I've seen more and more comments like these as of late and they scare the crap out of me. It's this kind of "eat your own" mentality that gave us Romney for a candidate. I certainly don't agree with Rubio on everything, passionately disagree on some things, but if we don't start trying to find reasons to stand together instead of tearing each other apart we're going to lose and lose big.
If we elected Rubio we would admit that a person not a natural born citizen can legally be President.
Not only that his stance on amnesty sucks.
It isn’t an eat your own mentality, it’s a fight for the Constitution.How can we argue that the Kenyan is ineligible and then elect our own candidate that is ineligble.
What made Romney our candidate was a pack of RINO’s, and they will still be there in 2016.
What we need is a new party.
Well, we already know what happens when we let the RINOs run the show on the national level, and we do lose and lose big. So, if we nominate a RINO like Rubio, I expect the exact same thing to happen that happens every time we select a RINO. If you would like to avoid that, then let’s try nominating a conservative candidate this time around, eh?
Actually the idea we had Romney is the reason there is a backlash on RINO Republicans and the GOP-e. Wee need candidates with substance not backstabbers. Remember not so long ago FReepers were on the Chris Christie bandwagon? How did that work out, with his “conservative views”?
Well said, other than the fact that those who do those kinds of things are not and never were Republicans, or conservatives, in the first place.