Skip to comments.Sandy Hook and Christopher Rodia – Most ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ Can’t Think
Posted on 01/16/2013 5:55:19 AM PST by Uncle Chip
click here to read article
The raid on Waco was as much part of an agenda as Fast and Furious.
Each involved murder and coverup: just such a concoction appears in the series of mass shootings leading to a 23-point fiat concurrent with a UN agenda and an ammo buy for Federal agencies in the tens of millions of rounds.
As Benghazi presents with the arming of the former enemy, and the DCI is removed with help from a compliant FBI.
Clinton was re-elected with the eleven-point boost of OKCBomb.
In the year the DCI who revealed the Agency's family jewels was likely murdered in a clumsily-contrived "canoe accident":
I knew one of you would post those two pictures claiming it was different kids. You might want to adjust your glasses. See the blonde boy in the middle of the group in the top picture? He's wearing jeans, gray sports shoes, a long sleeved black shirt with an image on it and he's carrying a piece of paper. Now, look at the kid in the lead in the second picture. Same kid, same clothes, carrying a piece of white paper. Back to the top picture, see the kid behind the kid I pointed out above? This boy is short, darker blond hair with straight cut bangs, darker shade of baggy blue jeans and a long sleeved gray shirt. Now, look at the kid in the back of the line in the second picture. Same kid. Ok, I'll play along that they might be twins dressed alike and that both sets of twins were split into the same two classes, but it's stretching it too much with one set carrying the white paper.
So two pictures of the same group of kids a few seconds apart — and that proves what??? that only one classroom was evacuated???
These are only two pictures out of the dozens of photos and videos showing kids walking down the hill to the fire station, the parents waiting for them and the multitudes of the parent’s vehicles parked along the road, and witnesses to the evacuations.
I never said it was one classroom. Either it's the same class or it's a different class. Whichever it is, there are problems. Look at the tar repairs in the parking lot pavement, specifically the repair that forms a square shape in the middle of each picture. Now, tell me why your "same group" is walking past those same repairs but over a few feet in each picture and with a different group composition? Did they stop, go back, get new kids, keep two boys and then walk past the square repair a second time?
Not the same kids. I don't see paper in the one kid's hands and the images on the shirts are not the same.
I see the similarities in the two; they could be the same, although how they completely re-arranged the class in the short distance travelled (the car is the same in both pictures, so they are pretty close to the same location) is problematic.
And the fact that none of the other kids match is also an issue. Several people have papers in their hands as well, so that isn’t definitive.
It seems odd that they would take the kid from the front and the kid from the back, and then move them to the middle, when all the kids are linked together.
That is why I suggest that it is two different classes. Although if all I saw was the one boy you mentioned in the two pictures, I would totally agree with you.
There would have been dozens of these groups, to get all the kids from the school to the firehouse.
Another thing that would suggest the same group rather than two — if the reporter just got out the camera for a few quick shots, it would make sense to have two pictures of the same group.
Other “wag the dog” incidents under Clinton involved the bombing of Iraq and then the bombing of Kosovo.
They are not the same boys IMHO.
Look carefully at the images on the shirts. One image stops at the chest level and the other goes down almost to the waist.
I agree that they could do a better job, but I think you are making a mistake thinking that there is no need to keep the investigation confidential. People are speculating that there may have been other shooters. I don’t think that there were, but that is something the police are surely going to investigate, if only to rule it out.
Now, what if they DO find evidence of another shooter? If they had gone off half-cocked and released all the evidence to the media before discovering that, they would have tainted their investigation. So, it’s better to err on the side of caution, even if you think the perp is dead and there will be no trial.
Still, some things they surely could release, but haven’t, and that is disappointing.
I don’t think those are the same two kids. The haircuts are different and the design on the shirt is not the same.
“The handguns would be covered under the term “multiple weapons”.
I’m sure the officer would have been more specific if they knew you were going to be so nitpicky but they were busy with other matters I trust you understand.”
