberals can, unless we get such a man(or woman) to tear down government we are forced to fight a defensive war.


123 posted on 11/23/2012 6:51:49 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BerryDingle

Oh I have no doubt that there was voter fraud, but not “massive”, nor was that the reason Romney lost IMHO.

Romney could barely tie Obama in the polls, so why is it such a shock that he lost? He ran a tepid campaign and could not convince a lot of liberals, independents, and conservatives, to vote for him.

It was massive candidate fraud.


124 posted on 11/23/2012 6:52:21 PM PST by turn_to
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma; EternalVigilance
just noting that Romney got about the same number of votes as did McCain rather demonstrates that the same Republicans who voted in 2008 voted in 2012.

There was little if any loss ~ except due to death ~ should have been a couple of million since we are now watching the Baby Boomers hit the high death rate years. So that means registrations were holding up on the other end of the line.

Democrats had a big drop ~ in fact, Obama ends up with about the same vote, or less, than George W. Bush in 2004!

If Romney or McCain could draw as well as George they'd both be President (except for Obama's record breaking total of 69 million in 2008.

The problem with both McCain and Romney was they gave little encouragement to Republicans to show up to vote!

125 posted on 11/23/2012 6:57:46 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

So how to we fix the primaries so that these dimwits don’t get the nod?!


126 posted on 11/23/2012 6:58:06 PM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: fabian

First of all, stop allowing states like Iowa and New Hampshire to have so much sway over who the nominee is.

I’m tired of the race already being decided by the time of the Texas Primary.....Texas, the ONLY big state that is reliably Republican. If anything, Texas should be the first primary.


127 posted on 11/23/2012 7:02:53 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Soon as we can get the show on the road Texas Republican party should sign up with the NRNC and just walk away from the old RNC. I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised when it comes to primary politics.


128 posted on 11/23/2012 7:06:52 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This reality led Jack Kemp to say “They don’t care how much you know until they know how much you care.” Mitt Romney may have had the better plans for America, but before voters were willing to consider them, they first had to think that he cared about them, which too many did not.

Remember Texas Gov. Ann Richards deriding GWB saying he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth? The GOP has a major image problem. Too many voters think it's the party of big business.

129 posted on 11/23/2012 7:08:24 PM PST by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

We may need a better party now...the republicans are all screwed up. i mean McCain and Romney one after another! O boy...that is suicidal.


130 posted on 11/23/2012 7:08:38 PM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: taterjay

“They are today. Or I mean they have in the past few years. Giving you what you think you want is not always a good idea. Unfortunately, America is getting what it wants now.”

It is not geting what you think you want its is what they are convenced by a carrasmaic man is fair & caring.

If “humanity possesses six moral foundations”(as the artical suggest) and they are “care, fairness, liberty, authority, sanctity, and loyalty” And liberals & “centerist” only possess two of them: “care, fairness”.

Then there is no reason anther carasmic man might not convence people some other policy is “caring and fair”.

There is also insodently no reason such a population lacking a value in “authority”, “sanctity”(of institution) or “loyalty”(to a particular man) would necessarily react so badly if their dominate carrasmic leader simply ended up dead.

To put it simply politics in this country will become more cutthroat, as despots & rivals are removed in political competition. unfortunately it is only a matter of time before a new Caesar is anointed.

Pray that the union is not preserved long enough to find out, or be consolidated under such a man. As John Adams pointed out 200 years ago sectionalism is our only defense against such faction.


131 posted on 11/23/2012 7:14:22 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

RE: Remember Texas Gov. Ann Richards deriding GWB saying he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth? The GOP has a major image problem. Too many voters think it’s the party of big business.

Not really, Dubya won with one slogan conservatives disliked because of what it falsely implied — COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATISM.

Whatever the senselessness of it, that phrase worked to elect Dubya twice.


132 posted on 11/23/2012 7:14:51 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He failed to hammer away on what will happen when Obama gets returned; The Obama past due 2013/14 Tax Increases. The impact of Obama’s gagging energy resources (a socialist construct never branded as such) with policies requiring reliance on intermittent sources wind and solar and that resulting in massive corruption .,restricted use of drilling, and coal ,bans and on fracking, and resulting prices doubling on everything.. This was a bread and butter issue which reached into every “demographics” pocketbook including accepting the demo-com definition of hyphenated African-Hispanic -Americans . .The impact of Supreme Court Appointments.. 18,000 new IRS agents and on and on. . Some were very briefly touched most weren’t and Benghazi/ foreign policy was left to languish. Then there is Obama’s personal extravagance and behavior refusing to visit Nashville after its disaster showing up at New Orleans after Mitt visited it. Even after the Christi thing if that was brought up it would have blunted the impact.

Instead we got a sales pitch on executive ability but not the reason why one should toss the old model and buy his. That print and tv pitch , 20 million new jobs, was given a discrarded dose of skepticism

This from a much larger essay on the subject I’ve been placing in the comments sections in FR postings on this subject.


