http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:smileright/index?tab=articles
Shows a propensity for posting from a single source and a single author.
Also a tendency to post as news, and in excerpted form.
Im thinking serial blogpimp here.
Self-promoting and shameless.
Sue them. Then sue them again. Then really sue them.
How did the paper get these addresses? (I’ve not been able to follow much news lately and searching for 3 letter words like ‘gun’ and/or ‘map’ doesn’t work on FR)
Harshly criticized...
Ya think?
Even a bad lawyer oughta be able to totally own them in a civil suit.
They are just as liable and complicit here as if they had published the names and addresses of people who had big screen TVs. Or large amounts of jewelry.
It will if the conservatives use it as a political football instead of the constitutional issue.
This can be framed as a rich versus poor issue.
Living in a gated community with 24/7 security, children attend private school with security, and working in a secured building, I can see why the upper classes don't see a need for someone to own a gun.
Vichy Media in action.