No, I don’t understand. What I do understand, is you in BOLD TEXT when asked about the weapon in the trunk 2 WEAPONS recovered. Oh, here it is #240 9:55:25: Be advised, we have multiple weapons. One rifle and a shotgun
Yea, “multiple weapons” specifically “one rifle and a shotgun”
Now, if that is “nitpicky” then maybe the cops need to be nitpicky cause it says and u posted 1 (as in ONE) rifle and a shotgun.
Here’s another “nitpicky” little thing. Building cleared. Except for A DAMN SECRETARY WHO WAS IN A CLOSET FOR FOUR ADDITION HOURS!!!!!!! Hows that for “NITPICKY”
A damn herd of cops, how many? 50? 100? So called “cleared” a building, the site of the most infamous mass shooting in history and Whoops, just forgot? or what? THE DAMN FRONT OFFICE NEAREST TO WHERE THE KILLER ENTERED?
I think many of you on this site have no idea how prevalent disinformation is from various factions.
And you do? Know how prevalent disinformation is?
And you come by that information how? By watching British television?
You may in fact be a skeptic and a lover of hard facts, but in this context you are quite simply playing the role of the devil’s advocate, and I base that on your continuing return to the Satanic symbols you see the young girls making, or should I say, that you are repeating from another source, as that is not original research of yours.
What connection are you drawing from the girls’ hands to the shootings at Sandy Hook? If none, why are you harping on it in this context?
And you. You send a really snarky comment but kindly leave contact information and say, Oh yea, hear it is, #199
Why doesnt somebody ask them now?
“Actually, I think the answer is because most of us are satisfied with the answers they have given. You are the one who doesnt seem satisfied, so why dont YOU ask them?
“Here, I will make it easy for you, so you have no excuse not to do so. Here is their contact info:”
Newtown Police Department
And then post later that if I don’t contact them then that means I don’t care about the truth I just want to believe conspiracys. So I contact the Medical Examiner, with an e-mail link YOU PROVIDED. And then you message me and say “well he probably won’t contact you”
Well, no shit. I knew that, you knew that but I did it just so I could get on here today and prove what kinda bullshit you are spreading.
So, come on now. Tell all the folks that you didn’t do that and you didn’t message me and say “he probably won’t contact you” after YOU provided the link
Where is the word "specifically" in that communication. The term "multiple" is usually used to mean more than just two.
Also audio of police dispatches don't include punctuation marks. Substitute a comma for that period and read it that way:
"multiple weapons, one rifle, and a shotgun".
You have got to be kidding me. It says right there, you posted it, it’s not hard to understand.
Where is the word “specifically”? Really? That was my word as in the cop said “ONE RIFLE AND A SHOTGUN” that’s pretty damn specific. Or maybe you would just call it “Nitpicky”
That was an interesting read. Another good guy murdered by our government agencies. Another Arkancide..
is not a toddler and she has done it in more than one picture.
So now you have gone from what could be the devil sign to “The girl who is intentionally giving the devil sign”.
PLease share how you are able to determine her intent.
The officer is either singling out the rifle and shotgun as part of the "multiple weapons" -- thus the use of the word "multiple" meaning more than two. Or by multiple weapons he means the "handguns".
Either way -- the rifle is identified as being there on the dispatch within 15 minutes.
Other wag the dog incidents under Clinton involved the bombing of Iraq and then the bombing of Kosovo.
Leno called the summer bombing Operation Blow Monica Off the Front Page
December '98 during impeachment proceedings our congressman called me
Democrats knew impeachment was coming
Their imperative was to make it "about the sex, not the treason"
Now we have a president who outed Petraeus' affair (sex) to obfuscate his own actions (treason)
Boy, I’m telling you it is almost like you were there. I’ll tell you what. Instead of your interpretation and convuluted reasoning behind a simple statement, I’ll just go with the statement as worded, without trying to read into it things that aren’t there.
So, now “multiple” means more than 2 huh? I thought that was several or some such. Maybe he should said “a few”. You know. So i wouldn’t be so confused....
“So I contact the Medical Examiner, with an e-mail link YOU PROVIDED. And then you message me and say well he probably wont contact you
Well, no shit. I knew that, you knew that but I did it just so I could get on here today and prove what kinda bullshit you are spreading.
So, come on now. Tell all the folks that you didnt do that and you didnt message me and say he probably wont contact you after YOU provided the link”
Well, first of all, YOU messaged me privately, not the other way around. I just replied to your message telling me you had emailed the medical examiner about the caliber of the bullet. Here is your message, and my reply, verbatim. If you want to put this in the public form, let’s quote the whole exchange so there is no confusion based on your limited description:
saleman: “Ok, I just e-mailed the Medical Examiner (assuming u gave me the proper link) asking him to confirm that the Ar with .223 bullets was the murder weapon. Im holding my breath waiting for a response.”
Boogieman: “I dont think he will answer you, because he said in the press conference that he is supposed to leave that question for the police (the ballistics guy works for the police dept). So, I would think you will have more luck with the PD.”
Remember, I provided you with links for BOTH the medical examiner’s office and the police department, with the police department listed first. We already know that the ME refused to answer a ballistics question, and directed that inquiry to the police, which nobody seemed to follow up on. You wanted to know the follow-up answer, so you should obviously contact the police, not the ME who has already publicly refused to answer the question.
I do not think they are the same boys. I enlarged the pics on my laptop and one boy has a gelled mini mohawk hairstyle and the other has flat combed forward bangs. I also think one has older jeans with more faded, possibly ripped knees.
Just my opinion.
I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say the Police Dept. is not gonna give me any information either. Just like the Medical examiner didn’t. Just like no one with any authority as said that the deaths were caused by an AR-15. Well that didn’t make any sense did it? Of course they werent caused by the AR. They were caused by a lunatic. Blaming an inantimate object for deaths would be....crazy?
I’ll tell you what. I’m done contacting folks you sent me contact info to.How bout this?My original question was “what was Eric Holder doing meeting with investigators” So, just ring him up and ask him, K? Thanks so much. I’d get the contact info for you but you’re pretty good at that.
That's one of the purposes of a real time police dispatch, isn't it???
And so that agnostics can't come back later and say it never happened.
He didn't say "multiple long guns" but "multiple weapons". Last time I checked the police consider handguns, rifles, shotguns to be "weapons". And more than one weapon is "multiple weapons".
Well! What do you know!
No assault weapons used at Sandy Hook?
Well shoot. We all know the Today Show is a bunch of lying liberal leftist MoFo’s.
Maybe they are in on the conspiracy too?
That's what they certainly were displaying there. It's old video that NBC and Pete Williams and the Federales who were the source for it would like to have back.
“Im gonna go out on a limb here and say the Police Dept. is not gonna give me any information either.”
You may be right, but I guess we’ll find out.
“Just like no one with any authority as said that the deaths were caused by an AR-15.”
Not quite true. Lt. Vance has said that, I just don’t think the video of him saying that is floating around the internet. At least, I haven’t seen it. The media has reported that, though, on Dec. 19th, the same day as the ME’s statement (so maybe someone did eventually ask that follow-up):
“4:15 p.m.: Lt. Vance just finished another briefing with reporters. Adam Lanza was identified as the shooter by police for the first time, and his death was officially confirmed as a suicide. Vance acknowledged that the AR-15 rifle was the primary weapon used, and confirmed the existence of a fourth weapon at the scene of the crime.”
“Ill tell you what. Im done contacting folks you sent me contact info to.How bout this?My original question was what was Eric Holder doing meeting with investigators So, just ring him up and ask him, K?”
No, why should I do that? I am not the one wondering what he was doing meeting with them, just like I wasn’t the one refusing to believe the reports that the AR was the murder weapon. You’re the one who is asking these questions, so you have to ask them yourself. I’m not going to do your homework for you :)
Evidently they figure it worked before and it’ll work again.