133 posted on 11/23/2012 7:15:55 PM PST by mosesdapoet ("A voice crying in the wilderness make When is the treatment of Amstreight for the way of the Lord")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Me, I'm so happy we have a POTUS who cares about me. Me, ME, ME!


134 posted on 11/23/2012 7:16:22 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Poor Dr. Republican, so misunderstood.

This is often my opening line to people who are shocked that I am a Republican. Then I follow it up, if anyone is still listening, with the assertion that we have a different way of caring for people. We want them to be all they can be, instead of just giving away stuff on a long-term basis.


135 posted on 11/23/2012 7:23:11 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fabian

You may be right, but if pools and studys are correct such a conservative will have to do what the M’s (Mitt and McCain) could not do in their lack of conviction. Convince people that there is no justice(fairness) in so called “social justice”. Convince them of the virtue of hard work(something our present leader has never done) again, and to care about those who actually labor to support our entire civilization(the successful) to care about the working mans right to work.

I don’t believe the M’s were capable of this because in their hearts they did not believe it. They were too much aswaided of the left’s world view, to truly represent a diameticrly apposed one with the needed passion and conviction to lead others.

I fear however it may be too late by 2016. that too many of our people will have been sold & commuted to the pack of lies that is socialism and idleness of Obama.

Say what you will about Obama but having lived this way his entire life he does speak for this ideology from the heart with great experience. Simply put He believes it more fully than most any other democrat because he has never had to work hard. It is that believe that makes him all the more effective a salesman of this self-destructive venium..


136 posted on 11/23/2012 7:24:43 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Did you see this part of the original article?
In The Righteous Mind, moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt presents volumes of research demonstrating the primacy of moral intuitions which “reason” is then used to buttress. It includes his in-person interviews where, of the 1,620 times that the interviewees were told of a repulsive story that explicitly stated no one was harmed, 38%, tojustify their revulsion at the outcome, nonetheless said that someone was harmed. The interviewees’ moral intuitions immediately led them to condemn the repulsive story, claim there was a victim, and then use their strategic reasoning to support their position rather than truly consider whether there was a victim.
In other words: 38% of the interviewees, when they heard a story that contained actions they considered morally repugnant, invented victimization when none existed.

That's enough to make for a fertile greenhouse for a lotta myths.

137 posted on 11/23/2012 7:32:25 PM PST by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: firebrand
Poor Dr. Republican, so misunderstood.

This is often my opening line to people who are shocked that I am a Republican. Then I follow it up, if anyone is still listening, with the assertion that we have a different way of caring for people. We want them to be all they can be, instead of just giving away stuff on a long-term basis.

We have to show we care for people. I'm afraid we give the general public the impression that we're simply selfish, hateful, and mean people who just resent the fact that other people are receiving benefits from the government. Too much vinegar and not enough honey will never draw flies, or voters.

138 posted on 11/23/2012 8:32:35 PM PST by Route797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Monorprise

I think it goes deeper than just charimatic convincing. I think you have to have a majority or close to it to even have a chance of advancing the ideas. Romney was right when he talked about the 47 percent. Either it was 51 or Obama convinced the other 4 percent to follow. This majority was not on the radar 25 years ago. So, I still think the country of America and its’ inhabitants are getting what they WANT. Of course, this assumes no fraud in the election. On either count there are many Americans that want what we are getting, at least for now. Romney got many votes because he was the anti-Obama, but also received many votes for being Obamalite. What America does not want now, at least on the Federal level is a commitment to America’s founding traditional ideals. Life, liberty, pursuit of happiness means something much different for the 51 percent than it does for you and me. I do agree with you concerning the future of politics becoming more cutthroat. The Petraeus, Benghazi, Jill Kelly fiasco is indicative of the Romana Empire without the murder or poisonings. But, that is not far behind with all the intrigue surrounding Obama’s past, the media’s compliance to Obama and the Dems, Benghazigate, the Czars, the Chicago thugocracy and so on. I too think we are headed down that path. Right now, state preservation seems to be the only defense. I am not talking seccession, but working very very hard to preserve the smaller unit, the state. Time will tell, but you are correct again in quoting the Founders and what they thought about the future and the time when leaders fail us. We are there I now believe.


139 posted on 11/23/2012 8:47:09 PM PST by taterjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: fabian

I don’t know how we beat the people that control the GOP, Romney rolled in, and in 2006 shaped the primaries for 2 election cycles, using a single term as a liberal governor as his launching pad, and to prove worthy to the big money people.

The GOPe doesn’t get everything they want, like Romney in 2008, but they do defeat or out maneuver most of everything that we try.

For one thing, they are willing to work with the democrats if needed, and even campaign against republican nominees when it takes that to defeat us, for instance the Alaska Senate race when Palin gave us a conservative primary winner, the Senate GOP came out for the liberal independent.


140 posted on 11/23/2012 9:24:20 PM PST by ansel12 (The only Senate seat GOP pick up was the Palin endorsed Deb Fischer’s successful run in Nebraska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: taterjay

I have to hope that people can look beyond what the State gives them. Indeed I would bet a sizable minority of those on government welfare are willing to vote to end it, just as a sizable minorty of those not vote to expand it.

As is no doubt very clear to all of us the Federal Constitution is but a thing of the past, and even the majority of Americans agree that Washington has not the consent of the governed.

Although with respect to the failure of our education system over the last 50 years it is something of a very serous question as to whether or not the majority of American even know what the consent of the governed means. It seems somewhat obvious to me so I have to guess they understand english.

The Federal injustice system on the other-hand is an arm of a lawless Federal Government which has been the beneficary of one of the rare successes of the public education system in training people to follow them as the masses follow the degree of a dictator.

Nether-side however can be said to hold political alegences to them anymore, an alegence which weakens more and more as we drift further and further into the despotism of democracy.

I wish i could say it was justice, that the Federal court did this to themselves just as the people in voting did this to themselves. But that is to presume we all are ant act as one homologous unit. Something that could never be further from the truth.

Parts of our population did this to us draging the rest of us along. The only failing of the rest of us in this regard is our choice to remain subjects,in lawless union with, those self-destructive parts.

As it is now, the cancer is overtaking us. Were I a gambling man, it saddens me to admit I would not bet on our survival. but as I am part of this dammed lot I have no choice but to bet and do all that I can to insure our(you and me) survival as a free people.


141 posted on 11/23/2012 9:43:50 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Monorprise

I agree. We must note a majority of voters gave us this but you have to include those Americans who do not vote either way. They contributed too. I know we are not part of the problem but still see America as one country and one people. But yes, we are past that now for the time being. We are divided.


142 posted on 11/23/2012 10:03:12 PM PST by taterjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Monty22002
Anyone that believes any government agent or any politician ‘cares about you’ is too stupid to live, much less vote.

Therein lies the problem. Our leaders really *are* supposed to care about us. Indeed, moral government requires it. That we have become so jaded as to cynically accept the idea that our leaders should be only out for themselves is a large part of the reason why we're in the mess we're in.

If the people don't demand that moral and ethical people govern them, then they are guaranteed to get immoral and corrupt leaders.
143 posted on 11/23/2012 10:15:09 PM PST by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; NFHale; Impy; ...
RE :”The answer lies in perhaps the single most illustrative exit poll question conducted, where CNN asked “What is the most important candidate quality to your vote?”
The response options were “Strong Leader,” “Shares Your Values,” “Has a Vision for the Future,” and “Cares about People.” Among folks that chose one of the first three responses, Mitt Romney won between 54-61% of their vote. But, among folks who chose “Cares About People,” Romney lost dramatically – 81-18%.
“Cares about you” is the single phrase that lost Romney the election. Those for whom empathy was the most important candidate quality clearly did not get a sense that he cared about people and worse, many even though he was antagonistic towards many Americans.”

No doubt, Romney did this to himself.

144 posted on 11/23/2012 10:17:47 PM PST by sickoflibs (How long before cry-Bohner caves to O again? They took the House for what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gator113
I don’t believe that even Ronald Reagan, the greatest president in my lifetime, could have won against todays media.

You are wrong. If anything, Reagan faced an even more hostile and formidable MSM in his day because they were a complete monopoly and talk radio was much more limited. Today, I am confident that a candidate who is unabashedly conservative, articulate and a warrior with no stupid skeletons in his closet can win. Such a candidate would turn the MSM back into the enemy just like Reagan did.
145 posted on 11/23/2012 10:22:21 PM PST by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Cares about you” explains a lot; it doesn’t even require doing anything, as “makes life better for me” would have. It allows a Democrat to get away with complete incompetence as long as he “feels your pain.”

“Too stupid to live” is a solid description of these people.


146 posted on 11/23/2012 10:22:45 PM PST by denydenydeny (Admiration of absolute government is proportionate to the contempt one has for others.-Tocqueville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

“...a candidate who is unabashedly conservative, articulate and a warrior with no stupid skeletons in his closet can win.”

Such a candidate should have the best chance, but I do not share your confidence.


147 posted on 11/23/2012 10:35:25 PM PST by Gator113 (**WHO in the hell gave the damn order to NOT rescue our men in Benghazi?**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Monty22002

Anyone that believes any government agent or any politician ‘cares about you’ is too stupid to live, much less vote.

truer words were never spoken.
More than half the population have s*** for brains.


148 posted on 11/24/2012 1:56:08 AM PST by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"You need to buff up on American history"

Ummm....look out the window; that's tomorrow's "history", and it ain't pretty.

Living in the PAST won't address the REALITY of what is being done to America today. (Yes, of course, "Learn from History")

149 posted on 11/24/2012 4:42:06 AM PST by traditional1 (Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
"Voters want to feel that office-holders are conscientious about fulfilling their responsibilities to all citizens."

When is the last time that happened?

When it happens, nobody notices.

We just complain as usual about the way things are.

It's when it doesn't happen that people notice, and remember.

Also, there's a threshold involved: all politicians have their own pet constituencies and interest groups that they try to benefit, but when they really leave some group in the lurch, people feel it and resent it.

150 posted on 11/24/2012 8:43:04 AM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson