Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

West New York assemblywoman's bill would require psychological tests for all gun buyers
nj.com ^ | January 10, 2013

Posted on 01/10/2013 9:04:19 AM PST by Tailgunner Joe

Edited on 01/10/2013 9:07:23 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: Truth29

“And no one would ever get through all the barriers set up by this bill. This is just another gun prohibition feint.”

Gun grabbers are criminals:

“Section 241 of Title 18 is the civil rights conspiracy statute. Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree together to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the Unites States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). Unlike most conspiracy statutes, Section 241 does not require that one of the conspirators commit an overt act prior to the conspiracy becoming a crime.

The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.”

http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/crm/241fin.php


61 posted on 01/11/2013 4:42:28 AM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

See post # 61


62 posted on 01/11/2013 4:55:17 AM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

If I have to have to be analyzed to exercise my 2A rights, perhaps we should analyze this woman before she exercises her 1A rights. She’s *clearly* not right in the head and we’d all be best served if she kept her yapper shut.


63 posted on 01/11/2013 5:02:18 AM PST by IamConservative (The soul of my lifes journey is Liberty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

“constitution did not specifically state that even people with mental problems shall not have their rights infringed upon, and they are now successfully no doubt, going to exploit this oversight”

Due process clause, and any infringement based on their ridiculous mental health evaluation tests doesn’t even come close to proper due process.


64 posted on 01/11/2013 5:11:49 AM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Psychological Gun Evaluation:

Evaluator: Hi there!

Applicant: Hi.

Evaluator: Why are you here today?

Applicant: I want to buy a gun.

Evaluator: That's CRAZY! Guns are DANGEROUS. I'm sorry, but crazy people can't own guns. DENIED!

Applicant: (mouth agape)

Evaluator: Next applicant......

Applicant: (silence, sits there)

Evaluator: NEXT APPLICANT!

Applicant: (armed security officers take applicant forcefully out of room)

65 posted on 01/11/2013 5:37:43 AM PST by Lazamataz (LAZ'S LAW: As an argument with liberals goes on, the probability of being called racist approaches 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Amendment:

Applicant: (Armed security officials execute applicant.)

Evaluator: (Takes applicant's assets and redistributes them to the more needy.)

66 posted on 01/11/2013 5:50:46 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ScottfromNJ

[[Due process clause, and any infringement based on their ridiculous mental health evaluation tests doesn’t even come close to proper due process.]]

I don’t see much due process anymore- Remember, if they are attackign the cosntitution itself, then surely clauses will have very little meanign to them- they are goign to have government run doctors dictating who gets what treatment now- (and you watch- we will soon be enterign aq period in time where doctors DENY treatment to the elderly because a younger patient mgiht benifit from the lifesavign kidney the elderly person was suppsoed to receive- healthcare will soon be basedc on a cost effective evaluation system, and noone will have a chance at due process simply because the governemtn says they aren’t entitled to it any longer ‘because it’s not fair to the masses’ or soem swuch bs)

Does the due process clause still hold any weight? George Zimmerman was denied due process in florida over and over again- He was ikllegally arrested and the prosecution even had to make up irrelevent unappropriate charges agaisnt him to justify their false arrest- He has been denied his freedom and has been unable to have his case heard in a timelty manner to plead his side- I think his due process has been thoroughly ignored throuyghout this whole case- and htose denyign him his due process will not be held accoutnabl for it UNLESS his lawyer is smarter than I think- (My hope for george is that he coems out of this a multimillionaire, and that EVERYONE invovled in his false arrest and violatiosn of his rights loses their right to practice law forever-)


67 posted on 01/11/2013 10:27:46 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ScottfromNJ

gun grabbers may be criminals, however- it ued to be that treason agaisnt hte coutnry was a serious offense punishable by death- that’s no longer the case- hell- treasoners are nowl ooked upon as ‘patriotic’ for ‘standign up agaisnt the government’ qwhen their lawyers get doen defending them- And let’s not forget, we have a treasoner in John Kerry abotu to be nominated to a very high position- rewarded for beign a treasoner- rewarded for putting soldeir’s lives at risk- rewarded for CAUSING the deaths of soldiers in prison camps overseas-

Violating hte laws and the constitution seem to be the new norm for our government- The constitution USED TO BE a deterrent to anyoen who wished ot trample the rights of citizens, however, the constitution has becoem a joke to htese people who now simpyl ignore it- and thanks to John Roberts- our government is NO LONGER accoutnable when breaking the laws set down by the constitution- Roberts let it be known loud and clear that the supreme court will NEVER hold the governemnt accoutnaqble- nor will the court impede the governemnt’s desire to dismatle the constitution-

Her’es yet ANOTHER case of treason agaisnt the country- A supreme court justice who REFUSED to do his duty and to protect the citizens agaisnt a rogue goernment

It has becoem very evident that our government now values sin, lies, corruption, unconstitutionality, and criminality over justice and truth

Thansk to john robertys, the peopel now have NO prototection agaisnt a rogue government- and we now have a preisadent that beleives that he has a mandate by the people who reelected him to violate the constitution and to force us to step aside whiel the government does whateve4r the hell it wishes-


68 posted on 01/11/2013 10:39:01 AM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson