Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Killing Conservative Talk Radio, One Market at a Time
American Thinker ^ | 01/22/2013 | Daren Jonescu

Posted on 01/22/2013 7:27:26 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 01/22/2013 7:27:38 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

NOTE THE LEFT’s MOST RECENT STRATEGERY ( Rush now likes to use that word ) FOR KILLING CONSERVATIVE TALK RADIO:

Recently, a new, left-leaning owner purchased the station, with the apparent intention of changing its all-talk (i.e. primarily conservative) format to a music format.

Green has heard from a major radio executive that this is a new strategy of the progressives. Having learned the hard way that liberal talk radio cannot compete for listeners with conservative hosts — the reason is obvious, and explains the “need” for NPR: extended political discussion, in order to be engaging, requires rational arguments and supporting facts, which leftists cannot provide — the left has hit upon the “slow-burned earth” tactic of gradually buying up local stations and converting them off the talk radio format altogether.


2 posted on 01/22/2013 7:29:13 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I've made the case for years that the news and entertainment business is not a business at all.

Newspapers, radio stations, TV shows, movies ... the crap that is produced doesn't really sell all that well. Who reads the Boston Globe? Who watches CNN? These outlets could make more money is they were more flexible in their viewpoints. Look at Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" -- it made huge money! Did Hollywood follow that up with a much of copy cat Biblical flicks? Not on your life.

They aren't looking for profits (profits are bad) -- they just want hearts and minds. The fact that successful conservative talk radio stations are being purchased, just so that they can adopt some other format (any other format) is an indication that the owners aren't looking for success or money. They just want to squash a viewpoint and they are willing to spend some money to do so.

3 posted on 01/22/2013 7:38:22 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Ich bin ein Brainerder.
4 posted on 01/22/2013 7:40:53 AM PST by Excellence (9/11 was an act of faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: suspects; holdonnow; SilvieWaldorfMD

Head’s up on this new lib tactic to try and bury Conservative Talk Radio.


5 posted on 01/22/2013 7:41:07 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Who needs music radio when anyone can afford a device that holds 50.000 songs? And you can listen to what you want and not what some programmer in L.A. wants you to listen to.


6 posted on 01/22/2013 7:42:02 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

OK. I give up. What are the major or even medium-sized markets that do not have news/talk format radio?


7 posted on 01/22/2013 7:44:18 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Maybe it’s just me, but I almost never watch cable news or listen to talk radio. They are such garbage. I do my research online and read as many sources about a story as I can. Sure, I’ll watch some clips of events, but TV “news entertainment”? Please.

Am I the only one? Do most here watch/kisten to that drivel? I don’t care if it is proclaimed as Conservative, it’s crap.

Kill off all pundit shows and news entertainment shows. They won’t be missed.


8 posted on 01/22/2013 7:44:50 AM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

There is no question that the media is not run on a profit-driven structure and instead is a propaganda arm of the government.

What a sad thought for our country?


9 posted on 01/22/2013 7:46:21 AM PST by Chickensoup (200 million unarmed people killed in the 20th century by Leftist Totalitarian Fascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

There is no question that the media is not run on a profit-driven structure and instead is a propaganda arm of the government.

I have maintained for years that book advances from media conglomerates were one way to provide payola to various leftists such as the clintons, leftist screed writers, and most notably, Obama. Here received two book advances for doing exactly nothing. It was payola. And the beat goes on.

What a sad thought for our country?


10 posted on 01/22/2013 7:49:12 AM PST by Chickensoup (200 million unarmed people killed in the 20th century by Leftist Totalitarian Fascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
They are such garbage. I do my research online and read as many sources about a story as I can.

One very big issue with this: the Internet can be hacked, modified, even silenced. Rush gets on the air, we KNOW it's Rush, we know his voice, and we know that he's not going to give up his principles to fill the airwaves with lies, distortions, or outright propaganda.

You go to a "reliable" website that's been compromised, and you have no idea if the information being disseminated is true or not. In the event of an EMP, sunspots, or other catastrophic electromagnetic event, the Internet, switches, routers, servers are all kaput. A basic HAM radio can be put together with the proper components to get back on the air.

Radio is a tried-and-true method for information dissemination. It's been in use for almost a century, and there are plenty of HAMs out here, myself included, who can open lines of communication where a digital network can be compromised.

11 posted on 01/22/2013 7:52:48 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
They aren't looking for profits (profits are bad) -- they just want hearts and minds. The fact that successful conservative talk radio stations are being purchased, just so that they can adopt some other format (any other format) is an indication that the owners aren't looking for success or money. They just want to squash a viewpoint and they are willing to spend some money to do so.

Absolutely correct. It's high time the right got in the game and started purchasing media for reasons other than making money. This is a war, the right needs to join it or be wiped out.

12 posted on 01/22/2013 8:03:05 AM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
Am I the only one? Do most here watch/kisten to that drivel? I don’t care if it is proclaimed as Conservative, it’s crap.

That's your opinion and you are entitled to it.

I've been staying away from all cable news and listening only a few hours a week of Quinn in the AM and Rush in the PM. But yesterday, obama coronation day, Mark Steyn, your undocumented radio substitute, from ice station zebra, was in for Rush and I laughed for three hours.

The man is very conservative but very gifted at seeing humor in the darkest events.

He and a caller from White Plains, NY, did a skit about squirrels and nuts and peta and assault rifles, that had me howling.

It may be drivel, but I haven't laughed at a political subject since november 6th, 2012, a day that will live in infamy.

13 posted on 01/22/2013 8:09:08 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages, start today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Many of these station changes involve change from a talk format to a “jock-in-the-box” automated music station, with no live “talent” except for announcements and canned blurbs about the music.

They don’t pull in much listenership but are very very cheap to run, so are more profitable than a traditional music station where you pay for “personalities”, or a talk station where, again, you pay for “personalities”.

Some if not all of this is driven by more and more people getting music online or by satellite, lots of cars have WiFi nodes and better.

I know people that use the USB port in their new car radios to listen to podcasts. I don’t know how prevalent this is but it may be a factor, you don’t miss any talk when you get out of the car.

http://formatchange.com/category/los-angeles/


14 posted on 01/22/2013 8:10:36 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA
Who needs music radio when anyone can afford a device that holds 50.000 songs? And you can listen to what you want and not what some programmer in L.A. wants you to listen to.

Ah, but you see that's the real truth here. Talk radio isn't dying all by itself. Radio itself is dying, albeit ever so slowly.

15 posted on 01/22/2013 8:19:59 AM PST by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

They killed off the local conservative talk shows in Memphis. Either they have added other hosts that are variations of Liberal to drown out the remaining (weak) Conservative, or they replaced the show with a national one.


16 posted on 01/22/2013 8:23:43 AM PST by Ingtar (Everyone complains about the weather, but only Liberals try to legislate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In southeastern NC on the coast we had major changes late last summer. We no longer have Hannity, Beck, Levin, or Boortz. All were replaced with garbage.


17 posted on 01/22/2013 8:25:52 AM PST by killermosquito (Buffalo, Detroit (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Not just local talk, local shows of all sorts are disappearing, including local hosts for music. I’ve always liked ‘personality’ radio and it’s dying.

Most places are lucky to have a local morning show and a local afternoon show with the rest syndicated.

Mitt Romney’s Clear Channel was a pioneer in stripping local programming.


18 posted on 01/22/2013 8:33:09 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

You’re just upset that there isn’t any left talk radio, at least that anybody wants to listen to. It’s just crap to you, because it is conservative.

You don’t fool anyone.


19 posted on 01/22/2013 8:33:09 AM PST by beandog (All Aboard the Choo Choo Train to Crazy Town)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There is nothing, other than motivation, to stop wealthy conservatives from doing the same thing.

They could buy stations like this to protect them from liberal takeovers and buy liberal stations and convert them.
That would be a start to rolling liberalism back a little

One thing you cannot take away from liberals is their persistence.
They are always pushing their agenda 24/7.

More often than not liberals are the aggressors and conservatives are the defenders.
When you are defending, your objective is to maintain the status quo.
When you are attacking your objective is to gain ground - to move the defenders back.

That is why liberals are always hollering about compromise.
Every compromise advances the attacker and rolls back the defender.

As Ayn Rand said: “In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit.”


20 posted on 01/22/2013 8:42:50 AM PST by Iron Munro (I Miss America, don't you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson