Skip to comments.Magazine Ban of 2013 (Video - Bill Will Be Introduced This Week!)
Posted on 01/02/2013 7:48:33 PM PST by servo1969
The House Democrats (Diana DeGette, D-CO) are submitting a bill in the next few days to Congress to ban any magazine over 10 rounds in capacity. We must act now to stop this erosion of our 2nd Amendment rights!
With all due respect F15Eagle -—— They’re MAGAZINES!
I am “Pro-Choice” when it comes to the method of defending myself and family - regardless of calibre, capacity, or the use of agressive-looking hand-grips. I am “Pro-Life” in the protection of my life and home. The Second Amendment should not be aborted - not even a partial abortion. I would not own assault weapons, I would only own aggressively-defensive weapons.
At the same time, write your Republican COngresscritters and tell them to get that Damned Idiot Boehner out of the Speaker’s slot.
While he is there, Obama will have a cakewalk over ANY bill he pushes.
Boehner is the WORST surrender monkey in American history.
The way I’m getting this is that if you have a pistol that will accept a magazine with over 10 round capacity the pistol will have to be specially permitted. You won’t have to have the magazine.
Time for Geo-caching?
Boehner if you want the job, do the job.
DeGette is a House Dimwit. Boehner’s replacement better not bring this idiotic bill to the floor.
And Graham didn’t give any indication on NBC with David ‘DC 30 Rd Mag’ Gregory he was in favor of any ban. In fact, to his credit, Graham said he’s a proud owner of an AR-15.
...without the other participants.
Lindsey, who’s he, and what would a “signature” by him mean?
Last time the House passed such a bill, they all got the heave-Ho.
This time will be no different.
Reader’s Digest too?
If they initiate a ban that needs resistance now, then it’s better to take the fight directly to them and immediately.
The question should be, are we ready to stand our ground over magazine capacity, or will we let them continue to slowly erode our Second Amendment rights.
The way I see it, more than enough people are happy to simply let them ban “high capacity magazines”, so it wouldn’t surprise me to see this go through Congress with little to no opposition.
Zero. Got it Congressmen and women? Stop it.
OK, shall we try to make it closer to a “fair fight”? Any person using a banned magazine in a gun in order to further some other crime, automatically gets put to death? So maybe the robbers and muggers and gang bangers will get with the program too?
(HA! Let’s see the liberals do the double walk on that one)
so how does this work for the military and police?
What if banned magazines belong to a corporation that never dies and has hundreds of employees they let use them?
Grahamnesty is not in the House, but we also know the ban didnt work in DC. David Gregory is still walking the streets.
What has happened is everyone was pounded with coordinated propaganda about the school shooting for 3 weeks straight.
Never mind during that same time, a huge number more people were variously dead from any number of things.
Already, people are starting to forget. That is why Obama is trying to get as much as possible as quickly as possible.
Forget it. No new laws.
No new laws. Period. Stand up and say no, Republicans.
Act like you stand for something, and maybe, just maybe...
This time will be no different.
I agree. Even many democrats see this B.S. for what it is.
“The way Im getting this is that if you have a pistol that will accept a magazine with over 10 round capacity the pistol will have to be specially permitted. You wont have to have the magazine.”
Wouldn’t that include just about EVERY semi-automatic pistol that can accept a magazine?
What handgun out there can accept a 10-round mag, but nothing larger?
... I guess that’s the point. Make them ALL “registrable”...
Yes, the Dems are saying exactly that on MSNBC, they are saying they must get these up for votes fast before the public moves on.
But they dont have the House fortunately and will hopefully get no vote there, the senate might pass some bills.
The public has already moved on.
The news media in the US is increasingly corrupt and driven by a coordinated agenda.
But, I plan to hide some things just in case they’re needed later.
However, it's well past time to prepare to go on the offensive if they pass any kind of “Assault Weapon Ban”, IMO.
Use it or lose it. Take the fight to the domestic enemies, and I mean immediately after any “confiscation” effort commences. I would also suggest starting an offensive at the beginning of any so-called “amnesty period” if such nonsense is mandated.
In the end, if they want to attempt to start confiscating from citizens, it's immediately time to turn the tables on them and start “confiscating” their possessions and put them on the defensive. If they start Ruby Ridge or Waco ops, then put them under siege as well, surround them and get the initiative at the outset.
Hit them where they breed!
Anyways, sorry for the rant, just so sick and tired of reading so many posts about how there is nothing we can do but submit and we have no chance and after a few people are made examples of we will all willingly turn in our weapons. It just pisses me off to see so many cowards that have little or no imagination. I feel that Americans are very intelligent and are quite capable of stunning ingenuity when faced with "impossible odds", and I'm not a fan of so much "negativity".
But what about the children? Think of them :)
It’s not me who needs to understand what you’re saying, it’s our “elected legislature” that needs to understand.
And seeing how fast they really want to push this, we need to do something now to get our representative to understand their duty as OUR servants.
Why should they get anything?
The Dems have two of three houses.
The GOP has one.
Stop it. Cold. GOP wake up would you?
Stop being wimps. We do not respect that. Stand up.
Where you in time to see F15Eagle’s comment before the Mod’s removed it?
Imprecise language aside.
The GOP has veto power here.
USE IT. You might find a whole lot of support, and a whole lot of backing, if you stood for something.
How can they ever regulate magazines under a grandfather till death clause?
There are gazillions of them and no one knows who has what.
And don’t forget UFO Monthly!
Yup, I got my January edition today! The UFO centerfold dolly from the planet Zircon is a realy dazzler!
I had it pulled but it wasn’t anything. I am sure he was doing the FR wry humor. Obviously you saw it was nothing but decided to skip it.
In California, the 10 round Magazine applies to Semi-auto Pistols as well. Here we have the “approved” Handgun list, coming to a State near you.
Funny how the Rat introducing this is from the formerly Free State of Colorado.
Well it is somewhat heartening to hear the Democrats are going to push their anti-America agenda again. It won’t pass, I think even quite a few Dims are going to keep their distance, and at least it will help us hold the house in 2014.
Why don’t they ban abortions instead and really save some lives?
In other news:
“Gun Sales Up, Crime Down”
January 2, 2013
by Sam Rolley
“Gun sales are up in California and, contrary to what politicians and the media say, gun deaths and injuries in the State are down sharply.
Firearm dealers in California sold 600,000 guns in 2011, almost double the number sold in 2002. Over the same period of time, hospitalizations due to gun injuries declined from about 4,000 annually to 2,900, a roughly 25 percent drop, according to The Sacramento Bee...”
I think they are trying to ban any gun that accepts magazines of 10 rounds or more. That is effectively every semi-automatic rifle and handgun in existence.
They want us back to bolt action rifles and revolvers.
The Communists would love it.
The new law would read: "Possession of a firearm at the same time you possess a 30-round magazine is a felony..." There's your crime.
[It’s a complete sentence, and needs no qualifiers.]
Instead of gun magazines how about we ban print ones like Newsweek? That’s something we can all get behind.
graham may love to lap dive on boy toys and pack fudge but he is an AR-15 owner and has stated that he supports the Second Amendment. We must attack these creatures when they are wrong but we must also support them when they are correct.
FReepmail me what was said please. Thanks!
I tend to agree. We have no advocates in Congress anymore on either side. It’s as if we are in a free fall zone of accelerating tyranny.
And what happens when the next mentally ill shooter in a “gun-free” school zone uses a 10 round magazine? What’s next, a 2 round mag?